Article citationsMore >>

Tannast, M., Zheng, G. and Anderegg, C., “Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs”. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 438. 182-90. 2005.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Are Measurements of Sacral Slopes Reliable?

1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan


American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2014, Vol. 2 No. 3, 57-60
DOI: 10.12691/ajcmr-2-3-2
Copyright © 2014 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Norio Imai, Dai Miyasaka, Yoji Horigome, Hayato Suzuki, Ryota Takubo, Naoto Endo. Are Measurements of Sacral Slopes Reliable?. American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2014; 2(3):57-60. doi: 10.12691/ajcmr-2-3-2.

Correspondence to: Norio  Imai, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan. Email: imainorio2001@yahoo.co.jp

Abstract

Background: Malpositioning during total hip arthroplasty may cause dislocation, pain, and other complications. To evaluate the potential of sacral slope (SS) as a reliable parameter of pelvic flexion. Methods: We developed a model of pelvic flexion to determine the intraobserver and interobserver variability and reliability of SS measurements by lateral radiography by three independent observers. Results: Measurement error was 1.2 and the intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial (Interclass correlation coefficient: 0.31 to 0.66). Based on the Spearman-Brown formula, the measurement is reliable if it is done at least seven times by two observers, and four times by three observers. Conclusions: The data suggest that measurement of SS of pelvic flexion is a clinically useful parameter for the optimization of THA conditions.

Keywords