Article citationsMore >>

Center for Reproductive Rights. (2018). “Ending Impunity for Child Marriage in Bangladesh: NORMATIVE AND IMPLEMENTATION GAPS”. Center for Reproductive Rights.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Understanding the Gender and Power Influences Regarding Access to MNH and SRHR Services: A Qualitative Study at Selected Rural Areas of Rangpur, Bangladesh

1Project Director – Jononi, Save the Children International, Rangpur, Bangladesh

2Director – Health & Nutrition Sector, Save the Children International, Dhaka, Bangladesh

3Technical Specialist – MEAL, Save the Children International, Rangpur, Bangladesh

4Intern - MEAL, Save the Children International, Rangpur, Bangladesh


American Journal of Public Health Research. 2025, Vol. 13 No. 5, 245-256
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-13-5-6
Copyright © 2025 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Uzzal Kumar Roy, Golam Mothabbir, Md. Atikur Rahman, Rafa Raina Islam. Understanding the Gender and Power Influences Regarding Access to MNH and SRHR Services: A Qualitative Study at Selected Rural Areas of Rangpur, Bangladesh. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2025; 13(5):245-256. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-13-5-6.

Correspondence to: Md.  Atikur Rahman, Technical Specialist – MEAL, Save the Children International, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Email: mdatikur.rahman@savethechildren.org

Abstract

Background: Despite policy commitments and programmatic interventions, persistent gendered social norms, discriminatory practices, and structural barriers continue to undermine women’s and girls’ access to maternal, newborn, and reproductive health services, it’s necessary to understand how gender and power relations shape health-seeking behaviors are critical for advancing progress. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the influence of gender norms, household and community power dynamics, and institutional practices on access to maternal, newborn, and reproductive health services. Methods: A qualitative design was employed using the Gender and Power (GAP) Analysis framework including focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and key informant interviews with pregnant and lactating women, adolescents, men, mothers-in-law, community leaders, and health service providers. Thematic analysis was applied to identify recurring patterns within six GAP domains. Results: The findings highlight that myths, taboos, and misconceptions around antenatal care, institutional delivery, contraception, and diagnostic services (e.g., ultrasound) are pervasive. Decision-making regarding maternal, newborn and reproductive health is dominated by husbands and senior family members, while women’s autonomy remains constrained by gender norms. Early marriage is widely practiced and socially legitimized. Home deliveries persist, and men show limited engagement in pregnancy or menstrual health issues, though they act as critical gatekeepers in facilitating access to care. Women and minority groups face discrimination and reduced access to quality services, while mistrust of healthcare providers and weak institutional mechanisms further discourage service utilization. Conclusion: The study underscores the need for gender-transformative approaches to address entrenched power imbalances and harmful norms limiting women’s access to maternal, newborn, and reproductive health services. Policy and programmatic priorities should be focused on addressing these multidimensional barriers, which are essential to advancing equity and achieving national and global maternal and newborn health targets.

Keywords