Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Assessment of Genetic Diversity among Newly Selected Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn.) Genotypes in Nigeria Using Rapd-Pcr Molecular Analysis

Daudu O.A.Y.*, Falusi O.A., Gana S.A., Abubakar A., Oluwajobi A.O., Dangana M.C., Yahya S.A

Department of Biological Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Federal University of Technology, Minna

Abstract: In order to assess the genetic diversity among Nigerian Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn.), certain genetic and morphological markers were used to group the various accessions collected into distinct genotypes. Molecular characterisation was then conducted on the twenty newly selected genotypes (NGR-HS-001, NGR-HS-002, NGR-HS-003, NGR-HS-004, NGR-HS-005, NGR-HS-006, NGR-HS-007, NGR-HS-008, NGR-HS-009, NGR-HS-010, NGR-HS-011, NGR-HS-012, NGR-HS-013, NGR-HS-014, NGR-HS-015, NGR-HS-016, NGR-HS-017, NGR-HS-018, NGR-HS-019, and NGR-HS-020) of the Roselle (H. sabdariffa Linn.), using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RAPD-PCR) based techniques. The molecular characterisation was carried out at the Biotechnology Laboratory, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan. Five RAPD primers i.e. OPH05, OPB17, OPT17, OPB11 and OPB04 were able to amplify 30 reproducible fragments of which 100 % were polymorphic, indicating that Nigerian Roselle accessions are genetically heterogeneous; it also showed that RAPD analysis is an effective molecular marker in detecting genetic diversity among different Roselle genotypes in Nigeria. All the primers gave a high genetic diversity and high polymorphic information contents, however, OPT17 gave the highest genetic diversity and polymorphic information content (0.79 and 0.78 respectively). The Dice Dissimilarity index for the calculation of distances among the roselle accessions revealed an interesting phenomenon because a clear divergence among the H. sabdariffa accessions was found. The dissimilarity index ranged from 0-1, which revealed a wide range of genetic identity. Dissimilarity coefficient of accession NGR-HS-017 was the highest (1.00); this accession was totally different or genetically distance from all the other accessions. In addition, a high dissimilarity index (1.00) was also obtained among some of the accessions; NGR-HS-018 was highly dissimilar from NGR-HS-002, NGR-HS-012 and NGR-HS-016. However, a quite number of the accessions showed moderately low to zero dissimilarity indices. It is therefore concluded that RAPD-PCR analysis provided very valuable means for determining relationships among H. sabdariffa accessions. Wide genetic variability observed among the Roselle accessions could be exploited in different breeding programs of the crop. Therefore, other DNA markers like SSR and RFLP should be used to ascertain these levels of relationships.

Keywords: Keywords: RAPD-PCR, genetic variability, dissimilarity coefficient, genetically heterogeneous

Citation: Daudu O.A.Y., Falusi O.A., Gana S.A., Abubakar A., Oluwajobi A.O., Dangana M.C., Yahya S.A, Assessment of Genetic Diversity among Newly Selected Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn.) Genotypes in Nigeria Using Rapd-Pcr Molecular Analysis. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 4 (3). 64-69. January 2016. doi:10.12691/wjar-4-3-1

1. Introduction

Molecular markers referred to any specific Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) segment whose base sequence is polymorphic in different organisms [1]. Such markers can be visualised by hybridization-based techniques such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) or by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) based methods. Molecular markers present numerous advantages over conventional phenotype based alternatives. DNA markers have proven to be efficient tools for the molecular characterisation of the plant species [2]. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), molecular markers, Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR), etc., are useful in various application of plant breeding. Among them, RAPD and ISSR are the arbitrary markers in which only one primer is used [3]. Different types of molecular markers have been used in detecting differences between individuals [4].

The Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker is based on the amplification by PCR of random DNA segments, using single primers of arbitrary nucleotide sequence. The amplified DNA fragments, referred to as RAPD markers, were shown to be highly useful in the construction of genetic maps. With RAPD method the resulted polymorphisms are detected by electrophoresis as different DNA fragments. The different DNA fragments are generated once the primers used usually anneal with multiple sites in different regions of the genome, producing multiple amplified products that often contain repetitive DNA sequences [5]. DNA fingerprinting techniques such as RAPD permits to identify taxa and to determine the phylogenetic relationships for systematic analysis [6].

Reproducible RAPD markers have been used to study genetic variability and evolutionary basis among the Malvaceae family, most especially the genus Gossypium [3]. It has also proven to be an efficient molecular technique for genetic fingerprinting of the cotton cultivars [7]. There are few studies on Roselle at the molecular level, Hussein et al. [8] noted that different primers showed distinct difference in the Roselle genotypes studied. In addition, Omalsaad et al. [9] used PCR based RAPD analysis to study genetic relationship among roselle and kenaf accessions from different parts of the world, including Nigeria. They found out that RAPD analysis is very efficient in showing similarities and differences among the accessions; this was because of high level of polymorphism detected by the DNA marker. Also, Prasad [10], successfully used RAPD molecular marker to characterize and determine the genetic diversity among Hibiscus species. He opined that, RAPD technique can be said to be reliable and promising for the characterisation of the Hibiscus germplasm and therefore Sequence Characterised Amplified Regions (SCAR) primers can be easily designed for many of these Hibiscus varieties and species. He concluded that RAPD markers have the potential for identification and characterisation of genetic variation within the varieties in a species.

Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.), an important member of the family Malvaceae, is a crop of great economic importance in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Nigeria, both the leaves and calyxes are consumed by the people [11]; they are rich sources of anti-oxidants, riboflavin, ascorbic acid, niacin, and carotene that are nutritionally important as well as amino acids and mineral salts [12]. The annual production of the crop worldwide is said to be very low; this is as a result of lack of improved varieties available to the Roselle farmers. In addition, the knowledge about the genetic diversity of the crop is scanty, and the data collected from the peasant Roselle farmers as regards that, are unreliable. For these reasons, the crop has a great economic potential in Nigerian Crop Improvement Programmes (NCIP), which is aimed at the development of varieties with a high content of important phytochemicals for nutritional and medicinal purposes. These are of great economic value for income generation to Nigerian farmers in particular and Nigerian government in general.

The knowledge of genetic diversity of this crop is very important in Nigeria, as it is the key factor towards the improvement of the crop. The advent of different molecular techniques has led plant breeders to estimate genetic diversity on the basis of data generated by different molecular markers, which provide a means of rapid analysis of germplasm which often corroborate phenotypic data. In addition, molecular marker-based genetic diversity is necessary for genetic mapping and marker-assisted selection in breeding. As imperative as the genetic improvement of Roselle may be, it can only be achieved when predicated on a good knowledge of baseline information regarding the existing germ-lines in the country; of course, such information is presently lacking in Nigeria. Therefore, this study is germane in addressing the current challenges facing the crop in other to bring about the improvement of the crop in Nigeria in the future. The aim of this study is to evaluate the genetic diversity existing among Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn.) Germplasm in Nigeria, using molecular characterisation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Characterisation using RAPD Molecular Markers

The different accessions of Hibiscus sabdariffa collected were subjected to DNA extraction using a modified procedure of [13]. This was done at the Genetic Engineering Laboratory, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan. For the DNA analysis and extraction procedures, approximately 1.5g of leaf tissue from each sample was ground in liquid nitrogen inside a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube to which 700 μl of pre-heated plant extraction buffer was added. The tubes were incubated at 65°C for 20 minutes with regular mixing by occasionally inverting the tubes to homogenise the samples. The tubes were removed, allowed to cool for 2 minutes and 500 μl of ice-cold 5 M Potassium acetate added and incubated on ice for 20 minutes to precipitate protein.

They were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 mins and the supernatants were transferred into freshly labelled tubes. Seven hundred (700) μl of Chloroform-Isoamyalcohol mixture in the ratio 24:1 was added and mixed gently to further precipitate protein and lipids. The tubes were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 mins and the supernatants transferred into new tubes. Five hundred (500) μl of ice-cold Isopropanol was added, mixed gently by inverting the tube and incubated in -80oC for 15mins to precipitate the DNA. Tubes were centrifuge at 12000 rpm for 10 mins and the supernatants were decanted to the last drop leaving the DNA pellet at the bottom of the tube. One hundred (100) μl of 70 % ethanol was added to wash the DNA pellet. The tubes were centrifuged and the ethanol decanted. The pellets were air dried until no trace of ethanol was found in the tubes. Ultra-pure water (60µl) was added to re-suspend the DNA to which 2 μl of RNase was added. This was incubated in 37°C for 30 minutes. The DNA quality was checked on 0.8 % Agarose and Nanodrop Spectrophotometer ND-1000 was used to quantify the DNA. The DNAs were stored in -20°C.

2.2. PCR Amplification using RAPD Primers

PCR amplification was performed in a 25µl reaction volume which contained 2.0 μl of template DNA, 2.5 μl of 10X buffer, 1.2 μl 50 mM MgCl₂, 1 μl of DMSO, 2.0 μl of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.2 μl of Taq polymerase and 10 μl of RAPD primer. The PCR cycle was carried out in a 9700 Applied Biosystems Thermal Cycler as follows: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 minutes followed by 45 cycles of 94°C for 20 seconds, 37°C annealing for 40 seconds and 72°C for 1 min and a final step of 72°C for 7 min extension. The product was stored at 4°C and loaded on 2 % Agarose gel, stained with Ethidium Bromide and it was run at 80 Volts for 4 hrs. The molecular fragments were estimated using 50 base pair (bp) standard size marker. Photographs of the probes were taken under the UV light.

2.3. Data Analyses

For the DNA scoring and analyses, various bands shown on the gel were scored for both the control and other treatments. Presence of an allele was scored one (1) while absence earned zero (0). The data obtained were subjected to analyses using Darwin 5.0 software by [14]. Dice Dissimilarity index was used to calculate dissimilarity values between the germ-lines. Cluster diagram was drawn using Unweighted Pair Group Method Average (UPGMA). Estimates of genetic and environmental parameters were used to evaluate the breeding chances of these traits.

3. Results

3.1. DNA Fingerprint using RAPD Amplification

In the present study, five RAPD primers i.e. OPH05, OPB17, OPT17, OPB11 and OPB04 with their respective DNA sequences (-51 - GGG TTT GGC A-3¹, - 51 -AGG GAA CGA G - 3¹, - 5¹-CCA ACG-TCG T - 3¹, -51 - GTA GAC CCG T- 3¹ and 51 - GGA CTG GAG T - 3¹) were used to differentiate among the twenty roselle accessions; their polymorphism for each of the primers are presented in Table 1. The RAPD primers amplified 30 reproducible fragments of which 100 % were polymorphic. The data matrix of the RAPD-PCR for the twenty roselle accessions which indicates the behaviours of each of the primers and their replicates is shown in Table 2. It clearly indicates how the primers produced the polymorphic bands mentioned earlier.

Table 1. Polymorphic bands produced by the RAPD primers in the Roselle accessions

Table 2. Data Matrix of RAPD-PCR for the twenty H. sabdariffa accessions studied

The result showed that OPH05 produced a total number of 4 bands of which all are polymorphic while OPB17 produced a total number of 12 bands, which are all polymorphic too. Similarly, OPT17 produced a total of 6 polymorphic bands and there was no monomorphic band obtained. In the same vein, OPB11 and OPB04 both produced 4 reproducible bands each, all which are polymorphic. This showed that for polymorphism of all the twenty roselle accessions under study, all the primers yielded a maximum polymorphism of 100%. All the primers gave reproducible results but the best primer used to differentiate was primer OPT17. In addition, OPT17 also gave the highest genetic diversity and polymorphic information content (0.79 and 0.78 respectively), Table 3.

Table 3. Major allelic frequency, Allele number, Gene diversity and Polymorphic Information Content detected by each of the DNA primers

The Dice Dissimilarity index for the calculation of distances among the roselle accessions revealed an interesting phenomenon. A clear divergence among the H. sabdariffa accessions was found. The dissimilarity index ranged from 0-1, which revealed a wide range of genetic identity (Table 4). Dissimilarity coefficient of accession NGR-HS-017 was the highest (1.00); this accession was totally different or genetically distance from all the other accessions. In addition, a high dissimilarity index (1.00) was also obtained among some of the accessions; NGR-HS-018 was highly dissimilar from NGR-HS-002, NGR-HS-012 and NGR-HS-016 (Table 4). However, a quite number of the accessions showed moderately low to zero dissimilarity indices. NGR-HS-001 and NGR-HS-003 showed zero dissimilarity index, showing how closely related they are at molecular level. Also, NGR-HS-013 and NGR-HS-014 (0.40 dissimilarity index); NGR-HS-001 and NGR-HS-002 (0.40 dissimilarity index); NGR-HS-003 and NGR-HS-005 (0.40 dissimilarity index); while NGR-HS-001 showed a very low (0.20) dissimilarity index with NGR-HS-006 and NGR-HS-007. Similarly, NGR-HS-008 and NGR-HS-019 as well as NGR-HS-010 and NGR-HS-012 showed a very low (0.2) dissimilarity index. On the other hand, NGR-HS-008 showed a relatively high (0.8) dissimilarity index with most of accession; also NGR-HS-018 showed a relatively high dissimilarity index with most of the accessions (Table 4). The similarity matrix was obtained after multivariant analysis as shown in Table 4; this was used to prepare an un-weighted pair group method of arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram and has been presented in Figure 1. This dissimilarity matrix indicated segregation among the different accessions of H. sabdariffa.

Figure 1. Dendrogram based on UPGMA analysis of genetic dissimilarity of Roselle accessions, showing relationships among them

Table 4. Dice Dissimilarity index among the twenty Roselle accessions

The dendrogram showed five major clusters; the first major cluster contains only accession NGR-HS-017 (a green roselle type with large lobed leaves and green calyces). The second major cluster contains NGR-HS-019 (a green roselle type with lobed leaves and green calyces) and NGR-HS-008 (a deep red roselle type with lobed leaves and deep red calyces). This was followed by the third cluster, containing NGR-HS-004 (a deep red roselle type with large lobed leaves and deep red calyces) and NGR-HS-018 (a green roselle with large lobed leaves and green calyces). The fourth cluster contains NGR-HS-020 (a green roselle type with tiny lobed leaves and green calyces). The fifth and last cluster was broadly divided into two large groups; the first group was further divided into three sub-groups containing NGR-HS-009, NGR-HS-011 and NGR-HS-15 for the first subgroup. The second sub-group contains only NGR-HS-005 only, while the last sub-group contains NGR-HS-016, NGR-HS-002, NGR-HS-003, NGR-HS-001, NGR-HS-006 and NGR-HS-007. The second large group of the fifth cluster is further divided into two sub-groups. The first sub-group contains NGR-HS-012 and NGR-HS-010, while the second sub-group contains NGR-HS-014 and NGR-HS-013.

4. Discussion

4.1. Genetic Diversity of the Roselle Accessions using RAPD Markers

Genetic diversity and genetic relationship have been widely studied using RAPD markers in a number of plant species. For example, [9] in Hibiscus spp; [15] in Olea europaea; [16] in Allium sativum.

The high level of polymorphism reported demonstrated that Nigerian Roselle accessions are genetically heterogenous, confirming that they are highly variable species which supported the grouping of the different roselle types based on some morphometric parameters. The result is slightly different from that of [17], who reported a very low genetic diversity (0.02-0.09 dissimilarities) among ninety-four roselle accessions from Thailand. [9], had earlier reported that there exist a wide range of genetic identity among roselle accessions and concluded that roselle had relatively low genetic variation. This present results disagrees with that general conclusion by [9]; this might be due partly to the higher number of accessions studied in this present work. The presence of genetic similarities among some of the accessions as shown from the result might be recorded for high rates of gene flow, genetic exchange and the presence of natural selection on the species. Similar conclusion had been drawn by [18]. However, this present work is in perfect agreement with the work of [19] and [20] on H. sabdariffa.

It is also evident from the present results that RAPD molecular marker was able to detect small genetic differences among the Nigerian Roselle accessions. Similar reports on the ability of RAPD in detecting genetic diversity in crops have been reported by [9] and [19]. The clustering together might have been recorded for their similarities in leaf shapes and some other morphological parameters; Ahmed [20] had also reported that some green roselle types and coloured roselle types have been clustered together when he used both RAPD and ISSR molecular markers to study the genetic diversity in the crop. Natural hybridization and selection between genetically related accessions like NGR-HS-001 and NGR-HS-016 could have led to the evolution of NGR-HS-002 which is genetically related to both accessions. Similarly, study of the diversity among the accessions using only the morphological characteristics is not reliable. This is because most of the quantitative traits are influenced by environmental factors, thus, they vary a lot between species [21]. Therefore, data obtained from this research demonstrated that morphological analysis followed with RAPD molecular marker analysis are very valuable for determining relationships among H. sabdariffa accessions similar assertions have been made by [9] and [21]. It is therefore concluded that RAPD-PCR analysis provided very valuable means for determining relationships among H. sabdariffa accessions. Wide genetic variability observed among the Roselle accessions could be exploited in different breeding programs of the crop. Therefore, other DNA markers like SSR and RFLP should be used to ascertain these levels of relationships.

We are grateful to the Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria for providing the necessary laboratory facilities. To Tertiary Education Trust Fund who sponsored part of the research, we are grateful.

References

[1]   | G. Kahl, The dictionary of gene technologies. Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics. (3rd Ed). Volume 1 and 2. Verlag, Gmb H & Co. KGaA. Weinheim: Wiley – VCH (2004) 1916pp
[2]   | S. Joshi, P. Ranjekar, V. Gupta, Molecular markers in plant genome analysis. Current Science, 77 (2000) 231-240.
[3]   | A. Dongre, V. Parkhi, S. Gahukr, Characterisation of Cotton (Gossypium hirsitum) germplasm by ISSR, RAPD markers and agronomic values. Indian Journal of Biotech. (2004) 388-393.
[4]   | R. Bernardo, Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sciences, 48 (2008) 1649-1664.
[5]   | I. Paran, W.R. Michelmore, Development of reliable PCR-based markers linked todowny mildew resistance genes in lettuce. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 85 (1993) 985-993.
[6]   | J. G. K.Williams, A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski, S. V. Tingey, DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Research, 18 (1993) 6531-6535.
[7]   | D. S. Multani, B. R. Lyon, Genetic fingerprinting of Australian cotton cultivars with RAPD markers, Genome. 38 (1995) 1005-1008.
[8]   | R. M. Hussein, E. S. Yasser, E. E. Amr, M. A. Hanem, Biochemical and molecular characterisation of three colored types of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Journal of American Science, 6(11) (2010) 726-733.
[9]   | A. K. M. Omalsaad, I. Aminu, A. J. Murshida, Y. Zahira, O. Mohamad, Genetic relationship between roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) and kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) accessions through optimization of PCR based RAPD method. Emirate Journal of Food and Agriculture, 26(3) (2014) 247-258.
[10]   | M. P. Prasad, Molecular characterisation and genetic diversity determination of Hibiscus species using RAPD molecular markers. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 4(3) (2014) 50-56.
[11]   | O.A.Y. Daudu, O.A. Falusi, M.C. Dangana, A. Abubakar, S.A. Yahya, D.R., Abejide, Collection and Evaluation of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) Germplasm in Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science, 9(3) (2015) 92-96.
[12]   | G. M. Anjah, O. Y. Ogunsanwo, S. O. Jimoh, J. N. Farjoh, F. M. Tsombow, Assessment of regeneration potential of Hibiscus sabdariffa L, under established ecosystem in Cameroon. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry. 4(6) (2012) 96-102.
[13]   | K. Edwards, C. Johnstone, C.A. Thompson, A simple and rapid method for preparation of Plant Genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 19 (1991) 13-49.
[14]   | X. Perrier, J.P. Jacquemoud-Collet, DARwin software (2006). Available online at http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin. Retrieve on 11th July, 2014.
[15]   | M. Shahriari, A. Omrani, A., Falahati-Ambaran, B. Gharayezei, A. Nankali, Identification of Iranian Olive cultivars by using RAPD and Microsatellite Markers. Acta Horticulturae, 791 (2008) 109-115.
[16]   | A. Pardo, A. Hernandez, N. Mendez, Caracterizacion molecular de siete clones de ajo (Alliumsativum L.) mediente la tecnica RAPD. Bioagro, 21(2) (2009) 81-86.

[17]  
Y. Hanboonsong, T. Vinijsanum, W. Ponragdee. Molecular characterisation and Genetic Relationships of Roselle Germplasm in Thailand. Proceedings of the Final Workshop on ‘Application of Biotechnology in the Improvement of Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres-Phase II’, (IJO/AGR/10). Beijing, China, (2000) 95-106.

[18]   | S. Rajasekar, S. Fei, E.C. Nick, Analysis of genetic diversity in rough bluegrass determined by RAPD markers. Crop Science, 46(2005). 162-167.
[19]   | M. H. Rafaei, E.S.Yasser, E.E. Amr, M.A. Hanem, Biochemical and molecular characterisation of three colored types of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Journal of American Science, 6(11) (2010) 726-733.
[20]   | F. A. K. Ahmed, Molecular Genetic Identification of Some Egyptian Hibiscus Samples. Journal of American Science, 9(10) (2013) 28-35.
[21]   | B.Seeruttum, V.M. Ranghoo-Sanmukiya, (2013). Molecular characterisation of some Hibiscus species cultivated in Mauritius. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research, 2(3), 358-366.