Article citationsMore >>

Shahid S, Nath SK, Ray J. (2000). Groundwater potential modeling in soft rock using a GIS. Int J Remote Sens 21:1919-1924.

has been cited by the following article:

Article

Groundwater Recharge Zone Mapping Using GIS-based Analytical Hierarchy Process and Multi-Criteria Evaluation: Case Study of Greater Banjul Area

1Abomey Calavi University, Benin

2Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, Banjul, Gambia

3Geology Department, Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar, Senegal

4Department of Earth Science, University of Douala, Cameron


American Journal of Water Resources. 2020, Vol. 8 No. 4, 182-190
DOI: 10.12691/ajwr-8-4-4
Copyright © 2020 Science and Education Publishing

Cite this paper:
Adama Gassama Jallow, Djim M. L Diongue, Huguette C. Emvoutou, Daouda Mama, Serigne Faye. Groundwater Recharge Zone Mapping Using GIS-based Analytical Hierarchy Process and Multi-Criteria Evaluation: Case Study of Greater Banjul Area. American Journal of Water Resources. 2020; 8(4):182-190. doi: 10.12691/ajwr-8-4-4.

Correspondence to: Adama  Gassama Jallow, Abomey Calavi University, Benin. Email: adagass@gmail.com

Abstract

Remote sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) play a crucial role in understanding groundwater potential recharge in semi-arid areas. In this present study, groundwater recharge zone map is delineated for the shallow aquifer in the Greater Banjul Area (GBA) using GIS, RS and Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) technique utilizing seven criteria (geology, land-use/cover, slope, drainage density, soil texture, groundwater fluctuation and aquifer transmissivity). Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) is used as MCE technique to normalize the weights of the various criterion. Each class of the different themes was assigned suitable score and normalized using a Fuzzy membership algorithm. Thematic layers were integrated using Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) in a GIS platform to generate groundwater recharge zone maps. The recharge map thus obtained was divided into four classes (poor, moderate, good, and very good) based on their influence to groundwater recharge. Results indicates that about 10.5 % of the total study area falls under ‘poor’ and ‘moderate’ zone and cover the estuarian portion of GBA, 40% of the total area falls under ‘very good’ zone which is a good indication for future artificial recharge planning and potential drilling of boreholes.

Keywords