Article citationsMore >>

Tagg, J. “Why does the faculty resist change (2012)? Available at http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2012/January-February%202012/facultychange-full.html. [Accessed March 3, 2016].

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Implementation of the Adjunct Faculty Model

1School of Business Management, Notre Dame de Namur University, California, USA


American Journal of Educational Research. 2016, Vol. 4 No. 8, 637-647
DOI: 10.12691/education-4-8-9
Copyright © 2016 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
K. Garth-James. Implementation of the Adjunct Faculty Model. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(8):637-647. doi: 10.12691/education-4-8-9.

Correspondence to: K.  Garth-James, School of Business Management, Notre Dame de Namur University, California, USA. Email: kgarthjames@ndnu.edu

Abstract

The growing use of adjunct faculty in higher education has drawn its share of criticism. However, it is not necessarily bad to make use of the Adjunct Faculty Model (AFM) to support institutional mission and goals. This research uses content analysis to explore issues regarding how to precisely define the AFM as well as implementation and implications for faculty job satisfaction linked to student learning, which academic leadership (college deans, department chairs, directors) want to know.

Keywords