Article citationsMore >>

Abangah Ghobad, Asadollahi Ruhangiz, Rahmani Asghar, Asadollahi Khairollah, Teimouri hadi. Plasma Inflammatory Cytokines as Predictor Markers for Severity of Histological Variations of Intestine among Celiac Patients. International Journal of Celiac Disease 2014; 2(2): 54-57.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Biostatistics Methods Used in Celiac Disease Population Studies

1Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Romania

2Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Targu Mures, Romania


International Journal of Celiac Disease. 2014, Vol. 2 No. 4, 134-136
DOI: 10.12691/ijcd-2-4-10
Copyright © 2014 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Mihaela Iancu, Mariana Tilinca, Andrei Achimas Cadariu. Biostatistics Methods Used in Celiac Disease Population Studies. International Journal of Celiac Disease. 2014; 2(4):134-136. doi: 10.12691/ijcd-2-4-10.

Correspondence to: Mariana  Tilinca, Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Targu Mures, Romania. Email: tilincamari@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction. Research on celiac disease is based on a descriptive and inferential variety of techniques that allow summarizing data and extrapolating the target population. The aim of this study was to identify descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in International Journal of Celiac Disease. Material and method. The sample of this study was defined based on all original articles published in the journal mentioned above in 2013-2014 period. We evaluated the descriptive statistics, the number and type of inferential statistical methods used. Results. Of the eight articles analyzed, one study was a randomzat clinical trial, the remaining studies were cross-sectional studies. The articles have used both quantitative and qualitative data. The indicator of central tendency on data was mean (n = 5, 62.5 %) or the median with interquartile range (n = 1, 12.5 %) and the dispersion of data was estimatedonly by the standard deviation in 5 studies (62.5 %). Quantitative data were used in raw form, except for one study using Z scores. Qualitative data were summarized using absolute and relative frequencies (n = 7, 87.5 %). The statistical software was mentioned in all studies. All articles except one used the inferential statistical methods or statistical tests. Most articles (87.5 %) used common tests as Student’s t- test (37.5), analysis of variance/covariance (25 %), Kruskal -Wallis test (12.5 %), χ2 test (50 %), and Fisher’s exact test (12.5 %). A specified significance level was noted in 62.5 % of the articles and the significance level was estimated in 6 studies (75 %). Conclusion. Results showed that a proper understanding of standard statistical methods leads to a proper interpretation of clinical research hypothesis. If necessary, the advanced statistical analysis should be performed by a multidisciplinary collaboration with specialists in biostatistics or epidemiology.

Keywords