Article citationsMore >>

Ha SR. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7(6): 475-83.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Laboratory Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM- Manufactured Zirconium Crown on Primary Teeth: A Comparison of Two Different Cement Types and Gap Widths

1Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry ,Taif University, Taif, KSA


American Journal of Biomedical Research. 2025, Vol. 13 No. 1, 15-19
DOI: 10.12691/ajbr-13-1-3
Copyright © 2025 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Nouf Al Humayyani. Laboratory Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM- Manufactured Zirconium Crown on Primary Teeth: A Comparison of Two Different Cement Types and Gap Widths. American Journal of Biomedical Research. 2025; 13(1):15-19. doi: 10.12691/ajbr-13-1-3.

Correspondence to: Nouf  Al Humayyani, Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry ,Taif University, Taif, KSA. Email: dr.nouf.m@tudent.org

Abstract

Background: The current research aimed to assess the outcome of dissimilar cement types on the strength of zirconium crowns fabricated by a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system at varying occlusal cement gap widths for primary molars. Methods: A total of 40 extracted mandibular deciduous 2nd. molars were prepared and randomly allocated into two main sets and two subgroups, totaling 4 groups according to the cement type and occlusal gap width. After preparation, the deciduous molars were implanted in methyl methacrylate blocks. The restorations were made-up from zirconium (InCoris TZI C, Sirona Dental Systems, GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) using CAD/CAM system, with occlusal cement gap widths of 100 µm and 200 µm, and were then glass ionomer cement and adhesive resin cements were used to cement the crowns. Fracture strength was measured for all samples at a crossheading speed of 10 mm/min, and the values were verified in Newtons (N). statistical analysis of results were done through the Shapiro–Wilk normality test and independent t-tests. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all analyses. Results: Cement type and cement gap width had statistically insignificant effect on the zirconium fracture strength of (p > 0.05). The greatest fracture resistance was detected in the 100 µm cement gap and adhesive resin cement group (3847±984,74 N). Conclusions: Zirconia crowns fabricated using CAD/CAM technology demonstrated high fracture strength when placed on primary teeth. Different cement types and gap widths may be considered clinically acceptable alternatives in pediatric applications.

Keywords