Article citationsMore >>

Lakey, B., & Cohen, S., Social support theory and measurement. In. S. Cohen & L. Underwood (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 29-52.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Teacher-Student Attachment and Student School Adaptation: A Variable Centered and Person Centered Analytical Approaches

1Department of special education, Oranim-Academic College of Education, Tivon, Israel


American Journal of Educational Research. 2014, Vol. 2 No. 11, 1005-1014
DOI: 10.12691/education-2-11-2
Copyright © 2014 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
David Granot. Teacher-Student Attachment and Student School Adaptation: A Variable Centered and Person Centered Analytical Approaches. American Journal of Educational Research. 2014; 2(11):1005-1014. doi: 10.12691/education-2-11-2.

Correspondence to: David  Granot, Department of special education, Oranim-Academic College of Education, Tivon, Israel. Email: dudi_g@oranim.ac.il

Abstract

The present study followed the attachment perspective for assessing the contribution of teacher-student relationships to the explanation of student school adaptation. The study sample included 100 pairs comprised of Israeli homeroom teachers and their school-aged students (mean age=10.7 years). Participating teachers and students reported on their perceptions about their reciprocal relationships on dimensions used for the evaluation of parent-child attachment relationships, such as availability, acceptance, closeness, rejection, conflict, and dependence. Additionally, 56 of the children's subject-matter teachers reported on the children's school adaptation. Person-centered cluster analysis identified two teacher-student ad hoc attachment-like relationship groups: secure (n=72), characterized by high levels of acceptance and closeness, and by low levels of rejection, conflict, and dependency; and insecure (n=28), characterized by high levels of rejection, conflict, and dependence, and by low levels of acceptance and closeness. After controlling for children's socio-demographic indicators (gender, age, class size, and family socioeconomic status), analysis revealed that children in the secure teacher-student attachment-like group showed lower levels of behavior problems (externalizing, internalizing), difficulties in learning self-regulation, higher levels of frustration tolerance, task orientation, popularity among peers, and better academic achievement than did the children in the insecure teacher-student attachment-like group. Implications for educational counseling intervention for teachers and for research are discussed.

Keywords