<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences</journalTitle>
<eissn>2328-3920</eissn>
<publicationDate>2025-11-10</publicationDate>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<startPage>94</startPage>
<endPage>103</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/aees-13-3-5</doi>
<publisherRecordId>AEES20251335</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Critical Provenance Deficits in Pvc Nanoplastics Research: Implications for Environmental Fate and Plant Uptake Studies</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Jared D. Mimbs</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Greg Hunlen</name>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Bipul K. Biswas</name>
<email>biswasb@fvsu.edu</email>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">MS Biotechnology Program, CAFST, Fort Valley State University, Fort Valley, GA 31030, USA</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Agilent Technologies Inc. USA</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) nanoplastics (&lt; 1,000 nm) are widely used in exposure and fate studies, yet the original sourcing and pre-treatment of starting materials, which govern additive profiles, particle properties, and leachates are inconsistently reported. Our primary objective was to evaluate how PVC-nanoplastics studies report feed-stock provenance and the implications for reproducibility and environmental relevance. We conducted a systematized narrative review (PubMed, database inception to 20 July 2025) of primary studies that purchased or produced PVC particles with at least one dimension &lt; 1000 nm and used them in exposure, characterization, fate, or calibration experiments. Data extraction captured six provenance descriptors (supplier, catalogue/lot, molecular-weight/inherent-viscosity, additive profile, cleaning/aging, pre-processing), synthesis routes, morphology, and a six-item characterization completeness score. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, starting materials comprised virgin scientific-grade resin (41.2%), commercially purchased PVC nanoparticles (20.6%), post-consumer waste (14.7%), virgin commercial powder (11.8%), and external reference materials (11.8%). Only 1 of 34 studies (2.9%) reported a catalogue number, while 13 of 34 (38.2%) described any additive information. The median characterization score was 2 of 6 (range 0¨C5). Nanoprecipitation and top-down milling were the most common synthesis methods, but reporting of yields and leachate controls was inconsistent. Provenance reporting for PVC nanoplastics is frequently incomplete, particularly for catalogue/lot numbers and additive profiles that critically influence solubility, morphology, surface chemistry, and leachate composition. We propose a PVC-specific reporting extension emphasizing supplier/batch identifiers, additive quantification, weathering/cleaning verification, and leachate controls to enable reproducible, decision-useful research.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://pubs.sciepub.com/aees/13/3/5/aees-13-3-5.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>Polyvinyl Chloride</keyword>
<keyword>Nanoplastics</keyword>
<keyword>Provenance Reporting</keyword>
<keyword>Additive Profiles</keyword>
<keyword>Particle Characterization</keyword>
<keyword>Environmental Fate</keyword>
<keyword>Reproducibility</keyword>
<keyword>Reporting Standards</keyword>
<keyword>Methodology</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
