1College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
2Gansu Agriculture Technology College, Lanzhou, China
3College of Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
4Qingshui Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingshui, China
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research.
2014,
Vol. 2 No. 4, 141-147
DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-2-4-2
Copyright © 2014 Science and Education PublishingCite this paper: Yang Fu-min, Xu Xiao-xia, Yang Min, Qiang Kai-xia, Wang Xue-yan. Comparison of Quality and Nutritional Components of Eggs from Blue Peafowl and Hen.
Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2014; 2(4):141-147. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-2-4-2.
Correspondence to: Yang Fu-min, College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China. Email:
yfumin@163.comAbstract
The study was undertaken to compare the quality and nutritional components of eggs from blue peafowl and Jingbai hen. The results showed that the average egg weight, eggshell thickness and egg yolk relative weight of blue peafowl eggs were significantly bigger than those of hen eggs (p < 0.01). Blue peafowl eggs contained significantly higher protein (p < 0.01), higher carbohydrate (p < 0.01), total amino acid and essential amino acid (p < 0.01), Zn (p < 0.01), Ca (p < 0.05) but lower fat (p < 0.01) and water (p < 0.05) than those in hen eggs. Amino acid content of blue peafowl eggs was in accordance with the ideals of the FAO mode. Blue peafowl eggs contained significantly higher VC and VB2 (p < 0.01) but lower VA and VE (p < 0.01) than hen eggs. 47 volatile compounds were found in raw blue peafowl eggs while only 30 in raw hen eggs; 60 volatile compounds were found in cooked blue peafowl eggs while only 41 in cooked hen eggs. Overall, most indices of qualities and nutrient components of blue peafowl eggs were not inferior to hen eggs.
Keywords