Article citationsMore >>

Applebaum, M. and Leikin R. (2007). Teachers’ conceptions mathematical challenge in school mathematics. Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, pp. 9-16. Seoul: PME.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Connectivism vs Traditional Theories of Learning

1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Graduate Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, Patras, Greece


American Journal of Educational Research. 2022, Vol. 10 No. 4, 257-261
DOI: 10.12691/education-10-4-15
Copyright © 2022 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Michael Gr. Voskoglou. Connectivism vs Traditional Theories of Learning. American Journal of Educational Research. 2022; 10(4):257-261. doi: 10.12691/education-10-4-15.

Correspondence to: Michael  Gr. Voskoglou, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Graduate Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, Patras, Greece. Email: mvoskoglou@gmail.com

Abstract

A common principle of all the traditional theories of learning, which developed in a time when learning was not taking place through technology, is that learning occurs inside a person. In today’s digital environment, however, we frequently need to act by drawing information which is stored within a database or an organization and is manipulated by technology. The traditional learning theories do not address this kind of learning, defined as actionable knowledge and occurring outside of people. The need to bridge this gap led to the development of connectivism, a new theory for understanding learning in our digital era. The paper outlines the headlines of connectivism, which is based on an integration of principles related to chaos, networks, and self-organization theories, and exposes briefly the reported criticisms for it and the recently developed teaching approaches related to it. The paper presents also a framework due to Siemens for organizing the primary learning theories. From the analysis performed, our conclusion is that none of the existing theories can stand alone as a complete theory for learning. The combination of them, however, seems to provide an adequate framework to study and understand the process of learning.

Keywords