Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Flowering Stage Soil Bacterial Diversity as Affected by Long-term Tillage and Crop Residue Retention

Eunice Essel*, Lingling Li, Jicheng Shen

College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, No.1 Yingmencun, Anning District, Lanzhou 730070, P.R. China

Abstract: Tillage practises can affect the soil microbes and edaphic properties. The research was aimed to assess the influence of tillage and stubble retention on the soil bacterial diversity and soil properties at the flowering stage of the field pea (Pisum arvense L.) in a rotation system with spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment had four treatments; no-tillage with stubble removed (NT), no-tillage with stubble retained (NTS), conventional tillage with stubble removed (T), and conventional tillage with stubble incorporated (TS). Microbial genes in top bulk soil and rhizosphere soils were sequenced using bacterial 16S rRNA (V3V4) genes. Soil from NT and NTS recorded high number of bacterial 16S rRNA operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and the bacterial community in the 0-10 cm top soil varied significantly. Bacterial diversity indices in the bulk soil were greater compared to the rhizosphere. The predominant bacterial groups were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria. Bacterial classes correlated with soil temperature, nitrogen, and organic carbon, Olsen phosphorus and microbial biomass carbon in bulk and rhizosphere soil. The results showed the benefits of long-term tillage and crop residue and their influence on soil properties and microbial diversity in semi-arid environments.

Keywords: bacterial diversity, 16S rRNA, tillage, crop residue, soil properties

Received November 15, 2023; Revised December 17, 2023; Accepted December 24, 2023

Citation: Eunice Essel, Lingling Li, Jicheng Shen, Flowering Stage Soil Bacterial Diversity as Affected by Long-term Tillage and Crop Residue Retention. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 11 (4). 98-106. January 2023. doi:10.12691/wjar-11-4-2

1. Introduction

Tillage is used to optimize soil conditions such as water, temperature, and nutrient availability for crop production [1]. However, tillage can have a harmful impact on soil physicochemical properties by aggravating soil erosion and degradation and cause changes in the composition and structure of soil microbiome [2]. Crop residue retention, crop rotation, and no-tillage on the other hand, are practises that protect against soil erosion, conserve soil water and nutrients, and enhance microbial biomass and processes [3]. Authors [4,5] have found increased bacterial alpha diversity in no-tillage relative to conventional tillage. Furthermore, Author [6] reported that no-tillage with stubble retained treatment had significantly improved bacterial diversity in top soil compared to conventional tillage with all stubble removed, but the composition of the microbial community was not significantly different. The effects of conservation tillage practices such as crop residue retention and no-tillage on soil microbes are complex to explain [7]. However, residue retention in no-tillage system has proven to be an effective method for reusing crop residues, improve soil fertility and boost crop productivity [8]. Many studies have showed that residue retention not only increases the soil carbon [9] but improves the soil function. Conservation tillage methods improve soil carbon through minimal soil disturbance and slow organic carbon decomposition rate [10]. Thus, agriculture practices that create changes in soil nutrient levels may influence microbial communities and the nutrients [11]. The microbial community is critical in determining soil function and the sustainability of agroecosystems because it plays a key role in organic matter breakdown and mineralization [12]. Change in the soil microbiome could affect soil chemical properties such as pH and other intermediate nutrient cycle processes [13,14].

The Loess Plateau of China is one of the major regions selected for national conservation because region is affected by soil erosion [15], low precipitation and high evaporation which causes crop yield [16]. Therefore, the application of conservation tillage methods has become an effective means to improve soil quality for crop production in the region. Past research in the Loess Plateau has employed conservation tillage methods to improve soil physical properties and nutrient levels for sustainable crop production [17]. Authors [18] found that no-tillage with crop residue retained significantly increased soil microbial biomass carbon [19]. However, there is limited research on the effects of tillage practices on microbial diversity indices and their relation with soil physical (moisture and temperature) and chemical (major soil nutrients) changes during the crop growing season. There is also, the need to understand the relationship between tillage practice and microbial diversity in the region in order ensure sustainable management of the soil physical and chemical environment of the semi-arid Loess Plateau. Therefore, the study aimed to (i) determine the diversity of bacteria in the flowering stage bulk soil and rhizosphere as affected by crop residue and tillage, and (ii) explore the relationships among soil bacterial composition and physicochemical properties. We hypothesized that no-tillage and crop residue retention increase microbial diversity and also improve soil physicochemical properties. This research will help explain the relationships between soil indices and changes in bacterial community composition as affected by different tillage practices studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

This study was conducted in the year 2018 at the Rainfed Agricultural Experimental Station (35°28′N, 104°44′E, elevation 1971 m above sea level) of Gansu Agricultural University, Dingxi, P.R. China, within the long-term experiment that was initiated in 2001. Before the initiation of the experiment, the site had a long history of continuous of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) cropping under traditional tillage method. The soil in the area has a sandy loam texture and is a Calcaric Cambisol [20]. The soil at depth of 0-30 cm had <14.79 g kg⁻¹ organic carbon and a pH of 8.45 in 2015. The study area has a mean long-term (2001 to 2018) annual rainfall of 390.9 mm, a minimum monthly air temperature of -22oC in January, and a maximum monthly air temperature of 38oC in July.

2.2. Design of Experiment

The experiment utilised a factorial arrangement of two levels of tillage (T), two levels of stubble management (S), and two phases of field pea (Pisum arvense L.) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop rotation within a complete randomised block with three replications. The four combinations of tillage and stubble treatments were, no-tillage with stubble removed (NT), no-tillage with stubble retained (NTS), conventional tillage with stubble removed (T) and conventional tillage with stubble incorporated (TS). For the T treatment, all crop residues (i.e., stubble) were removed immediately after grain harvest, and tillage involved moldboard plowing in the fall to a depth of 20 cm and harrowing in the spring before sowing. In the plots with the TS treatment, all crop stubble was returned to the plots and was incorporated into the soil by moldboard plowing in the fall to a depth of 20 cm and harrowing in the spring before sowing. For the NT treatment, all crop stubble was removed immediately after harvest and there were no tillage operations in the fall or spring. In plots with the NTS treatment, all crop stubble from previous season’s crops were returned to the plots and retained on the soil surface and there was no tillage operation in the fall or spring. Each year, pea (cv. Yannong) and spring wheat (cv. Dingxi No. 35) were seeded in a two-year rotation, with the two phases of rotation present.

Each year, field peas were planted in April at a rate of 180 kg ha⁻¹ with a row spacing of 24 cm and harvested in July. Spring wheat was sown in mid-March at a rate of 187.5 kg ha⁻¹ with a row spacing of 20 cm and harvested in late July to early August. Chemical nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers were applied as urea (46% N) and calcium superphosphate (6.1% P₂O₅) were applied in sowing in all plots with no-tillage seeder at a rate of 105 kg N ha⁻¹ and 45.9 kg P₂O₅ ha⁻¹ for spring wheat and 20 kg N ha⁻¹ and 45.9 kg P₂O₅ ha⁻¹ for pea.

2.3. Soil Sampling

Soil was collected from plots at the 60-70% flowering stage of the pea phase planted to pea in 2018. A total of three soil cores were randomly collected from each plot from the depths of rhizosphere and the 0-10 and 10-30 cm of bulk soil. A composite sample was obtained for each plot. The composite sample was stored on dry ice and taken to the laboratory, where they were frozen at -80oC until molecular analysis. Other sub-samples were stored at 4oC for biological property analysis while other sub samples apportioned for chemical analyses were air-dried.

2.4. Soil Moisture and Temperature

Moisture content and temperature were measured throughout the planting season of the experimental year. Soil moisture in the 0–5 and 5–10 cm soil was estimated using the oven-drying method at 105oC for 24 hours. A Trime–Pico IPH (Precise Soil Moisture Measurement, IMKO Micromodultechnik GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) was used to determine volumetric soil water in 10-30 cm soil. Soil temperature at the 5, 10, and 15 cm depths was determined employing geothermometers fixed at random locations in each plot.

2.5. Soil Chemical Analyses

The soil pH was determined in a soil:water ratio of 1:2.5 (water:volume) [21]. The pH metre (Sartorius PB–10, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) was used to obtain the values. A modified wet oxidation method described by Walkley-Black was used to determine total organic carbon (TOC) [22]. Total nitrogen (TN) was determined by Kjeldahl Method [23]. The chloroform fumigation and extraction method was used to determine soil microbial biomass nitrogen and carbon (SMBN /SMBC) [24]. The Olsen phosphorus (P) method was used to determine the available P in the soil [25]. The protocol in [26] was used to determine soil nitrate-nitrogen (NO₃¯-N) and ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N) based on 2M KCl extraction.

2.6. DNA Sequencing

Soil microbial DNA extraction and amplification were done following the protocol in [6]. Illumina HiSeq sequencing was used to sequence the V3V4 16S rRNA of bacteria in each replicate sample. Assemblage of paired-end reads was done with PANDAseq software [27]. Chimera was removed with USEARCH v7 [28] using the Denovo method. Unique sequences were clustered at a cutoff of 97% similarity into representative operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UPARSE software [29]. UCLUST was used to compare the representative sequences with bacterial 16S rRNA databases to classify OTUs. The SILVA rRNA databases were used to match 16S rRNA sequences. Diversity indices such as Chao1 richness, observed species, Shannon, and Simpson were estimated using QIIME software. Paleontological Statistics Software Package (PAST) version 3 [30] was used to perform permutation analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) to measure the effects of treatments on the microbial community. Mantel tests [31] were performed in PAST to identify soil physical and chemical properties attributes that correlated with microbiome composition (abundance of OTUs).

2.7. Data Analysis

The software SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform a variance analysis of variance at P < 0.05 and compare treatment means for soil chemical properties and microbial diversity indices. Treatment means were compared by post hoc analysis using Tukey’s HSD Test (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis was performed between tillage and stubble effects, soil physicochemical properties, soil respiration, total carbon emission, and class level bacterial abundance.

3. Results

3.1. Soil Physicochemical Properties as Affected by Treatments

The management of tillage and stubble influenced soil moisture during the planting season (Figure 1a). Soil moisture content in the 0-5, 5-10, and 10-30 cm soil was significantly different among treatments. No-tillage with stubble retained increased soil moisture content by 7.5% in the 0-5 cm and by 10.0% in the 5-10 cm soil and decreased it in the 10-30 cm by 11.0% compared with T. The mean soil moisture at depths did not differ significantly between treatments. Tillage and stubble influenced soil temperature and the temperature increased progressively during the growing season (Figure 1b). The soil temperature in the 0-5, 5-10 and 10-15 cm soil did not differ significantly with the treatments. No-tillage with stubble retained decreased soil temperature in the 0-5, 5-10, and 10-15 cm soil by 4.9, 1.4, and 3.6oC, respectively, compared with T. The mean soil temperature at the depths were not significantly different among treatments.

Figure 1. Soil moisture content (a) and temperature (b) as affected by tillage and stubble treatment during the growing season

Most chemical soil indices determined in the bulk soil varied significantly with treatments (Table 1). However, NO₃¯ -N, soil pH and NH₄⁺ -N in the 0-10 cm depth and soil pH in the 10-30 cm soil were not significantly different among treatments. Soil Olsen P, TN, TOC, SMBN and SMBC in the soil 0-10 cm were significantly higher with conservation tillage treatments (NTS and NT), while TN, TOC, Olsen P, SMBN and NO₃¯ -N in the 10-30 cm soil were greater with TS. In the soil of 0-10 cm, NTS increased TOC by 33% compared to T, NT increased TN by 24% and SMBN by 21.5% compared to TS, NT increased Olsen P by 11.9% compared to T, and NTS increased SMBC by 17.1% compared to TS. However, in the 10-30 cm soil, TS increased TOC by 12.1%, TN by 11.6%, and SMBN by 54.9% compared to T, TS increased Olsen P by 27.7% and NO₃¯ -N by 20% compared to NT, T increased NH₄⁺ -N by 73.9% compared to TS, and NT increased SMBC by 35.6% compared to TS. T.

3.2. Soil Microbial Community Diversity as Affected by Treatments

The number of high-quality gene sequences obtained was 35,307-46,949 for bacterial 16S rRNA in bulk soil and 31,352-55,960 for bacterial 16S rRNA in rhizosphere soil. At 97% similarity cutoff, a number of subsampled sequences equivalent to the minimum number of reads per sample gave the representative OTUs used for the statistical analysis. Bacterial OTUs in the 0-10 cm top soil was 5.5-10.4% higher in NTS compared to T (Table 2). In the 10-30 cm soil, NTS increased bacterial 16S OTUs by 1.9-9.7% compared with TS. However, soil sampled from the 10-30 cm soil in all treatments had 7.6-8.3% greater 16S OTUs which mostly translated into corresponding higher diversity indices. For soil in the rhizosphere, 16S OTUs increased 4.6-5.1% with NT when compared to T (Table 3). Bacterial 16S OTUs in the 0-10 cm top soil differed significantly between treatments. Bacterial 16S observed species and Shannon index in the 0-10 cm top soil and Chao1 richness of rhizosphere soils differed significantly among treatments. The 16S OTUs in the 0-10 cm soil was 14% (T), 14.1% (NT), 15% (TS), and 21.1% (NTS) higher compared with rhizosphere soil. Tillage significantly affected bacterial 16S number of OTU, observed species, chao1 richness, and Shannon index in the 0-10 cm top soil (Table 3). In the 10-30 cm soil, tillage significantly influenced bacteria observed species and the Shannon and Simpson indices.

Table 1. Effect of tillage (T) and stubble (S) treatment on soil chemical properties in the bulk soil

Table 2. Effect of tillage (T) and stubble (S) treatment on bacterial 16S rRNA diversity indices in bulk soil

Table 3. Effect of tillage (T) and stubble (S) treatment on bacterial 16S rRNA diversity indices in rhizosphere soil

Figure 2. Operational taxonomic units abundance of Phylum level of bacterial 16S rRNA in the rhizosphere soil (a) and top bulk soil (b) as affected by tillage and stubble treatment

3.3. Soil Microbial Community Composition

The main representative bacterial phyla identified across treatments in bulk soil and rhizosphere soil were Acidobacteria (15.1-24.7%), Proteobacteria (14.5-23.4%), Actinobacteria (13.0-27.0%), Bacteroidetes (6.1-13.2%), Planctomycetes (9.4-5.6%) and Gemmatimonadetes (5.7-11.3%) (Figure 2a, b). Minor representative bacterial phyla such as Chloroflexi, Verrucomicrobia, Armatimonadetes, Nitrospirae, Cyanobacteria, Chlorobi, Firmicutes, unidentified bacteria were also identified in low abundance.

The five predominant bacterial classes in the 0-30 cm top bulk soil and rhizosphere soil according to percentage abundance were class Subgroup 6, Alphaproteobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Sphingobacteriia and Actinobacteria. The dominant bacterial genera included RB41, Sphingomonas, Streptomyces, Adhaeribacter, and Nocardioides. The abundance of bacterial classes was usually <21.5 whereas the abundance of bacterial genera was <12% in the rhizosphere and bulk soils but was not significantly different between treatments.

3.4. Association Between Soil Microbial Diversity and Soil Properties

PERMANOVA pairwise tests did not show a significant influence of treatments on soil bacterial communities (Table 4). The ANOSIM showed that bacterial communities were highly separated among treatments. Mantel tests showed few significant correlations among microbial OTUs abundance and the measured parameters. The bacterial community had a significant correlation (Mantel tests) with TOC in the 0-10 cm soil and SMBC in both soil depth (Table 5). Pearson’s correlation analyses were also conducted to further assess the association between soil properties and bacterial classes (Table 6, and 7). Several bacterial classes had significant positive and negative correlation (r ≥ 0.578 or r ≤ -0.588 and P < 0.01 or P < 0.05) with the soil properties studied.

Table 4. Matrices of PERMANOVA and ANOSIM for tillage and crop residue effects on bacterial and fungal communities in the top bulk soil and rhizosphere soil

Table 5. Correlations (R) and significance (P) determined by Mantel tests between soil microbial community composition (abundance of operational taxonomic units) and soil properties in the top bulk soil and in rhizosphere soil

Table 6. Pearson’s correlation between bacterial classes, tillage (T) and stubble (S) effect, temperature, moisture and chemical properties in bulk soil

Table 7. Pearson’s correlation between bacterial classes, tillage (T) and stubble (S) effect, temperature, moisture and chemical properties in rhizosphere soil

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Tillage and Crop Residue on Soil Microbial Diversity

In this study, soil microbial OTUs and diversity indices such as Chao1 richness, observed species, Simpson and Shannon indices were generally greatest with NTS and NT for bacterial 16S genes in the top soil and rhizosphere. Similar findings from previous studies were reported by [32]. The alpha diversity was increased in the 10-30 cm soil for all treatments when compared to 0-10 cm soil and this could be attributed to the relatively undisturbed subsoil layer; thus, soil depth and tillage may affect microbial diversity [33]. Tillage significantly influenced the soil bacterial community in the top soil. The main effect of stubble management and the interaction between stubble management and tillage significantly influenced bacterial community composition during the growing season. Bacteria associate with highly disturbed ecosystems with rapid nutrient recycling, whereas fungi tend to be associated with soil that has been undisturbed [34]; this may help explain the tillage and stubble management effects in this study. Author [35] found that soil bacteria exhibited temporal dependency on tillage and crop residue management has less influence on the soil bacterial community composition. Crop residues serve as carbon source for soil microbiome and lack of tillage reduces the destruction of soil aggregates and subsequent disturbance of soil microbial communities. Many bacterial groups can breakdown recalcitrant carbon source such lignin in crop residues and soil organic matter [36], making them the main decomposition drivers in soil [37]. This may partly explain the increased microbial diversity under the crop residue retention treatment which was in combination with no-tillage.

4.2. Soil Microbial Community Composition

The predominant bacterial phyla in our research indicated that all treatments had common phyla in varying percentage abundance. These dominant groups of bacteria (Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, and Planctomycetes) are reported as common and abundant phyla in different tillage systems and ecosystems [38]. At the genus level, RB41 (phylum Acidobacteria) was associated with no-tillage and tilled treatments [39], but its abundance was increased in bulk soil than rhizosphere soil. Streptomyces (class Actinobacteria) occurred at relatively greater abundance in rhizosphere soil than in their bulk soil. Rhizobium (class Alphaproteobacteria) occurred in the rhizosphere soil [40] at lower abundance, but it was absent in bulk soil in the present study.

4.3. Association Between Soil Microbial Diversity and Soil Properties

Soil temperature and moisture levels are the most important environmental agent affecting microbial growth and activity that shapes the soil microbiome [41]. Author [42] observed that concentrations of bacteria cell components were greater at higher temperatures and moderate moisture. Soil moisture content also regulate the effects of temperature on soil microorganisms [43]. The top soil Olsen P, TN, TOC, SMBN and SMBC in were significantly increased with conservation tillage treatments in the study. Soil chemical properties are indicators of soil quality, sustainable crop production and affect soil function and microbial processes [44]. Microbial abundance in bulk soil in this was significantly associated with TN, TOC, Olsen P, and SMBC, and occasionally associated with pH. The microbial community in rhizosphere soil was mostly associated with Olsen P. The results suggest that soil bacterial community composition at the study site could be driven by these soil properties and may also be involved in the cycling of the nutrients [45].

5. Conclusion

No-tillage treatments (NTS and NT) increased bacterial 16S rRNA diversity. Tillage significantly influenced bacterial diversity in the 0-10 cm top soil. Soil microbial diversity was mostly associated with TOC, TN, Olsen P and SMBC in this study. The study highlights the benefit of residue retention and no-tillage in improving soil quality for sustainable agriculture.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31660373 and 31761143004), the Education Department of Gansu Province (grant 2017C-12), and the Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science Open Fund Project (grant GSCS-2013-13). We also thank the students from the Dingxi Rainfed Agricultural Experimental Station of Gansu Agricultural University for their assistance with the field and laboratory research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1]   | Mehra, P., Baker J., Sojka, R.E., Bolan, N., Desbiolles, J., Kirkham, M.B., Ross, C. and Gupta, R. “A Review of Tillage Practices and Their Potential to Impact the Soil Carbon Dynamics”. Advances in Agronomy, 150, 185-230, 2018.
[2]   | Dorr de Quadros, P., Zhalnina, K., Davis-Richardson, A., Fagen, J.R., Drew, J., Bayer, C., Camargo, F.A.O. and Triplett, E.W. “The effect of tillage system and crop rotation on soil microbial diversity and composition in a subtropical Acrisol”. Diversity, 4, 375-395, 2012.
[3]   | Feng, Y., Motta, A.C., Reeves, D.W., Burmester, C.H., van Santen, E. and Osborne, J.A. “Soil microbial communities under conventional-till and no-till continuous cotton systems”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 1693-1703, 2003.
[4]   | Dong, W., Liu, E., Yan, C., Zhang, H. and Zhang, Y. “Changes in the composition and diversity of topsoil bacterial, archaeal and fungal communities after 22 years conventional and no-tillage managements in Northern China”. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 63, 1369-1381, 2017.
[5]   | Liu, C., Li, L., Xie, J., Coulter, J.A., Zhang, R., Luo, Z., Cai, L., Wang, L., Gopalakrishnan, S. “Soil bacterial diversity and potential functions are regulated by long-term conservation tillage and straw mulching”. Microorganisms, 8, 836, 2020.
[6]   | Essel, E., Li, L., Deng, C., Xie, J., Zhang, R., Luo, Z. and Cai, L. “Evaluation Of Bacterial And Fungal Diversity In A Long-Term Spring Wheat – Field Pea Rotation Field Under Different Tillage Practices”. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 98, 619-637, 2018.

[7]  
Ng, J.P., Hollister, E.B., González-Chávez, C.A.M., Hons, F.M., Zuberer, D.A,, Aitkenhead-Peterson, J.A., Loeppert, R. and Gentry, T.J. “Impacts of Cropping Systems and Long-Term Tillage on Soil Microbial Population Levels and Community Composition in Dryland Agricultural Setting”. ISRN Ecology, 2012, 487370, 2012.

[8]   | Lehtinen, T., Schlatter, N., Baumgarten, A., Bechini, L., Krüger, J., Grignani, C., Zavattaro, L., Costamagna, C. and Spiegel, H. “Effect of crop residue incorporation on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in European agricultural soils”. Soil Use and Management, 30, 524-538, 2014.
[9]   | Malhi, S., Nyborg, M., Goddard, T. and Puurveen, D. “Long-term tillage, straw and N rate effects on quantity and quality of organic C and N in a Gray Luvisol soil'”. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 90, 21–22, 2011.
[10]   | Andruschkewitsch, R., Geisseler, D., Koch, H.J. and Ludwig, B. “Effects of tillage on contents of organic carbon, nitrogen, water-stable aggregates and light fraction for four different long-term trials”, Geoderma. 192, 368–377, 2013.
[11]   | Nimmo, J., Lynch, D.H. and Owen, J. “Quantification of nitrogen inputs from biological nitrogen fixation to whole farm nitrogen budgets of two dairy farms in Atlantic Canada”. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 96, 93-105, 2013.
[12]   | Phil, M., Cook, R. and Mizen, T. Biodiversity in Soils. IGER Innovations, 2001.
[13]   | Kaschuk, G., Alberton, O. and Hungria, M. “Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 1–13, 2010.
[14]   | Samad, M.S., Biswas, A., Bakken, L.R., Clough, T.J., de Klein, C.A.M., Richards, K.G., Lanigan, G.J. and Morales, S.E. “Phylogenetic and functional potential links pH and N₂O emissions in pasture soils”. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–9, 2016.
[15]   | Wang, X., Jiao, F., Li, X., and An, S. The Loess Plateau. In: Zhang, L., and Schwärzel, K., Eds, “Multifunctional land-use systems for managing the nexus of environmental resources”. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017, 11–27.
[16]   | He, L., Cleverly, J., Chen, C., Yang, X., Li, J., Liu, W., and Yu, Q. “Diverse responses of winter wheat yield and water use to climate change and variability on the semiarid Loess Plateau in China”. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1169–1178, 2014.
[17]   | Huang, G.B., Luo, Z.Z., Li, L.L., Zhang, R.Z., Li, G.D., Cai, L.Q. and Xie, J.H. “Effects of stubble management on soil fertility and crop yield of rainfed area in Western Loess Plateau, China”. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2012, 256312, 2012.
[18]   | Lu, X., Lu, X., Wen, X. and Liao, Y. “Tillage and straw affect soil CO₂ emissions in a rain-fed corn field”. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 7, 2353-2360, 2015.
[19]   | Yeboah, S., Zhang, R., Cai, L., Li, L., Xie, J., Luo, Z., Liu, J. and Wu, J. “Tillage effect on soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon and crop yield in spring wheat-field pea rotation”. Plant, Soil and Environment, 62, 279–285, 2016.
[20]   | Chinese Soil Taxonomy Cooperative Research Group Chinese Soil Taxonomy (Revised Proposal). Institute of Soil Science/Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Academic Sinica, Beijing, 1995.
[21]   | McLean, E.O. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. Eds, “Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2–Chemical and microbiological properties”. Agronomy Monograph 9. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, 1982, 199-224.
[22]   | Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.W. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page. A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R. Eds, “Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties”. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science, Wisconsin, 1982, 301-312.
[23]   | Bremner, J.M. Nitrogen total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, 1996, 1085.
[24]   | Ladd, J.N. and Amato, M. “Relationship between microbial biomass carbon in soils and absorbance of extracts of fumigated soils’. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 21, 57-459, 1989.
[25]   | Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular 939, 1954.
[26]   | Bremner, J.M. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. In: Black, C.A. Ed, “Methods of soil analysis”. American Society of Agronomy, Wisconsin, 1965, 1149-1178.
[27]   | Masella, A.P., Bartram, A.K., Truszkowski, J.M., Daniel, G. and Neufeld, J.D.B. “PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences”. BMC Bioinformtics, 13, 31, 2012.
[28]   | Edgar, R.C. “Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST”. Bioinformatics, 26, 2460-2461, 2010.
[29]   | Edgar RC. “UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads”. Nature Methods 10, 996-998, 2013.
[30]   | Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. and Ryan, P.D. “PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis”. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1-9, 2001.
[31]   | Xiang, X., Shi, Y., Yang, J., Kong, J., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Zeng, J. and Chu, H. “Rapid recovery of soil bacterial communities after wildfire in a Chinese boreal forest” Scientific Reports, 4, 3829, 2014.
[32]   | Sharma-Poudyal, D., Schlatter, D, Yin, C, Hulbert S and Paulitz T. “Long-term no-till: A major driver of fungal communities in dryland wheat cropping system”. PLoS ONE, 12, e0184611, 2017.
[33]   | Sipilä, T.P., Yrjälä, K., Alakukku, L. and Palojärvi, A. “Cross-Site Soil Microbial Communities under Tillage Regimes: Fungistasis and Microbial Biomarkers”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78, 8191-8201, 2012.
[34]   | Lavelle, P. and Spain, A.V. Soil Ecology. Springer, New Delhi, 2005.
[35]   | Degrune, F., Theodorakopoulos, N., Colinet, G., Hiel, M.P., Bodson, B., Taminiau, B., Daube, G., Vandenbol, M. and Hartmann, M. “Temporal dynamics of Soil Microbial Communities below the seed bed under Two Contrasting Tillage Regimes”. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 1127, 2017.
[36]   | Kameshwar, A.K. and Qin, W. “Recent developments in using advanced sequencing technologies for the genomic studies of lignin and cellulose degrading microorganisms”. International Journal of Biology Sciences, 12, 156-171, 2016.
[37]   | Bastian, F., Bouziri, L., Nicolardot, B. and Ranjard, L. “Impact of wheat straw decomposition on successional patterns of the structure of the soil microbial community”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 262-275, 2009.
[38]   | Nelson, M.B., Berlemont, R., Martiny, A.C., and Martiny, J.B.H. “Nitrogen Cycling Potential of a Grassland Litter Microbial Community”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 81, 7012-7022, 2015.
[39]   | Liu, H., Carvalhais, L.C., Crawford, M., Dang, Y.P., Dennis, P.G. and Schenk, P.M. “Strategic tillage increased the relative abundance of Acidobacteria but did not impact on overall soil microbial properties of a 19-year no-till Solonetz”. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 52, 1021-1035, 2016.
[40]   | Lagos, L., Maruyama, F., Nannipieri, P., Mora, M.L., Ogram, A. and Jorquera, M.A. “Current overview on the study of bacteria in the rhizosphere by modern molecular techniques: a mini‒review”. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15, 504-523, 2015.
[41]   | Paul, E.A. and Clark, F.E. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, USA, 1996.
[42]   | Zhou, W.P., Shen, W.J., Li, Y.E. and Hui, D.F. “Interactive effects of temperature and moisture on composition of the soil microbial community”. European Journal of Soil Science, 68, 909-918, 2017.
[43]   | Sheik, C.S., Beasley, W.H., Elshahed, M.S., Zhou, X., Luo, Y. and Krumholz, L.R. “Effect of warming and drought on grassland microbial communities”. The ISME Journal, 5, 1692-1700, 2011.
[44]   | Lauber, C.L., Hamady, M., Knight, R. and Fierer, N. “Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 5111-5120, 2009.
[45]   | Li, Q., Song, X., Gu, H. and Fei, G. “Nitrogen deposition and management practices increase soil microbial biomass carbon but decrease diversity in Moso bamboo plantations”. Scientific Reports, 6, 2823, 2016.