<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>American Journal of Biomedical Research</journalTitle>
<eissn>2328-3955</eissn>
<publicationDate>2025-05-10</publicationDate>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<startPage>15</startPage>
<endPage>19</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/ajbr-13-1-3</doi>
<publisherRecordId>AJBR20251313</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Laboratory Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM- Manufactured Zirconium Crown on Primary Teeth: A Comparison of Two Different Cement Types and Gap Widths</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Nouf Al Humayyani</name>
<email>dr.nouf.m@tudent.org</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry ,Taif University, Taif, KSA</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">Background: The current research aimed to assess the outcome of dissimilar cement types on the strength of zirconium crowns fabricated by a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system at varying occlusal cement gap widths for primary molars. Methods: A total of 40 extracted mandibular deciduous 2nd. molars were prepared and randomly allocated into two main sets and two subgroups, totaling 4 groups according to the cement type and occlusal gap width. After preparation, the deciduous molars were implanted in methyl methacrylate blocks. The restorations were made-up from zirconium (InCoris TZI C, Sirona Dental Systems, GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) using CAD/CAM system, with occlusal cement gap widths of 100 &#181;m and 200 &#181;m, and were then glass ionomer cement and adhesive resin cements were used to cement the crowns. Fracture strength was measured for all samples at a crossheading speed of 10 mm/min, and the values were verified in Newtons (N). statistical analysis of results were done through the Shapiro¨CWilk normality test and independent t-tests. A significance level of p &lt; 0.05 was used for all analyses. Results: Cement type and cement gap width had statistically insignificant effect on the zirconium fracture strength of (p &gt; 0.05). The greatest fracture resistance was detected in the 100 &#181;m cement gap and adhesive resin cement group (3847&#177;984,74 N). Conclusions: Zirconia crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM technology demonstrated high fracture strength when placed on primary teeth. Different cement types and gap widths may be considered clinically acceptable alternatives in pediatric applications.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://pubs.sciepub.com/ajbr/13/1/3/ajbr-13-1-3.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>Fracture resistance</keyword>
<keyword>CAD/CAM</keyword>
<keyword>zirconia crown</keyword>
<keyword>cement gap</keyword>
<keyword>primary molar</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
