Article citationsMore >>

Fahrmeir, L. (2013).Regression. Berlin; Springer.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Evaluating Methods of Assessing “Optimism” in Regression Models

1Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Jommo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

2Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Dedan Kimathi University of Science and Technology, Nyeri, Kenya


American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2018, Vol. 6 No. 4, 126-134
DOI: 10.12691/ajams-6-4-2
Copyright © 2018 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Daniel Thoya, Antony Waititu, Thomas Magheto, Antony Ngunyi. Evaluating Methods of Assessing “Optimism” in Regression Models. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2018; 6(4):126-134. doi: 10.12691/ajams-6-4-2.

Correspondence to: Daniel  Thoya, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Jommo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya. Email: daniel.thoya@yahoo.com

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methods used to assess “optimism” in regression models. Particularly, focus was on the use of pseudo R2 values of cox &snail and the Nagelkerke to identify the best statistic for measuring “optimism” in regression models, measure model performance and determine the relationship between “optimism” and over fitting. Different underlying data sets assume different models that fit their data accurately. However, the fitted regression models usually fit the data they are based on better than new data. This is what we call ‘optimism’. Specific focus will be on determining the best statistic for measuring optimism in regression models, assess model performance using ‘optimism’ through cross-validation and also determining the relationship between optimism and over fitting of regression models. The study focus on three models (Cox-regression, Logistic regression and Linear Regression) and bootstrap procedure was used.

Keywords