Article citationsMore >>

Katch F.I., Katch V.L, “Measurement and prediction errors in body composition assessment and the search for the perfect prediction equation”, Res Quarterly Exerc Sport, 51 (1), 249–260, March 1980.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Cross-validation of Equations for Estimating Pre-training, Post-training, and Training-induced Changes in Leg Extension 1-Repetition Maximum

1Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA

2Department of Health, Human Performance, and Sport, Wayne State College, Wayne, NE 68787, USA


American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2024, Vol. 12 No. 2, 29-35
DOI: 10.12691/ajssm-12-2-2
Copyright © 2024 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Trevor D. Roberts, Robert W. Smith, Jocelyn E. Arnett, Dolores G. Ortega, Justin S. Pioske, Richard J. Schmidt, Terry J. Housh. Cross-validation of Equations for Estimating Pre-training, Post-training, and Training-induced Changes in Leg Extension 1-Repetition Maximum. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2024; 12(2):29-35. doi: 10.12691/ajssm-12-2-2.

Correspondence to: Trevor  D. Roberts, Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA. Email: troberts17@huskers.unl.edu

Abstract

Eight previously published equations (EQs) that estimate 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) from repetitions to failure (RTF) were cross-validated for estimating pre-training, post-training, and training-induced changes (post-training minus pre-training) in leg extension (Leg Ext) 1-RM. Thirty-one recreationally active men (age: 20.8±1.5 years; body mass: 81.7±14.6 kg) trained 3 days per week for 8 weeks with 1 bilateral Leg Ext set to failure at ~80% 1-RM. The subjects performed Leg Ext 1-RM and RTF tests at pre-training and post-training. The pre-training and post-training RTF were performed at ~80% pre-training 1-RM and the values were input into the EQs for estimating the 1-RM values. The measured changes in 1-RM and RTF from pre-training to post-training were analyzed with paired t-tests. The cross-validation statistical analyses included paired t-tests for the constant error, correlation coefficient, standard error of the estimate, and total error (TE). Training significantly increased (p < 0.001) Leg Ext 1-RM (pre-training: 126.9±25.2 kg; post-training: 161.6±24.6 kg) and RTF (pre-training: 9.8±2.7 repetitions; post-training: 19.9±7.6 repetitions) by 34.6 kg and 10.1 repetitions, respectively. The cross-validation analyses indicated that an exponential EQ (Estimated 1-RM = RTF0.1•weight lifted) exhibited the lowest TE (3.9 kg) for estimating pre-training 1-RM, however, all EQs exhibited high TE values for estimating post-training 1-RM (21.9 to 606.3 kg) and changes in 1-RM values (24.0 to 603.1 kg) relative to the mean measured values of 161.5 kg and 34.6 kg, respectively. Therefore, this exponential EQ is recommended for estimating a pre-training Leg Ext 1-RM with 4 to 17 RTF in recreationally active men, but none of the EQs in the present study are recommended for estimating post-training Leg Ext 1-RM or changes in Leg Ext 1-RM values with post-training RTF ranging from 11 to 37 RTF.

Keywords