1Department of Finance, Community College, Taibah University, Medinah, Saudi Arabia
2Department Finance, Higher Institute of Informatics and Management of Kairouan, Kairouan University, Kairouan, Tunisia
3Department of Economic, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management of Sousse, Sousse University, Sousse, Tunisia
4Department of Economic, College of Business Administration, Taibah University, Medinah, Saudi Arabia
International Journal of Business and Risk Management.
2019,
Vol. 2 No. 1, 1-8
DOI: 10.12691/ijbrm-2-1-1
Copyright © 2019 Science and Education PublishingCite this paper: Abdelkader Derbali, Fathi Jouini, Lamia Jamel, Mohamed Bechir Chenguel. Monetary Policy and Cryptocurrencies: Much Noise for Nothing?.
International Journal of Business and Risk Management. 2019; 2(1):1-8. doi: 10.12691/ijbrm-2-1-1.
Correspondence to: Abdelkader Derbali, Department of Finance, Community College, Taibah University, Medinah, Saudi Arabia. Email:
derbaliabdelkader@outlook.frAbstract
At the beginning of 2017, there were more than 500 digital currencies (DC) for a total market value of $ 16.8 billion or € 16 billion, the Bitcoin, launched in early 2009, representing alone about 85% of the market. In comparison, euro banknotes and coins in circulation at the end of 2016 amounted to EUR 1 150 billion, 72 times more, for the single currency in fiduciary form. However, some authors have suggested that increased use of DCs could, at some point and under certain circumstances, have profound consequences for the financial system and the conduct and effectiveness of monetary policy (Raskin and Yermack, 2016; Bordo and Levin, 2017). Under the same hypothesis that the consequences of monetary policy can only be significant if the use of DC was widespread, this article offers a more nuanced view. The first part recalls the main characteristics of DCs. The third part looks at Consequences and adjustments of monetary policy from widespread use of digital currencies. In this part, we describe scenarios of widespread use of DCs and their consequences for monetary policy. The fourth part concludes.
Keywords