Article citationsMore >>

Lalley, J. P., Miller, R. H. Effects of Pre-Teaching and Re-Teaching on Math Achievement and Academic Self-Concept of Students with Low Achievement in Math (2006).

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Varied Intervention Models: Its Effect on Students’ Retention Score

1University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines


American Journal of Educational Research. 2020, Vol. 8 No. 5, 321-324
DOI: 10.12691/education-8-5-15
Copyright © 2020 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Charita A. Luna, Janneth Q. Rondina, Nerissa V. Dazo. Varied Intervention Models: Its Effect on Students’ Retention Score. American Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 8(5):321-324. doi: 10.12691/education-8-5-15.

Correspondence to: Nerissa  V. Dazo, University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines. Email: nerissavdazo@gmail.com

Abstract

The study used a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design. The experimental groups were exposed to three intervention models: Differentiated Intervention Model, Re-teaching Intervention Model, Modularized Intervention Model. Questions in posttest and retention were all multiple choice. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, ANCOVA Unequal n’s. The analysis of the data revealed that those who were exposed to differentiated intervention model retained more mathematical concepts compared to those exposed to re-teaching model but is as good as those students exposed to modularized model. Furthermore, retention of students exposed to re-teaching have comparable retention of those who underwent modularized model. The researchers recommend that mathematics teachers may employ any of the three models but preferably used differentiated model to improve students’ retention in mathematics. Modules may be used as intervention to help students increased performance since it only need teacher’s presence as consultant.

Keywords