Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Identification and Description of Culturable Airborne Bacteria Suspended in Aerosols from the Milking Area in Two Dairy Farms in Puerto Rico by Using MALDI-TOF MS

J. J. Dragoni-Rosado*, H. M. Ramirez-Ortiz, A. González-Mederos, A. E. Pérez-Matos

Department of Science and Technology, Inter American University of Puerto Rico, San Germán, Puerto Rico

Abstract: Due to its nutritional value and physicochemical characteristics, milk is susceptible to detrimental and pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, the dairy industry needs to control the factors that pose risks to the safety and quality of the product. Thus, a microbiological analysis of the air was carried out in the milking area of two dairy farms in Puerto Rico. Triplicate air samples were collected from May to September 2021. The results showed that farm B had higher bacteria concentrations in most months. Sixty-three genera of bacteria were identified among all the samples collected from both farms using MALDI-TOF MS. Additionally, several important sanitary bacteria were detected in the samples, albeit at a low frequency. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate that the concentration of microorganisms in the air of milking areas can be influenced by different factors, such as the location of the farm, as well as temperature and relative humidity. Furthermore, MALDI-TOF MS proved to be a helpful and fast technique for identifying the isolated bacteria in the samples.

Keywords: milk, food microbiology, environmental microbiology, milking area, environment

Received April 14, 2023; Revised May 17, 2023; Accepted May 30, 2023

Citation: J. J. Dragoni-Rosado, H. M. Ramirez-Ortiz, A. González-Mederos, A. E. Pérez-Matos, Identification and Description of Culturable Airborne Bacteria Suspended in Aerosols from the Milking Area in Two Dairy Farms in Puerto Rico by Using MALDI-TOF MS. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 11 (2). 44-53. January 2023. doi:10.12691/wjar-11-2-2

1. Introduction

Cows’ milk is widely used product, because of its nutritional value. However, its physicochemical characteristics make it susceptible to detrimental and pathogenic microorganisms that may affect its quality [1]. In dairy farms, the microorganisms can vary by the facility’s location, environmental conditions, management practices, storage, and the effectiveness of the cleaning processes [2]. Therefore, the dairy industry aims to control those factors that would put the safety and quality of the product at risk by implementing regulations and guidance for cleaning and disinfection, animal health, employee hygiene, and the farm's natural environment [3].

Identification of microorganisms in bioaerosols of farms have been proposed as a tool to identify possible detrimental and pathogenic microorganisms before the product reaches its destination. Currently, several microbiological methods are used to analyze the presence of microorganisms in the process environments that occur on livestock farms. Most of those methods sought to isolate, purify, classify, and identify the microorganisms found during environmental sampling [4,5,6]. However, many of these processes take long to obtain results, especially when identifying a microorganism. For this reason, instrumentation such as Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is being proposed as an accurate and fast technique to identify microorganisms [7]. MALDI-TOF-MS uses protein analysis to identify bacteria, yeasts, viruses, and fungi, surpassing conventional identification methods that depend on a pure and fresh culture.

MALDI-TOF has been used successfully in several studies to identify microorganisms in livestock farms [8], including milk processing farms [9]. However, some/all these studies identified potentially pathogenic microorganisms such as Aerococcus viridans, Corynebacterium striatum, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Enterococcus avium [8]. Also, other bacteria that pose a risk of spoilage, such as Staphylococcus and Bacillus spp. [9].

Milk is a widely used human food product susceptible to deterioration caused by microbial contamination. Microorganisms in the environment surrounding livestock industries may affect the animals and the raw material (milk) obtained [10]. Therefore, the dairy industry needs to know the microbiological relationship between the environment and the process to ensure milk and animal health quality and safety. However, identifying this relationship is challenging in livestock farming because microbial identification is a slow and complex process [11]. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the bacteria suspended in aerosols from the milking area of two dairy farms in Lajas (farm A) and Hatillo (farm B) Puerto Rico by using MALDI-TOF MS.

2. Methodology

Microbiological sampling was conducted in the milking area of two dairy farms to isolate and identify the bacteria in bioaerosols using the MALDI-TOF MS technique. Samples were obtained monthly from May to September 2021 in three different areas of the milking process (entrance, middle, and exit).

2.1. Microbiological Sampling

The microbiological sampling was carried out according to Łukaszuk et al. [12] with some modifications. The bacteria suspended in the air were collected by using the SAS-Super 100/180 (International pbi Spa, Milan, Italy) air sampling system previously disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol. The equipment was programmed with a speed of 100L/min, and RODAC (replicate organism detection and counting) plate with Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) / Lecithin was used for the isolation. The collected samples were covered with paraffin, placed in sterile bags, and transported at refrigeration temperatures of 4 - 6°C to the laboratory to be processed as soon as possible in a biological safety cabinet (Nuaire NU-440-400 Class II).

2.2. Sample Analysis

Before working with the samples, the laboratory and the equipment were disinfected to avoid sample contamination. Next, the RODAC plates were incubated at 30 - 35°C for 48 - 72 hours. After the incubation period, the colonies were counted, and the concentration of microorganisms was calculated using the following formula:

[picture] | (1)

Where Colonies, Pr is the adjusted value of probable colony counts, 28.3 is used to express the CFU/m3 value in CFU/ft3, and sample volume was 100 L.

The colonies obtained from the microbiological sampling were subcultured on the TSA culture medium and incubated at 30 - 35°C for 24 - 48 hours. The most isolated colonies were selected, transferred with a sterile needle, and streaked on the TSA plate. In addition, Gram staining was performed with the pure cultures.

2.3. Bacterial Identification – MALDI TOF MS

Isolated and purified bacteria were identified with Bruker MALDI-TOF Biotyper (positive ion mode) by the direct method (colony placed with matrix solution of α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) and bacterial DNA extraction [13].

2.3.1. Direct Method – MALDI TOF MS

In the direct method, fresh (24 - 48 hours) and pure cultures of the microorganisms isolated and subcultured in TSA medium were used. Using a sterile needle, a small part of the colony was placed in the stainless-steel sample plate used by the MALDI-TOF-MS [14]. The colony was allowed to dry at room temperature in the previously disinfected biosafety cabinet for one minute. After drying, 1 µl of formic acid and 1 µl of the matrix were added. In addition, a BTS standard was used. This standard contains an extract of Escherichia coli DH5 alpha and worked as a positive control to warrant that the MALDI TOF worked properly and identified the characteristic profile of peptides and proteins [15]. The peptide mass fingerprinting (PMFs) was then passed to the Accugenix® portal database to identify the microorganisms. DNA extraction was performed for isolates that were not properly identified within the database.

2.3.2. DNA Extraction

In a 1.5 mL microtube, 300 µl of molecular-grade water and the isolated bacteria were added and mixed in a vortex for one minute. Next, 300 - 900 µl of ethyl alcohol was added and centrifuged (Benchmark MC-12 microcentrifuge) for 2 minutes at 13,000 rpm. The resulting supernatant was discarded, and the centrifugation step was repeated. Subsequently, the supernatant was discarded, and 50 µl of 70% formic acid was added and mixed on the shaker to dissolve the precipitate. After this step, 20-50 µl of acetonitrile was added, mixed, and centrifuged. Finally, 1 µl of the supernatant was placed in the cover plate of the MALDI-TOF-MS and allowed to dry at room temperature in the biosafety cabinet, after which 1 µl of the matrix was added. When the plate dried, it was placed in the MALDI-TOF MS for analysis following the same indications as in the direct method [15].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A paired t-test at 0.05 significant level was used to determine if the concentration of airborne microorganisms was statistically different in each dairy farm during the sampling months.

3. Results

The results obtained in farms A and B during the sampling months are presented.

3.1. Bacterial Concentration

Farm B consistently exhibited higher levels of bacteria throughout the sampling months. The t-test analysis conducted on the microorganism concentrations between both farms from June to September showed a significant difference, which is clearly displayed in Table 1.

Table 1. Statistical analysis results for the t-test analysis conducted on the microorganism concentrations (CFU/ft3) between both farms

3.2. Predominant Identified Bacteria

A total of 200 isolated organisms were identified using MALDI-TOF MS, of which 17 families and 63 genera of bacteria were identified. The families found most frequently were Bacillaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Moraxellaceae, and Planococcaceae (Figure 1). Gram-positive microorganisms predominated with 58% occurrence, while 42% of the organisms isolated were Gram-negative.

Figure 1. Frequency of bacterial families isolated in both farms (A & B). The frequencies were determined by the number of microorganisms identified in the family divided by the total number of all microorganisms identified

Table 2 shows the bacterial families and species occurrences during the sampling months in both farms. Thus, the Bacillaceae was the predominant family, with 15 species in all analyzed samples. The most frequent microorganisms of this family in the five sampling months were Bacillus cereus and Bacillus altitudeinis/pumilus/safensis, followed by Exiguobacterium acetylicum and E. indicum isolated during the months of July and August in both farms. Also, in farm A was detected Bacillus subtilis and Exiguobacterium aurantiacum from May to July.

Table 2. Bacterial families and species occurrence during the sampling months in farms A & B

The Staphylococcaceae was the second most frequently isolated group of microorganisms with 10 species. Of this family, the genus found the most in the five samplings was Staphylococcus chromogenes in both farms, followed by Staphylococcus sciuri, which was detected in May, July, and August in farm A. Something similar happened with Staphylococcus gallinarum, which was detected in farm B in May, June, and August.

The third most frequent group was the Moraxellaceae family, with seven species isolated and identified by the MALDI-TOF technique. All the bacteria identified were from the Acinetobacter genera. In this group, A. indicus was the most frequent bacteria, detected in May and September in both farms. The occurrence of the other species was random during the five sampling months in both farms.

Five species of bacteria were detected during the sampling months in farms A and B in the Enterobacteriaceae and Micrococcaceae families. For the Planococcaceae family, three species of Kurthia were identified, being Kurthia massiliensis the most frequent in both farms. Other families such as Alcaligenaceae, Caulobacteraceae, Comamonadaceae, Corynebacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae, Flavobacteriaceae, Microibacteriaceae, Paenibacillaceae and Xanthomonadaceae.

3.3. Microorganisms of Sanitary Importance

In this study, most of the sanitary-important bacteria detected in the sampling had a low occurrence (Figure 2), except for Staphylococcus chromogenes and Bacillus cereus. The other microorganisms detected in low frequency were Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens.

Figure 2. The occurrence of microorganisms of sanitary importance during all the sampling months

4. Discussion

4.1. Bacterial Concentration

In this research, the number of bacteria suspended in the process area air may be influenced by some factors related to the conditions of this area. For example, temperature, relative humidity, and ventilation directly affect the quantity and distribution of bacteria in these process environments [16]. Also, in the case of milk-producing farms, the conditions of the milking place, the place available for the animals, and its design influence the concentration of microorganisms suspended in the air [17]. Additionally, other factors related to practices on the farm contribute to the concentration of air-suspended microorganisms, such as the frequency with which the facilities and equipment are cleaned before and after each milking process [11]. In this investigation, when comparing the number of cattle owned by both farms studied, farm B has a higher number than farm A. Also, farm A has a more rigorous cleaning system to perform the milking process. These practices may be responsible for farm B obtaining a higher number of bacteria suspended in the air in the milking area.

4.2. Predominant Bacteria Identified

4.2.1. Bacillaceae

The most frequent bacterial family in this study was the Bacillaceae. This family is commonly found in milking farm environments, contaminating dairy products and affecting their quality and shelf life with the presence of endospores produced by some genera belonging to this family [18]. Controlling this type of spore-producing microorganism in places of large-scale milk production is an important challenge for producers [19].

In this study, the most frequent Bacillaceae isolated was B. cereus. This result is comparable with the study by [20], where the Bacillus genus was most abundant during sampling on a chicken farm. In another study presented by [21], the two bacteria with the highest frequency in the microbiological monitoring of seven dairy farms were B. cereus and Clostridium perfringens, with the microorganism B. cereus appearing first in 93% of the samples taken.

B. cereus is commonly found in the environment (soil, water, air). It is a bacterium of interest in food microbiology due to its ability to produce enterotoxins that affect people's health [22]. Also, B. cereus is resistant to food cooking and pasteurization processes [23]. Additionally, it can cause infections such as bacteremia, meningitis, and brain abscesses [24]. The other bacteria with high frequency in the Bacillaceae family were Bacillus altitudeinis/pumilus/safensis. These microorganisms contaminate food and pharmaceutical facilities, causing product quality problems [25]. In addition, Bacillus pumilus has been implicated in food poisoning, human infections, and bacteremia in humans [26].

Exiguobacterium was another genus frequently isolated in farm sampling and belonging to the Bacillaceae family. This genus is versatile and present in various environments, temperature ranges, pH, heavy metals, and salinity [27]. Exiguobacterium can be an essential resource for natural alternatives to the environment and agricultural practices (for its ability to promote plant growth and improve productivity) [28]. However, this genus of bacteria has been isolated as a contaminant from colostrum samples on dairy farms in the Czech Republic [29]. The researchers characterized this microorganism as one of the environmental contaminants present in 75% of the samples analyzed.

4.2.2. Staphylococcaceae

During this research, the Staphylococcaceae family was the second most frequent group isolated in both farms. The members of this family are characterized by being bacteria with a coccus morphology, Gram-positive, catalase-positive, and non-motile. They are antibiotic-resistant organisms and do not produce spores. These organisms survive various non-physiological environmental conditions and can grow in oxygen-rich (aerobic) environments or oxygen-depleted (anaerobic) conditions. Some genera of Staphylococcus spp. have been isolated from bovine udders, raw milk, storage tanks, and cheese samples [30]. This bacterium is highly related to the development of mastitis in susceptible cattle [31].

Some species of the Staphylococcaceae family (i.e., S. aureus, S. chromogenes, S. sciuri, S. xylosus) inhabit the skin, oral cavity, respiratory system, and intestine also are opportunistic pathogens. These bacteria can cause suppurative lesions and septicemia in humans and animals [32]. Multiple studies have used MALDI-TOF to identify Staphylococcus spp. in raw milk and cheese [30,33,34]. These studies demonstrate that the Staphylococcus identification technique by MALDI is reliable for identifying this family.

In this research, the bacterial species found most frequently in the five samplings was Staphylococcus chromogenes, with a frequency of 80% for farm A and 40% for farm B. This bacterium is a coagulase-negative, Gram-positive coccus, which can be isolated from dairy cattle with mastitis. S. chromogenes was isolated in the study by [20] from air samplings over several months in different areas of a poultry plant. Furthermore, S. chromogenes was isolated in bovine milk samples from 76 farms in Austria and identified using MALDI-TOF MS [35].

4.2.3. Moraxellaceae

The family Moraxellaceae comprises a heterogeneous group of bacteria widely distributed in different natural habitats and have diverse ecological and clinical significance [36]. Additionally, this family has members that can colonize the mucosa and skin of humans and animals, causing infections. Among the bacteria genera in this family are Moraxella spp., Acinetobacter spp., and Psychrobacter spp. [37].

Studies abundantly detected microorganisms belonging to the Moraxellaceae family in milk from farms in Henan and Heilongjiang Province [10]. The authors suggest that these microorganisms in milk may be due to transfer from feces into milk. These results relate to those in this investigation, where several species of Acinetobacter were isolated from the milking area air. Species of this genus, such as A. baumannii, isolated from raw milk, have demonstrated the ability to resist multiple antibiotics [38]. This adaptation risks the health of dairy farm animals due to the bacteria's ability to survive, potentially infecting animals and spreading.

4.2.4. Enterobacteriaceae

The Enterobacteriaceae family are Gram-negative bacteria associated with warm-blooded animals' gastrointestinal tract. Several bacteria in this family are pathogenic microorganisms related to food spoilage and safety. Therefore, they are considered a high-risk factor in raw milk. This family includes genera such as Escherichia, which inhabits the feces of animals; Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Serratia, and Klebsiella, present in soils, water, and grains [14]. Mastitis in cattle is associated with Gram-negative bacteria, especially those of the Enterobacteriaceae family. These bacteria mainly affect cows after milking due to contact of the udder with contaminated water and farm areas.

However, phenotypic methods often misidentify Enterobacteriaceae at the genus and species level. Therefore, there is an interest in using more precise techniques for identifying enterobacteria, such as MALDI-TOF MS. This interest was demonstrated in the study by [14], where 183 members of Enterobacteriaceae were identified with MALDI-TOF MS in milk, cow feces, water samples, and from the process area in a dairy farm in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The authors' statements are related to the findings of our investigation, in which we isolated several genera of the Enterobacteriaceae family (including Cronobacter sp., Enterobacter sp., Enterococcus sp., and Klebsiella spp.) from air samples collected in milking areas.

4.2.5. Micrococcaceae

The Micrococcaceae family comprises a diverse group of microorganisms exhibiting various morphological and chemical-taxonomic properties that distinguish between genera and species [39]. These bacteria are found in the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals and can also be in the environment. Some species in this family can cause opportunistic infections in hosts. A study by [40] detected Micrococcaceae in environments associated with a dairy farm, including the bedding area and air during summer and winter. Our study's findings align with Nguyen et al.'s results, as we isolated Arthrobacter spp., Glutamicibacter sp., and Rothia spp. from the air in the milking area.

4.2.6. Pseudomonadaceae

This bacterial family comprises Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria, saprophytic microorganisms in soil and marine waters, and some pathogens of animals, humans, and plants [41]. In addition, members of this family, such as Pseudomonas spp., are classified as plant growth promoters through certain growth factors, nutrients, and disease prevention [42]. Studies have shown the presence of Pseudomonas spp. in milk samples and at various sampling points in the analyzed milk dairies [43]. Its presence in milk was related to inadequate handling of milking processes, hygiene, and product storage. These results are associated with this study since one of the bacteria isolated from this family was Pseudomonas aeruginosa during May in both farms. Furthermore, this P. aeruginosa bacterium has been related, isolated, and identified with the MALDI-TOF technique in an outbreak of mastitis in a herd of dairy cows where it was determined that the outbreak occurred with a single strain of the microorganism using a cleaning solution that contained the bacteria [44].

4.2.7. Planococcaceae

The Planococcaceae family is taxonomically heterogeneous. According to [42], more than one hundred species of bacteria are grouped into fourteen genera. These are primarily bacilli and Gram variables; some can produce motile and aerobic spores. Also, the Planococcaceae family may be prevalent in the microbiota of cheese ripening. It was a family of organisms found in the sampling of dairy farms [46]. A study isolated and molecularly characterized microorganisms from the Planococcaceae family, which was possible in a sampling carried out in dairy farm storage tanks [47]. In this study, Kurthia massiliensis was the family member most prevalent during the samplings. One author described K. massiliensis as a Gram-positive, aerobic, encapsulated, motile rod shape; no evidence of pathogenicity exists for this microorganism [48].

4.3. Predominant Bacteria Identified

In both farms, a group of sanitary-importance microorganisms was found with variable occurrence. Although the capacity of these microorganisms to cause problems is moderate, they are agents that can cause diseases in humans and animals or represent a risk to the environment [49]. The sanitary-important microorganisms identified were Enterobacter cloacae, a nosocomial pathogenic bacterium responsible for bacteremia and respiratory, urinary, and intra-abdominal tract infections. Several strains of this microorganism have already been detected as resistant to antibiotics, which has caused a significant increase in infections [50]. In addition, this microorganism in dairy products can indicate unsanitary production or improper handling, which constitutes a safety problem for the consumer [51].

Enterococcus casseliflavus is a bacterium commonly found in human and animal intestinal tracts. It is one of the species of enterococci widely found in dairy cows [52]. This organism has been found in bulk tanks and milking equipment even after they have been disinfected. A study found the bacteria E. casseliflavus in a few of the 2,000 samples of cows suspected of mastitis in Poland [53]. In addition, cases of human infections have been reported where E. casseliflavus has shown antibiotic resistance [54].

Klebsiella pneumoniae is found on mucosal surfaces in mammals and the environment (water and soil). In humans, it is located in the gastrointestinal tract and nasopharynx. However, in immunocompromised people, it can cause pneumonia [55]. K. pneumoniae, an opportunistic pathogen, infects the mucosal epithelium and spreads to deep tissues and the bloodstream. It causes severe infections such as meningitis, ophthalmitis, bacteremia, and liver abscesses. K. pneumoniae is clinically challenging as it is resistant to certain antibiotics [56]. This bacterium, also associated with mastitis, was accurately identified by MALDI-TOF in isolates from the Mastitis Pathogen Culture Collection of the Canadian Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Network [57].

Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogenic bacterium causing nosocomial infections, such as pneumonia, skin infections, and meningitis. A. baumannii is one of the pathogens most resistant to antibiotics [58]. In addition, it causes mastitis, pneumonia, and sepsis in animals for consumption [59]. Therefore, a study recommends analyzing bulk tank milk for foodborne pathogens and Acinetobacter spp. due to their potential risk to milk quality and public health [60].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogenic bacterium, ubiquitous and persistent in the environment [61] Found in water, soil, and various physical media. P. aeruginosa is the main microorganism and the fifth worldwide cause of nosocomial infections. It is the second and fourth cause of urinary and surgical infections, respectively [61]. In addition, it is one of the pathogenic agents that cause mastitis [62]. One study described an outbreak of mastitis in 20 herds of dairy cows caused by P. aeruginosa related to poor cleaning practices. The investigation showed that the microorganism's transmission occurred with a contaminated cleaning solution used during the milking process [44].

Serratia marcescens is an opportunistic pathogenic bacterium belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family and causing various lung and urinary tract infections, meningitis, and sepsis. One study described their results from two herds of dairy cows, where positive samples of S. marcescens were obtained in milk with mastitis [63]. It was concluded that this microorganism and its transmission are due to the mishandling of equipment and chemical compounds used during cleaning.

Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus chromogenes were the sanitary-important microorganisms with a frequency of over 60% in the samplings on both farms. B. cereus is a bacterium commonly found in the environment and capable of producing toxins related to foodborne illnesses. Consuming these toxins can cause symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea. In addition, these bacteria can contaminate animal feed [23]. As a spore-former, B. cereus resists pasteurization and adverse environmental conditions. This bacterium has been linked (although not as frequently) to mastitis in cows used in the dairy industry [64]. S. chromogenes is a bacterium classified as a pathogen for humans, resistant to antibiotics, and associated with nosocomial infections [65]. It is a pathogenic microorganism that can coagulate plasma and has been isolated from dairy cow mastitis [66]. Several of these microorganisms have already been isolated in previous research. For example, in the study by [67], conventional dairy farms in Canada were microbiologically sampled, reporting pathogens such as Bacillus spp., Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli most related to mastitis disease in cows.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study show that the concentration of microorganisms in the air of milking areas can be influenced by different factors, such as the location of the farm, as well as temperature and relative humidity. The study also demonstrates the effectiveness of using MALDI-TOF MS to identify microorganisms quickly and accurately in dairy farms. This study successfully isolated and identified numerous bacteria that are commonly associated with animal production environments. Some of the identified bacteria are known to be part of the normal environmental flora, while others have been linked to livestock diseases. Additionally, MALDI-TOF MS accurately identified bacteria classified as opportunistic pathogens, capable of affecting the health of both animals and humans. These findings contribute to the understanding of the significance of comprehending and identifying the microbial flora present in dairy farms, thereby facilitating the development of new protocols to prevent and reduce microbial contamination.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Pace Analytical Laboratory, Inc. for allowing the use of the laboratories to conduct this research.

References

[1]   | Islam, M. A., Roy, S., Nabi, A., Solaiman, S., Rahman, M., Huq, M., Siddiquee, N. A., and Ahmed, N., “Microbiological quality assessment of milk at different stages of the dairy value chain in a developing country setting,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, 278, pp. 11-19, 2018.
[2]   | Ouamba, A. J. K., Gagnon, M., LaPointe, G., Chouinard, P. Y., and Roy, D., “Graduate Student Literature Review: Farm management practices: Potential microbial sources that determine the microbiota of raw bovine milk,” Journal of Dairy Science, 105(9), pp. 7276-7287, 2022.
[3]   | Ortega, T. and Augusto, W., Bases para el diseño del sistema de análisis de riesgos y puntos críticos de control para leche de calidad en un ordeño manual, 2011. Available: http://repositorio.utc.edu.ec/handle/27000/673.
[4]   | Deddefo, A., Mamo, G., Asfaw, M. and Amenu, K. “Factors affecting the microbiological quality and contamination of farm bulk milk by Staphylococcus aureus in dairy farms in Asella, Ethiopia,” BMC Microbiology, 23(1), 2023.
[5]   | Mukuna, W., Aniume, T., Pokharel, B., Khwatenge, C., Basnet, A. and Kilonzo-Nthenge, A. “Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of pathogenic and commensal bacteria recovered from cattle and goat farms.,” Antibiotics, 12(2), 2023.
[6]   | Wei, X., Aggrawal, A., Bond, R. F. and Atwill, E. R. “Low to zero concentrations of airborne bacterial pathogens and indicator E. coli in proximity to beef cattle feedlots in imperial valley, California,” Microorganisms, 11(2), 2023.
[7]   | Maldonado, N., Robledo, C., and Robledo, J., “La espectrometría de masas MALDI-TOF en el laboratorio de microbiología clínica,” Infectio: Revista de la Asociación Colombiana de Infectología, 2017.

[8]  
Druckenmüller, K., Gärtner, A., Jäckel, U., Klug, K., Schiffels, J., Günther, K., and Elbers, G., “Development of a methodological approach for the characterization of bioaerosols in exhaust air from pig fattening farms with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry,” International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220(6), pp. 974-983, 2017.

[9]   | Brandl, H., Fricker-Feer, C., Ziegler, D., Mandal, J., Stephan, R., and Lehner, A., “Distribution and identification of culturable airborne microorganisms in a Swiss milk processing facility,” Journal of Dairy Science, 97(1), pp. 240-246, 2014.
[10]   | Du, B., Meng, L., Liu, H., Zheng, N., Zhang, Y., Guo, X., Zhao, S., Li, F., and Wang, J., “Impacts of milking and housing environment on milk Microbiota,” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 10(12), 2020.
[11]   | Quintana, Á. R., Seseña, S., Garzón, A., and Arias, R., “Factors affecting levels of airborne bacteria in dairy farms: A review,” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 10(3), 2020.
[12]   | Łukaszuk, C., Krajewska-Kułak, E., Guzowski, A., Kułak, W. and Kraszyńska, B. “Comparison of the results of studies of air pollution fungi using the SAS Super 100, MAS 100, and air IDEAL,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 2017.
[13]   | Bester, LA., Khan, N., Essack, SY. and Phulukdaree, A. “Efficacy of phenotypic, PCR and MALDI -ToF identification methods for Campylobacter spp.,” Medical Technology SA, 30(1), 2016.

[14]  
Bento, N., Bronzato, G., Stefaninni, G., Batista, L., Meurer B., da Silva, I. Soares, M. and de Oliveira, S. “The Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification versus biochemical tests: a study with enterobacteria from a dairy cattle environment,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 48(1), 2017.

[15]   | PennState. “Biotyper sample preparation,” Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, 2019. Available: https://sites.psu.edu/msproteomics/biotyper/biotyper-sample-preparation/.
[16]   | Qiu, Y., Zhou, Y., Chang, Y., Liang, X., Zhang, H., Lin, X., Qing, K., Zhou, X. and Luo, Z. “The effects of ventilation, humidity, and temperature on bacterial growth and bacterial genera distribution,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 2022.
[17]   | Quintana, Á. R., Perea, J. M., Palop, M. L., Garzón, A., and Arias, R., “Influence of environmental and productive factors on the biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria population from sheep milk,” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 10(11), 2020.

[18]  
VanderKelen, J. J., Mitchell, R. D., Laubscher, A., Black, M. W., Goodman, A. L., Montana, A. K., Dekhtyar, A. M., Jimenez-Flores, R. and Kitts, C. L., “Short communication: Typing and tracking Bacillaceae in raw milk and milk powder using preprinting,” Journal of Dairy Science, 99(1), pp. 146-151, 2016.

[19]   | Gopal, N., Hill, C., Ross, P. R., Beresford, T. P., Fenelon, M. A. and Cotter, P. D., “The prevalence and control of Bacillus and related spore-forming bacteria in the dairy industry,” Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 2015.
[20]   | Liang, R., Xiao, P., She, R., Han, S., Chang, L., and Zheng, L., “Culturable airborne bacteria in outdoor poultry-slaughtering facility,” Microbes and Environments, 28(2), 251-256, 2013.
[21]   | McAuley, C. M., McMillan, K., Moore, S. C., Fegan, N., and Fox, E. M., “Prevalence and characterization of foodborne pathogens from Australian dairy farm environments,” Journal of Dairy Science, 97(12), pp. 7402-7412, 2014.
[22]   | Phelps, R. J., and McKillip, J. L., “Enterotoxin production in natural isolates of Bacillaceae outside the Bacillus cereus group,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(6), pp. 3147-3151, 2002.
[23]   | Sánchez, J., Correa, M. and Castañeda-Sandoval, L. M., “Bacillus cereus un patógeno importante en el control microbiológico de los alimentos,” Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 34(2), 2016.
[24]   | Cortés-Sánchez, A. D. J., Díaz-Ramírez, M., and Guzmán-Medina, C. A., “Sobre Bacillus cereus y la inocuidad de los alimentos (una revisión),” Revista de Ciencias, 22(1), 2018.
[25]   | Branquinho, R., Sousa, C., Lopes, J., Pintado, M. E., Peixe, L. V., & Osório, H., “Differentiation of Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus safensis using MALDI-TOF-MS,” PloS One, 9(10), 2014.
[26]   | Shah, M. M., Miringu, G., Wada, A., Kaneko, S., & Ichinose, Y. (2019). Case report: Bacillus pumilus-caused bacteremia in a patient with food poisoning. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 100(3), 688-690.

[27]  
White, R. A., Soles, S. A., Gavelis, G., Gosselin, E., Slater, G. F., Lim, D. S. S., Leander, B. and Suttle, C. A. “The complete genome and physiological analysis of the eurythermal firmicute Exiguobacterium chiriqhucha strain RW2 isolated from a freshwater microbialite, widely adaptable to broad thermal, pH, and salinity ranges,” Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 2018.

[28]   | Pandey, N. Exiguobacterium. In American, N, Senthil, M., Annapurna, K., Kumar, K. and Sankaranarayanan, A. (Eds.), Beneficial Microbes in Agro-Ecology, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 169-183.
[29]   | Šlosárková, S., Pechová, A., Staněk, S., Fleischer, P., Zouharová, M. and Nejedlá, E., Microbial contamination of harvested colostrum on Czech dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(10), pp. 11047-11058, 2021.
[30]   | Tonamo, A., Komlósi, I., Varga, L., Kačániová, M. and Peles, F. “Identification of ovine-associated staphylococci by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry,” Acta alimentaria, 50(2), pp. 210-218, 2021.
[31]   | Toltzis, P., Staphylococcus epidermidis and Other Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. In Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Elsevier, 2018; pp. 706-712.
[32]   | Brabb, T., Newsome, D., Burich, A. and Hanes, M. Infectious Diseases. In The Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents, Elsevier, 2012; pp. 637-683.
[33]   | Dobranić, V., Kazazić, S., Filipović, I., Mikulec, N., and Zdolec, N., “Composition of raw cow’s milk microbiota and identification of enterococci by MALDI-TOF MS - short communication,” Veterinarski Arhiv, 86(4), pp. 581-590, 2016.
[34]   | Mercanoglu Taban, B., and Numanoglu Cevik, Y., “The efficiency of MALDI-TOF MS method in detecting Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk and artisanal dairy foods,” CyTA - Journal of Food, 19(1), pp. 739-750, 2021.
[35]   | Wald, R., Hess, C., Urbantke, V., Wittek, T. and Baumgartner, M., “Characterization of staphylococcus species isolated from bovine quarter milk samples,” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 9(5), 2019.
[36]   | Teixeira, L. M. and Merquior, V., The Family Moraxellaceae, In The Prokaryotes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014; pp. 443-476.
[37]   | Yang, X. (2014). Moraxellaceae. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 826-833. Elsevier.
[38]   | Mohamed, H. M. A., Abd-Elhafeez, H. H., Al-Jabr, O. A., and El-Zamkan, M. A., “Characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Raw Milk,” Biology, 11(12), 2022.
[39]   | Dastager, S. G., Krishnamurthi, S., Rameshkumar, N. and Dharne, M. The Family Micrococcaceae. In The Prokaryotes, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014, pp. 455-498.
[40]   | Nguyen, T. T., Wu, H., and Nishino, N., “An investigation of seasonal variations in the microbiota of milk, feces, bedding, and airborne dust,” Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 33(11), pp. 1858-1865, 2020.
[41]   | Cousin, M. A. (1999). Pseudomonas | Introduction. In Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology, Elsevier, 1999; pp. 1864-1867.
[42]   | Hemati, A., Shafea, L., Asgari Lajayer, B., Ghorbanpour, M., and Astatkie, T., An overview of bacterial bio-fertilizers function on soil fertility under abiotic stresses, In Plant Stress Mitigators, Elsevier, 2023, pp. 505-512.

[43]  
Vidal, A. M. C., Saran Netto, A., Vaz, A. C. N., Capodifóglio, E., Gonçalves, A. C. S., Rossi, G. A. M., Figueiredo, A. S. and Ruiz, V. L. A. “Pseudomonas spp.: contamination sources in bulk tanks of dairy farms,” Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira [Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research], 37(9), pp. 941-948, 2017.

[44]   | Schauer, B., Wald, R., Urbantke, V., Loncaric, I. and Baumgartner, M., “Tracing mastitis pathogens-epidemiological investigations of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mastitis outbreak in an Austrian dairy herd,” Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 11(2), 2021.
[45]   | Gupta, R. S., and Patel, S., “Robust demarcation of the family Caryophanaceae (Planococcaceae) and its different genera including three novel genera based on phylogenomics and highly specific molecular signatures,” Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 2019.

[46]  
Sant’Anna, F. M., Wetzels, S. U., Cicco, S. H. S., Figueiredo, R. C., Sales, G. A., Figueiredo, N. C., Nunes, C. A., Schmitz-Esser, S., Mann, E., Wagner, M. and Souza, M. R., “Microbial shifts in Minas artisanal cheeses from the Serra do Salitre region of Minas Gerais, Brazil throughout ripening time,” Food Microbiology, 82, 349-362, 2019.

[47]   | Masiello, S. N., Martin, N. H., Watters, R. D., Galton, D. M., Schukken, Y. H., Wiedmann, M., and Boor, K. J., “Identification of dairy farm management practices associated with the presence of psychrotolerant sporeformers in bulk tank milk,” Journal of Dairy Science, 97(7), pp. 4083-4096, 2014.
[48]   | Roux, V., El Karkouri, K., Lagier, J.-C., Robert, C. and Raoult, D., “Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov,” Standards in Genomic Sciences, 7(2), pp. 221-232, 2012.
[49]   | Trapotsis, A. “Biosafety levels 1, 2, 3 & 4,” Consolidated Sterilizer Systems, 2015. Available: https://consteril.com/biosafety-levels-difference/.
[50]   | Moreno-Rovira, L. Y., Tamayo-Quintero, M. T., Amariles-Tamayo, N., and Garrido-Zea, E. F., “Infecciones por Enterobacter y Enterococcus resistentes asociadas a la atención en salud en Hispanoamérica 2002-2017,” Medicina y Laboratorio, 24(3), pp. 221-232, 2020.
[51]   | Mokadem, E., Leboudy, A., & Amer, A., “Occurrence of Enterobacteriaceae in dairy farm milk,” Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 64(2), 2020.
[52]   | Gelsomino, R., Vancanneyt, M., Cogan, T. M., Condon, S., and Swings, J., “Source of enterococci in a farmhouse raw-milk cheese,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(7), pp. 3560-3565, 2002.
[53]   | Różańska, H., Lewtak-Piłat, A., Kubajka, M. and Weiner, M., “Occurrence of enterococci in mastitic cow’s milk and their antimicrobial resistance,” Journal of Veterinary Research, 63(1), pp. 93-97, 2019.

[54]  
Narciso-Schiavon, J. L., Borgonovo, A., Marques, P. C., Tonon, D., Bansho, E. T. O., Maggi, D. C., Dantas-Corrêa, E. B., and de Lucca Schiavon, L., “Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum as causative agents of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis,” Annals of Hepatology, 14(2), pp. 270-272, 2025.

[55]   | Piperaki, E.-T., Syrogiannopoulos, G. A., Tzouvelekis, L. S., and Daikos, G. L., “Klebsiella pneumoniae: Virulence, Biofilm and Antimicrobial Resistance,” The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 36(10), pp. 1002-1005, 2017.
[56]   | Joseph, L., Merciecca, T., Forestier, C., Balestrino, D., and Miquel, S., “From Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization to dissemination: An overview of studies implementing Murine models,” Microorganisms, 9(6), 2021.
[57]   | Massé, J., Dufour, S., and Archambault, M., “Characterization of Klebsiella isolates obtained from clinical mastitis cases in dairy cattle,” Journal of Dairy Science, 103(4), pp. 3392-3400, 2020.
[58]   | Bonnin, R. A., Nordmann, P. and Poirel, L., “Screening and deciphering antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: a state of the art,” Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 11(6), pp. 571-583, 2013.
[59]   | Wareth, G., Neubauer, H. and Sprague, L. D., “Acinetobacter baumannii - A neglected pathogen in veterinary and environmental health in Germany,” Veterinary Research Communications, 43(1), pp. 1-6, 2019.
[60]   | Gurung, M., Nam, H. M., Tamang, M. D., Chae, M. H., Jang, G. C., Jung, S. C., and Lim, S. K., “Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter from raw bulk tank milk in Korea,” Journal of Dairy Science, 96(4), pp. 1997-2002, 2013.

[61]  
Paz-Zarza, V. M., Mangwani-Mordani, S., Martínez-Maldonado, A., Álvarez-Hernández, D., Solano-Gálvez, S. G., and Vázquez-López, R., “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: patogenicidad y resistencia antimicrobiana en la infección urinaria,” Revista Chilena de Infectologia: Organo Oficial de La Sociedad Chilena de Infectologia, 36(2), pp. 180-189, 2019.

[62]   | Park, H. R., Hong, M. K., Hwang, S. Y., Park, Y. K., Kwon, K. H., Yoon, J. W., Shin, S., Kim, J. H., and Park, Y. H., “Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa related to bovine mastitis,” Acta Veterinaria Hungarica, 62(1), pp. 1-12, 2014.
[63]   | Friman, M. J., Eklund, M. H., Pitkälä, A. H., Rajala-Schultz, P. J., and Rantala, M. H. J., “Description of two Serratia marcescens associated mastitis outbreaks in Finnish dairy farms and a review of literature,” Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 61(1), 2009.
[64]   | Parkinson, T. J., Merrall, M., and Fenwick, S. G., “A case of bovine mastitis caused by Bacillus cereus,” New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 47(4), pp. 151-152, 1999.
[65]   | Couto, I., Pereira, S., Miragaia, M., Sanches, I. S., and de Lencastre, H., “Identification of clinical staphylococcal isolates from humans by internal transcribed spacer PCR,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(9), pp. 3099-3103, 2001.
[66]   | Dos Santos, D. C., Lange, C. C., Avellar-Costa, P., Dos Santos, K. R. N., Brito, M. A. V. P., and Giambiagi-deMarval, M., “Staphylococcus chromogenes, a coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species that can clot plasma,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 54(5), pp. 1372-1375, 2016.
[67]   | Levison, L. J., Miller-Cushon, E. K., Tucker, A. L., Bergeron, R., Leslie, K. E., Barkema, H. W., and DeVries, T. J., “Incidence rate of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on conventional and organic Canadian dairy farms,” Journal of Dairy Science, 99(2), pp. 1341-1350, 2016.