﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Global Journal of Surgery</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2379-8750</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2015-10-15</publicationDate>
    <volume>3</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <startPage>27</startPage>
    <endPage>30</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/js-3-2-3</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>JS2015323</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Extracapsular Dissection versus Superficial Parotidectomy for Treatment of Benign Parotid Tumors</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Mohamed Korany</name>
        <email>mkorany2015@gmail.com</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ahmed Said</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Surgery, Assiut University, Egypt</affiliationName>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="2">Department of Surgical Oncology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">Objective: The current study aimed to compare extracapsular dissection (ED) versus superficial parotidectomy (SP) in surgical treatment of benign parotid tumors. Methodology: Thirty two patients with benign parotid tumors were included in this study. The patients divided into two groups: the ED group (16) patients (5 males and 11 females) and SP group 16 patients (7 males and 9 females). Patients were followed up for 2 years. Results: Sixteen were included in (ED) group and 16 in (SP) group, twelve patients were males (37.5%) and 20 patients were females (62.5%). The mean age was 47.2 years (range 21 to 69 years) in both groups. No complications developed in (ED) group except wound infections in 2 patients (12.5%).  Many cases complicated in (SP) group: two cases of temporary facial paresis, (12.5%), 3 cases of salivary fistula (18.7%), 10 cases (62.5) of cosmetic deformity in the form of depressions in the parotid region and one patient (6.2%) developed Frey's syndrome. No recurrence in either group. Conclusion: Extracapsular dissection is safe and reliable procedure compared to superficial parotidectomy with reduced morbidity and good cosmetic results.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/js/3/2/3/js-3-2-3.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>extracapsular dissection</keyword>
      <keyword>parotid</keyword>
      <keyword>superficial parotidectomy</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>