Article citationsMore >>

Tester, R. F., Karkalas, J. and Qi, X. “Starch-composition, fine structure and architecture”. Journal of Cereal Science, 39, 151-169, 2004.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Physicochemical, Structural and Rheological Properties of Chestnut (Castanea sativa) Starch

1Department of Food Technology, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

2Department of Food Science and Technology, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil

3Department of Biochemical Engineering, School of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

4Institute of Food Technology, Campinas, Brazil


American Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015, Vol. 3 No. 4A, 1-7
DOI: 10.12691/ajfst-3-4A-1
Copyright © 2015 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Marcio Schmiele, Georgia Ane Raquel Sehn, Valéria da Silva Santos, Thaís de Souza Rocha, Eveline Lopes Almeida, Elizabeth Harumi Nabeshima, Yoon Kil Chang, Caroline Joy Steel. Physicochemical, Structural and Rheological Properties of Chestnut (Castanea sativa) Starch. American Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015; 3(4A):1-7. doi: 10.12691/ajfst-3-4A-1.

Correspondence to: Marcio  Schmiele, Department of Food Technology, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. Email:

Abstract

Chestnuts have high starch content, which makes them an alternative source of starch for the food industry. Brazil is a country where the production of chestnuts has been increasing in recent years. The aim of this study was to extract starch from chestnuts (Castanea sativa), to characterize its physicochemical, structural and rheological properties, and to compare the results with corn starch. Chestnut starch presented light color, and granules smaller than corn starch, with various dimensions, suggesting a bimodal distribution. Chestnut starch showed 20.48% absolute amylose, higher amylopectin branched-chain length and B-type crystallinity. The infrared spectra of chestnut starch showed characteristic peaks at 1647, 1157, 1079, and 1018 cm-1. Chestnut starch presented higher peak viscosity, breakdown and setback, and lower pasting and gelatinization temperatures than corn starch. The swelling power and the solubility of chestnut starch were significantly higher than those of corn starch. Chestnut starch showed characteristics of a gelling and thickening agent, with potential for use as an ingredient in the food industry, as an unconventional starch from an alternative source.

Keywords