Article citationsMore >>

Kadayifcia, H., B. Atasoya and H. Akussa, “The correlation between the flaws students define in argument and their creative and critical thinking abilities,” Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 47, 802-806, 2012.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Lampung, Indonesia

1Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Lampung University, Indonesia

2Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics, State University of Malang, Indonesia


American Journal of Educational Research. 2015, Vol. 3 No. 9, 1185-1192
DOI: 10.12691/education-3-9-20
Copyright © 2015 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Neni Hasnunidah, Herawati Susilo, Mimien Henie Irawati, Hedi Sutomo. Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research. 2015; 3(9):1185-1192. doi: 10.12691/education-3-9-20.

Correspondence to: Neni  Hasnunidah, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Lampung University, Indonesia. Email: nenihasnunidah@gmail.com

Abstract

Argumentation skills as a form of communication to externalize ideas through scientific discourse is a very important process in learning of biology. Develop strategies argumentation can be one of the alternatives that can help students to improve their critical thinking skills. Students can demonstrate their critical thinking skills, especially in inquiry-based laboratory activities. Therefore, the learning process that uses the inquiry-based laboratory experiments to establish scientific arguments should be designed to develop the argumentation and critical thinking skills of student. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) strategy, Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding (ADIS) strategy, and conventional strategy on the argumentation and critical thinking skills of pre-service sience teachers in Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Lampung University. The study had been carried out in Quasi-Experiment of Pretest-Posttest Nonequivalent Control Group design. The data of the study were collected through argumentation and critical thinking tests before and after the implementation the learning strategies. The data were analyzed by using MANCOVA and were tested in terms of the normality and homogeneity beforehand. The result of the study showed that there were significant differences in the argumentation skill between the learning activities which implemented ADI, ADIS, and conventional strategies. ADIS learning strategy was more effective in improving the students’ argumentation skills compared to ADI and conventional learning strategies. Meanwhile, ADIS strategy was as effective as ADI strategy in improving the students’ critical thinking skills than conventional strategy. This study also showed that the students’ argumentation and critical thinking skills are similar or almost similar between two academic abilities (high and low) when ADIS was applied.

Keywords