1State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
2Department of Food Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
3Themba LABS, Somerset West, Cape Town, South Africa
4Department of Food Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda;Research and Development, AAFUD industry (Zhuhai) Co. Ltd, Zhuhai, Guangdong, PR China
American Journal of Food Science and Technology.
2017,
Vol. 5 No. 5, 192-198
DOI: 10.12691/ajfst-5-5-4
Copyright © 2017 Science and Education PublishingCite this paper: Habimana Jean de Dieu, Ituze Kubana Marie Claudine, Ineza Claire, Karangwa Eric. Comparative Study of Physicochemical and Bacteriological Characteristics of Banana Wines Produced by Conventional and Modern Techniques in Southern province of Rwanda.
American Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017; 5(5):192-198. doi: 10.12691/ajfst-5-5-4.
Correspondence to: Karangwa Eric, State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China. Email:
erikare005@hotmail.comAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the physicochemical and bacteriological characteristics of different types of banana wine (Urwagwa) produced in Southern province of Rwanda. Both conventional (not bottled i.e from Bulinga (B) and Gahogo (GA)) and modern produced banana (bottled i.e Igisubizo from Ruli (I) and Ganzinyota from Ruvumera (G)) wines were analyzed and compared. Results showed that the alcohol content (v/v) of I, G, B and GA was 25.9% , 26.1%, 12.0% and 40.1 %, respectively while their total soluble contents were 15.2%, 12.2%, 21.7% and 21.8%, respectively. Titratable acidity (g/L) varied from 5.29 to 6.95 while pH varied from 4.45 to 3.30. The volatile acidity was found to be 0.49, 0.040, 0.147 and 0.19 g of acetic acid for wines I, G, B and GA, respectively. The turbidity was significantly higher in conventional wines than in modern ones. Sulfur dioxide content, heavy metals and minerals respected the standard norms however, potassium content (mg/L) was higher in wines B (1207) and GA (1107,21) and Pb was not recognized in all samples. Furthermore, wines GA accounted higher Escherichia coli (3 x 107 cfu/ml) and Staphylococci aureus (1.5 x 107 cfu/ml). In conclusion, these results indicated that the safety of un-bottled wine was far lower compared to that of bottled ones.
Keywords