<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>Journal of Innovations in Teaching and Learning</journalTitle>
<publicationDate>2025-07-07</publicationDate>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<startPage>68</startPage>
<endPage>76</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/jitl-5-1-10</doi>
<publisherRecordId>JITL20255110</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Challenges in the Implementation of Quality Assurance Mechanisms at the University of Zambia</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Shanziwe Abesi Mijere</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Harrison Daka</name>
<email>harrison.daka@unza.zm</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Mukuka Lydia Mulenga ¨C Hagane</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Ireen Bwembya</name>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Boniface Banda</name>
<affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Friday Chazanga</name>
<affiliationId>4</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia</affiliationName>


<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Directorate of Open and Distance Education, Ministry of Education Headquarters, Lusaka, Zambia</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="3">University of Zambia Library, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="4">Communication Information and Computer Technology, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia</affiliationName>
</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">The study examined the implementation challenges faced by both academic and administrative staff of quality assurance mechanisms at the University of Zambia. The study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, collecting quantitative data through questionnaires from 89 academic staff and qualitative data through interviews with 10 administrative staff and 5 Quality Assurance Directorate personnel and 5 students in leadership. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, multiple regression and thematic analysis. Findings revealed that resource constraints emerged as the predominant implementation challenge (84.27%). Qualitative findings revealed improved role clarity and streamlined processes attributed to quality systems, but severe understaffing and infrastructure limitations hindered implementation. Based on these findings, the study recommends implementing a tiered quality assurance training framework and establishing a decentralized quality assurance support structure with designated officers in each school.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://pubs.sciepub.com/jitl/5/1/10/jitl-5-1-10.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>Quality Assurance</keyword>
<keyword>Higher Education</keyword>
<keyword>Staff Perceptions</keyword>
<keyword>Academic Performance</keyword>
<keyword>Institutional Effectiveness</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
