Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Determination of Phenolic Content, Biological Activity, and Enzyme Inhibitory Properties with Molecular Docking Studies of Rumex nepalensis, an Endemic Medicinal Plant

Ercan Bursal*, Mustafa Abdullah Yılmaz, Abdülmelik Aras, Fikret Türkan, Ümit Yildiko, Ömer Kılıç, Abhijit Dey

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Muş Alparslan University, Mus, Turkey

Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the phenolic content, antioxidant potential, and enzyme inhibitiory properties of Rumex nepalensis by in vitro spectrophotometric methods. The experiments demonstrated that glutathione S-transferase (GST), α-glycosidase (α-Gly), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) enzymes were strongly inhibited by R. nepalensis extracts. The IC₅₀ values for GST, α-Gly, AChE, and BChE enzyme inhibitions were calculated as 21.01 mg/mL, 34.65 mg/mL, 27.72 mg/mL, and 17.32 mg/mL, respectively. Also, effective antioxidant capacities of water and methanol extracts of R. nepalensis were determined by ABTS, CUPRAC, DPPH, and FRAP methods. Furthermore, quinic acid (15.61 mg/g), miquelianin (2.06 mg/g), quercitrin (1.97 mg/g), and protocatechuic acid (0.217 mg/g) were identified to be the major phenolic compounds of the plant extract according to the LC-MS/MS analysis. Finally, molecular docking studies were carried out to show the interactions of quinic acid, miquelianin, and quercitrin with AChE, BChE, GST, and α-Gly enzymes. Docking analysis indicated the possible roles of these phytochemicals in enzyme inhibitory activities.

Keywords: biological activity, enzyme inhibition, molecular docking, phenolic compounds, Rumex

Received February 02, 2021; Revised March 05, 2021; Accepted March 14, 2021

Citation: Ercan Bursal, Mustafa Abdullah Yılmaz, Abdülmelik Aras, Fikret Türkan, Ümit Yildiko, Ömer Kılıç, Abhijit Dey, Determination of Phenolic Content, Biological Activity, and Enzyme Inhibitory Properties with Molecular Docking Studies of Rumex nepalensis, an Endemic Medicinal Plant. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 9 (3). 114-123. January 2021. doi:10.12691/jfnr-9-3-3

1. Introduction

Rumex genus contains high amounts of flavonoids, naphthalenes, anthraquinones, and phenolic compounds [1]. Rumex genus consists of around 250 plant species, which are mostly consumed as herbal drugs for the treatment of an array of human diseases [2,3]. Some parts of Rumex plants have been used in folk medicine. For example, underground parts prepared by decoctions have been claimed to be beneficial as tonic and cholagogue. Also, the fresh leaves are consumed as a vegetable which are also reported for use in the treatment of eczema for blood cleansing [4]. The roots of Rumex nepalensis have been used for the treatment of pain, tinea, bleeding, tumor, constipation, and inflammation in Chinese folk medicine. Likewise, the roots of Rumex hastatus possess medicinal importance against headache, fever, and cough. Rumex nepalensis and Rumex hastatus were reported to contain naphthalenes, anthraquinones, and flavonoids [5]. Due to the high contents of naphthalenes, stilbenoids, anthraquinones, polyphenols, and steroids, Rumex species have demonstrated several pharmacological attributes, such as antioxidant, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antibacterial, and antifungal properties [6]. A plenty of Rumex species have got medicinal value [7].

A great number of studies related to antioxidant activity and phenolic content of some cereal products, fruits, and vegetables have been reported [8]. Due to their aromatic and pharmacological properties, chemical compounds of the plants are used for several purposes [9]. These natural components, such as vitamins, anthocyanins, carotenoids, tannins, flavonoids, and volatile oils have been extensively used in cosmetics. Some of them have wound-healing, antioxidant, anti-aging, and anti-inflammatory properties [10]. According to the report of World Health Organization, approximately 70% of the world population in developing countries are still consuming traditional medicines for their primary health care and about 25% of the current medicines are obtained from natural sources [11].

Bioactive phenolic compounds from plants have been reported as potent acetylcholinesterase inhibitors implicated to be used against Alzheimer's disease treatment [12]. AChE and BChE enzymes are known to be responsible for hydrolyzing the acetylcholine in the human body [13]. Acetylcholine is a nerve cell transmitter located at the lymph nodes in the internal organs motor systems, in the intersections of the nerve and muscles, and in the central nervous system. Many works demonstrated that acetylcholine has effects on the speed of individual neurons [14]. AChE takes charge of break up the acetylcholine in the brain synaptic cleft. Thus by the keeping of the acetylcholine for neurotransmission in the synaptic cleft, symptoms of Alzheimer's disease can be reduced or prevented [15]. Another enzyme α-glycosidase released from intestine cells hydrolyzes polysaccharides to the small glucose and fructose [16].

Despite numerous studies reporting antioxidant potentials and enzyme inhibitions of plants, to the best of our knowledge, there is no detailed study on investigating phenolic contents, antioxidant potential, and enzyme inhibition of R. nepalensis. Thus, the primary objectives of the present study are to determine the enzyme inhibition and antioxidant activity of R. nepalensis. Hence, we identified its phenolic contents by using the LC-MS/MS technique which led to the identification of antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-Alzheimer’s bioactive ingredients. Molecular docking and computational studies have also been applied to determine the possible role of the most detected phytochemicals on biological activities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Sample

R. nepalensis was collected from Bingöl, an Eastern city of Turkey, from an open Quercus forest at an altitude of 1650-1850 m, in May 2018. The plant species was subsequently identified and preserved as a herbarium sample by a plant taxonomist Dr. Omer Kılıç. The voucher specimen (5896) is deposited at the herbarium of the Yıldırımlı (Ankara) and at the Department of Park and Garden Plants of Bingol University, Turkey.

2.2. Plant Extraction

The water and methanol extracts of R. nepalensis leaves were prepared for antioxidant studies. For the water extraction, air-dried leaves of R. nepalensis (20 g) were powdered using a blender and was dissolved in 200 mL distilled water (1/10: w/v). The mixture was stirred at room temperature (25°C) for 24 h then was filtered using a filter paper. The same ratio and procedure were used for the methanol extract as well. The water extract was lyophilized at -50°C and 5 mm Hg in a lyophilizer (Labconco, Freezone 1 L). The methanol extract was evaporated using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph 94200, Bioblock Scientific).

2.3. Determination of Phenolic Compounds

Ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu-Nexera) coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer (LCMS-8040 model) was used to determine the phenolic contents of R. nepalensis. The reversed-phase UHPLC was equipped with a SIL-30AC model autosampler, CTO-10ASvp model column oven, LC-30CE model binary pumps, and DGU-20A3R model degasser. Analytical column: RP-C18 Inertsil ODS-4 (100 mm×2.1 mm, 2 μm) and 120 EC-C18 models (150 mm×2.1 mm, 2.7 μm) were used. The column temperature was set to 40°C. As mobile phases methanol and acetonitrile were used. As mobile phase additives ammonium formate, acetic acid, ammonium acetate, and formic acid were used. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min and the injection volume was 5 μL. For spectrometric detection ionization source (ESI) was used and for vanillin, daidzin, piceid, coumarin, and hesperidin ESI was operated in positive ionization mode while for other standards ESI was operated in negative mode. MS conditions were adjusted as follows; 3 L/min for nebulizing gas (N₂) flow, 15 L/min for drying gas (N₂) flow, 350°C for interface temperature, 250°C for DL temperature, and 400 °C for heat block temperature [17].

2.4. Antioxidant Activity

2.4.1. ABTS Assay

ABTS cation radical solution was obtained by the reaction of 2 mM ABTS solution with 2.45 mM K₂S₂O₈ solution for twelve hours. The absorbance of the control solution at 734 nm was adjusted to 0.9±0.1 with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) dilution. ABTS•+ radical scavenging activity was determined by calculating the reduction in sample absorption [18].

2.4.2. DPPH Assay

DPPH free radical solution was obtained by mixing 1 mM DPPH with ethanol using a magnetic stirrer for 12 h at 25°C. The DPPH radical solution (1 mL) was added to 3 mL of the extracts and standard solutions (10–30 mg/mL), separately and left to incubation for 30 min at 25°C. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm. Decreasing absorbance demonstrates DPPH free radical scavenging capacity [19].

2.4.3. CUPRAC Assay

The CUPRAC method was applied as detailed in a previous study [20]. Briefly, the different concentrations (10-30 µg/mL) of samples were mixed with CuCl2 solution (0.25 mL, 10 mM), neocuproine solution (0.25 mL, 7.5 mM), and CH₃COONH₄ buffer solution (0.25 mL, 1.0 M), respectively. Increasing absorbance at 450 nm demonstrates Cu²⁺ reducing for antioxidant capacity of a sample.

2.4.4. FRAP Assay

The mixtures including R. nepalensis extracts at different concentrations (10-30 µg/mL), phosphate buffer (2.5 mL, 0.2 M), and potassium ferricyanate (2.5 mL, 1%) were prepared to initialize the reaction. After incubation at 50°C for 20 min, trichloroacetic acid (2.5 mL, 10%), and FeCl₃ (0.5 mL, 0.1%) solutions were added to each mixture. Increasing absorbance at 700 nm demonstrates Fe³⁺ reducing for antioxidant capacity of a sample [20].

2.5. Enzyme Inhibition Potential

The inhibitory effect of different concentrations (20-100 µM) of R. nepalensis on GST enzyme was determined as detailed in a previous study [16]. The GST inhibition effect of R. nepalensis at different concentrations in a range of 20-100 µM was determined as detailed in our previous study [21]. The inhibitory activity of R. nepalensis on AChE and BChE enzymes were determined by using acetylthiocholine iodide (AChI) and butyrylcholine iodide (BChI) as substrates [22].

2.6. Molecular Docking

Molecular docking was performed to investigate the exact binding site of the ligand on the protein and its binding mechanism. Maestro Molecular Modeling platform (version 11.8) by Schrodinger, LLC model was applied in the molecular doking study [23,24]. High-resolution (1.55-2.10 Å) crystalline structures of acetylcholinesterase (PDB ID: 6O4W), butyrylcholinesterase (PDB ID: 6QAA), glutathione s-transferase (PDB ID: 3KTL), and α-glycosidase (PDB ID: 5NN8) enzymes were obtained from protein data bank at research collaboration for Structural Bioinformatics (RSCB) protein database (PDB) [25]. The structures of the most intensive phenolic of the R. nepalensis plant were downloaded from PubChem site in SDF file format as 3D structures (Figure 1). Molecular minimization of the ligands was prepared by applying the default parameters by the Lig prep module in Maestro. All proteins were prepared using the protein preparation wizard of Maestro software; at this stage, all water molecules were removed and polar hydrogen atoms were added. A grid box was formed around the active site of the proteins containing natural ligands. These studies were carried out according to the methods used in previous studies [26,27]. Each ligand was analyzed for docking score and energy, receptor binding affinity, and structure of all proteins, respectively. The docking studies were performed with the Glide docking module. The resulting receptor model, 2D & 3D interactions were visualized with Discovery Studio 2017 version [28].

Figure 1. The structures of the ligands; the 3D views of quinic acid, quercitrin, and miquelianin

Table 1. LC-MS/MS parameters and phenolic compounds of R. nepalensis

Figure 2. LC-MS/MS chromatograms of R. nepalensis (1-gallic acid, 2-catechin, 3-caffeic acid, 4-p-coumaric acid, 5- trans-ferulic acid, 6-o- coumaric acid,7-quercetin) and standards

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. LC–MS/MS Analysis

R. nepalensis plant has been investigated as a potent metabolic enzyme inhibitor for a new therapeutic approach against diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease. Phenolic compounds of the R. nepalensis extracts were identified and quantified by a developed LC-MS/MS method as given in Table 1 and Figure 2. Method validation parameters such as the accuracy (recovery), precision (repeatability) were studied for standard uncertainties of each analyte according to EURACHEM guide [29].

Quinic acid (15.61 mg/g), miquelianin (2.06 mg/g), quercitrin (1.966 mg/g), protocatechuic acid (0.217 mg/g), kaempferol (0.15 mg/g), and p-coumaric acid (0.13 mg/g) were found to be the most intensive phenolics compounds in R. nepalensis, as shown in Table 1. Also, apigenin (0.005 mg/g), naringenin (0.005 mg/g), salicylic acid (0.009 mg/g), luteolin (0.012 mg/g), gallic acid (0.036 mg/g), hesperidin (0.03 mg/g), rutin (0.052 mg/g), and quercetin (0.075) compounds are the other compounds determined in R. nepalensis extract. However, the rest of analytes used as standards were not detected in the plant extract.

The association of the most intensive phenolic compounds (quinic acid, miquelianin, and quercitrin) of R. nepalensis with various biological properties and their metabolic functions in the treatment of many diseases have been described in previous studies. Quinic acid derivatives demonstrated favorable effects on human health via their anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, antioxidant, anti-hepatitis B virus, and anti-HIV properties [30,31]. A former study revealed the efficacy of miquelianin as promising antidiabetic, wound healing, and antioxidant agents [32]. Another study proved that quercitrin significantly prevents inflammation [33].

Phenolic compounds have many biological attributes, such as antioxidants, antiviral, and antimutagenic properties. Plant phenolic compounds have several health benefits which have been correlated with their antioxidant properties [34,35].

3.2. Antioxidant Activity

Antioxidants are considered as important factors for preventing some serious diseases such as cancer, brain dysfunction, cardiovascular diseases, and cataracts [36]. Free radicals, such as reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), the hallmarks of AD pathology, trigger an imbalance between antioxidant mechanisms and free radical production [37]. The levels of free radicals and antioxidants are balanced by the human body [38].

In the present study, the water and methanol extracts of R. nepalensis leaves were examined by four in vitro antioxidant methods. ABTS (2,2-azino-bis 3-ethylbenzothiazloine-6-sulphonic acid) and DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) methods were used for measuring the radical scavenging capacity whereas CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity) and FRAP (ferric ion reducing antioxidant power) methods were used for measuring the reducing power antioxidant activity.

ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging properties of R. nepalensis extracts were compared with standard antioxidants. BHA (butylated hydroxyanisole), BHT (Butylated hydroxytoluene), α-tocopherol, and ascorbic acid were the standard references of the present study. In the radical scavenging methods, decreasing absorbance indicates radical scavenging potential. According to the measurements, WER (water extract of R. nepalensis) and MER (methanol extract of R. nepalensis) showed quite low free radical scavenging activity in the DPPH method, while both extracts revealed effective cation radical scavenging activity in the ABTS method (Figure 3).

ABTS radical scavenging percentage values of the extracts and standards at the same concentration (30 μg/mL) for the ABTS radicals were found as follows: WER (53.6±8.7 %), MER (51.9±7.8 %), BHA (61.4±6.9 %), BHT (27.9±9.8 %), ascorbic acid (39.8±7.1 %), and α-tocopherol (54.1±10.7 %) as shown in Figure 3a. According to the ABTS cation radical scavenging method, the IC₅₀ values (the concentration of a sample to scavenge 50% of radicals) of R. nepalensis extracts and standards were ordered as: BHA (16.3±6.9 μg/mL) < WER (18.2±5.3 μg/mL) < MER (18.5±3.5 μg/mL) < α-tocopherol (25.5±10.8 μg/mL) < ascorbic acid (26.8±7.3 μg/mL) < BHT (34.3±9.5 μg/mL) (Figure 3b). The water and methanol extracts showed close ABTS cation radical scavenging amounts. A former study reported close amounts of ABTS cation radical scavenging IC₅₀ values for chloroform (10.24 μg/mL) and ethyl acetate (8.70 μg/mL) extracts of R. nepalensis [39].

In DPPH method, the IC50 values of standards were as follows: BHA (10.9±4.8 μg/mL), BHT (12.9±6.0 μg/mL), ascorbic acid (11.1±6.2 μg/mL), and α-tocopherol (11.3±6.7 μg/mL). The IC₅₀ values of WER and MER were not significant. The lower IC₅₀ means the higher radical scavenging activity for both ABTS•+ and DPPH radical scavenging assays. The DPPH scavenging percentages of R. nepalensis extracts and standards decreased as ascorbic acid (91.9±0.6 %) > α-tocopherol (90.2±3.5 %) > BHA (88.9±1.8 %) > BHT (75.6±7.6 %) > MER (2.6±2.4 %) > WER (1.5±1.3 %).

Figure 3. Antioxidant activities of R. nepalensis and standards for ABTS, DPPH, CUPRAC, and FRAP methods

CUPRAC and FRAP methods were used to determine the reducing antioxidant activities of R. nepalensis extracts. Increasing absorbance of a sample was proportionate to the increase of its reducing antioxidant potential. Antioxidants cause the reduction of ferric (Fe³⁺) ions to the ferrous (Fe²⁺) ions as well as the reduction of cupric (Cu²⁺) ions to the cuprous (Cu⁺) ions due to their reducing capacities. As seen in Figure 3d, reducing levels of the WER and MER were very weak in the FRAP method. The ferric ions reducing antioxidant capacities at 30 μg/mL concentration were decreased as: α-Tocopherol > BHT > BHA > ascorbic acid > MER > WER. In the CUPRAC method, MER showed weak reducing activity, while WER showed moderate activity compared to the standards. The cupric ions reducing capacities at 30 μg/mL concentration ordered as follows: BHA > ascorbic acid > BHT > α-Tocopherol > WER > MER (Figure 3c). Notable differences were calculated for WER and MER in CUPRAC method while some minor differences were observed in other three techniques minor differences were observed.

3.3. Enzyme Inhibition

In the present study, glutathione S-transferase (GST), AChE, BChE, and α-glycosidase enzymes were adequately inhibited by the R. nepalensis extracts. The IC₅₀ values for R. nepalensis methanol extract on used enzymes were calculated as 21.01 mM for GST, 27.72 mM for AChE, 17.32 mM for BChE, and 34.65 mM for α-Gly. The results showed that α-Gly, AChE, BChE, and GST were very efficiently inhibited by R. nepalensis methanol extracts.

AChE acts as a predominant enzyme while BChE has been identified as a regulator of acetylcholine levels with a secondary role in the human brain [40]. Cholinesterase enzymes catalyze the hydrolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine and butyrylcholine. Many studies examined the effects of glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes. Glutathione S-transferase is a multifunctional enzyme catalyzing the metabolic pathway for detoxification. This enzyme is used as a catalyst in the first step in forming mercapturic acid, which is the water-soluble end product [41]. Catalyzed by GST in this first step, glutathione (GSH) binds the endogenous and exogenous hydrophobic electrophiles [42].

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GIs) have great importance for controlling hyperglycemia and type-2 diabetes mellitus [43]. α-Glycosidase is an enzyme that is particularly important for studying enzyme inhibitory activity and it is also performs lag glucose absorption. The liberalization of the glucose molecule from complex carbohydrate compounds results in decreased postprandial plasma blood glucose and suppression of postprandial hyperglycemia [44]. In another study, it is reported that caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) effectively inhibited by AChE, BChE, and GST enzymes. These data may explain the beneficial effects of such compounds on human health and also enable researchers and drug designers to focus on them.

3.4. Molecular Modeling and Docking Studies

Nowadays, in silico ADME studies are used in drug production to select the most promising compounds and to minimize the risk of drug attrition [45,46]. With these studies, an equilibrium between pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties can be determined as preliminary information. Several parameters such as molecular properties, drug solubility, cell permeability, human intestinal absorption, polar surface area, and drug similarity scores are investigated with virtual scanning methods used on small molecules [47]. The molecular weight and LogP of an existing oral drug selected by the 5 rules of Lipinski [48] should not be more than 500 and 5, respectively. Also, the number of hydrogen bond acceptors should be less than 10 and the number of hydrogen bond donors should be less than 5.

Online servers such as Molinspiration and SwissADME softwares were employed to check the chemo-informatics and biological properties of the major compounds of the plant extract as ligand molecules. The results showed that the compounds are compatible with MW 192.17 - 478.36 g/mol, LogP values according to the Lipinski rule with -1.69 to 1.60 and HBA 5-8 (Table 2). Among all the values, quinic acid appears to have better permeability than the other molecules.

Molecular docking is a reliable calculation technique that can be used to examine the binding mechanism between the ligand-receptor and to predict possible binding modes, and the results can be experimentally controlled [49,50]. In this study consisting of three different phenolic compounds with four enzyme sets, totally twelve promising docking results were obtained. These ligands were placed in the catalytic active region of the enzyme and the docking results were analyzed based on binding affinities and interaction modes. Glide scores demonstrated that quercitrin exhibited good binding affinity with the AChE enzyme and exhibited excellent binding affinities with AChE and BChE enzymes, as seen in Table 3. Miquelianin achieved a good binding score with all enzymes. However, the binding affinity score of quinic acid the smallest molecular structure was slightly lower than the others.

Table 2. Physicochemical and lipophilicity of the major compounds of R. nepalensis by using SwissADME software

Table 3. Best-binding affinity scores (kcal/mol) of major phenolic compounds of R. nepalensis in the catalytic sites of the enzymes

After the best exposure selection in all ligand-enzyme docking, the binding modes were analyzed to understand the inhibition mechanisms. Figure 4 shows the 3D and 2D interactions of quercitrin-AChE docking. The Glide score was calculated as -7.604 cal/mol in the binding affinity of quercitrin with AChE. Here in the binding mechanism; Conventional hydrogen bond on the TYR-124 (2.54 Å) in the middle phenyl ring, TRP-286 (4.20 Å) Pi-Pi stacked on the phenyl ring in the middle, SER-293 (2.35 Å) carbon-hydrogen bond on branched six rings, GLU-292 (2.68 Å) carbon hydrogen bond on oxygen-bonded to a branched six ring are samples. The other interactions and the 3D view of the hydrogen bonds donor/acceptor surface on the receptor are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 5 shows the 3D and 2D interactions and binding affinity of quinic acid with α-Gly. The Glide score of quinic acid was calculated as -6.266 cal/mol in the binding affinity of quinic acid with α-Gly. The obtained results of quinic acid were close to the previous studies [51,52]. Here in the binding mechanism; ASP-616 (2.65 Å) first hydroxyl-bonded on the six ring carbon-hydrogen bond, ASP-404 (1.86 Å) second hydrogen hydroxy-bonded on the six rings conventional hydrogen bond and HIS-674 (2.49 Å) hydrogen-bonded on the six ring hydrogen carbon bond are samples. Figure 5 shows the 3D view of the SAS surface on the receptor and 2D view of other interactions.

Figure 6 represents the 3D and 2D interactions of miquelianin-GST docking study. The Glide score was calculated as -7.617 cal/mol in miquelianin-GST binding affinity. The obtained results were close to a previous study [53]. The binding mechanism; LEU-107 (2.26 Å) hydroxyl-bonded in middle phenyl ring conventional hydrogen bond, PHE-222 (4.74 Å) and PHE-220 (5.74 Å) middle six ring bonded to the center Pi-Pi stacked, VAL-111 (5.46 Å) middle six rings bonded to the center pi-alkyl, Hydroxyl-bonded VAL-55 (1.67 Å) in the branched six rings, oxygen-bonded GLN-54 (2.67 Å), carboxyl-bonded ARG-15 (1.97 Å) conventional hydrogen bond are the other bonds.

Figure 4. The interaction mode between quercitrin - AChE with enzyme, 3D view of the hydrogen bonds donor/acceptor surface on the receptor and 2D view of the interactions

Figure 5. The interaction mode between quinic acid - α-Gly with enzymes, 3D view of the SAS surface on the receptor, and 2D view of the interactions

Figure 6. The interaction mode between miquelianin -GST enzyme, 3D view of the aromatic surface on the receptor, and 2D view of the interactions

Figure 7. The interaction mode between quercitrin-BChE enzyme, 3D view of the SAS surface on the receptor d) 2D view of the interactions

In Figure 7, the 3D and 2D interactions are given as a result of the quercitrin-BChE docking study. The Glide score was calculated as -8.495 cal/mol in the highest affinity for quercitrin-BChE. In the binding mechanism; GLY 116 (4.61 Å) in the middle of the center of the phenyl ring amide-Pi stacked, in the middle phenyl ring, oxygen-bonded LEU 286 (2.00 Å) and hydroxyl-bonded SER 198 (2.89 Å) conventional hydrogen bond, PHE 329 (5.26 Å) and TRP 231 (5.67 Å), bonded to the center of the phenyl ring in the middle Pi-Pi T-shaped, TR-82 (4.17 Å) carbon-bonded in the branched hex ring Pi-alkyl, THR 120 (2.89 Å) carbon-bonded in a branched six ring carbon-hydrogen bond are the samples. Quercetin proved to be an effective inhibitor that binds with the enzyme structure by many chemical bonds [54,55,56].

4. Conclusion

The present study investigates the phytochemical contents, biological activities, molecular insertion, and computational insights of the endemic plant, R. nepalensis. The results demonstrated the potent antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities of R. nepalensis extracts against glutathione S-transferase, α-glycosidase, acetylcholinesterase, and butyrylcholinesterase enzymes. The docking study revealed the highest affinity energy of quercitrin for AChE and BChE, quinic acid for α-Gly, and miquelianin for GST, respectively. Since the molecular size of quinic acid is smaller than the other reference compounds, the surface fully complies with oral absorption and with Lipinski rule. Therefore, the inhibition effect against AChE is more significant than the other inhibition values. Altogether, this plant extracts could be exploited as a novel source of the phenolic ingredient, antioxidants, and inhibitors of diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease related enzymes for pharmaceutical industries.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Mus Alparslan University for providing antioxidant studies, Iğdır University Research Laboratory Application and Research Center (ALUM) for providing enzyme inhibition studies, and Dicle University Research Laboratory (DUBTAM) for providing the LC-MS/MS analyses.

References

[1]   | K. Rao, S. Ch, D. Banji, A study on the nutraceuticals from the genus Rumex, (2011).
[2]   | A. Savran, G. Zengin, A. Aktumsek, A. Mocan, J. Glamoćlija, A. Ćirić, M. Soković, Phenolic compounds and biological effects of edible Rumex scutatus and Pseudosempervivum sempervivum: potential sources of natural agents with health benefits, Food & function 7(7) (2016) 3252-3262.
[3]   | A. Vasas, O. Orbán-Gyapai, J. Hohmann, The Genus Rumex: Review of traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology, J. Ethnopharmacol. 175 (2015) 198-228.
[4]   | T. Baytop, Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (past and present), Publication of the istanbul University 312 (1999).
[5]   | G. Zhang, H. Zhao, Z. Wang, J. Cheng, X. Tang, Recent advances in the study of chemical constituents and bioactivity of Rumex L, World Sci Tech (Mod Trad Chin Med) 10 (2008) 86-93.
[6]   | V. Spínola, E.J. Llorent-Martínez, P.C. Castilho, Antioxidant polyphenols of Madeira sorrel (Rumex maderensis): How do they survive to in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion?, Food Chem. 259 (2018) 105-112.
[7]   | D.-C. Hao, P.-G. Xiao, Deep in shadows: Epigenetic and epigenomic regulations of medicinal plants, Chinese Herbal Medicines 10(3) (2018) 239-248.
[8]   | Y.S. Velioglu, G. Mazza, L. Gao, B.D. Oomah, Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits, vegetables, and grain products, J. Agric. Food. Chem. 46(10) (1998) 4113-4117.
[9]   | S. Takshak, S.B. Agrawal, Defense potential of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants under UV-B stress, J Photochem Photobiol B 193 (2019) 51-88.
[10]   | M.M. Donglikar, S.L. Deore, Sunscreens: A review, Pharmacognosy Journals 8(3) (2016).
[11]   | C. Lee, S.-Y. Kim, S. Eum, J.-H. Paik, T.T. Bach, A.M. Darshetkar, R.K. Choudhary, B.H. Quang, N.T. Thanh, S. Choi, Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plants used by local Van Kieu ethnic people of Bac Huong Hoa nature reserve, Vietnam, J. Ethnopharmacol. 231 (2019) 283-294.
[12]   | O. Ajayi, M. Aderogba, E. Obuotor, R. Majinda, Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor from Anthocleista vogelii leaf extracts, J. Ethnopharmacol. 231 (2019) 503-506.

[13]  
X. Lu, H. Yang, Q. Li, Y. Chen, Q. Li, Y. Zhou, F. Feng, W. Liu, Q. Guo, H. Sun, Expansion of the scaffold diversity for the development of highly selective butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitors: Discovery of new hits through the pharmacophore model generation, virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation, Bioorg. Chem. 85 (2019) 117-127.

[14]  
P. Taslimi, A. Sujayev, F. Turkan, E. Garibov, Z. Huyut, V. Farzaliyev, S. Mamedova, İ. Gulçin, Synthesis and investigation of the conversion reactions of pyrimidine‐thiones with nucleophilic reagent and evaluation of their acetylcholinesterase, carbonic anhydrase inhibition, and antioxidant activities, Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology 32(2) (2018) e22019.

[15]   | K. Yates, F. Pohl, M. Busch, A. Mozer, L. Watters, A. Shiryaev, P.K.T. Lin, Determination of sinapine in rapeseed pomace extract: Its antioxidant and acetylcholinesterase inhibition properties, Food Chem. 276 (2019) 768-775.
[16]   | N. Traverso, R. Ricciarelli, M. Nitti, B. Marengo, A.L. Furfaro, M.A. Pronzato, U.M. Marinari, C. Domenicotti, Role of glutathione in cancer progression and chemoresistance, Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 2013 (2013).
[17]   | M.A. Yilmaz, Simultaneous quantitative screening of 53 phytochemicals in 33 species of medicinal and aromatic plants: A detailed, robust and comprehensive LC–MS/MS method validation, Industrial Crops and Products 149 (2020) 112347.
[18]   | İ. Gulcin, Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview, Archives of toxicology (2020) 1-65.
[19]   | E. Bursal, A. Aras, Ö. Kılıç, Evaluation of antioxidant capacity of endemic plant Marrubium astracanicum subsp. macrodon: Identification of its phenolic contents by using HPLC-MS/MS, Natural product research 33(13) (2019) 1975-1979.
[20]   | A. Aras, M. Silinsin, M.N. Bingol, E. Bursal, Identification of Bioactive Polyphenolic Compounds and Assessment of Antioxidant Activity of Origanum acutidens, International Letters of Natural Sciences 66 (2017) 1-8.
[21]   | F. Türkan, M.N. Atalar, A. Aras, İ. Gülçin, E. Bursal, ICP-MS and HPLC analyses, enzyme inhibition and antioxidant potential of Achillea schischkinii Sosn, Bioorganic Chemistry 94 (2020) 103333.
[22]   | M. Işık, Y. Demir, M. Kırıcı, R. Demir, F. Şimşek, Ş. Beydemir, Changes in the anti-oxidant system in adult epilepsy patients receiving anti-epileptic drugs, Archives of physiology and biochemistry 121(3) (2015) 97-102.
[23]   | D. Biovia, H. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. Bhat, T.J.T.J.o.C.P. Richmond, Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA, Discovery Studio Visualizer, v. 17.2, San Diego: Dassault Systèmes, 2016, 10 (2000) 0021-9991.
[24]   | S. Release, 3: Maestro, Schrödinger, LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2019, 2019.

[25]  
S.K. Burley, H.M. Berman, C. Bhikadiya, C. Bi, L. Chen, L. Di Costanzo, C. Christie, K. Dalenberg, J.M. Duarte, S. Dutta, RCSB Protein Data Bank: biological macromolecular structures enabling research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology and energy, Nucleic acids research 47(D1) (2019) D464-D474.

[26]   | N.J.P. Subhashini, E. Praveen Kumar, N. Gurrapu, V. Yerragunta, Design and synthesis of imidazolo-1, 2,3-triazoles hybrid compounds by microwave-assisted method: Evaluation as an antioxidant and antimicrobial agents and molecular docking studies, Journal of Molecular Structure 1180 (2019) 618-628.
[27]   | M. Taha, M.S. Baharudin, N.H. Ismail, S. Imran, M.N. Khan, F. Rahim, M. Selvaraj, S. Chigurupati, M. Nawaz, F. Qureshi, S. Vijayabalan, Synthesis, α-amylase inhibitory potential and molecular docking study of indole derivatives, Bioorganic Chemistry 80 (2018) 36-42.
[28]   | D.S. Biovia, Discovery studio modeling environment, Release, 2017.

[29]  
M.A. Yilmaz, A. Ertas, I. Yener, M. Akdeniz, O. Cakir, M. Altun, I. Demirtas, M. Boga, H. Temel, A comprehensive LC–MS/MS method validation for the quantitative investigation of 37 fingerprint phytochemicals in Achillea species: A detailed examination of A. coarctata and A. monocephala, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 154 (2018) 413-424.

[30]   | S.Y. Lee, E. Moon, S.Y. Kim, K.R. Lee, Quinic acid derivatives from Pimpinella brachycarpa exert anti-neuroinflammatory activity in lipopolysaccharide-induced microglia, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23(7) (2013) 2140-2144.
[31]   | A. Farah, C.M. Donangelo, Phenolic compounds in coffee, Brazilian journal of plant physiology 18(1) (2006) 23-36.

[32]  
S. Ahmed, A.J. Al-Rehaily, P. Alam, A.S. Alqahtani, S. Hidayatullah, M.T. Rehman, R.A. Mothana, S.S. Abbas, M. Khan, J.M. Khalid, Antidiabetic, antioxidant, molecular docking and HPTLC analysis of miquelianin isolated from Euphorbia schimperi C. Presl, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 27(5) (2019) 655-663.

[33]   | Y. Dönder, T.B. Arikan, M. Baykan, M. Akyüz, A.B. Öz, Effects of quercitrin on bacterial translocation in a rat model of experimental colitis, Asian Journal of Surgery 41(6) (2018) 543-550.

[34]  
T. Koeduka, K. Sugimoto, B. Watanabe, N. Someya, D. Kawanishi, T. Gotoh, R. Ozawa, J. Takabayashi, K. Matsui, J. Hiratake, Bioactivity of natural O‐prenylated phenylpropenes from I llicium anisatum leaves and their derivatives against spider mites and fungal pathogens, Plant Biology 16(2) (2014) 451-456.

[35]   | M.N. Bingol, E. Bursal, LC-MS/MS Analysis of Phenolic Compounds and In Vitro Antioxidant potential of Stachys lavandulifolia Vahl. var. brachydon Boiss, International Letters of Natural Sciences (2018) 28.
[36]   | E. Köksal, H. Tohma, Ö. Kılıç, Y. Alan, A. Aras, I. Gülçin, E. Bursal, Assessment of antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Nepeta trachonitica: analysis of its phenolic compounds using HPLC-MS/MS, Scientia pharmaceutica 85(2) (2017) 24.
[37]   | C. Pena-Bautista, M. Baquero, M. Vento, C. Chafer-Pericas, Free radicals in Alzheimer's disease: Lipid peroxidation biomarkers, Clin. Chim. Acta 491 (2019) 85-90.
[38]   | I.O. Alisi, A. Uzairu, S.E. Abechi, S.O. Idris, Evaluation of the antioxidant properties of curcumin derivatives by genetic function algorithm, Journal of Advanced Research 12 (2018) 47-54.
[39]   | R. Gautam, K.V. Karkhile, K.K. Bhutani, S.M. Jachak, Anti-inflammatory, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, COX-1 inhibitory, and free radical scavenging effects of Rumex nepalensis, Planta Med. 76(14) (2010) 1564-1569.
[40]   | Y. Chen, H. Lin, H. Yang, R. Tan, Y. Bian, T. Fu, W. Li, L. Wu, Y. Pei, H. Sun, Discovery of new acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors through structure-based virtual screening, RSC Advances 7(6) (2017) 3429-3438.

[41]  
İ. Gülçin, A. Scozzafava, C.T. Supuran, Z. Koksal, F. Turkan, S. Çetinkaya, Z. Bingöl, Z. Huyut, S.H. Alwasel, Rosmarinic acid inhibits some metabolic enzymes including glutathione S-transferase, lactoperoxidase, acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes, Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry 31(6) (2016) 1698-1702.

[42]  
İ. Gülçin, A. Scozzafava, C.T. Supuran, H. Akıncıoğlu, Z. Koksal, F. Turkan, S. Alwasel, The effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on metabolic enzymes including acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, glutathione S-transferase, lactoperoxidase, and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I, II, IX, and XII, Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry 31(6) (2016) 1095-1101.

[43]   | S. Burmaoglu, A.O. Yilmaz, M.F. Polat, R. Kaya, İ. Gulcin, O. Algul, Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel tris-chalcones as potent carbonic anhydrase, acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase and α-glycosidase inhibitors, Bioorg. Chem. 85 (2019) 191-197.

[44]  
G. Gondolova, P. Taslimi, A. Medjidov, V. Farzaliyev, A. Sujayev, M. Huseynova, O. Şahin, B. Yalçın, F. Turkan, İ. Gulçin, Synthesis, crystal structure and biological evaluation of spectroscopic characterization of Ni (II) and Co (II) complexes with N‐salicyloil‐N′‐maleoil‐hydrazine as anticholinergic and antidiabetic agents, Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology 32(9) (2018) e22197.

[45]   | H. van de Waterbeemd, E. Gifford, ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2(3) (2003) 192-204.
[46]   | M. Corvaro, M. Bartels, The ADME profile of the fungicide tricyclazole in rodent via the oral route: A critical review for human health safety assessment, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 108 (2019) 104438.
[47]   | M.M. Morcoss, E.S.M.N. Abdelhafez, R.A. Ibrahem, H.M. Abdel-Rahman, M. Abdel-Aziz, D.A. Abou El-Ella, Design, synthesis, mechanistic studies and in silico ADME predictions of benzimidazole derivatives as novel antifungal agents, Bioorganic Chemistry 101 (2020) 103956.
[48]   | C.A. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B.W. Dominy, P.J.J.A.d.d.r. Feeney, Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings, 23(1-3) (1997) 3-25.
[49]   | Q. Cao, Y. Huang, Q.-F. Zhu, M. Song, S. Xiong, A. Manyande, H. Du, The mechanism of chlorogenic acid inhibits lipid oxidation: An investigation using multi-spectroscopic methods and molecular docking, Food Chemistry (2020) 127528.
[50]   | P. Śledź, A. Caflisch, Protein structure-based drug design: from docking to molecular dynamics, Current Opinion in Structural Biology 48 (2018) 93-102.
[51]   | S.E. Yazdi, G. Prinsloo, H.M. Heyman, C.B. Oosthuizen, T. Klimkait, J.J.M. Meyer, Anti-HIV-1 activity of quinic acid isolated from Helichrysum mimetes using NMR-based metabolomics and computational analysis, South African Journal of Botany 126 (2019) 328-339.
[52]   | D. Son, C.S. Kim, K.R. Lee, H.-J. Park, Identification of new quinic acid derivatives as histone deacetylase inhibitors by fluorescence-based cellular assay, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 26(9) (2016) 2365-2369.
[53]   | S. Pleško, H. Volk, M. Lukšič, Č. Podlipnik, In Silico Study of Plant Polyphenols' Interactions with VP24-Ebola Virus Membrane-associated Protein, Acta chimica Slovenica 62(3) (2015) 555-64.
[54]   | E.R. da Silva, C.d.C. Maquiaveli, P.P. Magalhães, The leishmanicidal flavonols quercetin and quercitrin target Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis arginase, Experimental Parasitology 130(3) (2012) 183-188.
[55]   | S.P. Singh, B.K. Konwar, Molecular docking studies of quercetin and its analogues against human inducible nitric oxide synthase, Springerplus 1(1) (2012) 69-69.
[56]   | M.G. Maharani, S.R. Lestari, B. Lukiati, Molecular docking studies flavonoid (quercetin, isoquercetin, and kaempferol) of single bulb garlic (Allium sativum) to inhibit lanosterol synthase as anti-hypercholesterol therapeutic strategies, 2231(1) (2020) 040021.