Article citationsMore >>

Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall; 1993.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

TL-Moment-Based Regional Frequency Analysis of Extreme Rainfall Using Ward's Clustering and Kappa-Type Distributions

1Department of Statistics, Kano State Polytechnic, Kano, Nigeria

2Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kampus Besut, 22200 Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia


American Journal of Water Resources. 2026, Vol. 14 No. 2, 46-54
DOI: 10.12691/ajwr-14-2-3
Copyright © 2026 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Muhammad Nura, Zahratul Amani Binti Zakaria. TL-Moment-Based Regional Frequency Analysis of Extreme Rainfall Using Ward's Clustering and Kappa-Type Distributions. American Journal of Water Resources. 2026; 14(2):46-54. doi: 10.12691/ajwr-14-2-3.

Correspondence to: Zahratul  Amani Binti Zakaria, Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kampus Besut, 22200 Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia. Email: muhdnuru@gmail.com

Abstract

Peninsular Malaysia is highly flood-prone. Conventional L-moment regional frequency analysis (RFA) is sensitive to post-2013 extreme monsoon outliers at multiple stations across the peninsula. This study presents the first parallel TL-moment and L-moment RFA for the comprehensive 179-station DID network (1971–2023), simultaneously evaluating GEV, GLO, GPA, and K3D-II distributions across three climatologically distinct regions. Ward's minimum-variance hierarchical clustering was applied to TL-moment site characteristics, optimized by the average silhouette width (ASW) criterion. Discordancy, heterogeneity, goodness-of-fit (Z-test), and quantile estimation were executed in strict parallel under both estimation frameworks. Parametric bootstrap (B = 1,000 replicates) was applied to derive 90% confidence intervals for all regional quantiles. Three acceptably homogeneous regions were delineated: R1 (N = 55; west coast, mean = 115.0 mm), R2 (N = 94; interior, mean = 117.7 mm), and R3 (N = 30; east coast interior, mean = 200.9 mm). Under L-moments, GLO was best for R1 and R2; GPA was the sole passing distribution for R3. Under TL-moments, K3D-II was best for R2, GPA for R3. No standard distribution passed for R1 under TL-moments. TL-moment quantiles were 7–44% lower than L-moment estimates at T ≥ 10 years. Bootstrap 90% CI widths for T = 100 years were 0.076 (R1), 0.037 (R2), and 0.066 (R3) growth-factor units. L-moment and TL-moment quantiles should be used jointly as upper and lower design-rainfall bounds. For life-safety-critical structures, the L-moment estimate is the conservative upper bound.

Keywords