Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

In vitro Propagation of Carica papaya L. Variety ‘Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’ Using Shoot Tip

S.M. Waidyaratne*, L.G.I. Samanmalie, P.K.C. Buddhinie

Department of Plant Sciences, University of Colombo, Colombo, 00300, Sri Lanka

Abstract: In vitro plantlet regeneration ability of the local hybrid papaya variety Horana Papaya Hybrid 01 was evaluated using shoot tips from greenhouse-raised seedlings. Shoots tips surface sterilized in 20% Sodium Hypochlorite (Clorox®) for 20 min were established in Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium containing 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP; 0.0,0.5,1.0,1.5 mg/L) in combination with 1-Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA; 0.0,0.1,0.5 mg/L) for shoot multiplication. Considering the high mean number of shoots per explant (4.8 ± 0.5) and absence of calli, 1.0 mg/L BAP was the best treatment for direct organogenesis. Proliferated shoots were transferred to a 1.5 strength MS medium containing 0.25 mg/L BAP and Gibberellic Acid (GA₃; 0.0, 0.15, 0.30 mg/L) for further elongation. Elongated shootlets were placed in half-strength MS medium supplemented with Indole-3-Butyric Acid (IBA; 0.0,1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 mg/L) for rooting. The highest root induction response (86%) and roots suitable for acclimatization were observed with 2.0 mg/L of IBA. Plantlets were acclimatized in poly cups containing a sterile potting mixture (soil, sand, compost, and coir dust; 1:1:1:1) and a survival rate of 75% was achieved under in vitro conditions. The findings of the present study can be optimized to develop a suitable in vitro micropropagation protocol for rapid clonal propagation of this papaya variety for producing true to type planting material.

Keywords: direct organogenesis, hybrid, micropropagation, papaya, shoot tip

Received April 22, 2022; Revised May 29, 2022; Accepted June 08, 2022

Citation: S.M. Waidyaratne, L.G.I. Samanmalie, P.K.C. Buddhinie, In vitro Propagation of Carica papaya L. Variety ‘Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’ Using Shoot Tip. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 10 (1). 15-19. January 2022. doi:10.12691/wjar-10-1-3

1. Introduction

The papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a tropical fruit of family Caricaceae. Introduced to Sri Lanka in the 16th century, it is now a popular plantation crop giving high economic returns in the dry and intermediate zones [1]. However, papaya growers prefer imported hybrid (F₁) seeds for cultivation despite the availability of local germplasm, making local varieties less popular in local markets [2,3]. The 'Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’ was released by the Department of Agriculture (DOA), Sri Lanka in 2014 to popularize local papayas among both farmers and consumers. It is the first F₁ papaya hybrid released in Sri Lanka and is a cross between two local inbred lines 'Rathna' and 'Cp -13' [3,4]. The hybrid offers several favorable agronomic traits such as high yield (nearly 50 fruits or 45 kg) per tree and offers moderate resistance to anthracnose and powdery mildew and the Papaya Ring Spot Virus (PRSC [4].

Papaya is a heterozygous, cross-pollinated crop, mainly propagated sexually through seeds. However, seed propagation leads to variability among offspring [1]. Thus, conventional breeding programs have been developed to obtain papaya lineages to be used in hybridization while focusing on heterosis (hybrid vigor). When two inbred lines are crossed, the resulting first generation (F₁) is uniform and vigorous in terms of morpho-agronomic characters, making them more suitable for commercial-scale cultivation. However, it consumes time, space, and resources to maintain such inbred lines [5].

Several papaya hybrids have been developed to have many desirable agronomic traits (such as yield, fruit size, quality, pest, and disease resistance). ‘Known You Number One’, ‘Sun rise’, ‘Solo’ and ‘Red Lady’. are some popular imported F₁ hybrids cultivated in Sri Lanka [3]. Segregation of offsprings at the second filial generation (F₂) still causes variations in yield and quality parameters, which limits the stability of hybrids to the first (F₁) generation. Therefore an efficient clonal propagation method is necessary [6,7]. Asexual reproduction via grafting and rooted papaya cuttings has a low success rate. Thus, micropropagation is an effective alternative for producing disease-free, true-to-type plants from quality germplasm [1,5,7]. The use of pre-existing meristems (shoot tips and axillary buds) is the most common method for in vitro regeneration of papaya plantlets and is governed by many internal and external factors [8,9,10]. This includes the genotype of plants, explant type, and the culture conditions (e.g. media constituents, light, temperature, and relative humidity) provided during micropropagation [11].

The present study aims at determining the effects of some selected plant growth regulators (PGRs) and culture conditions during stages of micropropagation (in vitro establishment, shoot multiplication, elongation root induction, and acclimatization) of ‘Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’ to produce tissue cultured plants via rapid clonal propagation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Surface Sterilization

The F₁ seeds of ‘Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’ were obtained from the Plant Breeding Division, Fruit Research and Development Institute (FRDI), Horana, Sri Lanka. Seeds were soaked in 200 ppm of Gibberellic acid (GA₃) for 24 hrs. to enhance germination [12]. Four-day-old, germinated seedlings were planted in a potting mixture having soil: sand: compost: and coir dust (1:1:1:1) and maintained under greenhouse conditions to obtain explants. At the end of six weeks, shoot tips from greenhouse-raised F₁ seedlings were excised and proceeded for aseptic culture.

Shoot tips (1.5 cm) were washed under running tap water for 45 min. followed by rinsing in a 0.5% v/v liquid detergent solution. Afterward, they were immersed in 20% Clorox (Sodium Hypochlorite) for 20 min. with shaking (at 100 rpm) followed by rinsing twice with sterile distilled water to remove all traces of sterilant. Thereafter, the shoot tips were resized into 1 cm segments and cultured in twelve different multiplication media for shoot regeneration (Table 1).

2.2. Culture Media and Culture Conditions

Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium [13] with modified vitamins, 7.5 g/L agar, and 30 g/L of table sugar [2] were used in preparing culture media. The pH was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving. Changes made in the MS strength, sugar concentration and PGRs added have been mentioned under each instance. Cultures were placed in the growth room at 25±1°C for a photoperiod of 16 hrs. (cool white fluorescent lights at 2000 - 3000 lux intensity).

2.3. Shoot Multiplication and Elongation

Combinations of four levels (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L) of 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) and three levels (0.0, 0.1 and 0.5 mg/L) of 1-Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) were used to determine the effect on in vitro shoot multiplication with eight replicates for each treatment (Table 1). Proliferating shoots were subcultured into the same respective media on the 4th and 7th weeks and allowed to multiply in vitro for 60 days [8].

Table 1. The Effect of BAP and NAA on the Mean Number of Shoots Produced Per Explant After 60 Days

An additional shoot elongation phase had to be carried out as the height of shoots produced in the above treatments was inadequate for rooting. At the end of 60 days, shoots from the three best proliferation media were selected for elongation after statistical analysis of shoot multiplication data. Treatments containing 1.5 strength MS basal media containing 0.0, 0.15, and 0.30 mg/L of Gibberellic acid (GA₃) in combination with 0.25 mg/L BAP were adopted as stated in Wu et al. [14]. Accordingly, individual shoots excised from proliferating clumps were placed in the above PGR combinations for 3 weeks for elongation.

2.4. Root Induction and Acclimatization

After elongation, root induction was done in a two-step procedure. First, the shoots were placed in a PGR-free MS medium for 10 days to remove the residual effects of previously used PGRs (BAP, NAA, and GA₃). Then, individual shoots were placed on half-strength MS media with five different levels of Indole-3-Butyric Acid (0.0,1.0,2.0,3.0, and 4.0 mg/L) for four weeks. in vitro root development was evaluated using three parameters namely, percentage of root induction, mean number of roots initiated per explant, and the mean root length.

Following root induction, rooted plantlets were withdrawn from culture vessels and gently washed with sterile distilled water and planted in sterile polycups containing an autoclaved potting mixture of soil: sand: compost: coir dust (in 1:1:1:1 ratio). Each plant was irrigated with a PGR free full-strength liquid MS solution (10 mL), covered with polypropylene bags to maintain humidity, and placed in an air-conditioned room (25±1°C) that has access to sunlight while monitoring the number of surviving and dead plants regularly for a total of four (04) weeks [8,9,10].

2.5. Experimental Design

All in vitro experiments were arranged in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Each experiment (multiplication, elongation, and root induction) had at least seven replicates per treatment. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Pairwise comparison test was conducted for parametric data in significantly different (p<0.05) treatments. Nonparametric data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test and were presented as the mean ± standard error (SE) using the MINITAB version 17.1.0 software [8,10].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of BAP and NAA on Shoot Multiplication

Shoot proliferation was initiated after two weeks of in vitro establishment. By the fourth week, shoot multiplication was observed in all treatments. Skoog and Miller [15] reports that balancing auxin and cytokinin levels in the tissue culture medium affect organogenesis. Thus, different combinations of BAP and NAA were tested to identify the most suitable treatments [8,9,10]. Table 1 presents the mean number of shoots per explant produced by each treatment at the end of 60 days of incubation.

Results of the two-way ANOVA indicated that the interaction effect between BAP and NAA was not significant (p=0.067). However, BAP and NAA had a significant effect individually at α=0.05 (p=0.000 and p=0.000). Thus, use of BAP and NAA were evaluated separately with one way ANOVA. Accordingly, all treatments containing BAP (0.5,1.0 and 1.5mg/L) alone or in combination with NAA, has significantly high multiplication rates (than ones without BAP). However, Tukey's pairwise comparison does not outline the best concentration among the tested BAP levels.

In addition to the statistical analysis. morphological traits (absence of callus formation and/or clumping of shoots) had to be considered when selecting suitable multiplication media. The use of BAP for shoot multiplication was preferred as it is a cost-effective cytokinin with widespread use and availability [8].

Callus induction was prominent in certain PGR combinations (Figure 1A) despite rapid multiplication. Such media are not suitable for producing true-to-type planting material. However, they can be used when indirect organogenesis is intended. Higher NAA levels (0.5mg/L) when combined with low cytokinin produced calli in treatment SM2 (0.5mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA) whose auxin: cytokinin ratio (1:1) favors callus formation. Treatments N1 and N2 carrying NAA alone (0.1 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L of NAA) give low multiplication rates. Root initiation without any shoot proliferation was observed in N1 with 0.1 mg/L NAA.

Considering the high mean number of shoots (4.8±0.5) per explant and the absence of callus formation, 1.0 mg/L of BAP was the most effective treatment for direct organogenesis in the present study (Figure 1C). Even though higher BAP levels facilitate shoot proliferation, it is known to arrest individual shoot development in papaya [16,17]. In agreement with the above, treatments SM4 (1.0 mg/L BAP+ 0.5 mg/L NAA) and SM6 (1.5 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA) produced stunted shoot clusters with smaller leaves in the present study despite high multiplication rates (Figure 1B). Such shoots had to undergo a subsequent elongation phase.

In similar studies for papaya, Setargie et al. [18] and Panjaithan et al. [8] have obtained the highest mean number of shoots per explant in MS media with 1.0 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA and 1.0 mg/L BAP + 0.05 mg/L NAA for Carica papaya L. cv. Maradol and Eksotika respectively. An additional step of elongation with a lowered cytokinin level combined with various auxins (NAA, IAA) or GA₃ might be required for in vitro raised C. papaya shoots [8,19]. Even though GA3 is known to cause shoot elongation, records on its applications in micropropagation of C. papaya are limited. Since the present study also had rapidly multiplying clumps of dwarf shootlets, an elongation step was necessary.

Figure 1. Results of in vitro shoot multiplication of 'Horana Papaya Hybrid 01'. (A) Callus formation and pale colored shoots in 0.5 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA (B) Small , compact shootlets formed with 1.0 mg/L BAP + 0.5 mg/L NAA (C) Shoot formation in 1 mg/L BAP

3.2. Effect of GA₃ on Shoot Elongation

Gibberellins stimulate elongation of internodes promote meristematic growth under in vitro conditions [14,19]. Although findings of Wu et al. were adopted for shoot elongation, no significant height increments were obtained in the present study. Wu et al., report that 1.5 strength MS basal medium containing 0.25 mg L⁻¹ BAP and, 0.3 mg/L GA3 cause significant height increments [14]. However, incorporating GA₃ into the multiplication phase itself (preferably after the first few subcultures) can be recommended [19,20] for this papaya variety to separate any compact shoot clumps before proceeding to rooting.

3.3. Rooting and Acclimatization

3.3.1. Effect of IBA on Root Initiation and Elongation

Since IBA is a synthetic auxin that is more stable than endogenous Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) present on adult papaya, it can be used for in vitro root induction in papaya [8]. The MS strength was reduced to half when preparing rooting media because lowering the mineral and nutrient supply is known to favor root induction [16,21].

All five treatments (including 0 mg/L IBA) showed rooting responses after four weeks. When the number of root initials per shoot was assessed using Kruskal Wallis nonparametric test, 4.0 mg/L IBA was revealed to be the best rooting treatment, followed by 2.0 mg/L IBA. The control treatment without IBA scored the least rank (Table 2). No significantly different treatment was found for the mean length of roots (at α = 0.05) after conducting one-way ANOVA and Tukey's pairwise comparison (Table 2).

Table 2. Mean Number of Plants that Produced Roots, Mean Number of Roots Initiated Per Shoot, and the Mean Length of Roots Produced After Four Weeks of Incubation in Half-Strength MS Medium with Different IBA Concentrations

The half-strength MS medium with 4.0 mg/L IBA produced the highest number of roots per shoot with 86% of root induction. However, the thin and hairy root initials were unsuitable for acclimatization (Figure 2A). Furthermore, rooting formation occurred from a mass of cells in the culture and not from the base of the explant. Therefore, half-strength MS medium with 2.0 mg/L IBA (which also had 86% root induction) can be considered suitable for in vitro root induction in 'Horana Papaya Hybrid 01' (Figure 2B and Figure 2C). Saker et al. [22] obtained the best root induction on full strength MS medium with 2.0 mg/L IBA for C. papaya variety 'Honey Dew'. Nguyen et al [23] reports successful root induction for 'Red Lady' papaya in both full and half-strength MS media when 2.0 - 2.5 mg/L of IBA was used.

During acclimatization, 75% of the plantlets survived inside their propagators by the end of the fourth week (Figure 2D and Figure 2E). Due to time limitations, evaluation of in vitro acclimatized plants under field conditions could not be performed. Only 12.5% of plants survived under normal temperature and humidity when transferred to ex-vitro conditions. Hence, optimizing field establishment acclimatization phases is necessary.

Figure 2. Formation of in vitro roots and acclimatization of ' Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’. (A) Root induction and callus formation in 4.0 mg/L IBA) (B) and (C) Root induction in 2.0 mg/L IBA. (D) An in vitro raised plantlet of 'Horana Papaya Hybrid 01' after one week and (E) after four weeks of acclimatization

4. Conclusion

Shoot tips are a suitable source of explants for in vitro propagation of C. papaya variety 'Horana Papaya Hybrid 01’. Shoot multiplication via Direct and indirect organogenesis can be achieved by altering the auxin: cytokinin ratio. Treatments with BAP only (1mg/L) or a higher BAP concentration in combination with NAA cause direct organogenesis. Increasing NAA levels, or combinations having lower BAP amounts leads to callus formation. Half strength MS with 2 mg/L IBA is the most suitable treatment for root induction. Further studies are necessary for investigating optimum conditions for root development and acclimatization. In vitro raised propagules would also be a useful source of planting materials for future crop improvement programs aimed at breeding new varieties through protoplast culture, somatic embryogenesis, mutation breeding and genetic transformation [5,24,25].

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Plant Breeding Division, Fruit Research and Development Institute, Horana, Sri Lanka for providing planting materials and information about ‘Horana Papaya Hybrid 01' for this study.

Statement of Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

References

[1]   | A. Farzana, P. Palkadapala, K. Meddegoda, P. Samarajeewa and J. Eeswara, “Somatic embryogenesis in papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. Rathna)”, Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 36(1). 41, 2008.
[2]   | L.G.I. Samanmalie, B.M.V.S. Basnayake, A. Rohini, K.G.G. Indika, “Developing a tissue culture protocol for production of planting materials of papaya (Carica papaya L.) Hybrid”, Annals of the Sri Lanka Dep. Agric., 19 (2). 45-52. 2017.
[3]   | I. Kalubowila, M.M.S. Jayawardane, H.D. Perera, K.D.A., Jayawickrama, G.N. Shiromali, “Heterosis in yield and fruit quality parameters in the papaya hybrids developed in Sri Lanka”, Annals of the Sri Lanka Dep. Agric., 37-44. 2014.
[4]   | A.P. Bentota, “Released and Recommended New Crop Varieties for 2014”, Department of Agriculture Sri Lanka. 47-50. 2015.
[5]   | J. A. T. Silva, Z. Rashid, D.T. Nhut, D. Sivakumar, A. Gera, M.T. Souza and P Tennant, “Papaya (Carica papaya L.) Biology and Biotechnology”, Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology. 1(1), 47-73. 2007.
[6]   | G. Fuentes, J.M. Santamaría , Papaya (Carica papaya L.): Origin, Domestication, and Production.In Genetics and genomics of Papaya, Springer, New York. 2014. 3-15.
[7]   | S. Priyadarshan, M.J.P. M., eds., Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Tropical Species, Springer Science & Business Media, New York. 2009. 121-159.
[8]   | N. Panjaitan, S.B, Aziz, M.A, Rashid, A.A and Saleh, “In-vitro plantlet regeneration from shoot tip of field-grown hermaphrodite papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. Eksotika)”, Int. J. Agric. Biol. 9. 827-832. 2007.
[9]   | B. Bindu, “Micro Propagation of Papaya Variety CO-5.”, International Journal of Research. 2(2). 46-49. 2015.
[10]   | D. Efendi and M.R. Putra, “Optimation of in vitro lateral shoots multiplication of papaya (Carica papaya L.) 'Callina' with BAP and NAA”, Journal of Tropical Crop Science. 4(3). 2017.
[11]   | E.F. George, M.A. Hall, G.-J. De Klerk, eds., Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture-3rd Edition, Springer Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2008. 1-28.
[12]   | R. C. Choudhary, J. Kanwar, H. Agarwal and O. Prakash, “Effect of GA3 and growing media on seed germination of papaya (Carica papaya L.) cv. Pusa Nanha”, International Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(5), 1423-1425. 2020.
[13]   | F. Murashigue, T. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobaco tissue cultures”, Physiologia Plantarum . 473-497. 1962.
[14]   | K. Wu, S. Zeng, Z. Chen, J. Duan, “In vitro mass propagation of hermaphroditic Carica papaya cv. Meizhonghong”, Pakistan J. Bot. 44 . 1669-1676. 2012.
[15]   | F. Skoog and C. Miller, “Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro.”, Symp Soc Exp Biol.,11.118-130. 1957.
[16]   | R. Miller and R. Drew, “Effect of explant type on proliferation of Carica papaya L. in vitro”, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 21(1), 39-44. 1990.
[17]   | M. McCubbin, J. van Staden and P. Debergh, “A modified technique for in vitro propagation of papaya (Carica papaya L.)”, South African Journal of Botany, 69(3), 287-291.2003.
[18]   | A. Setargie, F. Mekbib, E. Abraha, “In vitro Propagation of Papaya (Carica papaya L.)”, World J. Agric. Sci. 11. 84-88. 2015.
[19]   | A.D Caple and K. T. Cheah. “Micropropagation of Hermaphrodite Carica papaya L. ‘Rainbow’ Seedlings via Axillary Bud Pathway”, Biotechnology. 12. 1-5. 2016.
[20]   | P. Patil, N. Vastrad, M.R. Dinesh, A.R. Bantwal, “A revised protocol for in vitro propagation of Carica papaya using lateral buds from field-grown trees”, Journal of Horticultural Sciences .2. 99-103. 2007.
[21]   | J. R. Patel, R. M. Patel, R. R. Shah, and K. A. Shinde. “Proliferation, rooting and acclimatization of micropropagated papaya cv. Red Lady.” International Journal of Plant Sciences (Muzaffarnagar). 5 (2). 459-462. 2010.
[22]   | S.A. Bekheet, H. Taha, A.A. Reda, “In vitro Propagation of Papaya (Carica papaya L.)”, Arab Journal of Biotechnology. 2. 235-244.1999.
[23]   | V. Nguyen, C. Yen and C. Hsieh, “Effect of nutritional and growth hormonal factors on in vitro regeneration of papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. Red Lady)”, Journal of the National Science Foundation Sri Lanka, 46(4). 559-568. 2018.
[24]   | B. Al-Shara, R.M. Taha and K. Rashid. “Biotechnological methods and limitations of micropropagation in papaya (Carica papaya L.) production: a review.” J. Animal and Plant Sciences. 28(5). 1208-1226. 2018
[25]   | R. Drew, S. Ashmore and M. Azimi, “Papaya as a model tropical fruit species for the development of conservation and breeding technologies”, Acta Horticulturae.864.101-107. 2010.