Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Effect of Drying Methods and Type of Packaging Materials on Phytochemical Content and Total Antioxidant Capacity of Five Medicinal Plants with Cosmetic Potential over Three Months Storage at Ambient Temperature

DGND Gamage, RM Dharmadasa*, DC Abeysinghe, RGS Wijesekara, GA Prathapasinghe, Takao Someya

Industrial Technology Institute, 363, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka

Abstract: Drying and storage are the most integral parts of the post-harvest practices of herbal materials. These practices directly influence the physical and chemical quality of the processed product. Therefore, the main objective of the present study was to analyze the effect of drying methods and packaging materials on total flavonoid content, total phenolic content, and total antioxidant capacity of five medicinal plant leaves with cosmetic potential. Leaves of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L., Senna alata (L.) Roxb., Centella asiatica (L.) Urb., Ocimum tenuiflorum L. and Justicia adhatoda L. were dried to a constant weight using shade drier at 30-35°C, solar drier at 30-40°C and oven at 40°C. Thereafter, dried leaves were stored using three different packaging materials namely glass jars, polythene bags and gunny bags at ambient temperature for three months. Aluminum chloride colorimetric assay, folin-ciocalteau method, and phosphomolybdate assay were employed to analyze the total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of ethanolic extracts of leaves respectively in each month. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation of minimum three replications. Significant interactions of the drying methods and packaging materials on TAC, TFC and TPC of dried leaf materials were analyzed using Two-way ANOVA. Results showed that the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC in oven dried H. rosa-sinensis (23.48±2.49 mg RE/100g DW, 1.09±0.24 mg GAE/100g DW and 0.39±0.05 mg AAE/100g DW respectively) and C. asiatica (128.64±10.59 mg RE/100g DW, 2.38±0.32 mg GAE/100g DW and 2.2±0.05 mg AAE/100g DW respectively) leaves stored in glass jars and solar dried S. alata (117.43±9.00 mg RE/100g DW, 3.99±0.29 mg GAE/100g DW and 1.07±0.04 mg AAE/100g DW respectively), O. tenuiflorum (216.02±0.75 mg RE/100g DW, 1.92±0.12 mg GAE/100g DW and 1.07±0.03 mg AAE/100g DW respectively) and J. adhatoda (11.13±1.23 mg RE/100g DW, 1.02±0.19 mg GAE/100g DW and 0.42±0.04 mg AAE/100g DW respectively) leaves stored in glass jars at the end of the storage period. However, statistically significant interaction (p value < 0.05) was not reported between drying method and packaging material on TPC of C. asiatica and O. tenuiflorum leaves and TFC of S. alata leaves. In conclusion, determining the effect of different processing methods on chemical constituents of aforementioned plant leaf materials is suggested to assure the quality of the final product.

Keywords: antioxidant capacity, drying methods, medicinal plants, packaging materials, phytochemical content, storage

Received April 02, 2021; Revised May 07, 2021; Accepted May 15, 2021

Citation: DGND Gamage, RM Dharmadasa, DC Abeysinghe, RGS Wijesekara, GA Prathapasinghe, Takao Someya, Effect of Drying Methods and Type of Packaging Materials on Phytochemical Content and Total Antioxidant Capacity of Five Medicinal Plants with Cosmetic Potential over Three Months Storage at Ambient Temperature. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 9 (2). 73-79. January 2021. doi:10.12691/wjar-9-2-5

1. Introduction

The post-harvest process has great influence on quality assurance of medicinal plant materials in the productive chain. Among the post-harvest processes, drying and storage are essential to maintain the product with the physical and chemical characteristics closer to its fresh state. Failures in any of these steps influence the quality of the final product [1]. Drying is the fundamental and generally used method for post-harvest preservation of medicinal plants. It allows the quick conservation of the medicinal qualities of the plant material while enhancing shelf life of plant materials and reducing the risk of microbial attacks [2]. Conventionally, low drying temperatures between 30°C and 50°C are recommended to protect sensitive active ingredients [3]. But drying temperature is determined based on plant parts. For an instance, the air temperature is kept at 20 - 40°C for thin materials like leaves but is often elevated to 60 - 70°C for hard plant parts such as roots and barks. During the drying process, rapid removal of the water from the cells of plant materials will prevent the enzymatic degradation of the cell constituents, thus augmenting the shelf life of the plant materials during storage. However, to halt the enzymatic activities, the water content must be brought down to about 10% [4].

Good Storage Practices of raw drugs are very imperative as it plays a pivotal role in safety, efficacy and quality of the finished products [4]. The storage of medicinal plants has the purpose of avoiding the deterioration of its quality, maintaining the qualitative and quantitative aspects after drying, by the development of ideal conditions of temperature and relative humidity, avoiding the attack of microorganisms, fungi and insects during the period of storage [1]. In order to expand the shelf life of processed plant materials, it is essential to store them in a dry condition in carefully closed containers in dark place [4]. It enhances the stability of crude drugs by excluding the direct impacts of oxygen, light, microbes and insects on crude drugs [4,5]. Further, it is crucial to prevent the remoistening of dried material by keeping relative humidity in the storage room at a suitable level [3]. Masand et al. [5] stated all the raw herbal drugs should be stored at a cool place where temperature is between 8 - 25°C. Another important factor to be considered in the storage of medicinal plants is the type of packaging. Lisboa et al. [1] recommended that paper bags, polyethylene bags, cardboard boxes and paper bags type double kraft with an inner layer of non-toxic polyethylene are the most suitable packaging materials for storing leaves. However, raw herbal drugs require a series of extended studies that aim on establishing the safety and efficacy of finished herbal drugs by changing or improving drying and storage practices of raw herbs used in plant-based industries [5].

As an emerging plant - based industry in Sri Lanka, herbal cosmetic industry is facing several challenges at present. Of these, inadequacy of quality raw materials is the key challenge. This may result of the lack of standards for post-harvest practices of herbal materials in terms of drying and storge [6]. Therefore, the aim of this present study was to determine the impact of different drying methods and different types of packaging materials on total flavonoid content, total phenolic content, and total antioxidant capacity of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L., Senna alata (L.) Roxb., Centella asiatica (L.) Urb., Ocimum tenuiflorum L. and Justicia adhatoda L., leaves with cosmetic potential over three months storage period at ambient temperature.

2. Methodology

2.1. Collection of Plant Materials

Fresh leaves of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L., Senna alata (L.) Roxb., Centella asiatica (L.) Urb., Ocimum tenuiflorum L. and Justicia adhatoda L. were collected from Chilaw, North Western province, Sri Lanka. Collected leaves were sorted and washed with running water. Thereafter, washed leaves were drained completely on paper towels. Then, each leaf sample was divided into 3 batches.

2.2. Drying and Storage of Herbal Materials

Three different methods were employed for drying leaves.

2.2.1. Oven Drying

Leaves were dried at 40 °C in a laboratory oven (OF-22G, Jeio Tech, Korea). Evenly distributed leaves on perforated stainless-steel trays were dried until it reached to a constant weight.

2.2.2. Solar Drying

Fabricated solar dryer equipped with forced air circulation system was used to dry leaves. Inside temperature was ranged from 30 - 40°C during the daytime. Samples were placed uniformly on perforated trays and dried until constant weight was achieved.

2.2.3. Shade Drying

Leaves were dried using a fabricated shade drier at ambient temperature ranged from 30 - 35°C without exposing to sun light. Leaves were spread uniformly on perforated trays and dried until leaves reached a constant weight.

2.2.4. Storing the Dried Materials

100 g of each dried leaf sample under three different drying methods was separated into 10 batches. One batch of each leaf variety was used to measure the total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) immediately after drying. The remaining 9 batches in each leaf type was stored in three glass bottles, three polythene bags, three gunny bags (10 g per each) and labelled for three months quality analysis.

2.3. Preparation of Crude Extracts

Dried samples were coarsely powdered using mechanical grinder. One gram of powdered sample from each was soaked in 20ml of 80% ethanol (1W:20V) for 24 hours. The extracts were subsequently filtered through a filter paper (Whatman No. 01; Whatman Paper Ltd, Maidstone, UK). Then filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure using a centrifugal evaporator (EYELA CVE-3000, Indonesia) to obtain the ethanol extracts. Three replicates were prepared from each packaging type. The prepared extracts were stored at 4 °C until assayed within a week.

2.4. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)

The aluminium chloride colorimetric assay was used to determine the total flavonoid content (TFC) as described by Gunathilake et al., [7]. In brief, 0.5 mL of ethanolic extracts of leaf solutions was added to 3 mL of distilled water. Then, 0.3 ml of 5% NaNO₂ was added and stands for 5 min at room temperature (30°C). About 0.3 ml of 10% AlCl₃ was added 5 min later and allows standing for another 6 min, and then 2 ml of 1 M NaOH was added, and the solution was made up to 10 mL with distilled water and mixed. The absorbance was determined at 510 nm against blank using the spectrophotometer (GENESYS 10S UV-VIS). Rutin standard solutions were prepared by dissolving rutin in ethanol at the concentrations ranging from 50 to 250 mg/L. The standard curve of rutin, y = 0.0118x + 0.0126 (R² = 0.981) was used to determine the TFC expressed as milligram of rutin equivalents (RE) per 100 g dry weight of leaves.

2.5. Determination of Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

Folin–Ciocalteu assay was used to determine the total phenolic content (TPC) of extracts as described by Gunathilake and Ranaweera, [8]. About 0.5 mL of extract and 0.1 mL of Folin- Ciocalteu reagent (0.5 N) were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. Then 2.5 mL 7.5% sodium carbonate was added to the mixture and further incubated for 2 hours in the dark at room temperature. Thereafter, the absorbance was measured at 760 nm using a spectrometer (GENESYS 10S UV-VIS). Gallic acid standard solutions were prepared by dissolving gallic acid in ethanol at the concentrations ranging from 50 to 250 mg/L. The standard curve of gallic acid, y = 0.0906x + 0.4804 (R² = 0.989) was used to determine the TPC expressed as milligram of gallic acid equivalents per 100 g dry weight of leaves.

2.6. Determination of Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC)

Phosphomolybdate method was used to determine the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of extracts as described by Gunathilake and Ranaweera, [8]. The tubes containing leaf extract (0.3 mL) and 3 mL reagent solution (0.6 M sulphuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate and 4 mM ammonium molybdate) were incubated at 95 °C for 90 min. After the mixture had cooled to room temperature, the absorbance of each solution was measured at 695 nm spectrophotometrically (GENESYS 10S UV-VIS) against a blank. Ascorbic acid standard solutions were prepared by dissolving ascorbic acid in ethanol at concentrations ranging from 50 to 250 mg/L. The standard curve of ascorbic acid, y = 0.0657x + 0.1071 (R² = 0.995) was used to determine the TAC expressed as milligram of ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) per 100 g dry weight of leaves.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to show the results of total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of leaves immediately after drying under three different methods. Results of the assessment of the effect of three drying methods and three packaging materials of five medicinal plant leaves were presented as mean ± standard deviation of minimum three replications. Significant interaction of the drying methods and packaging materials on TAC, TFC and TPC of dried leaf materials was analysed using Two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was set at 5%. The programmes used were Microsoft Excel 2016 and Minitab 17.

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in the Table 1, the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC of H. rosa-sinensis leaves were reported from the solar dried sample after immediate drying. It was 90.09 ± 2.51 mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 4.39 ± 1.26 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 17.53 ± 2.09 mg AAE/ 100g DW of leaves, respectively. However, the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC were recorded from the oven dried H. rosa-sinensis leaves stored in glass jars at the end of each month. The highest TFC and TPC were about 24 mg Rutin/ 100g DW and 2 mg Gallic/ 100g DW while the maximum TAC was 0.39 mg AAE/ 100g DW of H. rosa-sinensis leaves by the end of the trimester. Furthermore, statistically significant interaction was reported between drying method and packaging material on TFC (p = 0.00), TPC (p = 0.00) and TAC (p = 0.00) of H. rosa-sinensis leaves.

According to the Table 2, the highest value of TFC and TAC were recorded from solar dried leaf sample of S. alata whereas the highest TPC was recorded from the shade dried sample before storage. Those values were approximately 323 mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 40 mg AAE/ 100g DW and 8 mg Gallic/ 100g DW of S. alata leaves, respectively. But at the end of the storage period, the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC were reported from solar dried S. alata leaves stored in glass jars. It was approximately 117 mg mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 4 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 1 mg AAE/ 100g DW of S. alata leaves, respectively. Moreover, statistically significant interactions were recorded between drying method and packaging material on TPC (p = 0.011) and TAC (p = 0.000) of S. alata leaves excepting for TFC (p = 0.187).

Table 1. TFC, TPC and TAC of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. leaves dried under 03 different drying conditions and stored in three types of packaging materials for three months

Table 2. TFC, TPC and TAC of Senna alata (L.) Roxb. leaves dried under 03 different drying conditions and stored in three types of packaging materials for three months

Table 3. TFC, TPC and TAC of Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. leaves dried under 03 different drying conditions and stored in three types of packaging materials for three months

Considering the results of TFC, TPC and TAC of C. asiatica leaves after immediate drying, the highest value of TFC and TAC was recorded from the solar dried C. asiatica leaves while the maximum TPC was reported from the oven dried C. asiatica leaf sample. Those values were 390.28±4.39 mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 23.59±3.44 AAE/ 100g DW and 5.71±0.94 mg Gallic/ 100g DW of C. asiatica leaves. However, as indicated in the Table 3, by the end of the third month, the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC were recorded from oven dried leaves stored in glass jars. It was about 129 mg mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 2 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 2 AAE/ 100g DW of leaves respectively. Furthermore, statistically significant interaction between drying method and packaging material on TFC (p = 0.000) and TAC (p = 0.000) of C. asiatica leaves were reported excluding for TPC (p = 0.094).

As demonstrated in the Table 4, the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC were reported from solar dried O. tenuiflorum leaves just after immediate drying. It was reported as 688.84±10.61 mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 6.58±1.66 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 34.82±2.91 mg AAE/ 100g DW of O. tenuiflorum leaves, respectively. At the end of the storage period, the maximum TFC, TPC and TAC were reported from solar dried O. tenuiflorum leaves stored in glass jars. It was about 216 mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 2 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 1 mg AAE/ 100g DW of leaves, respectively. Moreover, interaction between the drying method and packaging material was statistically significant on TFC (p = 0.002) and TAC (p = 0.000) of O. tenuiflorum leaves excepting for TPC (p = 0.305).

Table 4. TFC, TPC and TAC of Ocimum tenuiflorum L. leaves dried under 03 different drying conditions and stored in three types of packaging materials for three months

Table 5. TFC, TPC and TAC of Justicia adhatoda L. leaves dried under 03 different drying conditions and stored in three types of packaging materials for three months

In contrast, J. adhatoda showed the maximum TFC in shade drying samples, the highest TPC in solar dried leaves and the maximum TAC in oven dried leaves after immediate drying. Those values were 95.62±0.95 mg Rutin/ 100g DW, 3.64±0.95 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 25.11±1.38 mg AAE/ 100g DW of J. adhatoda leaves, respectively. By the end of the third month, the highest TFC, TPC and TAC were reported from the solar dried leaves stored in glass jars. It was about 11 mg Rutin/ 100g DW of leaves, 1 mg Gallic/ 100g DW and 0.5 mg AAE/ 100g DW of J. adhatoda leaves, respectively. Further, statistically significant interaction was reported between drying method and packaging material on TFC (p = 0.00), TPC (p = 0.00) and TAC (p = 0.00) of J. adhatoda leaves.

Considering the results of TFC, TPC and TAC values of 05 plant leaf materials with cosmetic potential after immediate drying, TFC was comparatively high in O. tenuiflorum leaves while TPC and TAC were high in S. alata leaves than other plant leaf materials. Overall, results showed higher TFC, TPC and TAC of solar dried leaves of H. rosa-sinensis and O. tenuiflorum in comparison with oven drying and shade drying methods. Solar dried S. alata and C. asiatica leaves showed high TFC and TAC while TPC was high in shade dried leaves of S. alata and oven dried leaves of C. asiatica respectively. In contrast, shade dried J. adhatoda leaves showed the maximum TFC while solar dried showed the highest TPC. However, the maximum TAC was recorded from the oven dried J. adhatoda leaves. These results are in agreement with the study conducted by Gamage et al. [9].

Packaging protects herbs from the growth of microorganism, browning and moisture accumulation, etc. The final quality of the product depends on the drying method, type of packaging material and storage environment [10]. In general, results of this study disclosed high TFC, TPC and TAC in oven dried H. rosa-sinensis, C. asiatica leaves and solar dried S. alata, O. tenuiflorum, and J. adhatoda leaves stored in glass jars by the end of the storage period. Moreover, TFC and TPC of all plant leaf materials dried under oven, solar and shade have been gradually depleted throughout the storage period in each packaging material. Although, TAC of all plant dried leaves under three different drying methods was considerably high in all packaging materials in the first and second months, it has steadily decreased by the end of the third month. During the study, packed dried leaf materials were stored in a room where room temperature and relative humidity (RH) were highly subjectable to the changes with the external environment. Neither glass jars nor polythene bags were airtight but kept in closed containers. Trapped air inside the glass jars was considerably low in comparison with polythene bags after filling the leaf materials. Thus, high TFC, TPC and TAC of oven dried leaf materials stored in glass jars may be due to the result of rapid inactivation of degradative enzymes during the drying and less exposure to the oxygen during storage period [5,11]. Inferior quality of shade dried leaves stored in polythene and gunny bags may be due to the longer period of drying and contaminations during the shade drying. Moreover, long term exposure of dried leaf materials to oxygen during drying as well as inside the packaging materials such as gunny bags may result in increasing the redox activity of plant materials and degradation of phenolic compounds [12]. Further, uncontrollable RH in the storage room may result the remoistening of dried materials in gunny bags [3]. When a product is placed in an environment at an uncontrollable temperature and RH, it will affect the equilibrium moisture content (EMC) between the product and the environment. Exposing the dried plant materials to the high RH environment for an infinite period may result the remoistening. Thus, it will lead to the deterioration of plant materials due to the growth of microorganisms [13] and biotransformation of secondary metabolites [14] by activating the degradative enzymes which are widely present in plant tissues such as lipoxygenase and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) [15]. Ultimately, diphenols are oxidised with the presence of oxygen and causing rapid enzymatic oxidation of natural antioxidants [16]. PPO plays an important role in the degradation of phenolics and flavonoids of crops. However, as Ghasemzdeh et al. (2016) mentioned, PPO shows variable activity under different storage conditions and its activity is dependent on the drying method of samples, storage, and processing conditions.

4. Conclusion

Considering the TFC, TPC and TAC of plant leaf materials over the three months storage period, the best combination of drying method and packaging material would be oven drying and glass jars for H. rosa-sinensis and C. asiatica leaves while solar drying and glass jars would be ideal for S. alata, O. tenuiflorum and J. adhatoda leaves. However, the information and comprehensive research on the influence of drying methods and packaging materials of herbs on bio-active compounds is still lacking. Thus, shelf-life evaluation of herbs is one of key areas to be addressed in future through comprehensive research to unleash the true potential of medicinal plants during post-harvest processing. Different processing methods cause variations in the chemical constituents and biological activity of medicinal plant materials. Thus, determining the effect of post-harvest treatment on chemical constituents and biological activity of medicinal plant materials is key to improve for the quality control. Moreover, conducting efficacy/ safety tests on medicinal plant ingredients are important to ensure the physical and analytical characteristics of raw materials used for the production up to the standard.

Acknowledgements

This research project, “Systematic survey on flora with cosmetic potential, development of agronomic and post-harvest aspects for selected medicinal plants” (project number: WU/SRHDC/MPHIL/2017/86) was funded by ALBION Co., Ltd, Japan. A deep appreciation is extended to the funding organization.

References

[1]   | Lisboa, C. F., Melo, E. de. C. and Donzeles, S. M. L. Influence of Storage Conditions on Quality Attributes of Medicinal Plants. Journal of scientific and technical research, 4(4), 4093-4095. 2018.
[2]   | Qaas, F. and Schiele, E. Influence of energy costs on profitability in drying operations. Journal for medicinal and spice plants, 6 (3), 144-145. 2001.
[3]   | Muller, J. and Heindl, A. Drying of medicinal plants. In: R. Bogers, L. Craker and D. Lange, eds. Medicinal and aromatic plants. Netherlands: Springer. 237-252. 2006.
[4]   | Alamgir, A. Herbal Drugs: Their Collection, Preservation, and Preparation; Evaluation, Quality Control, and Standardization of Herbal Drugs. In: Therapeutic Use of Medicinal Plants and Their Extracts. s.l.: Springer, 453-495. 2017
[5]   | Masand, S., Madan, S. and Balian, S. Modern concept of storage and packaging of raw herbs used in Ayurveda. International journl of research in Ayurveda and pharmacy, 5(2), 242-245. 2014.
[6]   | Gamage, DGND., Abeysinghe, DC., Wijesekara, RGS., Prathapasinghe, GA., Dharmadasa, RM & Someya, T. Emerging Herbal Cosmetic Production in Sri Lanka: Identifying Possible Interventions for the Development of the Herbal Cosmetic Industry, Scientifica, vol. 2021, Article ID 6662404, 12 pages. 2021.
[7]   | Gunathilake, K., Ranaweera, K. and Rupasinghe, H. Change of phenolics, carotenoids, and antioxidant capacity following simulated gastrointestinal digestion and dialysis of selected edible green leaves. Food Chemistry. 2017.
[8]   | Gunathilake, K. and Ranaweera, K. Antioxidative properties of 34 green leafy vegetables. Journal of Functional Foods, 26, 176-186. 2016.

[9]  
Gamage, DGND., Abeysinghe, DC., Wijesekara, RGS., Prathapasinghe, GA., Dharmadasa, RM & Someya, T. Assessment of Phytochemical Contents and Total Antioxidant Capacity of Five Medicinal Plants with Cosmetic Potential under Three Different Drying Methods. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(1): 24-28. 2021.

[10]   | Mahanon, H., Azizh, A. H. and Dzulkilfly, M. H., Effect of different drying concentration of several photochemical in herbal preparation of eight medicinal plant leaves. J. Mal. Nutrition., 5, 47-54. 1999.
[11]   | Bernard, D., Kwabena, A., Osei, O., Daniel, G., Elom, S. and Sandra, A. The Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Phytochemicals and Radical Scavenging Activity of Ceylon Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Plant Parts. European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 4(11), 1324-1335. 2014.
[12]   | Pham, H. N., Nguyen, V., Vuong, Q., Bowyer, M. and Scarlett, C. Effect of Extraction Solvents and Drying Methods on the Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Helicteres hirsuta Lour. Leaves. Technologies, 3, 285-301. 2015.
[13]   | Cuervo-Andrade. Quality oriented drying of Lemon Balm (Melissa officinalis L.), 2011.
[14]   | Santana, P. M., Quijano-Avilés, M., Chóez-Guaranda, I., Lucas, A., Espinoza, R., Martínez, D. and Martínez, M. Effect of drying methods on physical and chemical properties of Ilex guayusa leaves. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín, 71(3), 8617-8622. 2018.
[15]   | Chan, E., Lim, Y., Wong, S., Lim, K., Tan, S., Lianto, F. and Yong, M. Effects of different drying methods on the antioxidant properties of leaves and tea of ginger species. Food Chemistry, 113 (2009), 166-172. 2008.
[16]   | Ghasemzadeh, A., Jaafar, H. Z. E. and Rahmat, A. Variation of the Phytochemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activities of Zingiber officinale var. rubrum Theilade Associated with Different Drying Methods and Polyphenol Oxidase Activity. Molecules, 21, 780. 2016.