Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Seasonal Variation of Nutrients that Influence the Growth of Cyanobacteria in Surface Water Reservoirs of River Tapi

Jay Bergi*, Ratna Trivedi

Department of Biotechnology, Shree Ramkrishna Institution of Computer Education and Applied Sciences, M.T.B. College Campus, Athwalines, Surat, Gujarat-395001

Abstract: Water reservoirs as one of the sources for the supply of domestic water to Surat city are having extensive algal blooms that may contain species of toxic cyanobacteria. Current water treatment procedures do not detect or try to remove toxins possibly produced by these toxic cyanobacteria. These toxins are potent health hazard if present in drinking water. The aim of the present study was to study the presence of any such toxic cyanobacteria along with its diversity and their toxins in surface water of river Tapi. Detail analysis of nutrient pollution in surface water along with seasonal variation in cyanobacterial population was studied. Detecting genes responsible for toxin production in cyanobacteria that identify the possible health hazard of cyanobacterial toxins in drinking water reservoirs of Surat city.

Keywords: cyanobacteria, seasonal variation, health hazards, water reserviour, toxin

Received February 05, 2022; Revised March 07, 2022; Accepted March 15, 2022

Citation: Jay Bergi, Ratna Trivedi, Seasonal Variation of Nutrients that Influence the Growth of Cyanobacteria in Surface Water Reservoirs of River Tapi. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics, 10 (1). 18-30. January 2022. doi:10.12691/jgg-10-1-2

1. Introduction

The hydrological cycle involves complex network of many water bodies each having different characteristics and distinct uses. Because of its easy availability and relatively less pollution, groundwater remains major source of domestic water supply in India like most other parts of world.

However in certain regions, geological structure do not allow the use of groundwater or the supply of groundwater is not enough. Surface water from rivers can be an alternative in such cases. Some municipal corporations also use surface water because of its perennial availability as drinking water supply. Present study is focused on one such case where Tapi river surface water is used as the source of drinking water supply for Surat city.

Perennial rivers usually have good flushing rate. It is wrongfully believed that this process removes undesirable substances from water. Flushing cannot actually eliminate the contaminants due to adsorption of contaminants to the sediments. Substances bound to riverbed may accumulate, be released back into the water, and may be carried downstream. Riverbed therefore acts as sink for important nutrients such as phosphates, but the same sediments can also serve as source, liberating the phosphates back into the water where it can encourage the growth of cyanobacteria and algae. Further, construction of weirs and barrages may hinder the flow of river water and may aggravate situation.

Cyanobacteria are frequent constituent of many freshwater and marine ecosystems. Cyanobacteria that live dispersed in the water constitute phytoplanktons while those that grow on sediments make the phytobenthos. Under certain conditions, cyanobacteria may reproduce to an alarming level - a condition referred as bloom, especially where waters are rich in nutrients, temperature is favourable and exposure to sunlight is long enough [1].

1.1. Surat City at a Glance

The city of Surat is located on the banks of river Tapi in the western state of Gujarat in India.

The city has a population of 4.66 million as per the Census, 2011 [2]. The Surat municipal corporation operates four different water works with the cumulative capacity of 1300 M.L.D. to fulfill the demand of clean water [3]. Most of this water is provided through four water works of Surat city viz. Rander, Katargam, Varachha and Sarthana. All these water works use surface water from river Tapi. Construction of a weir created a reservoir augmenting this source of surface water.

Figure 1. Location of Surat City

It is observed that eutrophication is a severe problem in river Tapi. It is hypothesized that one of the major contributors are cyanobacteria.

1.2. Eutrophication, Cyanobacteria and Toxicity

The contamination of water resources and drinking water supplies by human excreta has always been a major human health concern since more than a century. Although eutrophication has been recognised as a growing concern since the 1950s, only recently have cyanobacterial toxins become widely recognised as a human health problem. Problem of eutrophication is also aggravated by urbanization.

The general trend has been an increase in concentrations of pollutants in surface waters together with increase in urbanisation. Construction of sewerage first enhanced this trend by concentrating pollutants from latrines. After some decades, construction of sewage treatment systems began extensively in the 1950s. Originally these systems comprised only a biological step which degraded the organic material in the receiving water bodies. However, phosphate remained untreated and led to the nutrient contamination. Wherever conditions like temperature, light and phosphate are conducive, surface waters may host increased growth of algae and/or cyanobacteria. Where such proliferation is dominated by a single or a few species, the phenomenon is referred to as an algal or cyanobacterial bloom. Problems associated with cyanobacteria are likely to increase in areas experiencing population growth with a lack of concomitant sewage treatment and in regions with agricultural practices causing nutrient losses to water bodies through over-fertilisation and erosion. Thus, eutrophication becomes a common nuisance in tropical water bodies due to nutrient contamination [4].

Cyanobacteria producing hepatotoxins are a major apprehension related to river eutrophication [5]. Persistent presence of toxic species of cyanobacteria may pose a health hazard even in treated drinking water if it is acquired from such river water.

According to various literature, toxic freshwater cyanobacteria are reported in as many as 65 countries [6]. They produce a range of hepatotoxins and neurotoxins. Many episodes of acute cyanobacterial toxicity are reported in countries like U.K., U.S.A., Australia, China and Brazil [6]. In one of the worst cases 76 people were killed in Brazil [7]. While acute toxicity is the most obvious problem in cyanobacterial poisoning, a long-term risk may also be present. Short exposures to toxins may result in long-term injury and chronic low-level exposure may cause adverse health effects. Animal experiments have shown chronic liver injury from continuing oral exposure to microcystins [8].

Table 1. Nature of Cyanobacterial Toxins

The possibility of carcinogenesis and tumor growth promotion need careful evaluation because both have been detected in animal experimentation. Cyanotoxins are not proved to be carcinogenic, however some epidemiological and animal studies have suggested close association between toxin production and elevated frequency of primary liver tumor occurrence [9].

The World Health Organization hase proposed a provisional guideline value of Microcystin-LR to be tolerated in drinking water [10]. However in many countries like India there is no such local guideline.

2. Methodology

2.1. Sampling

Four specimen sites were selected near the intake wells of four major water works namely Rander (A), Katargam (B), Varachha (C) and Sarthana (D) in river Tapi of Surat city (Figure 3). Surface water samples were collected by WHO guidelines in prescribed containers by standard grab method [5]. Samples were analyzed within 2 hours for microscopic identification. For scum, standard sampling method using plankton net was use [11].

Considering specific nature of sampling of cyanobacteria from river, Standard Operation Procedures developed by Klamath Blue Green Algae Working Group was also considered [11].

2.2. Preliminary Identification of Cyanobacteria by Microscopy

Most cyanobacteria can be readily distinguished from other phytoplankton and particles under the microscope by their morphological features at a magnification of 200-1000×. Identification up to genus level was done by wet mount observations in bright field microscope. Identification was carried out with the help of Anagnostidis guidelines [12]. In case of doubt, for establishing cyanobacterial identification in laboratory, occasional consultation with experts was done.

2.3. Physicochemical Analysis of Surface Water

Parameters like temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen concentration were checked [13].

2.4. Indirect Estimation of Cyanobacterial Biomass

Cyanobacterial enumeration was originally carried out using inverted microscope by Utermöhl's counting technique (Utermöhl, 1958). Spectrophotometric estimation of chlorophyll-a was carried out after organic solvent extraction as per ISO method [14].

2.5. Cultivation, Isolation and Maintenance of Cyanobacterial Species

Enrichment of cyanobacteria was initially carried out in four different media out of which BG11 Broth gave good results and was used in all later studies [15]. However, axenic growth of cyanobacteria on solid media is difficult due to high sensitivity of cyanobacteria to acidity and towards contaminants present in agar agar powder. To overcome this, isolation was carried out using BG11 agar prepared in Mili-Q water with agar agar been replaced with molecular biology grade agarose [16]. Isolates were preserved in soft agar stabs of oligotrophic version of BG11 medium at 4°C.

2.6. DNA Extraction from Isolates

A modified method using non-ionic detergents was used for the extraction of genomic DNA from cyanobacterial isolates [17].

2.7. Confirming the Presence of Toxic Cyanobacteria

In order to identify capacity to produce all these molecules, primer set used in this study was designed to target the aminotransferase domain of microcystin synthetases and nodularin synthetases from all hepatotoxic cyanobacteria [18].

Figure 2. Location of sampling sites across River Tapi

Figure 3. Identification of common genera of cyanobacteria (All reference images are from http://www-cyanosite.bio.purdue.edu)

3. Results

3.1. Preliminary Microscopic Identification of Cyanobacteria

Microscopy identified many genera of cyanobacteria. However, dominant genera in most samples belonged to the Oscillatoria, Microcystis, Planktothrix, Cylindrospermopsis and Merismopedia. (Figure 4)

Besides common cyanobacteria, certain genera of algae were also observed. These commonly included Agmenellum, Scenedesmus, Actinastrum, Stauroneis and Navicula.

3.2. Physicochemical Analysis of Surface Water

Physicochemical analysis of surface water samples from each sampling site for two consecutive years gave following results.

Figure 4. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site A (Rander) during first year of study

Figure 5. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site B (Katargam) during first year of study

Figure 6. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site C (Varachha) during first year of study

Figure 7. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site D (Sarthana) during first year of study

Figure 8. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site A (Rander) during second year of study

Figure 9. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site B (Katargam) during second year of study

Figure 10. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site C (Varachha) during second year of study

Figure 11. Physiochemical analysis of water from sampling site D (Sarthana) during second year of study

3.3. Indirect Estimation of Cyanobacterial Biomass

Seasonal variation in the Cholorophyll-a concentration in surface water from each sampling site was found as per following.

Figure 12. Chlorophyll-a concentration in the water from sampling site A (Rander)

Figure 13. Chlorophyll-a concentration in the water from sampling site B (Katargam)

Figure 14. Chlorophyll-a concentration in the water from sampling site C (Varachha)

Figure 15. Chlorophyll-a concentration in the water from sampling site D (Sarthana)

Figure 16. Correlation between Phosphate and Chlorophyll-a (ug/ml) concentrations at sampling site A (Rander)

Figure 17. Correlation between Phosphate and Chlorophyll-a (ug/ml) concentrations at sampling site B (Katargam)

Figure 18. Correlation between Phosphate and Chlorophyll-a (ug/ml) concentrations at sampling site C (Varachha)

Figure 19. Correlation between Phosphate and Chlorophyll-a (ug/ml) concentrations at sampling site D (Sarthana)

Figure 20. Overlay of NDVI, Chlorophyll, Phosphorous during winter season-1

Figure 21. Overlay of NDVI, Chlorophyll, Phosphorous during winter season-2

Figure 22. Overlay of NDVI, Chlorophyll, Phosphorous during summer season-1

Figure 23. Overlay of NDVI, Chlorophyll, Phosphorous during summer season-2

Figure 24. Time series of coverage in km of chlorophyll and NDVI area in Tapi River

3.4. Confirming the Presence of Toxic Cyanobacteria

PCR reactions resulted in detecting the presence of toxin producing aminotransferase (AMT) domain of mcyE gene or other equivalent genes in 20 distinct isolates.

Figure 25. Detection of AMT domain of mcyE gene using PCR

4. Discussion

Monthly samples were compared for their phosphate and cyanobacterial biomass content to assess seasonal variation in Tapi water. Results suggested that chlorophyll-a levels peak up in late summer and before monsoon season (Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15), especially in April. Further, out of the collected four water works samples, Varachha-the northeast part of the city (upstream river area) was found to have maximum values of chlorophyll-a (2.67 mg/m³) (Figure 15).

High cyanobacterial population in terms of high chlorophyll-a concentration can also be correlated with higher temperatures as seen in physicochemical analysis. Due to less fluctuations, the values of pH and dissolved oxygen does not seem to have larger impact on cyanobacterial growth.

On microscopy of samples, it was observed that five genera Oscillatoria, Microcystis, Planktothrix, Cylindrospermopsis and Merismopedia predominated the phototrophic diversity of river water. Some of these cyanobacteria are known to produce hepatotoxins. As observed in (Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18 and Figure 19); phosphate contamination in water is the major cause for the formation of cyanobacterial blooms. There was a strong correlation between seasonal variation in the concentrations of phosphate and chlorophyll-a. It is clearly evident that season and ambient temperature have stimulatory effect on the cyanobacterial biomass. It was measured in terms of chlorophyll-a and values increased to maximum in the month of April and remained considerably high up to June. With advance of monsoon, it gradually decreases due to mixing with estuarine water and dilution. At the onset of winter, a major reduction in chlorophyll-a concentration is observed. These results were analogous with other similar studies on the global tropical water bodies [19,20,21].

PCR amplification of toxin producing domain of enzyme microcystin synthetases and nodularin synthetases convincingly proves ability of isolates to produce hepatotoxins.

5. Conclusion

Monthly study of phosphate and chlorophyll-a concentrations establish a strong correlation between nutrient contamination and resulting eutrophication in the river. Both of these values peak late in summer before monsoon. Identification of cyanobacteria using microscopy suggests presence of previously known hepatotoxin-producing genera in river that may pose public health hazard. PCR amplification proves genetic basis of toxin production.

Being heavily reliant on the surface water as a source of domestic water supply, presence of cyanobacterial toxins is a major concern for Surat city. This demands further studies on cyanobacterial toxins in the river water. Continuation of this study in terms of advanced molecular technology along with metagenomic profile of river water and study of peptides can throw more light on this problem.

References

[1]   | Chorus I, Bartram J. Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management (1999), New York, Routledge.
[2]   | Office of The Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Census of India: Population enumeration data (final population) [cited 2016 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population_enumeration.html.
[3]   | Surat Municipal Corporation. Hydraulic Home: [cited 2016 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.suratmunicipal.gov.in/Departments/HydraulicHome.
[4]   | Brodie JE, Mitchell AW. Nutrients in Australian tropical rivers: changes with agricultural development and implications for receiving environments. Marine and freshwater research. 2005 Jun 22; 56(3): 279-302.
[5]   | Bartram J, Ballance R, editors. (1996). Water quality monitoring: a practical guide to the design and implementation of freshwater quality studies and monitoring programmes, New York, CRC Press.
[6]   | Hitzfeld BC, Höger SJ, Dietrich Dr. (2000). Cyanobacterial toxins: removal during drinking water treatment, and human risk assessment. Environmental health perspectives. (2000); 108 (11): 113.
[7]   | Carmichael WW. Health effects of toxin-producing cyanobacteria: “The CyanoHABs”. Human and ecological risk assessment: An International Journal. 2001 Sep 1; 7(5): 1393-407.

[8]  
Hawkins PR, Runnegar MT, Jackson AR, Falconer IR (1995). Severe hepatotoxicity caused by the tropical cyanobacterium (blue-green alga) Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Woloszynska) Seenaya and Subba Raju isolated from a domestic water supply reservoirr. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1995; 50(5): 1292-5.

[9]   | Falconer IR, Humpage AR (2005). Health risk assessment of cyanobacterial (blue-green algal) toxins in drinking water. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2005 Apr 30; 2(1): 43-50.
[10]   | World Health Organization. (1994). Guidelines for drinking-water quality Vol. 1: Recommendations. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994 Jan 1.
[11]   | Klamath. (2009). Blue Green Algae Working Group. Standard Operating Procedures. Environmental Sampling of Cyanobacteria for Cell Enumeration, Identification and Toxin Analysis. 2009.
[12]   | Komarek J, Anagnostidis K. (1986). Modern approach to the classification system of cyanophytes. 2-Chroococcales. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl.. 1986; 73(2): 157-226.
[13]   | American Public Health Association. (1998), American Water Works Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: selected analytical methods approved and cited by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. American Public Health Association; 1998.
[14]   | Aminot A, Rey F. (2000). Standard procedure for the determination of chlorophyll-a by spectroscopic methods. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 2000: 7-10.
[15]   | Hu X, Ma Z, Yi W, Ge X, Zheng S. (2003). Growth of Microcystis aeruginosa and Scendesmus quadricauda in four different mediums. Research of Environmental Sciences. 2003: 55-7.
[16]   | Bolch CJ, Blackburn SI (1996). Isolation and purification of Australian isolates of the toxic cyanobacteriumMicrocystis aeruginosa Kütz. Journal of Applied Phycology. 1996; 8(1): 5-13.
[17]   | Singh SP, Rastogi RP, Häder DP, Sinha RP. (2011). An improved method for genomic DNA extraction from cyanobacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2011: 1; 27(5): 1225-30.
[18]   | Saker ML, Jungblut AD, Neilan BA, Rawn DF, Vasconcelos VM. (2005). Detection of microcystin synthetase genes in health food supplements containing the freshwater cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae. Toxicon. 2005; 46(5): 555-62.
[19]   | Maske SS, Sangolkar LN, Chakrabarti T (2010). Temporal variation in density and diversity of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in lakes at Nagpur (Maharashtra State), India. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2010; 169(1-4): 299-308.
[20]   | Bhakta S, Das SK, Nayak M, Jena J, Panda PK, Sukla LB. (2011). Phyco-diversity assessment of Bahuda river mouth areas of East coast of Odisha, India. Recent Research in Science and Technology. 2011: 14; 3(4).
[21]   | Sharma C, Jindal R, Singh UB, Ahluwalia AS, Thakur RK. (2013). Population dynamics and species diversity of plankton in relation to hydrobiological characteristics of river Sutlej, Punjab, India. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2013; 19(3): 717-24.