Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Effects of Pilates Exercise on Women’s Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review with Meta-Analysis

Hyun Seo Ko MS, Soyoung Choi PhD RN*

Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite Pilates exercise’s widespread adoption in health promotion, variations in implementation protocols and targeted health outcomes have resulted in fragmented evidence. A synthesis of existing evidence is required to establish evidence-based protocols and its validated effects for women’s health outcomes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the characteristics of Pilates exercise interventions, evaluate the methodological quality of existing systematic reviews, estimate Pilates exercise effects on diverse health outcomes, and discuss future Pilates exercise research. METHODS: Two independent researchers conducted a literature search across four databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. After the screening process, eight systematic reviews were included. Additionally, the researchers investigated each systemic review’s included independent studies (n = 40). Quality of appraisal was conducted using the AMSTAR 2 tool, followed by a meta-analysis performed with R software. RESULTS: Analysis of FITT revealed substantial heterogeneity in Pilates exercise interventions. No study adopted theoretical frameworks for guiding intervention development and implementation. Methodological quality assessment rated all systematic reviews low, primarily due to inadequate statistical approaches and insufficient analysis of between-study heterogeneity. There were significant improvements in flexibility (Cohen’s d = 0.74, 95% CI [0.32, 1.16]), cardiorespiratory fitness (Cohen’s d = 0.95, 95% CI [0.41, 1.48]), and labor outcomes (pain: Cohen’s d = -1.29, 95% CI [-1.86, 0.72]; delivery time: Cohen’s d = -0.42, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.08]). CONCLUSION: There is a critical need to develop standardized Pilates exercise protocols tailored to women’s specific health outcomes.

Keywords: exercise, female, health promotion, meta-synthesis, Pilates

Received May 02, 2025; Revised June 03, 2025; Accepted June 10, 2025

Citation: Hyun Seo Ko MS, Soyoung Choi PhD RN, Effects of Pilates Exercise on Women’s Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review with Meta-Analysis. Journal of Physical Activity Research, 10 (1). 7-17. January 2025. doi:10.12691/jpar-10-1-2

1. Introduction

Pilates exercise is a comprehensive physical conditioning method that emphasizes core stability, muscular strength, flexibility, postural alignment, and controlled breathing [1] Its biomechanical foundation is grounded in principles of human movement science; each exercise is purposefully designed to improve neuromuscular efficiency and joint mechanics, thereby promoting functional movement patterns and minimizing injury risk [2]. Moreover, the integration of biomechanical precision and mindful awareness underlies its use in both physical rehabilitation and psychological well-being [3,4,5]This holistic approach suggests Pilates exercise holds promise as a versatile intervention adaptable to diverse population and fitness levels, including for addressing the complex health needs specific to women.

Globally, women encounter distinct and often disproportionate health challenges arising from a complex interplay of biological determinants, sociocultural dynamics, and systematic inequities [6]. Biological factors, including the reproductive life cycle (e.g., menarche, pregnancy, postpartum, menopause), hormonal fluctuations, and sex-specific predispositions, contribute to unique health profiles. Women experience higher rates of certain conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, autoimmune diseases, osteoporosis, and specific musculoskeletal issues such as low back pain [7]. Sociocultural factors, including unequal power relationships, restrictive gender norms limiting education and employment, an overwhelming focus on reproductive roles, and pervasive gender-based violence, further compound these vulnerabilities [8,9]. Systemic issues, such as gender bias in medical research and healthcare delivery, diagnostic delays for conditions like cardiovascular disease and cancer, and socioeconomic disadvantages, create additional barriers to optimal health [6]. These challenges are not static but accumulate and interact across a woman’s lifespan; early life exposures and cumulative stressors significantly shape long-term health trajectories, influencing risks for chronic diseases and functional decline in later life [10]. The constant pressure on women to navigate these biological, social, and systemic challenges highlights a critical need for holistic health interventions that address both physical and mental well-being.

The recognition of Pilates exercise potential benefits, combined with its increasing global popularity, has drawn considerable scholarly interest, resulting in an exponential rise in studies investigating Pilates exercise-based interventions for diverse women’s health outcomes (Figure 1). In response to the numerous reports of Pilate exercise-based interventions in the domain of physical activity research, there is a clear need for a comprehensive synthesis and critical appraisal of the existing evidence base. Umbrella reviews provide a methodological solution by systematically synthesizing evidence from multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses, offering a high-level overview of the existing knowledge, assessing the consistency and quality of evidence, and identifying robust findings and persistent research gaps [11]. Therefore, this umbrella review was conducted to synthesize the breadth of evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding the effects of Pilates exercises across a spectrum of women’s health outcomes. A key aspect of this review involves not only summarizing what is known about the effectiveness of Pilates exercise but also evaluating how this knowledge has been generated. By systematically mapping the characteristics of interventions alongside quantifiable health impacts across existing literature reviews, this study aimed to reveal patterns in research methodology and highlight areas needing more rigorous investigation, thereby informing future research and evidence-based practice guidelines.

Figure 1. Trends of Pilates exercise research

Specifically, this umbrella review addressed the following research questions: 1) What are the characteristics (i.e., experimental design, implementation strategies, theoretical frameworks) of Pilates exercise interventions targeting women’s health outcomes as reported in existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses?; 2) what is the synthesized evidence from these reviews on the quantifiable health impacts of Pilates exercise interventions across various physiological and psychological domains relevant to women’s health?’; and 3) what are the key strengths and limitations in the current body of systematic review evidence on Pilates exercise for women’s health?

2. Methods

An umbrella review is a rigorous methodological approach that synthesizes and critically evaluates evidence from multiple systematic reviews into a comprehensive analytical framework [12]. This methodology allows researchers to systematically compare, contrast, and assess the quality, consistency, and strength of conclusions across multiple reviews, thereby producing a higher-level synthesis of the existing results [12]. Given the heterogeneity in reported effects of Pilates exercises on diverse health outcomes [13], we applied a focused analytical lens on women in the general population and their associated health outcomes. To strengthen the analytical rigor of this review, we conducted a detailed examination of the primary studies included within each systematic review. This additional layer of analysis was expected to enable the calculation of pooled effect sizes while accounting for inter-study heterogeneity, ultimately providing deeper insights into the effectiveness of Pilates exercise interventions and the variability of their outcomes.

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

Table 1. Developed search queries

A literature search was conducted across four major electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus. Citation management and organization were facilitated through the integration of Zotero reference management software and Microsoft spreadsheet application. The development of search strategies benefited from a collaborative partnership between a research team member, who serves as an instructor (SC) for the graduate-level course “Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” and a specialized Kinesiology librarian at the university. This expert collaboration ensured the construction of database-specific search queries optimized for each platform’s unique search workflow [12]. The search strategy incorporated both controlled vocabulary (i.e., MeSH terms) for “Pilates” and supplementary keywords including “women” and “female” to ensure comprehensive retrieval of pertinent literature. The detailed search syntax and Boolean operators employed for each database are systematically documented in Table 1. The definitive literature search was concluded on August 27, 2024.

2.2. Study Selection Process

The study selection criteria were established using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework [14]. The target population was specifically defined as adult women aged between 18 and 65 years engaging in Pilates exercise. This age range delimitation excludes pediatric and adolescent populations, where developmental factors significantly influence health outcomes, and older adults, where age-related conditions and comorbidities may confound results. This investigation focused specifically on Pilates exercise interventions designed to enhance health and wellness in adult women without acute or chronic illnesses, excluding studies primarily aimed at medical treatment. This limited scope allows for a more focused examination of Pilates’ effectiveness in health promotion rather than treatment purposes. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included to facilitate the synthesis of existing scientific evidence. Studies were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: 1) involved participants currently undergoing active medical treatment or acute rehabilitation, 2) examined mixed-modality exercise interventions that extended beyond pure Pilates exercise, 3) lacked health-related outcome measures including health-related quality of life, physical function, fitness, body composition, or psychological well-being, or 4) were published in languages other than English.

The initial screening process was conducted independently by two researchers (Author 1, Author 2) who evaluated titles and abstracts for relevance. Full-text articles were retrieved when abstracts provided insufficient information for eligibility determination. Any disagreements between two authors were resolved through collaborative discussion to reach consensus. The final selection of studies was determined through independent full-text review by two researchers, applying the predetermined eligibility and exclusion criteria with systematic rigor (Figure 2).

Figure 2. PRISMA flowchart

2.3. Data Extraction Process

A hierarchical two-tiered approach was employed for data extraction, systematically analyzing characteristics at the review level as well as components of individual studies. The first tier focused on the analysis of the included systematic reviews, encompassing bibliometric information, review methodology, number of included individual studies, key findings regarding Pilates exercise effects on women’s health outcomes, and methodological considerations including protocol variations, study design heterogeneity, and inconsistent outcome measurement. The second tier involved a detailed examination of all individual studies included in the selected systematic reviews. This analysis encompassed study characteristics (e.g., purpose, design, setting), women population demographics (e.g., sample size, participant characteristics, age range), theoretical frameworks, intervention details (e.g., instructor qualifications, Frequency/ Intensity/ Time/Time characteristics, delivery methods), and outcome assessment parameters, statistical approaches, and reported findings. This structured approach ensured comprehensive data capture while maintaining systematic organization of extracted information.

2.4. Assessment of Methodological Quality of Included Systematic Reviews

The methodological quality assessment was conducted using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews, version 2), a validated instrument for evaluating systematic reviews of healthcare interventions incorporating both randomized and non-randomized studies [15]. This tool comprises 16 items examining critical methodological aspects, including protocol registration, search strategy, study selection processes, data extraction protocols, risk of bias assessment, and meta-analytical methods. AMSTAR 2’s evaluation framework utilizes seven critical and nine non-critical domains, each assessed on a three-point scale (i.e., “Yes,” “Partial Yes,” or “No”). Moving beyond its predecessor’s numerical scoring system, AMSTAR 2 employs a nuanced approach that evaluates overall confidence in review findings based on performance across critical and non-critical domains, yielding four confidence levels: High, moderate, low, or critically low. For this review, two authors conducted domain-specific assessments, resolved discrepancies through consensus discussions, and applied standardized decision rules to determine final quality ratings.

2.5. Quantitative Synthesis

For continuous outcomes, means and standard deviations were extracted. A random-effect model was employed for meta-analysis, as Pilates exercise interventions included diverse age groups and varied protocols and experimental designs, requiring a model that accommodates this variability. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean differences (i.e., Cohen’s d) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Following Cohen’s criteria (1992), effect sizes were categorized as small (< 0.50), moderate (0.50 – 0.79), or large (> 0.80) [16]. Heterogeneity between studies was quantified using the I² statistics with values of 0 – 25% indicating low heterogeneity, 25 – 50% moderate heterogeneity, and > 50% moderate to high heterogeneity, and τ² statistic [17].

3. Results

3.1. Included Systematic Reviews and Their Analyzed Individual Studies

This umbrella review with meta-analysis encompassed eight systematic reviews (Table 2), collectively analyzing their included individual studies (N = 45) (Appendix A). Across these studies, a total of five studies were excluded due to non-English language (n = 3), and inability to retrieve the original paper (n = 2). Finally, a total of 40 individual studies were included in the additional analysis.

3.2. Quality of the Studies

The methodological quality assessment using AMSTAR 2 revealed significant limitations across included systematic reviews (Table 3), with an inter-rater agreement of 0.80 between two authors. While basic research design elements were adequately addressed (i.e., research question formulation, duplicate study selection, and data extraction), critical methodological domains showed substantial weaknesses. Fewer than 30% of reviews met criteria for comprehensive literature search strategy, excluded studies documentation, appropriate statistical methods, risk of bias consideration, and publication bias analysis. None of the reviews adequately addressed publication bias or its potential impact on findings, resulting in critically low overall quality ratings. Among the systematic reviews conducting meta-analyses [18,19,20,21,22,23], only 16.7% employed appropriate statistical methods, and 33.3% accounted for risk of bias. Notably, 75% failed to incorporate risk of bias assessments in their results interpretation. Overall, 81.3% of AMSTAR 2 criteria (13 out of 16 items) showed compliance rates of 50% or below.

3.3. Characteristics of Pilates Exercise Interventions

Analysis of 40 Pilates intervention studies in women aged 18-65 revealed predominant use of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 35, 87.5%) with sample sizes of 11-105 participants. Most studies (n = 30, 85.7%) employed parallel design comparing experimental and control groups. Intervention characteristics showed consistent session frequency (2.3±0.76 times/week, Coefficient of Variation (CV) = 33%) and duration (56±10.8 minutes, CV = 19.2%), though program length varied substantially (11.9±8.4 weeks, CV = 71.0%, Range: 4-48 weeks). Mat-based Pilates dominated (n = 31, 77.5%), followed by equipment-based (n = 6, 15.0%) and combined approaches (n = 1, 2.5%). Two studies did not report any type of Pilates exercise they used [24,25]. Exercise intensity was reported in 42.5% of studies (n = 17), categorized as low (n = 6, 15%) or moderate (n = 11, 27.5%), with 30% (n = 12) providing precise measurements via tools including the Borg RPE scale.

Instructor qualifications were notably underreported, with only one study mentioning “ample experience” without details [26]. It also revealed substantial diversity in targeted health outcomes, with 18 outcomes reported across the studies (n = 31, 77.5 %) and 59 appearing in single studies (n = 27, 67.5%). A trend analysis demonstrated an evolution in research focus: Early studies (2007-2012) emphasized rehabilitation and physical function outcomes (i.e., muscle strength, posture, pain management); the intermediate period (2013-2017) expanded to include quality of life and blood lipid profiles; and recent years (2017-2024) introduced labor-related outcomes.

The analysis revealed a lack of theoretical evidence in the Pilates exercise intervention literature: none of the included systematic reviews and their included individual studies examined theoretical frameworks underlying intervention development and implementation.

3.4. Pooled Effect Sizes of the Reported Health Impacts

The meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate Pilates exercise effects across diverse health outcomes, including physical health (i.e., pain, blood lipids, bone mineral density), function and mobility (i.e., 6-min walk test, sit and reach, timed up and go), body composition (i.e., body fat percentage, BMI, body weight), perceived quality of life (i.e., SF-36), pain (i.e., VAS) and labor/postpartum-related variables. The analysis incorporated baseline and post-intervention mean differences and standard deviations, excluding follow-up results due to inconsistent reporting across studies. Detailed results of the meta-analysis are presented in Table 4. The estimated effects of Pilates exercise interventions on women’s health outcomes included significant improvements in flexibility (Cohen’s d = 0.74, 95% CI [0.32, 1.16]) and cardiorespiratory fitness (Cohen’s d = 0.95, 95% CI [0.41, 1.48]). In addition, Pilates exercise showed significant effects in reducing labor pain (Cohen’s d = -1.29, 95% CI [-1.86, -0.72]) and shortening labor time (Cohen’s d = -0.42, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.08]). Conversely, no statistically significant pooled effects were found in pain, quality of life, body composition metrics, blood lipids, and agility. Nevertheless, Pilates exercise demonstrated potential effects on systolic blood pressure and weight gain during pregnancy with high heterogeneity.

Table 2. Included systematic reviews (N = 8)

Table 3. Quality of appraisal results (N = 8)

Table 4. Meta-analysis results

4. Discussion

This umbrella review identified methodological and conceptual limitations in the existing literature on Pilates exercise interventions for women’s health. Critical methodological weaknesses were evident across included systematic reviews (N = 8). While intervention characteristics showed consistency in session frequency and modality (i.e., mat-based Pilates), substantial heterogeneity was observed in program duration, intensity prescription, and outcome measures. The evolution of research priorities from physical function to broader wellness dimensions represents progress in Pilates exercise adoption, yet the absence of theoretical frameworks guiding intervention design and implementation remains a significant limitation. These findings highlight the urgent need for theoretically grounded, methodologically rigorous research to advance evidence-based Pilates exercise interventions for women’s health.

Although RCTs dominated the included studies (87.5%), deeper analysis revealed significant methodological limitations beneath this apparent methodological strength. Only 17.1% of studies provided comprehensive randomization and allocation concealment protocols, while a mere 5.7% detailed blinding procedures, undermining the robustness of the reported findings [24,27]. In particular, the lack of standardized methods for prescribing and quantifying exercise intensity emerges as a particularly critical flaw in the reviewed Pilates literature [28]. Several factors may contribute to this standardization deficit. Pilates methodology inherently emphasizes control, precision, and mindful execution overachieving maximal exertion or quantifiable loads in the traditional sense. Furthermore, the field may lack validated, Pilates-specific intensity measurement tools. This absence of standardized intensity guidelines presents a significant barrier to study interpretation, replication, and clinical implementation. Future research should incorporate objective measurement tools, such as electromyography (EMG), to quantify exertion levels and muscle activation patterns, thereby establishing Pilates-specific intensity parameters. The development of validated rating scales would enable precise dose-response analyses and facilitate meaningful cross-study comparisons, ultimately advancing evidence-based recommendations for Pilates exercise prescription.

Another significant layer of methodological limitation arises from the inadequate reporting of instructor qualifications and teaching experience [29], Pilates exercise research frequently omits crucial methodological details regarding instructor expertise, a significant oversight given that proper execution of breathing and centering principles influences physiological outcomes. Proper execution, influenced by instructor cueing and correction, as evidenced by studies showing specific breathing techniques significantly increase transversus abdominis activation [30]. This evidence underscores instructors’ professional expertise as a critical determinant of intervention efficacy, as proper guidance directly influences physiological outcomes. Future research must address this gap by systematically documenting instructor-related characteristics. This reporting should include details such as the specific training lineage or school (e.g., Classical, Contemporary, Polestar, Balanced Body), the level of certification achieved (e.g., Mat, Reformer, Comprehensive), total hours of training, and years of teaching experience. Where multiple instructors are involved, efforts should be made to standardize training or delivery, or at minimum, statistically account for potential instructor effects in the analysis.

The significant reduction in systolic blood pressure revealed by meta-analysis suggests Pilates exercise’s potential as an alternative to conventional aerobic exercise for cardiovascular health improvement. However, the substantial heterogeneity indicates marked variability across studies, likely attributable to differences in baseline blood pressure (ranging from 105 to 135 mmHg), participant’s developmental stage (i.e., pregnancy and labor), and intervention protocols (varying in equipment use and session duration from 45 to 60 minutes). The imprecise intensity measures and insufficient weekly exercise volumes relative to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)’s recommended 150 minutes [31], may contribute to inter-study variability. While interventions met ACSM’s minimum 8-week threshold for physiological adaptation, longer-duration studies are needed to confirm Pilates exercise’s cardiovascular health benefits. Moreover, the prior study discussed that isometric exercise can reduce arterial stiffness through enhanced vascular elasticity, potentially explaining the observed differential effects [32]. Based upon this evidence, future Pilates exerciselp-= research can consider employing advanced vascular assessment tools, such as pulse wave velocity measurement via VP-1000 systems, to elucidate Pilates exercise’s specific cardiovascular mechanisms and distinguish between acute hemodynamic responses and sustained vascular adaptations.

The significant improvements in flexibility highlight Pilates exercise’s effects in enhancing hamstring and lumbar extensibility. This pooled effect likely stems from intervention parameters aligning with ACSM guidelines [33] for flexibility and neuromuscular training. The study contributing the highest weight (65.1%) to the meta-analysis [34] employed higher frequency (4 times/week) and progressive intensity (40-60% HRmax), key factors in promoting tissue elongation and connective tissue adaptation through neuromuscular mechanisms [35,36]. This aligns with the evidence showing eccentric training with progressive loading effectively enhances muscle fascicle length and range of motion [37]. Possibly, Pilates exercise’s distinctive emphasis on active eccentric contractions may stimulate myofascial mobility and vascular perfusion—critical components for flexibility enhancement [38]. Lastly, the inclusion of specific Pilates motions (e.g., Spine Stretch, Forward Folds, Roll-Up) directly targeting sit-and-reach test requirements likely contributed to the observed large effect size. However, while the sit-and-reach test reliably measures linear static flexibility, it may not capture multi-regional or functional mobility aspects. Future research should incorporate more comprehensive assessment tools, such as Functional Movement Screening (FMS) [39], goniometric measurements (Goniometry) [40], to fully evaluate Pilates exercise’s multidimensional flexibility benefits.

The observed reduction in labor pain and labor time highlights Pilates exercise as a potential non-pharmacological, low-impact modality for pregnant women. Our findings align with a previous study reporting Pilates effect in reducing the labor length [41]. Reference [24] also showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d = -1.06) in a short-term intervention (2 times/week, 35 minutes/session) over eight weeks [24]. This highlights the benefit of Pilates exercise shown with minimal durations, distinguishing it from general prenatal exercises. This could be attributed to Pilates exercise’s unique approach of neuromuscular coordination through controlled movements with diaphragmatic breathing. A previous study showed that specific breathing patterns (e.g. deep breathing) regulate intra-abdominal pressure by activating core muscles, which could possibly provide rationale for Pilates exercise’s potential benefit in factors relevant to labor progression [42,43]. Furthermore, controlled movements and dynamic stretching of Pilates exercise are in line with principles shown to improve fascial mobility, which may promote elastic recoil, potentially making uterine contractions more efficient during labor [44]. However, more physical activity research is needed to accurately evaluate how Pilates exercise affects labor progression and efficacy from a biomechanical perspective. In addition, the flexibility and adaptability shown with short duration leading to benefits demonstrate its possibility as a practical exercise for pregnant women who may have physical or time constraints.

5. Limitations

Several limitations were included in this review work. First of all, the substantial heterogeneity observed across seven outcomes could not be addressed through sensitivity or subgroup analyses due to insufficient comparable studies, preventing exploration of potential moderators influencing Pilates’ effectiveness. The limited duplicates in outcome measures and varying assessment methods across studies underscores the urgent need for standardized outcome sets and intervention protocols to enhance research comparability and replication. Furthermore, while focusing on healthy adult women enabled more reliable comparisons across studies, this population restriction may limit the generalizability of results for more diverse women groups. Finally, the significant effects of Pilates exercise on labor pain and time should be cautiously interpreted due to potential confounding features such as the use of epidural anesthesia or infusion of oxytocin.

6. Conclusion

This umbrella review with meta-analysis discussed both the promise and limitations of Pilates exercise interventions for women’s diverse health outcomes. Meta-analyses demonstrated significant improvements in physical function domains, particularly flexibility and cardiorespiratory fitness, and notable benefits for labor-related outcomes. However, the review identified critical gaps in current Pilates exercise intervention research, including inconsistent methodological quality, lack of theoretical frameworks, and substantial heterogeneity in intervention protocols. To advance the field, future research should prioritize: (1) development of standardized, evidence-based Pilates exercise protocols with clear implementation guidelines, (2) incorporation of theoretical frameworks to strengthen intervention design and explain underlying mechanisms, and (3) rigorous methodological approaches with standardized outcome measures. These improvements would enhance the quality of evidence supporting Pilates as an effective exercise modality for women’s health promotion and provide clearer guidance for clinical practice.

References

[1]   | Isacowitz, R., Pilates. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Apr 2023.
[2]   | Muscolino, J. E. and Cipriani, S., “Pilates and the ‘powerhouse’—I,” J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 8 (1), 15–24. Jan 2004.
[3]   | Hushmandi, K., Jamali, J., Saghari, S., and Raesi, R., “The Effect of Eight Weeks of Pilates Exercises on Anthropometric Indices and Subjective Well-being in Obese Middle-aged Women,” Open Public Health J., 16 (1). Jul 2023.
[4]   | Miri, H., Mehrabian, H., Peyvandi, M. G., I. Skrypchenko, and V. Schastlyvets, “Effect of pilates training on balance, muscular endurance, fatigue, and quality of life among women with multiple sclerosis,” Health Sport Rehabil., 9 (4), 73–84. Dec 2023.
[5]   | Serra, A. C. S., Orlando, J. B., and Scheicher, M. E., “Influence of the pilates method on postural balance parameters in older women: An exploratory single-arm trial,” J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 37, 11–17. Jan 2024.
[6]   | Kaufman, M. R., Eschliman, E. L., and Karver, T. S., “Differentiating sex and gender in health research to achieve gender equity,” Bull. World Health Organ., 101 (10), 666. Aug 2023.
[7]   | Galea, L. A., Lee, B. H., Rajah, M. N., and Einstein, G., “Beyond sex and gender differences: The case for women’s health research,” in Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine, Elsevier, 699–711. Jan 2023.
[8]   | Gressel, C. M. et al., “Vulnerability mapping: A conceptual framework towards a context-based approach to women’s empowerment,” World Dev. Perspect., 20, 100245. Dec 2020.
[9]   | Meer, L., Barsties, L. S., Daalderop, L. A., Waelput, A. J. M., Steegers, E. A. P., and Bertens, L. C. M., “Social determinants of vulnerability in the population of reproductive age: A systematic review,” BMC Public Health, 22 (1), 1252. June 2022.
[10]   | Hornbuckle, L. M. et al., “Health Disparities in Women,” Clin. Med. Insights Womens Health, 10, 1179562X1770954. May 2017.
[11]   | Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C. M., Holly, C., Khalil, H., and Tungpunkom, P., “Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach,” JBI Evid. Implement., 13 (3), 132–140. Sep 2015.
[12]   | Smith, V., Devane, D., Begley, C. M., and Clarke, M., “Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 11 (1), 15, Dec 2011.
[13]   | Xu, H., Liu, J., Li, P., and Liang, Y., “Effects of mind-body exercise on perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.,” Menopause N. Y. N, 31 (5), 457–467. May 2024.

[14]  
Kloda, L. A., Boruff, J. T., and Cavalcante, A. S., “A comparison of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) to a new, alternative clinical question framework for search skills, search results, and self-efficacy: a randomized controlled trial,” J. Med. Libr. Assoc. JMLA, 108 (2), 185, Apr 2020.

[15]   | Shea, B. J. et al., “AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both,” bmj, 358, 2017. Sep 2024.
[16]   | Cohen, J., “Statistical Power Analysis,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 1 (3), 98–101, Jun 1992.
[17]   | Higgins, J. P. T., “Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses,” BMJ, 327 (7414), 557–560, Sep 2003.
[18]   | Baradwan, S., et al., “The effect of Pilates exercise during pregnancy on delivery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.,” Women Amp Health, 64 (2), 131–141. Feb 2024.
[19]   | de Almeida, P. P., de Oliveira, R. G., de Almeida, L. I. M., and de Oliveira, L. C., “Effects of Pilates exercises on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.,” Qual. Life Res., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 2067–2079, 2024.
[20]   | de Oliveira, R. G., Anami, G. E. U., Coelho, E. A., and de Oliveira, L. C., “Effects of Pilates Exercise on Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.,” J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2001, 45 (2), 107–114, Aug. 2022.
[21]   | de S. Ferraz, V., Peixoto, C., Ferreira Resstel, A. P., Cerqueira de Paula, Y. T., and Gomes de Souza Pegorare, A. B., “Effect of the pilates method on pain and quality of life in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.,” J. Bodyw. Amp Mov. Ther., 35, 220–227, Jul 2023.
[22]   | Lemos, A. Q., Brasil, C. A., Valverde, D., dos J., Ferreira, S., Lordêlo, P., and Sá, K. N., “The pilates method in the function of pelvic floor muscles: Systematic review and meta-analysis.,” J. Bodyw. Amp Mov. Ther., 23 (2), 270–277. Apr 2019.
[23]   | Zaman, A. Y., “Obstetric, maternal, and neonatal outcomes after Pilates exercise during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.,” Medicine (Baltimore), vol. 102 (21), e33688. May 2023.
[24]   | Ghandali, N. Y., Iravani, M., Habibi, A., and Cheraghian, B., “The effectiveness of a Pilates exercise program during pregnancy on childbirth outcomes: a randomised controlled clinical trial,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 21 (1), 480. Dec 2021.
[25]   | Oktaviani, I., “Pilates workouts can reduce pain in pregnant women,” Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract., 31, 349–351, May 2018.
[26]   | Campos de Oliveira, L., Gonçalves de Oliveira, R., and de A. Pires-Oliveira, D. A., “Effects of Pilates on muscle strength, postural balance and quality of life of older adults: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial,” J. Phys. Ther. Sci., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 871–876, 2015.

[27]  
Sonmezer, E., Özköslü, M. A., and Yosmaoğlu, H. B., “The effects of clinical pilates exercises on functional disability, pain, quality of life and lumbopelvic stabilization in pregnant women with low back pain: A randomized controlled study,” J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil., 34 (1), 69–76,. Jan 2021.

[28]   | Pucci, G. C. M. F., Neves, E. B., de Santana, F. S., de A. Neves, D., and Saavedra, F. J. F., “Effect of Resistance Training and Pilates on the Quality of Life of Elderly Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” Rev. Bras. Geriatr. E Gerontol., 23, e200283. May 2021.
[29]   | Ahmed, S. et al., “Fitness Trainers’ Educational Qualification and Experience and Its Association with Their Trainees’ Musculoskeletal Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Sports, 10 (9). Aug 2022.
[30]   | Kim, S.-T., and Lee, J.-H., “The effects of Pilates breathing trainings on trunk muscle activation in healthy female subjects: a prospective study,” J. Phys. Ther. Sci., 29 (2), 194–197. Feb 2017.
[31]   | Liguori G., and A. C. of S. Medicine (ACSM), ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Dec 2020.
[32]   | Inder, J. D., Carlson, D. J., Dieberg, G., McFarlane, J. R., Hess, N. C., and Smart, N. A., “Isometric exercise training for blood pressure management: A systematic review and meta-analysis to optimize benefit,” Hypertens. Res., 39 (2), 88–94. Mar 2016.
[33]   | Liguor, G., and A. C. of S. Medicine, ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Dec 2020.
[34]   | Çakmakçı, C., “The effect of 8 week plates exercise on body composition in obese women,” Collegium antropologicum, 35 (4), Dec 2011.
[35]   | Kubo, K., Kanehisa, H., and Fukunaga, T., “Effect of stretching training on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo,” J. Appl. Physiol., 92 (2), 595–602. Feb 2002.
[36]   | Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P. and Kjaer, M., “Biomechanical Responses to Repeated Stretches in Human Hamstring Muscle In Vivo,” Am. J. Sports Med., 24 (5), 622–628. Sep. 1996.
[37]   | Vetter, S., Schleichardt, A., Köhler, H.-P., and Witt, M., “The Effects of Eccentric Strength Training on Flexibility and Strength in Healthy Samples and Laboratory Settings: A Systematic Review,” Front. Physiol., 13. Apr. 2022.
[38]   | Enoka, R. M., “Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system,” J. Appl. Physiol., 81 (6), 2339–2346. Dec 1996.
[39]   | Cook, G., Burton, L., and Hoogenboom, B., “Pre-Participation Screening: The Use of Fundamental Movements as an Assessment of Function – Part 1,” North Am. J. Sports Phys. Ther. NAJSPT, 1 (2), 62–72. May 2006.
[40]   | Norkin, C. C., and White, D. J., Measurement Of Joint Motion: A Guide To Goniometry. F.A. Davis. Nov 2016.
[41]   | Haseli, A., Eghdampour, F., Zarei, H., Karimian, Z., and Rasoal, D., “Optimizing labor duration with pilates: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 24 (1), 573. Aug 2024.
[42]   | Artal R. and O’Toole, M., “Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period,” Br. J. Sports Med., 37 (1), 6–12, Feb 2003.
[43]   | Kawabata, M. and Shima, N., “Interaction of breathing pattern and posture on abdominal muscle activation and intra-abdominal pressure in healthy individuals: a comparative cross-sectional study,” Sci. Rep., 13 (1), 11338. Jul 2023.
[44]   | Schleip. R and Müller, D. G., “Training principles for fascial connective tissues: Scientific foundation and suggested practical applications,” J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther., 17 (1), 103–115. Jan. 2013.