Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Functional Properties and Physicochemical Composition of Different Leaf Positions of Soft and Firm Flesh Trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Moraceae)

M.A.S.P.K. Mudugamuwa, R.M. Dharmadasa*, D.C. Abeysinghe

Industrial Technology Institute, Bauddhaloka Mawatha, Colombo, 00700, Sri Lanka

Abstract: The present study was undertaken to determine the functional properties and physicochemical composition of different leaf positions (Leaf bud, first leaf, second leaf, third leaf and fourth leaf) of soft (Wela) and firm (Waraka) flesh trees of jackfruit. Physicochemical composition, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC.) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were determined using the official AOAC method, Folin-Ciocalteu method, colourimetric method and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay respectively. Among the leaf bud and leaf blades, significantly highest TPC, TFC, and TAC. were observed in the second leaf blade of the soft flesh type, whereas the significantly highest TPC, TFC. and TAC. were recorded in the first leaf blade of the firm flesh type. Among the leaf petioles, significantly highest TPC, TFC. and TAC were observed in the fourth petiole of the soft flesh type, whereas, in the firm flesh type, the second petiole had significantly highest TPC, TFC. and TAC. However, the soft flesh type had more bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity compared to the firm flesh type. Higher crude protein content was observed in leaf buds, whereas higher moisture and ash content were observed in leaf petioles in both types. According to the results, it could be concluded that all the tested leaf positions of both A. heterophyllous types contained significant amounts of TPC, TFC, and TAC, which can be effectively used for traditional or folk systems of medicine and pharmaceutical industries.

Keywords: Artocarpus heterophyllus, Firm and soft flesh, Functional properties, Leaf positions, Physicochemical composition

Received May 16, 2023; Revised July 01, 2023; Accepted July 11, 2023

Citation: M.A.S.P.K. Mudugamuwa, R.M. Dharmadasa, D.C. Abeysinghe, Functional Properties and Physicochemical Composition of Different Leaf Positions of Soft and Firm Flesh Trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Moraceae). World Journal of Agricultural Research, 11 (2). 54-58. January 2023. doi:10.12691/wjar-11-2-3

1. Introduction

Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. is a multi-purpose, medium-sized, evergreen, tropical perennial tree belonging to the family Moraceae [1]. Jackfruit is native to the Western Ghats of India and distributed in Asia, Africa and some regions of South America [1]. Artocarpus heterophyllus is commonly known in English as Jackfruit, Kos in Sinhala and Palaa in Tamil [2]. According to the softness or firmness of the flesh/aril of the fruitlets at the ripening stage, there are two major types of A. heterophyllus known as soft flesh type and firm flesh type. The soft flesh type is locally called wela, and the firm flesh type is waraka [3]. A. heterophyllus has broad, obovate or elliptic, glossy dark green leaves, which are inserted alternately on horizontal branches but tend to spiral on ascending branches. Leaves are 10-15 cm in length and have a pinnate venation pattern with 5-8 pairs of veins. The juvenile leaves are deeply lobed. The leaf petiole is dark green and approximately 3.5 cm long [4]. The leaves of jackfruit contain therapeutically important phytochemicals such as sapogenin, cycloaratenone, cycloartenol, β-sitosterols, flavanones, polyphenols and tannins [5]. Due to the presence of an array of phytochemicals and biologically active molecules, jackfruit leaves have been used for the treatment of skin diseases, fever, boils, wounds and vitiated conditions of Pitta and Vata. Also, the ash of the leaves is useful in healing ulcers [5]; apart from that, the glucose tolerance of healthy and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients can be improved significantly by using leaf decoctions or hot water extract of leaves [1,3]. In addition, the leaves of jackfruits are also help to increase lactation in women and animals and are used to treat anaemia, asthma, dermatitis, diarrhoea and cough [6]. The shoots of jackfruit also have some nematicidal activity against various nematodes, including Rotylenchulus reniformis, Tylenchorhynchus brassicae, Tylenchus filifofmis and Meloidogyne incognita [2]. Traditionally, the decoction of the mature leaf petioles of jackfruit is also used in various properties such as anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial agents due to the presence of phenols, flavonoids and alkaloids [7].

Despite such vast usefulness and health benefits, unfortunately, jackfruit remains an underutilized crop. It is also not classified as a commercial crop and is rarely grown on regular plantations [2]. Though jackfruit leaves have been widely studied, and the maturity level of jackfruit leaves and their functional properties of leaves at different leaf maturity stages and petiole at different leaf positions of soft flesh type and firm flesh type still needs to be improved. Therefore, the present study was carried out to determine the functional properties and physicochemical compositions of different leaf positions of soft and firm flesh trees of A. heterophyllus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Location

The study was carried out in the laboratory of the Department of Plantation Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila (NWP), from November 2022 to March 2023.

2.2. Sample Collection

Healthy fresh leaves from different leaf positions (Leaf bud, first, second, third and fourth leaves) of soft (Wela) and firm flesh (Waraka) trees of A. heterophyllus were collected from previously authenticated plants available at university premises. Homogeneous representative samples were collected and mixed to make composite samples.

2.3. Sample Preparation

After collecting the leaf samples, leaf blades and leaf petioles were separated and thoroughly washed under running water. Washed samples were cut into small pieces and air-dried for three days at room temperature (28 ± 2 ˚C). All air-dried samples were powdered using a coffee grinder and sieved with a 0.25 mm mesh. Powdered samples were stored at -20 ˚C until methanolic extraction.

2.4. Extraction of Phytochemicals

The powdered sample (0.1 g) was mixed with 5 mL of 80% methanol and vortexed for 15 min. Then it was kept in a water bath at 60 ˚C for 40 min. Then the vortex procedure was continued in 10 min intervals and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for five minutes to remove the solid fraction; the supernatant was decanted into a 15 mL falcon tube, and the remaining was re-extracted with 80% methanol. Supernatant stored at -20 ˚C until analysis. All the samples were extracted and analyzed in 3 replicates.

2.5. Qualitative Screening of Phytochemicals

Methanolic extracts of samples were screened for flavonoids, saponins, steroid glycosides and tannins according to the method described by Farnsworth [8] with slight modifications.

2.6. Determination of Functional Properties

The total phenolic content (TPC) of all samples was determined using a modified Folin-Ciocalteu method [9]. TPC was determined and expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g of DW. Total flavonoid content (TFC) was calculated by using a colourimetric method [10] with slight modifications. The values were calculated using the standard rutin curve and expressed as mg of rutin equivalents (RE) per g DW.

Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was determined using the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay described by Benzie and Strain [11] with slight modifications. TAC was determined using the standard Trolox curve and expressed as mg of Trolox equivalents (TE) per g of DW.

2.7. Determination of Physicochemicals

Under the determination of physicochemical properties, moisture, ash and crude protein contents were determined by using the Standard protocol published in AOAC [12].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance of mean values was performed by General Linear Model (GLM) of ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple Range Test using SAS statistical software (version 9.4). The P values, which are less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phytochemical Screening

Results of preliminary phytochemical screening are demonstrated in Table 1. The results revealed that all tested phytochemicals, namely flavonoids, saponins, steroid glycosides and tannins, are present in leaf buds, leaf blades and leaf petioles of all tested leaf positions of both A. heterophyllus types. The results obtained from this study agree with the findings of Okonkwo et al. [2], who reported that the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, saponins, tannins and steroids in ethanol leaf extract and also the findings of Thapa et al. [13] who reported that presence of tannins and saponins in aqueous methanolic extract of leaves of A. heterophyllus. The steroid is responsible for reducing cholesterol, and also saponin can lower blood cholesterol and inhibit cancer cell growth. Moreover, it is a well-known fact that medicinal properties of jackfruit leaves are due to the presence of phytochemicals or secondary metabolites in leaves [13].

Table 1. Qualitative phytochemical parameters of different leaf positions of soft and firm flesh trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus

3.2. Functional Properties

The total phenolic content (TPC) determined in different leaf positions of two types of A. heterophyllus is demonstrated in Table 2. TPC of leaf buds and leaf blades of A. heterophyllus at different leaf positions varied between 16.79 ± 0.33 to 19.09 ± 0.31 mg GAE/g DW. The significantly highest TPC (19.09 ± 0.31 GAE /g DW) was recorded in the second leaf blade of soft flesh type whereas, high TPCs (18.46 ± 0.39 and 18.29 ± 0.36 GAE /g DW) were recorded in the first and second leaf blades of firm flesh type respectively. Significantly lowest TPC was recorded in the fourth leaf blade of both types. TPC of leaf petioles of A. heterophyllus at different leaf positions varied from 13.02 ± 0.00 to 18.47 ± 0.41 mg GAE/g DW. These results were agreed with Kurian et al. [7], who reported that TPC in jackfruit leaf petioles was 24.23 ± 1.04 mg GAE/g DW. The significantly highest TPC (19.09 ± 0.31 GAE /g DW) was recorded in the fourth petiole of the soft flesh type, whereas the second petiole of the firm flesh type (15.17 ± 0.58 GAE /g DW). Kurian et al. [7] reported that traditionally the decoction of the mature leaf petiole of jackfruit is used in various ailments because of this high content of bioactive compounds. Moreover, leaf buds and blades of both A. heterophyllus types have significantly higher TPC than leaf petioles.

When considering the leaf bud and blades, as similar to the TPC, significantly high TFCs (326.19 ± 8.67 and 268.14 ± 11.56 mg RE/g DW) were recorded in the second leaf blade of soft flesh type and first leaf blade of firm flesh type, respectively (Table 2). Significantly lowest TFC was recorded in the fourth leaf blade of both types, and there was no significant difference between the fourth leaf blade and the leaf bud of the soft flesh type. When considering the leaf petioles, significantly high TFCs (208.42 ± 6.29 and 388.14 ± 20.57 mg RE/g DW) were also recorded in the second petiole of firm flesh type similar to the TPC. However, it varied in soft flesh type as the first petiole (Table 2).

When considering the leaf bud and blades, as similar to the TPC and TFC, significantly high TACs (147.04 ± 3.71 and 119.55 ± 12.74 mg TE/g DW) were recorded in the second leaf blade of soft flesh type and first leaf blade of firm flesh type respectively (Table 2). Significantly lowest TAC was recorded in the fourth leaf blade of both types. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the fourth leaf blade and the firm flesh-type leaf bud. When considering the leaf petioles, as similar to the TPC and TFC, significantly high TACs (149.47 ± 6.05 and 94.28 ± 9.05 mg TE/g DW) were also recorded in fourth leaf petiole of soft flesh type and second petiole of firm flesh type respectively (Table 2).

The results of the present study revealed that all the tested leaf positions of both A. heterophyllus types contained remarkable amounts of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity. However, there was a slight reduction in TAC, TPC and TFC of leaf blades with the maturity.

3.3. Correlation of TAC with TPC and TFC

The findings of this study showed positive correlations of TAC with TFC (R2 = 0.7828) and TPC (R2 = 0.4364). These positive correlations suggest that the phenolic and flavonoid components contribute significantly to the antioxidant capacity of different leaf positions of A. heterophyllus

Table 2. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of different leaf positions of soft and firm flesh trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus

3.4. Physiochemical Properties

The quality of jackfruit leaf-based products may depend mainly on their phytochemical and physiochemical properties. The results of moisture, ash and crude protein contents are presented in Table 3. The percentage of moisture, ash and crude protein contents of different leaf positions of A. heterophyllus types were varied within the ranges of 55.84 ± 1.58% to 74.12 ± 1.30%, 7.79 ± 0.28% to 19.78 ± 0.20% and 7.24 ± 0.20% to 16.81 ± 0.18% respectively. When considering the leaf bud and leaf blades, the highest crude ash content was reported in the leaf bud of both A. heterophyllus types. However, leaf petioles' moisture and ash content were significantly higher than leaf buds and leaf blades of both A. heterophyllus types. When considering the leaf bud and leaf blades, the highest crude protein content was reported in the leaf bud of both A. heterophyllus types. The crude protein contents of leaf buds and leaf blades were significantly higher than leaf petioles of both A. heterophyllus types. The moisture content of the leaves was approximately similar to the previous study [14]. However, ash and crude protein contents presented in our study were higher than that reported by Amadi et al. [14], who reported 2.53% ash content and 1.19% protein content in jackfruit leaves. Variations of physicochemical properties could result from various geographical locations, including soil type. However, Brion-Espinoza et al. [15] reported 7.64 ± 0.12% protein content in fresh leaves of jackfruit.

Table 3. Proximate composition of different leaf positions of soft and firm flesh trees of Artocarpus heterophyllus

4. Conclusions

The results of the present study conclude that all the tested leaf positions of both A. heterophyllus types contained marked amounts of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity. The leaves of the soft flesh type consist of more bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity compared to the firm flesh type. Our results suggest that, thus, jackfruit leaves of both soft and flesh varieties of jackfruit could be used for the preparation of jackfruit leaf-based value-added products.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to everyone who supported to complete the study successfully

References

[1]   | Ranasinghe, R.A.S. and Marapana, R.A.U.J. (2019). Effect of maturity stage on physicochemical properties of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) flesh. World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences, 14(1), 17-25.

[2]  
Okonkwo, C.C., Agu, C.V., Njoku, O.U., Abonyi, U., Victor, A., Anaduaka, E.G., Iloabuchi, K.V. and Odo, C.E. (2015). Hypoglycaemic and haematinic properties of ethanol leaf extract of Artocarpus heterophyllus in alloxan induced diabetic rats. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 12(2), 144-148.

[3]  
Karunarathne, S.I., Ranaweera, L.T., Daundasekera, D.M.K.C., Ananda, G.K.S., Kannangara, S.K., Ranathunga, A.P.D.T., Madhukalpani, O.V.S., Weebadde, C.K. and Sooriyapathirana, S.D.S.S. (2018). Assessment of the applicability of morphometric, organoleptic and phylogenetic analyses to differentiate soft and firm flesh bearing trees of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) in Sri Lanka. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Sri Lanka, 13, 200-218.

[4]   | Haq, N. (2006). Jackfruit, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Southampton Centre for Underutilised Crops, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
[5]   | Gupta, N., Jain, U.K. and Pathak, A.K. (2009).Wound healing properties of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. Ancient Science of Life, 28(4), 36.
[6]   | Bhat, V., Mutha, A. and Dsouza, M.R. (2017). Pharmacognostic and physiochemical studies of Artocarpus heterophyllus seeds. International Journal of Chem Tech Research, 10(9), 525-536.
[7]   | Kurian, S., Joseph, L. and Josekumar, V.S. (2018). Phytochemical evaluation, GC-MS analysis and antimicrobial activity of the leaves petiole of Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 4(3), 280.
[8]   | Farnsworth, N.R. (1966). Biological and phytochemical screening of plants. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 55(3), 225-276.
[9]   | Abeysinghe, D.C., Li, X., Sun, C., Zhang, W., Zhou, C. and Chen, K. (2007). Bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacities in different edible tissues of citrus fruit of four species. Food Chemistry, 104(4), 1338-1344.
[10]   | Liu, M., Li, X.Q., Weber, C., Lee, C.Y., Brown, J. and Liu, R.H. (2002). Antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities of raspberries. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 50(10), 2926-2930.
[11]   | Benzie, I.F. and Strain, J.J. (1996). The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FARP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FARP assay. Analytical Biochemistry, 239(1), 70-76.
[12]   | Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.
[13]   | Thapa, N., Thapa, P., Bhandari, J., Niraula, P., Shrestha, N. and Shrestha, B.G. (2016). Study of phytochemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Artocarpus heterophyllus. Nepal Journal of Biotechnology, 4(1), 47-53.
[14]   | Amadi, J.A., Ihemeje, A. and Afam-Anene, O. C. (2018). Nutrient and phytochemical composition of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) pulp, seeds and leaves. International Journal of Innovative Food, Nutrition and Sustainable Agriculture, 6(3), 27-32.
[15]   | Brion-Espinoza, I.A., Iniguez-Moreno, M., Ragazzo-Sanchez, J.A., Barros-Castillo, J.C., Calderon-Chiu, C. and Calderón-Santoyo, M. (2021). Edible pectin film added with peptides from jackfruit leaves obtained by high-hydrostatic pressure and pepsin hydrolysis. Food Chemistry: X, 12, 100170..