Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Biomass Production of Brachiaria ruzizienzis and Crotalaria retusa in Different Cropping Systems on an Andic Ferralsol in Western Highlands of Cameroon

Beyegue Djonko H.*, Tatang Tadjufo A., Mvondo-Awono J.P., Gafe Pelap H., Tankou C.M.

University of Dschang, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Sciences, P.O. Box 222 Dschang, Cameroon

Abstract: Benefits associated with cover crops in direct seeding mulch-based cropping systems (DMC) often depend on the establishment of a highly productive cover crop community. The objective of this study was to assess biomass production for the implementation of DMC and its efficiency based on Land Equivalent Ratios (LER) of Brachiaria ruziziensis and Crotalaria retusa grown in different cropping systems on an Andosol in the Western Highlands of Cameroon. The six treatments were pure stands and combinations of one or two lines of each cover crop. These were assigned to experimental units in a randomized complete bloc design with four replications. Biomass production, ability to start DMC and Land Equivalent Ratios (LER) were used to compare treatments. B. ruziziensis produced 10.51 t DM ha⁻¹ in pure stands and 2.9 to 5.37 t DM ha⁻¹ in intercropping. C. retusa produced 5.03 t DM ha⁻¹ in pure stands and 2.88 to 5.28 t DM ha⁻¹ in intercropping. There were highly significant differences (p < 0.01) among treatments for total biomass production. Biomass production was significantly higher when two lines of B. ruziziensis were associated with a single line of C. retusa. Intercropping one line of B. ruziziensis and one line of C. retusa was the only combination that could not allow the implementation of DMC the following season. LER larger than 1 for the other intercropping indicated their superiority compared to pure stands. Growing B. ruziziensis and C. retusa during the first season with one line of one species and two lines of the other species, or two lines of each crop species were considered appropriate for the implementation of DMC. Results provided a basis for DMC implementation using intercropping of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa as cover crops during the first cropping season. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the residual effects of the biomass produced.

Keywords: direct seeding mulch-based cropping systems (DMC), Brachiaria ruziziensis, Crotalaria retusa, intercropping, cover crops, biomass, LER (Land Equivalent Ratio)

Received September 08, 2022; Revised October 10, 2022; Accepted October 22, 2022

Citation: Beyegue Djonko H., Tatang Tadjufo A., Mvondo-Awono J.P., Gafe Pelap H., Tankou C.M., Biomass Production of Brachiaria ruzizienzis and Crotalaria retusa in Different Cropping Systems on an Andic Ferralsol in Western Highlands of Cameroon. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 10 (3). 70-75. January 2022. doi:10.12691/wjar-10-3-2

1. Introduction

The inclusion of cover crops such as Brachiria ruziziensis and Crotalaria retusa in cropping systems provides a number of agronomic and environmental benefits, such as restoration of soil fertility, increasing soil productivity and crop performance [1,2,3]. Achieving these benefits often depends on the establishment of a highly productive cover crop community either in pure stands or in mixtures [4]. Planting multi-species cover crops may be a viable solution for increasing the ecological stability and resilience of cover crop communities, which can contribute to higher and more consistent productivity [5,6], especially with direct seeding mulch-based cropping systems (DMC).

The DMC introduced in the Northern part of Cameroon [2,7,8] is an approach of Conservation Agriculture based on three principles: minimum soil tillage, permanent soil cover and crop rotations [1,9]. Biomass production by cover crops is followed by the cultivation of the desired crop with the mulches serving as nutrient sources and humus [10,11]. The minimum biomass to start a successful DMC in Northern Cameroon was estimated at 7 t DM ha-1 [12]. Both the quantity and the quality of biomasses are important for the efficiency of the systems [13]. Cover crops species are chosen on the basis of their ability to produce abundant biomasses and their capacity to improve soil properties [8,14]. Increasing cover crop biomass was positively correlated with several ecosystem services, namely weed suppression, prevention of nitrate leaching, and aboveground biomass N [4]. Plant mulches improve soil fertility by constant organic inputs, protect the soil from erosion and stimulate the biological activity [15,16].

Among available cover crops in Cameroon, Brachiaria ruziziensis and Crotalaria retusa are commonly used in pure stands [2,3,11]. The intercropping of the two plant species may allow a better performance of the system in terms of mulch persistence and soil properties improvement [17,18]. Intercropping systems typically include the production of two crop species within a given field in the same season, most commonly oriented in alternating rows or strips of rows [13,19]. There are many examples of intercropping systems that have demonstrated greater grain or forage yield compared to sole-cropping systems on an equivalent land area basis [19,20,21,22,23]. However, the performances of the systems vary according to several factors including plant species, cultural practices and growing conditions [24].

The agricultural system practiced in the Highlands of West Cameroon is based on two cultural seasons within the same year. It is important to adapt the DMC procedures to farmers’ needs and growing conditions [11]. This study aims to assess the implementation of DMC on a Ferrasol with andic character. The objectives of the study are the following: (1) to evaluate the amount of biomass produced in the first agricultural season by B. ruziziensis, and C. retusa grown in pure stands or intercropped; (2) to evaluate the ability to start DMC the next campaign and (3) to determine efficiency of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa intercropped during the first growing season using LER.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Location of the Experimental Area

The experiment was carried out in 2015 at the Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA) Teaching and Research Farm of the University of Dschang in Bansoa, in the West region of Cameroon. The geographical coordinates of the experimental site are as follows: latitude, 5°27’48’’N; longitude, 10°15’30’’E and altitude, 1420 m. The amount of rainfall during the study period was 1558.6 mm and temperatures oscillated between 15 and 35°C. The soil is a Ferrasol with an andic character. The soil characteristics determined by the soil analysis laboratory are presented in Table 1.

2.2. Planting Material

Brachiaria ruziziensis is an herbaceous grass; semi erected or creeping that grows in tufts with a height ranging from 1 to 1.5 m at flowering. Its root system is composed of numerous roots, dense and able to grow to more than 1.8 m deep [25,26]. The plant can be propagated either by seeds or by cuttings. Biomass production of 7.5 to 25.6 t DM ha⁻¹ have been reported [3,27]. The germination rate of the seed lot used was 25%.

Crotalaria retusa is an erect annual plant that grows to a height of between 1 and 1.40 m. It has a taproot system. The plant is propagated by seeds. C. retusa is leguminous plant that fixes atmospheric N₂. Its biomass production varies according to the ecologies. Yields of 3 to 12 t DM ha⁻¹ have been reported [28,29]. The germination rates of the seed lot used was 70%.

Table 1. Soil Characteristics of the Experimental Site

2.3. Treatments and Experimental Design

The six treatments were pure stands of B. ruziziensis (BP) and C. retusa (CP) and mixtures of one line and two lines of each cover crop in a randomized complete bloc design with four replicates. The four spatial arrangements of intercropped species determining the treatments were: one line of B. ruziziensis and one line of C. retusa (1B1C); one line of B. ruziziensis and two line of C. retusa (1B2C); two lines of B. ruziziensis and one line of C. retusa (2B1C) and two lines of B. ruziziensis and two lines of C. retusa (2B2C).

2.4. Cultural Practices

The experimental plots measured 20 m² (4 m x 5 m). Cover crops were sown in lines distant of 30 cm. The seeding rate was 15 kg per hectare for both cover crops. The fertilizer rates applied to cover crops during the first season were 100 kg N ha⁻¹, 100 kg P₂O₅ ha⁻¹ and 50 kg K₂O ha⁻¹ for B. ruziziensis and 50 kg N ha⁻¹, 100 kg P₂O₅ ha⁻¹ and 50 kg K₂O ha⁻¹ for C. retusa. Cover crops were weeded 27 days after sowing.

2.5. Determination of Aboveground Biomass and Ability to Implement DMC

The aerial biomass produced by cover crops was obtained from sub plots of 0.45 m² or 0.60 m² depending on the number of lines of each species involved in the mixture. After harvest, biomasses of both plants were separated and sun dried. Samples were subsequently oven dried at 70°C until constant weight for dry matter (DM) determinations. The evaluation of the ability to start DMC on the basis of biomasses produced was made following the recommendations by [7] and [2]. These authors proposed that cover crops should produce a minimum of 7 t DM ha⁻¹ before any successful DMC could be expected.

2.6. Land Equivalent Ratio Determination

The land equivalent ratio (LER) was used to compare the productivity of sole and intercropped cover crops. The LER indicates the relative amount of land required when growing sole crops to achieve the productivity observed in the mixture [30]. The LER is a robust and useful indicator of mixture productivity relative to sole crops [5]:

[picture] | (1)

Where LERi is the partial LER of species i, LERj is the partial LER of species j, and so forth for n number of species.

Partial LER is calculated as:

[picture] | (2)

where YMIi is the yield of species i planted in mixture and YSCi is the yield of species i planted as a sole crop.

A total LER > 1.0 indicates the mixture was more productive than the component sole crops, whereas a value <1.0 suggests sole crops were more productive.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Cover crops biomass data were statistically analysed using appropriate SAS software procedures. Analysis of variance and single degree of freedom orthogonal contrasts to compare the productivity of mixtures and mixtures vs. sole crops were carried out.  Means were separated using least square difference method at 5% probability level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Aboveground Biomass Produced by Cover Crop

Brachiaria ruziziensis produced 2.9 to 5.37 t DM ha⁻¹ when intercropped with C. retusa, depending on the number of lines involved in the mixture (Table 2). The amount of biomass harvested was higher (5.37 t DM ha⁻¹) when two lines of B. ruzizensis were associated with one line of C. retusa and lower (2.9 t DM ha⁻¹) when one line of B. ruziziensis was associated with two lines of C. retusa. There was a significant difference among treatments (p < 0.05) for biomass production (Table 3). The amount of biomass produced by B. ruziziensis in pure stands (10.51 t DM ha⁻¹) was significantly larger compared to biomasses produced in intercropping (Table 2 and Table 3). B. ruziziensis alone can produce 5 to 25 t DM ha-1 depending on the duration of the cropping cycle, fertilization and ecology [3,10,11,13,27,31,32,33].

Crotalaria retusa produced 2.88 to 5.28 t DM ha⁻¹, depending on the number of lines involved in the association with B. ruziziensis (Table 1). The higher biomass of Crotalaria retusa (5.28 t DM ha⁻¹) was obtained when two lines of C. retusa were associated with a single line of B. ruziziensis. The differences observed were highly significant (Table 3). 5 t DM ha⁻¹ were obtained in Brazil with C. juncea in sole cropping [13] C. retusa can produce up to 11 t DM ha⁻¹ with a longer growing period [10,11,29]. This species is very sensitive to irregular rainfall during the early stages of growth.

In mixtures, the highest total biomass (9.01 t DM ha⁻¹) was obtained when two lines of B. ruziziensis were associated with two lines of C. retusa. In general, the total biomass produced ranged from 6.84 t DM ha⁻¹ to 9.01 t DM ha⁻¹ depending on the number of lines of the two species involved in the intercropping (Table 2). Differences among treatments are highly significant (p < 0.01). Amounts of biomasses obtained in this experiment are similar to those obtained by [13] on mixtures of B. ruziziensis with C. juncea or pearl millet in Brazil. However, the quality of biomasses could be different according to the proportion of each species in the mixture. Differences in the qualitative value of biomasses of cover crops mixtures have been reported [13,34,35,36,37].

It is recommended to produce a minimum of 7 t DM ha⁻¹ biomass before starting typical DMC [2,7]. In this experiment, only C. retusa in pure stands and intercropping of one line C. retusa and one line B. ruziziensis did not produce enough biomass for starting DMC. They produced 5.03 and 6.84 t DM ha⁻¹, respectively. The other plant intercropping or sole crop produced enough biomasses (8.18 to 10.51 t DM ha⁻¹) and DMC could be started the next campaign [10,11]. However, these biomasses may not remain longer on the soil surface and need to be renewed. Establishing mixtures of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa for three months during the first campaign in the highlands of West Cameroon needs to be repeated every year and the sustainability of the system have to be assessed. The relatively low amounts of biomass obtained in this experiment can be explained by fact that cover cops were allowed to grow only for three months during the first campaign of the growing season. In a context of intensive use of soils for food crop cultivation, where soils are depleted in organic matter and request proper care to offset their degradation, allowing cover crops to grow all year round could contribute to substantially increase the biomass production for a more efficient establishment of a DMC system.

Table 2. Biomass production of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa in mixtures or in pure stands

Table 3. Summary of the analysis of variance from data of biomass production of Brachiaria ruziziensis and Crotalaria retusa in mixture or in pure stands

3.2. Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)

The computed LER varied from 1.00 to 1.34 for the various intercropping systems (Table 4). Theoretically, if the agro-ecological characteristics of each crop in a mixture of two are exactly the same, the total LER should be 1.0 and the partial LERs should be 0.5 for each [30]. LER value of 1.0 indicates no difference in yield between the mixture of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa compared to monocultures of the same species. The LER higher than 1.0 indicates the presence of positive inter-specific interference in the mixtures which provides an advantage to the intercrop.

The other mixtures with LER > 1 (Table 4) suggest that they were more beneficial compared to sole crops of each species in terms of the efficiency in land use. There is an increase in the biomass production in mixtures including Fabacae perhaps by the extra nitrogen supplied through the biological nitrogen fixation, which favors the development of the Poaceae species [13]. The partial LER of C. retusa range from 0.57 to 1.05. These values indicate that this species is more efficient for land use in mixtures with B. rusiziensis. In general, it is observed that grasses dominate legumes in mixtures [38,39] because of grasses relative fast growth at the early stages. The performance of C. retusa can be explained by its fast growth rate and its known allelopatic effects [40]. Delay planting of C. retusa may improve B. ruziziensis performance, if the need is to get more grass in the mixture.

Table 4. Theoretical and observed partial and total land equivalent ratios (LER) for mixtures of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa

4. Conclusion

This study was designed to assess biomass production of intercropped B. ruziziensis and C. retusa, their ability to implement DMC on a Ferrasol with andic character in the highlands of West Cameroon. Only the combination of one line B. ruziziensis and one line C. retusa did not produce sufficient biomass to start typical DMC the following season. The combination of two lines of B. ruziziensis and two lines of C. retusa provided higher and fairly balanced total biomass production. The LER for all cover crops mixtures were equal or greater than 1. There is an advantage of intercropping these two plants compared to their cultivation in pure stand. However, C. retusa tends to dominate over B. ruziziensis and delay sowings can be practiced if more grass is needed in the mulch. Results provide a basis for intercropping B. ruziziensis and C. retusa as cover crops for DMC in the Highlands of West Cameroon. But establishing mixtures of B. ruziziensis and C. retusa in three months during the first season in the Highlands of West Cameroon needs to be repeated every year and the sustainability of the system have to be assessed.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Department of crop sciences of Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences of the University of Dschang for the technical and financial support, and to the many Agronomy students who were involved in field work.

References

[1]   | Erenstein, O. (2003). Smallholder conservation farming in the tropics and sub-tropics: a guide to the development and dissemination of mulching with crop. Agric. Ecosyst. and Environ., 100: 17-37.

[2]  
M'biandoun, M., Dongmo, A. L., Balarabe, O. et Nchoutnji, I. 2010. Systèmes de culture sur couverture végétale en Afrique centrale: conditions techniques et socioéconomique pour son développement. Actes du colloque « Savanes africaines en développement: innover pour durer », 20-23 avril 2009, Garoua, Cameroun.

[3]  
Mvondo-Awono, J.P., Boukong, A., Beyegue, D. H., Abou Abba, A., Mvondo-Ze, D.A., Passale, M. et Lawane. 2012. Production de biomasse de Brachiaria ruziziensis (Germain et Evrard) en vue de la mise en place de systèmes de culture sous couvertures végétales dans la zone cotonnière du Cameroun. Cameroon Journal of Experimental Biology.8 (1): 1-7.

[4]   | Finney, D.M., White, C.M. and Kaye, J.P. 2016. Biomass production and carbon/nitrogen ratio inﬂuence ecosystem services from cover crop mixtures. Agronomy Journal, 108: 39-52.
[5]   | Wortman, S.E., Francis, C. A. and Lindquist, J.L. 2012. Cover crop mixtures for the Western Corn Belt: opportunities for increased productivity and stability. Agronomy Journal, 104 (3): 699-705.
[6]   | Nascente, A.S., Lacerda, M.C, Lanna, A. C., Corsi de Filippi, M.C. and Silva, D.M. 2016. Cover crops can affect soil attributes and yield of upland rice, Australian journal of Crop science. 10(2): 176-184.
[7]   | Séguy, L. 2006. Suivi évaluation et proposition de recherche-action pour la diffusion du semis direct sur couverture végétale au Nord Cameroun. CIRAD/IRAD/AFD/SODECOTON.
[8]   | Mvondo-Awono J. P., Boukong A., Beyegue, D. H., Abou Abba, A., Mvondo-Ze D. A., Teizem, B. and Guimbirke, G. 2013. Stylosanthes Guianensis Seeding Year Mulch Evolution and Residual Effects on a Subsequent Maize Crop in Northern Cameroon. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9 (1): 73-79.
[9]   | FAO.2016. FAO: AG: Agriculture de conservation. Available atwww.fao.org/ag/ca/fr/1a.html.
[10]   | Hinimbio, T.P., Madi, A. and Mvondo Awono, J.P. 2018. Réponse du maïs aux effets de réhabilitation de la fertilité des sols liés à la légumineuse Crotalaria juncea L. au Nord Cameroun, Afrique Science 14(4): 423-438.
[11]   | Tatang, T.A., Beyegue, D.H. and Mvondo-Awono, J.P. 2022. “Wheat Production under Mulches of Preceeding Brachiaria ruziziensis and Crotalaria juncea on Andic Ferrasol of Western Highlands of Cameroon.” World Journal of Agricultural Research, 10 (2): 36-43.
[12]   | Séguy, L. 2008. Rapport de mission au Cameroun. Comment passer des TCS (Techniques Culturales Simplifiées) actuellement très largement dominantes aux SCV. Rééquilibrer l’exploitation agricole des grandes unités de sol de la région Nord du Cameroun. Mission du 13 au 24 septembre 2008. 97 p.
[13]   | Mazetto Júnior, J. C., Torres, J. L. R., Costa, D. D., Silva, V. R., Menezes de Souza, Z. and Lemes, E. M. 2019. Production and Decomposition of Cover Crop Residues and Associations with Soil Organic Fractions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11(5): 58-69.

[14]  
Dabney, S. M., Delgado, J. A., Meisinger, J. J., Schomberg, H. H., Liebig, M.A., Kaspar, T. and Mitchell, J., Reeves, W. 2010. Using cover crops and cropping systems for nitrogen management, In: Delgado, JA and Follett, RF (Editors) Advances in nitrogen management for water quality, pp. 231-281. Ankeny, IA: SWCS.

[15]  
Dugué, P. 2013. Semis direct, Système de culture sur couverture végétale (SCV) et Agroécologie, vers où va – t –on ? Quelques enseignements de l’atelier de capitalisation sur les impacts et effets des systèmes de culture sous couvert végétal. Programme d’appui multi-pays à l’Agro-écologie (Montpellier, Agropolis, 6 au 8 novembre 2013). Montpellier. Alternatives rurales, 5 p.

[16]   | Randrianjafizanaka, M. T., Autfrayb P., Andrianaivo, A. P., Ramonta Isabelle,s R. and Jonne Rodenburg, J. 2018. Combined effects of cover crops, mulch, zero-tillage and resistant varieties on Striga asiatica (L.) Kuntze in rice-maize rotation systems, Agriculture Ecosystem & environment, 256: 1-24.
[17]   | Kramberger, B., Gselman, A., Povrsnik, M., Krist, J. and Lesnik, M. 2013. Environmental advantages of binary mixtures of Trifolium incarnatum and Lolium multiflorum over individual pure stands. Plant soil environ 59: 22-28.
[18]   | Chapagain T., Lee, E. A. and Raizada, M. N. 2020. The Potential of Multi-Species Mixtures to Diversify Cover Crop Beneﬁts. Review, Sunstainability, 12 (2058): 2-16.
[19]   | Chen, C., Westcott, M., Neill, K., Wichmann, D. and Knox, M. 2004. Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Agron. J., 96: 1730-1738.
[20]   | Agegnehu, G., Amare, G. and Woldeyesus, S. 2006. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Europ. J. Agronomy 25: 202-207.
[21]   | Ghosh, K., Manna, C., Bandyopadhyay, K., Ajay, Tripathi, K., Wanjari, H., Hati, M., Misra, K., Acharya, L. and Rao, S. 2006. Interspecific interaction and nutrient use in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Agronomy Journal, 98: 1097-1108.
[22]   | Shili-Touzi1, I., De Tourdonnet, S., Launay, M. and Doré T. 2010. Does intercropping winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with red fescue (Festuca rubra) as a cover crop improve agronomic and environmental performance? A modeling approach. Field Crops Research, 116(3): 218-229.
[23]   | Baldé, A. B., Scopel, E., Affholder, F., Corbeels, M., Da Silva, A. M. F., Xavier, J. H. V. and Wery, J. 2011. Agronomic performance of no-tillage relay intercropping with maize under smallholder conditions in Central Brazil. Field Crops Research, 124, 241-251.
[24]   | Young-Mathews, A. 2017. Seeding Rates for Legume-Grain Cover Crop Mixes in Western Oregon. FINAL STUDY REPORT NRCS Plant Materials Center, Corvallis, OR. USDA-NRCS. 9p.
[25]   | Hare, M., Tatsapong, P. and Saipraset, K. 2007. Seed production of two brachiaria hybrid cultivars in North-east Thailand.2.: Closing date defoliation. Tropical grassland, 41: 35-42.

[26]  
Husson, O., Charpentier, H., Razanamparany, C., Moussa, N., Michellon, R., Naudin, K., Razafintsalama, H., Rakotoarinivo, C., Rakotondramanana and Séguy, L. 2008a. Fiches techniques plantes de couverture: Graminées pérennes (Brachiaria sp.). Manuel pratique du semis direct à Madagascar. Volume III. Chapitre 3. § 4.1. Document obtenu sur le site CIRAD du réseau http://agroecologie.cirad.fr.

[27]   | Adjolohoun, S., Bindelle, J., Adandedjan, C., Toléba, S., Houinato, M., Kindomihou, V., Nonfon W. et Sinsin, B. 2013. Influence de l’écartement et de la fertilisation azotée sur le rendement et la qualité des semences de Brachiaria ruziziensis en climat tropical subhumide. Fourrages, 216, 339-345.
[28]   | IT², 2013. Les Crotalaires/Synthèse. Banne de Guadeloupe & Martinique.
[29]   | IRAD, 2003. Résultats des travaux réalisés entre mai 2002 et juin 2003 dans le cadre de la Convention de service N° 6/PH2/FFEM/SODECOTON – IRAD. Garoua.
[30]   | Vandermeer, J. 1989. The ecology of intercropping systems. Cambridge University Press, 237p.
[31]   | Tendonkeng, F., Boukila, B., Pamo, T. E., MBoko, A., Matumuini, N.E.F. and Zogang, F. B. 2009. Effet de différents niveaux de fertilisation azotée et du stade phénologique sur la croissance et le rendement de Brachiaria ruziziensis dans l’Ouest-Cameroun. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 3(4): 725-735.
[32]   | Tendonkeng, F., Boukila, B., Pamo T.E., Mboko, A.V. and Matumuini, N.E.F. 2011. Effets direct et résiduel de différents niveaux de fertilisation azotée sur la croissance et le rendement de Brachiaria ruziziensis à différents stades phénologiques. Tropicultura, 29(4): 197-204.

[33]  
Azangue, G. J., Nguetsop, V. F., Tendonkeng, F., Wauffo, D. F. et Pamo, T. E. 2019. Effets des différents niveaux de fertilisation aux fientes de poules sur la croissance et la production de biomasse de Brachiaria ruziziensis (Poaceae) en fonction des stades phénologiques à l’Ouest-Cameroun. International Journal Biological Chemical Science. 13(3): 1762-1774.

[34]   | Sullivan, D. and Andrews, N. (2012). Estimating plant-available nitrogen release from cover crops. International Plant Nutrition Institute, 22 p.
[35]   | Gastral, F., Julier, B., Surault, F., Litrico, I., Durand, J., Denoue, D., Ghesquière, M. and Sampoux, J.P. 2012. Intérêt des prairies cultivées multi espèces dans le contexte des systèmes de polyculture-élevage. Innovations Agronomiques, 22: 169-183.
[36]   | Kramberger, B., Gselman, A., Kristl, J., Lešnik, M., Šuštar, V., Muršec, M. and Podvršnik, M. 2014. Winter cover crop: The eﬀects of grass clover mixture proportion and biomass management on maize and the apparent residual N in the soil. European Journal of Agronomy. 55, 63-71.
[37]   | Julier, B., Louarn, G., Gastal, F., Surault, F., Sampoux, J. P., Maamouri, A. and Fernandez, L. 2014. Les associations graminées - légumineuses prairiales. Comment sélectionner des variétés adaptées pour accroitre leur productivité et faciliter leur conduite ? Innovations Agronomiques 40: 61-72.
[38]   | Daniaux, C. 2013. La prairie temporaire association graminées-légumineuses: quels intérêts? Filière Ovine et Caprine n⁰45- 4ème trimestre (2013), pp. 26-28.
[39]   | Smith, R., Atwood, L. and Warren, N. 2014. Increased Productivity of a Cover crop mixture is not associated with enhanced agroecosystem services. Cover crop mixture and agroecosystem services. PLOS ONE, 9: 8 p.

[40]  
Husson, O., Charpentier, H., Razanamparany, C., Moussa, N., Michellon, R., Naudin, K., Razafintsalama, H., Rakotoarinivo, C., Andrianaivo., A et Rakotondramanana et Séguy, L. 2008b. Le contrôle du striga par les systèmes SCV. Principes et intérêts des SCV: contrôle des pestes végétales. Manuel pratique du semis direct à Madagascar. Volume I. Chapitre 3. § 3.1. Document obtenu sur le site Cirad du réseau http://agroecologie.cirad.fr.