Article citationsMore >>

Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, Worthington JR, Eisenhauer MA, Cass D, Greenberg G, MacPhail I, Dreyer J, Lee JS, Bandiera G, Reardon M, Holroyd B, Lesiuk H, Wells GA. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003 Dec 25; 349(26): 2510-8.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Utility of MRI in Blunt Trauma Patients with a Normal Cervical Spine CT and Persistent Midline Neck Pain on Palpation


Global Journal of Surgery. 2013, Vol. 1 No. 1, 4-7
DOI: 10.12691/js-1-1-2
Copyright © 2013 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Jonas P. DeMuro, Sue Simmons, Kaitlin Smith, Judy Jax. Utility of MRI in Blunt Trauma Patients with a Normal Cervical Spine CT and Persistent Midline Neck Pain on Palpation. Global Journal of Surgery. 2013; 1(1):4-7. doi: 10.12691/js-1-1-2.

Correspondence to: Jonas P. DeMuro, . Email:

Abstract

Introduction: The blunt trauma patient with a normal neurologic exam, and persistent midline cervical spine tenderness remains a diagnostic challenge. The patient with a symptomatic neck can be subsequently treated with flexion-extension cervical spine X-rays, MRI of the cervical spine, or no further imaging. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective study that spanned five years. Our current protocol for cervical spine clearance is described, which utilizes neck MRI for the trauma patients with persistent midline neck tenderness, a normal neurologic exam, and a normal CT of the neck. These symptomatic neck patients were identified from the institution's radiology database of patients that had both a CT and an MRI. Results: There were 6237 patients identified during the time of the study, and 81 were found to have both a CT and an MRI of the cervical spine for a symptomatic neck without a neurological deficit. There were 4 patients identified that had a normal CT, and subsequently had a new finding on the MRI scan; all were discharged with their cervical collar on with Spine Specialist followup. Conclusion: In 4.94% of our patients, the MRI had significant findings that changed the management of the patient. We will continue to perform cervical MRI in our symptomatic neck patients after blunt trauma with a normal cervical spine CT.

Keywords