Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Microbiological and Physicochemical Quality of Honeys from South and South-West of Niger

Laredj Hocine*, Berakaa Tefiel, Ali Moustapha, Amine Allaoui, Kheïra Benamara

Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology and Nutrition in Semi-Arid Areas

Abstract: With all the complexity of the biological composition of honey, our work focused on the microbiological (bacteriological and mycological) and physicochemical characterization of Nigerian honeys. The results showed a satisfactory bacteriological composition of honey samples in accordance with the standards, high mold and a very high yeast load making these honeys of mediocre quality and unfit for human consumption. Isolated yeast species: Schizosaccharomyces plombe, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, Kluyveromyces thermotolerans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the isolated molds are: Aspergillus (Asp) fumigatus, Asp. candidus, Asp. niger, Asp. versicolor Asp. nidulans and Mucor. The study revealed that all honeys had pH, water content, electrical conductivity, ash content, free acidity, respectively, ranging within 3.8-4.95, 47.2-20 %, 0.484-0.669 mS/cm, 0.143-0.262 g/100g, 41.7-83.05 meq/kg. The quality of Nigerian honeys can be improved by applying Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).

Keywords: quality, microbiological, physicochemical, honey, Niger

Citation: Laredj Hocine, Berakaa Tefiel, Ali Moustapha, Amine Allaoui, Kheïra Benamara, Microbiological and Physicochemical Quality of Honeys from South and South-West of Niger. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 6 (6). 406-413. January 2018. doi:10.12691/jfnr-6-6-9

1. Introduction

The knowledge and use of honey by humans goes back to the most remote times. Food of the oldest of humanity, it is also recognized since the highest antiquity for its preventive and curative medicinal properties which made it use widely in an empirical therapeutic framework. Honey, the best known product of the hive, is one of the main pure and natural foods that enters into human nutrition as an important source of high-energy carbohydrates with various virtues [1]. The bee harvests nectar and honeydew to make honey and satisfy its nutritional needs and to feed the larvae. Bees extract pollen and nectar from trees in the forest and from fields, which enable them to produce the honey that is essential for the survival of larvae, the composition and characteristics of which are highly variable due to its geographical and botanical origin [2]. A natural honey can be contaminated by the flora of the air and the intestinal flora of the bee as well as by technological operations carried out on this food during its transformation [3,4]. Also the physicochemical properties intervene in the determination of its quality and are influenced by surrounding factors.

In Africa, where temperature and humidity are high, beekeeping encounters difficulties that negatively affect hive products [5]. In Niger honey is produced in a traditional way, despite the availability of the floral mass and a very significant natural production potential. Niger is one of the tropical countries characterized by a hot and humid climate, and because of insufficient studies on tropical honeys in general, it always suggests that these honeys are of mediocre quality because of the risks of alteration.

Thus, the physicochemical and microbiological evaluation is necessary for the control of the quality and the conformity of the products.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical (water content, HMF, electrical conductivity, ash, pH and acidity) and microbiological (total germs, coliforms and Thermotolerant coliforms, anaerobic sulphite-reducing spores and Bacillus) characterization of Nigerian honey as well as identify of fungal flora (yeasts and molds)

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Samples of honey were collected in five phytogeographical zones (Gaya, Magaria, Makoloundi, Madarounfa and Torodi) of Niger (Figure 1). The extraction mode of honey samples is of traditional type.

The regions shown in Figure 1 are located between two parallels 11 ° 37 and 16 ° north latitude, four of them are located in the Sahelian climate zone with a rainfall between 300 and 600 mm (samples 2, 3, 4 and 5) while Sample 1 is in an area with a rainfall greater than 600 mm and close to a nature reserve and that the origin of samples 3 and 5 is close to the Niger River.

Figure 1. Geographical location of studied area and sampling sites

Figure 2. Microbiological (1) and physico-chemical (2) honey samples

2.2. Preparation of Samples for Analysis

Before conducting our analyzes, we distributed the samples of honey to be analyzed in clean and disinfected boxes, while working near the Bunsen burner and respecting the aseptic conditions. The samples were divided into two batches, one for microbiology and the other for physicochemical analyzes (Figure 2). The boxes containing the samples were then hermetically sealed, labeled and stored in a dry and cool place at laboratory temperature.

All microbiological and physicochemical tests were performed in triplicate.

2.3. Physico-chemical Analyzes

2.3.1. Moisture Content

The water content was determined from the refractive index of honey, referring to the standard table of "Chataway" [6,7]. The honey to be analyzed must be perfectly liquid and homogeneous. At a constant temperature close to 20 °C, using a spatula, a few drops of honey are deposited and spread in a thin layer on the surface of the prism.

2.3.2. Determination of Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF)

The Winckler method is one of the methods used to determine the HMF content of a honey by colorimetry [6,7]. To perform the assay, a stock solution is prepared for each honey sample and two different reagent solution, barbituric acid and para-toluidine. The honey solution is prepared by dissolving 10 g of honey in 50 ml of de-aerated distilled water. The extinction curve as a function of time must have a maximum of 2 to 4 min.

2.3.3. pH and Free Acidity

Free acidity is the amount of free acids contained in honey. 10g of honey are dissolved in 75ml of distilled water. The electrode of the pH meter (HANNA 2211) was immersed in the honey solution. After reading the pH, the solution is titrated with the 0.1M sodium hydroxide solution to pH= 8.3 [6,7].

2.3.4. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

The electrical conductivity at 1/5 was determined according to the method described by [6,7] using a conductometer (Phywe instruments, 1370193). The measurements were carried out at 20°C in a 20% aqueous solution with respect to the dry matter of the honey. The value of the conductivity was directly determined by the cell in the solution after immersion. The results were expressed in micro-Siemens per centimeter (𝜇S/cm).

2.3.5. Ash Content

The ash content was determined by heating 5-10 g of honey in a muffle furnace at 600°C for 2 hours. After cooling, the ash content is determined [7].

2.4. Bacteriological Analyzes

The mother solution is obtained by mixing 2 g of honey with 18 ml of already prepared diluent (0.1 g of peptone in 100 ml of distilled water) and shaking slightly to obtain a homogeneous stock solution [8].

2.4.1. Research and Enumeration of Total viable count

For the search and enumeration of total viable count we used two culture media, GN (nutrient agar) and PCA (plat count agar). Introduce 1ml of the mother solution in a petri dish and then pour the culture medium at a rate of 15ml per dish, then homogenize. Allow the medium to solidify and incubate the dishes at 30°C for 72h [9,10]. Collect some bacteria colonies on the GN and PCA media to perform Gram stain.

2.4.2. Research of Coliforms and Fecal Coliforms

We used VRBG (Violet Red Bile Glucose) medium for coliform and fecal coliform research. The seeding mode is the same as that of the total germs. Incubate at 30°C and 44°C respectively [11,12,13,14,15].

2.4.3. Detection and Enumeration of Bacillus cereus

Mossel medium is used to observe possible Bacillus contamination. To 90 ml of this medium is added 10 ml of a sterile emulsion of egg yolk to demonstrate the presence of lecithinase and 1 ml of polymyxin at 0.1%. Spread 0.1 ml of the stock solution on the surface of the agar using the rake technique. Incubate at 30°C for 24 to 48 hours. Note pink colonies (mannitol-negative) with whitish halo (lecithinase +) [9,11].

2.4.4. Detection of Spores of Sulfte-Reducing Clostridia

This research is carried out on the medium VF (meat-liver). According to the following method: 5ml of the stock solution of the sample are placed in a water bath at 80 °C for 10min (for the destruction of vegetative forms). Cool the tubes under a stream of cold water. Fill the tubes with VF medium previously added with 5ml of sodium sulphite and 2.5ml of iron alum for 250ml of VF. Shake gently and incubate at 46°C / 24h to 48h. Note the appearance of black colonies [12,16].

2.4.5. Spore Coloring

After the appearance of the colonies on medium VF (Clostridium) and on medium Mossel (Bacillus) we proceeded to the coloration of the spores according to the method described in [17] using the malachite green to 5% and one against staining with safranin. The spores are green and the bacterial cells are colored red.

2.5. Mycological Analyzes (Research of Yeasts and Molds)

To detect and enumerate the maximum number of yeast and mold elements, it is recommended to use at least two agar culture media [18].

2.5.1. Culture on OGA

According to Guiraud and Rosec [10], the international standard V08 - 022, approved standard; ISO 7954 (1987) replaced by ISO 21527-2 (2008) recommends the use of chloramphenicol or Oxytetracycline glucose agars (OGA) for the enumeration of yeasts and molds in foods. According to King et al cited by Martin et al [19], inoculate 0.2 ml of the microbial suspension and spread it by rake technique. Incubate at 28- 30 °C for 3 days and more.

2.5.2. Research of Osmophilic Yeasts and Xerophilic Molds on YM40G

Osmophilic yeasts and xerophilic molds are isolated on high glucose media such as YM40G medium (Yeast extract, Malt extract, 40% Glucose). In this case, the diluent used for the preparation of the stock solution is glucose (0.1 g of peptone + 40 g of glucose + make up to 100 ml with distilled water) [8]. Spread 0.1 of the stock solution on the surface of the YM40G medium and incubate at 28 °C beyond 03 days [12].

2.5.3. Isolation and Purification of Molds and Yeasts

Isolation and purification of yeasts and molds is done on inclined media (OGA and YM40G) at one point for molds and streaks for yeasts. Incubate the tubes at 28 °C/3 days [20,21].

2.5.3.1. Identification of Yeasts

Identification includes: a) - Study of cultural characteristics (size, form, aspect and pigmentation of colonies) [22], b) - Study of cellular morphological characters; the tests carried out are: microscopic observation of vegetative cells [21], PDA filamentation test and sporulation test on Mac Clary medium [23], c) - physiological and biochemical characters (fermentation of sugars [20], assimilation of carbon sources on Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) medium [22] and nitrogen sources on Yeast Carbon Base (YCB) [21].

2.5.3.2. Identification of Molds

The identification of molds is based on: 1-The macroscopic examination (colony consistency, surface, the presence of rays, back and reverse color and the presence of a diffusible pigment in the agar), 2-Microscopic examination: This microscopic examination includes three techniques: a-Technique of flag, b-Technique of culture on blade and c-Technique of hydrolysis [12,21,24].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Parameters

Table 1 shows the results of the various physicochemical parameters studied.

Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of honey samples

3.1.1. Water Content

Moisture content values ranged from 17.2 to 20.0% (Table 1). All samples contain a water content in accordance with the standard (≤20%) fixed by the JOCE [32]. These water contents can be explained by the atmospheric humidity due to the extraction areas of these honeys at the river's edge and the date of extraction corresponding to the rainy season in Niger as well as the raw material (nectar) can be very rich in water. The moisture content can be influenced by many factors, including: the timing of the harvest, the rate of shelf capping, storage conditions and climatic conditions at harvest [25]. The risk of fermentation is higher when the water content is high. It is very weak or non-existent when this content is less than 18% [26]. Honeys with high water content are highly exposed to fermentation during storage [7]. All samples, except sample 1, present a fermentation risk.

The water content of honeys from neighboring countries such as Cameroonian honeys is very high ranging from 16 to 35% [27], for honeys from Nigeria 11.47 to 19.62% [28] and 16.380-30.820 [29], from 15.0 to 25.1% for honeys from Burkina Faso [30] on the other hand, for the benign honeys the values are very close 9.84 to 19.76 [31].

3.1.2. H.M.F content

The HMF content (mg/kg) of the honey samples ranged from 4.032 to 19.2 mg / kg (Table 1). All the analyzed samples have lower level than 40 mg / kg, threshold value of the norm fixed by JOCE [32], and with the maximum value of 80 mg / kg for the tropical countries fixed by the Codex Alimentarieus [33]. The amount of HMF is a great indicator to assess the quality and freshness of honey [34,35]. This is an important criterion for evaluating the storage time and damage caused by heat and aging of honey [36,37]. For a honey of the year, the amount of HMF should be very low (less than 10 mg / kg) [38,39]. The low HMF content of the samples (Table1) showed that these honeys were not heated and reflect a good degree of freshness. The results of the analyzes of neighboring countries show values ranging from 2.0 to 41.9 for Burkinabese honey [30], 17.06 to 41.96 mg / kg honeys from Benin [31], 17.66 to 68.86 for honeys from Madagascar [40].

3.1.3. pH and Free Acidity

The pH values of honey samples were well within the norms (3.2 to 5.5) recommended by [2]. The values obtained are between 3.8 and 4.95. All honeys were acidic; it is probably the bee that gives them this property, so pH strongly influenced the rate of degradation of sugars and the catalytic rate of enzymes [26]. According to the same author the nectar honeys have a pH between 3.5 and 4.5 against 4.5 and 5.5 for honeydew honeys. According to the values obtained, the honeys can be of floral origin.

Acidity is also an important quality criterion because it gives very important indications of the state of honey [42]. The acidity were between 41.7 and 83.05 meq / kg (Table 1). All samples have values greater than 50 meq / kg, a threshold value fixed by the Codex Alimentarius [33] and JOCE [32], with the exception of sample 4 which has a value of 41.7 meq / kg. Very high acidity can indicate a fermentation of sugars into organic acids [41]. Some acids come from the digestive secretions of bees during the elaboration of honey and can make them susceptible to alteration by fermentation [43]. A strong acidity of honey is likely to cause the degradation of hexoses in HMF. For Malagasy honeys the pH varied between 4.53 and 4.75 and the free acidity between 10 and 67 meq / kg [40]; in Burkina faso the pH values varied from 3.5 to 4.7 and the free acidity between 20.3 and 60.8 [30]. For honeys from Nigeria, the pH values was between 3.61 and 4.05 [28], 4.31-6.02 [29] and the free acidity ranged between 24.00 and 31.00 meq /kg [28]; for Cameroon honey the pH varied between 4.1-5.0 [27].

3.1.4. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

The electrical conductivity values of honey samples were between 0.484 and 0.669 mS /cm. Bogdanov et al. [44] reported that EC is a good criterion for determining the botanical origin of honey and is currently designated for routine honey testing instead of ash content. This measurement depends on the mineral content and the acidity of the honey; the higher they are, the higher the corresponding conductivity. All samples were in the standards recommended by [38], which are 0.1 to 1.5 mS/cm. This measure distinguishes floral honeys (EC <0.8mS / cm) against honeydew honeys with a much higher conductivity (> 0.8 mS /cm) [45]. All honeys studied are therefore of floral origin and confirmed the pH results.

3.1.5. Ash Content

The ash content is a quality criterion that depends on the botanical origin of the honey. The values of the ash content of the honeys varied between 0.143 and 0.262% (Table 1). Light honeys are generally less rich in minerals than dark honeys [46], as is the case with honey samples, the darkest honey has the highest ash content (sample 1) (Table 1). Variations in ash content are a function of botanical origin [47,48]. The low ash content of honey is characteristic of floral honeys [49]. According to the Codex Alimentarius Standard [50] and CRC [51], the ash content of honey nectar is not more than 0.6 g / 100 g and honeydew honey, mixture of honeydew honey and nectar honey or chestnut honey, maximum 1g / 100g [44,51], 1.2g / 100g [50]. All honeys were of floral origin and this confirms the results of the EC and pH. All values were similar to those of Nigerian honeys 0.29 and 0.36 [28] and 0.095- 0.518[29]. On the other hand, the levels of other neighboring countries were high; The values of honeys Cotonou (Benin) varied between 0.07 and 0.68% [31] and 0.130 to 0.947 for Burkinabese honeys [30]. The range of Malagasy eucalyptus honeys ranged from 0.46 to 1.02% [40].

3.2. Bacteriological Analysis

The level of bacteriological contamination of the different honey samples is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. The levels of bacteriological contamination of honey samples (CFU / g)

3.2.1. Enumeration of Total viable count

These germs are represented by bacteria, yeasts and molds. Total mesophilic aerobic flora (CFU/g) on GN was between 210 and 486 whereas on PCA it is between 190 and 1280 CFU / g (Table 2). It is found that the majority of the results obtained after a culture on GN and PCA are lower than 500, threshold value fixed by Fléché et al [52]. This can be explained by: antimicrobial effect of honey; composition of the culture medium, because it is difficult to make a count of the true total flora of a food, since there are no media and culture conditions common to all microorganisms. Sample 5 has a very high load of the total flora of which the majority is yeasts (Table 3). The detection of mesophilic aerobic flora reflected the general microbiological quality of natural products and allowed them to be controlled [10]. The absence of standards for the microbiological analysis of honeys makes interpretation difficult [8]. It seems that the PCA medium advocated by some authors [8] is better suited for honey. This has been confirmed by the results of Hocine [53]. Gram stain revealed the presence of bacilli and cocci G ⁺ and G⁻ in the different samples. Several studies have shown that honey can contain a number of mesophilic aerobic flora; thus numbers were between 10 to 3450 [53], 10-1416 [54], 00 to 200 [48], 30 to 1200[55], 75 to 1380 [56] and 10 to 75000 CFU / g [57].

3.2.2. Detection of Coliforms and Fecal Coliforms

These honeys have not been contaminated or these types of mesophilic aerobic flora cannot survive in honey. These results are consistent with many authors [41,48,53,54,55,56,58,59]. This can be explained by the fact that honey is an environment hostile to the development of this flora [60]. The absence of these flora indicated that honey samples are of good hygienic quality. Some studies mentioned a number of 30 CFU / g [28], a high number of fecal coliforms (in particular E. coli) in honey sold at the Bukavu market in Congo [61].

3.2.3. Enumeration of Bacillus Cereus

Two positive results in samples 4 and 5 were with 12 and 25 CFU / g respectively. The Bacillus counts observed in the present study are very low (samples 1-3). Gram stain and malachite green spore color showed green gram + and central spores. These results are very low compared to 10⁴ CFU / g found by Martins et al [19]. Above 10⁵ CFU/g, a toxigenic risk is possible [62,63]. Many regulations allow a maximum of 10⁵ CFU / g [64]. In honey Bacillus are part of mesophilic flora induced by bees (nectar or honeydew) [52]. Spores of B. cereus are found in the soil, digestive system of insects and warm-blooded animals [65]. In honey from Nigeria, the vegetative form of Bacillus constituted most of the mesophilic flora and the number of bacterial endospores ranged from 8.0 × 10² to 2.0 × 10³ [28].

3.2.4. Spores of Sulfte-reducing clostridia

Only one sample (Sample 4) showed a very small number with 2 CFU / g. Gram staining shows Gram + cells and spore staining with malachite green shows subterminal spores. The presence of spores of sulfite-reducing Clostridium originates from the manipulation of Nigerian beekeepers who pose their traditional braided straw hives on the ground to smoke the hive. The presence of Clostridium sulfite-reducing agents in honey may be considered as an indicator of negligence of hygiene conditions in the extraction rooms or during the packaging and storage of honey [66]. These microorganisms are part of the normal flora of the gastrointestinal tract of bees and can contaminate honey [67,68]. These bacteria are frequently found in the intestines of humans and many domestic and wild animals [64]. Różańska et al [57] obtained a relatively high number of honey samples contaminated with anaerobic sulfite-reducing bacteria.

3.3. Mycological Analyzes

Table 3 summarized mycological analyzes. The presence of moulds in food usually indicates microbial contamination due to lack of clean materials and hygiene at work and growth of the moulds in the food can lead to alteration in the nutritional values, thereby producing undesirable flavour and sensory characteristic. Some of the moulds (fungi) produce mycotoxins which diffuse in food matrix and cause acute or chronic poisoning to consumers. The presences of some moulds as earlier observed in this study may be due to lack of hygienic procedures during harvesting, packaging and/or storage of the honey samples

Table 3. Yeast and Mold Results (CFU / g)

3.3.1. Yeasts

Osmophilic yeasts are probably good indicators of the microbiological quality of honey [69]. The number of yeasts varies according to the culture medium. This number oscillates between ≤10 and 105x10² on medium YM40G and between ≤00 and 21.75 x10² on OGA medium (Table 3). From these results it appeared that the YM40G medium is more favorable to search for yeasts in honey. This is consistent with the results of Hocine [53] and the suggestions of Ward and Trueman [8] for the use of this medium in the search for osmophilic yeasts. These yeasts are demanding in high concentration of sugar for their growth. The number of yeast in different types of honeys can vary between 1 / 10g to 100,000 / g [70,71]. All samples, except sample 1, exceed 100 CFU / g, threshold value for a good conservation honey proposed by Fléché et al [52], Mercosur (market of Latin American countries) [49] and the Codex Alimentarius of the Slovak Republic [56]. Honey that contained more than 17% water is susceptible to fermentation and honey with more than 19% moisture is very likely to ferment [62]. Based on the Lochhead distribution [1,42], all samples, except No. 1, contained a high number of yeasts (Table 3) and a water content > 18% (Table 1) and are therefore highly exposed to the risk of fermentation or are already in the fermentation phase. The various identification tests identified the following species:

Schizosaccharomyces plombe (samples 2, 3, 4, 5); Zygosaccharomyces rouxii (samples 2, 4, 5); Kluyveromyces thermotolerans (samples 2, 3, 4, 5); Saccharomyces cerevisiae (samples 3, 4, 5).

3.3.2. Molds

The number of molds on OGA medium varied between 50 and 450 CFU / g whereas on the YM40G medium the number was between ≤10 and 250 CFU / g (Table 3). The load of molds was much lower compared to yeasts. This is reported by [48,49,52,56,72]. Only sample 1 contained less than 100 CFU / g. According to Moreau [73], the mold count without identification has no valid meaning. The isolates were identify the following species:

Aspergillus(Asp.) niger (samples 2,3,4,5); Asp. versicolor (sample 2); Asp. candidus (samples 2,3,4,5); Asp. nidulans (samples 2,4); Asp. fumigatus (samples 4,5) and Mucor (sample 4).

The most widespread molds isolated were Aspergillus flavus, Asp. niger, Asp. fumigatus, Asp. versicolor [69]. The frequency spectrum of yeasts and molds in CFU / g is represented in Figure 3. This figure showed the dominance of yeasts with respect to molds. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most dominant yeast in number of cells per gram of honey. All yeasts identified are osmophilic and are agents of fermentation and alteration of honey. For molds, there is the dominance of the genus Aspergillus.

4. Conclusion

Honey is a biological product that is distinguished by its physico-chemical and biological properties, its quality is determined by physicochemical and microbiological characters. The results of physicochemical properties (water content, pH, HMF, EC and ash) of honeys from southern Niger showed that all samples comply with quality standards. The acidity records values above 50 meq / g except for sample 4. Like other foods, natural honey can be contaminated during its extraction and packaging. The results of the bacteriological analyzes showed the absence of indicator bacteria of hygienic quality, absence of pathogens or toxinogens or a very small number reflect a good level of quality of Nigerian honeys. However, the mycological analyzes show a high number of yeasts and molds making these honeys unfit for consumption and are mostly at risk of fermentation. The quality of Nigerian honeys can be improved by applying good production and manufacturing practices.

The yeast species identified are: Schizosaccharomyces plombe, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, Kluyveromyces thermotolerans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Mold species identified as: Asp. fumigatus, Asp. candidus, Asp. niger, Asp. Versicolor, Asp. nidulans and Mucor.

Finally, this study recommended Nigerian beekeepers to follow the good practices of extraction and packaging of honey while respecting hygiene conditions to avoid contamination that can cause food poisoning or alteration of honey.

Figure 3. Distribution of yeast anf mold in the honey samples

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the laboratory of nutrition and agro biotechnology in semi-arid zone for the supply of reagents and culture media

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

References

[1]   | Bogdanov, S., “The honey book”, Bee Product Science, 2011.
[2]   | Jean-Prost, P., Le Conte, Y, “Apiculture, connaitre l’abeille, Conduire le rucher,” 7ème éd Lavoisier, France, 2005, 698.
[3]   | Snowdon, J.A, “The microbiology of honey - meeting your buyers,” specifications (Why they do what they do), Am. Bee J., 139. 51-60. 1999.
[4]   | Salamanca Grosso, G; Henao Rojas, C; Moreno, I; Luna, A, “Características microbiológicas de las mieles tropicales de Apis mellifera” . Galeria Apícola virtual. Apiservices. 2001.
[5]   | Hussein, M. H, “L’apiculture en Afrique: les pays du Nord, de l’Est, du Nord-Est et de l’ouest du continent,” Apicta, (1). 34-48. 2001.
[6]   | Bogdanov, S., Martin, P., Lullmann, C., Borneck, R., Flamini, C., et al., “Harmonised methods of the European honey commission”, Apidologie,. (Extra issue). 1-59. 1997.
[7]   | International Honey Commission (IHC), “Harmonized methods of the international Honey commission,” 1-63. 2009. Available: http://www.beehexagon.net/en/network.htm [accessed June, 2, 2017)].
[8]   | Ward, W.H., Truman, K.F, “A quality survey of Australian Honeys,” RIRDC Publishers, 2001, 41.
[9]   | Guillaume, P, “Milieu de culture PCA, milieu de culture GN,” 1-54. 2004. Available: www.ac-lyon.fr/enseigne/biotech/microbio. [Accessed Dec. 13, 2012].
[10]   | Guiraud, J.P., Rosec, J.P, “Pratique des normes en microbiologie alimentaire,” ed. AFNOR.1-96. 2004.
[11]   | Larpent-Gourgaud, M., Larpent, J.P, “ Mémento technique de microbiologie”, Lavoisier, Tec et Doc., 1997, 280.
[12]   | Guiraud, J.P, “Microbiologie alimentaire,” Dunod, Paris, 2003, 651.
[13]   | NF ISO 4832 (V 08-015), “Microbiologie des aliments. Méthode horizontale pour le dénombrement des coliformes. Méthode par comptage des colonies,” Jul. 2006.
[14]   | NF V08-050, “Microbiologie des aliments. Dénombrement des coliformes présumés par comptage des colonies obtenues à 30°C,” Apr. 2009.
[15]   | NF V08-060,“Microbiologie des aliments. Dénombrement des coliformes thermotolérants par comptage des colonies obtenues à 44°C,” Apr. 2009.
[16]   | Petransxiene, D., Lapied, L., “La qualité bactériologique du lait et des produits laitiers, analyses et tests,” 2eme édition Technique et Documentation, Lavoisier, Paris, 1981, 228.
[17]   | Larpent, J.P., Guiraud, L.M., “Manuel pratique de microbiologie,” Edition Hermann, 1985.
[18]   | Moreau M, “Les moisissures,” In “microbiologie alimentaire,” Tome 2. Edition Tec et Doc, Paris, 1996, 54-62.
[19]   | Martins, H.M., Martins, M.L., Bernardo, F.M.A, “Bacillaceae spores, fungi and aflatoxins determination in honey,” Revista Portuguesa De Ciências Vet- erinárias, 98(546). 85-8. 2003.
[20]   | Boeufrag, J.M., Bonaly R., Larpent, J.P, “L’identification des levures,” In “Biotechnologie des levures,” Ed masson, 1991, 171-204.
[21]   | Koenig H, “Guide de mycologie médicale,” Ellipse édition Marqueting Paris, 1995, 288.
[22]   | Bouix, M., Leveau, J .V, “Les levures,” in technique d’analyses et de contrôle dans les industries agroalimentaire,” Edition technique et documentation, paris, volume 03, 1980, 130-143.
[23]   | Bouix, M., Leveau, J. V, “Microbiologie industrielle,” Tome 01, Edition Lavoisier technique et documentation, Paris, 1993, 5-32.
[24]   | Midgley, G., Yvonn, E., Clayton, M., Roderick, J. H, “Atlas de poche de mycologie”. Edition Flammarion, Paris, 1998, 15.
[25]   | Bruneau, E, “Les analyses du miel: les paramètres physico-chimiques,” ActuAPI ; CARI, 2005, 1-8.
[26]   | CETAM-LORRAINE, “Information sur des différentes analyses des miels,” Laboratoire d’analyses et d’écologie apicole. 2002, 1-5.
[27]   | Mbogning, E., Tchoumboue, j., Damesse, F., Sanou Sobze, M., & Canini, A, “Caractéristiques physico- chimiques des miels de la zone Soudano-guinéenne de l’Ouest et de l’Adamaoua Cameroun,” Tropicultura, 29 (3). 168-175. 2011.
[28]   | Omafuvbe, B. O., and Akanbi O. O, “Microbiological and physico-chemical properties of some commercial Nigerian honey,” African Journal of Microbiology Research Vol. 3 (12). 891-896. Dec. 2009.
[29]   | Adebiyi, F.M., Akpan, I., Obiajunwa E.I., and Olaniyi, H.B, “Chemical/ Physical Characterization of Nigerian Honey,” Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 3 (5). 278-281. 2004.
[30]   | Meda, A., Lamien , C.E., Millogo,J., Romito , M., Nacoulma, O.G, “Physicochemical Analyses of Burkina Fasan Honey,” ACTA VET. BRNO, 74. 147-152. 2005.
[31]   | Djossou, J.A., Tchobo, F.P., Yédomonhan, H., Alitonou, A.G., & Soumanou M, “Evaluation des caractéristiques physico-chimiques des miels commercialisés à Cotonou,” Tropicultura, 31 (3). 163-169. 2013.
[32]   | Journal officiel des Communautés européennes (JOCE) . 12.1.2002 N°10, 47-52. ( The Council of the European Union. Council Directive 2001/110/ec of 20 Dec. 2001 relating to honey), Dec. 1, 2002.
[33]   | Codex Alimentarius Commission Codex standard 12, Revised Codex Standard for Honey, Standards and Standard Methods. FAO- Rome, 2001, 1-7. Available: http://www. codex alimentarius. netCodex alimentaire (2001).
[34]   | Mendes, E., Brojo, P.E., Ferreira, I., Ferreira, M.A, “Quality evaluation of Portuguese honey,” Carbohydr. Polym, 37(3). 219-223. 1998.
[35]   | Terrab, A., Diez, M.J., Heredia, F.J, “Characterization of Moroccan unifloral honeys by their physicochemical characteristics,” Food Chem, 79. 373-379. 2002.
[36]   | Gonnet, M, “L'hydroxyméthylfurfural dans les miels. Mise au point d'une méthode de dosage,” Ann. Abeille, 6 (1). 53-67. 1963.
[37]   | Ruoff, K., Bogdanov, S, “Authenticity of honey and other bee products”. Apiacta, 38. 317-327. 2004.
[38]   | Gonnet, M, “Le miel, composition, propriétés, conservation”. INRA station expérimentale d’apiculture, 1982, 1-18.
[39]   | Schweitzer, P, “Qualité du miel,” Journée de l'abeille à Sombernon. Apiservices, Oct. 7, 2000.
[40]   | Rabeharifara, Z.P, “Caractérisation alimentaire des miels malgaches en vue d’une authentification: cas des miels d’eucalyptus,” Mém DEA en Biochimie, Univ d’antananarivo, Madagascar. 2011, 102.
[41]   | Gomes, S., Dias, L. G., Moreira, L.L., Rodrigues, P., Estevinho, L, “Physicochemical, microbiological and antimicrobial properties of commercial honeys from Portugal,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, Volume 48, Issue 2. 544-548. February 2010.
[42]   | Bogdanov, S., Lüllmann, C., Martin, P., von der Ohe, W., Russmann, H., Vorwohl, G., Persano Oddo, L., et al. “Honey Quality and International Regulatory Standards: Review of the Work of the International Honey Commission,” Swiss Bee Research Centre, 1999, 7.
[43]   | Louveaux, J, “Composition, propriétés et technologie du miel”, In traité de biologie de l’abeille, Tome 3: les produits de la ruche, Sect l’abeille et la fleur, Ed. Masson et CIE, Paris. 1968, 277-318.
[44]   | Bogdanov, S., Rouff, K., Persano-Oddo, L,“Physico-chemical methods for the characterisation of unifloral honeys: a revieu,” Apidologie, (35). 4-17. 2004
[45]   | Leblanc, P, “Univers merveilleux du miel: Caractères physicochimiques du miel,”. 2001, 61.
[46]   | Donadieu, Y, “Le miel, thérapeutique naturelle,” 2ème édition Maloine, 1978, 14-27.
[47]   | Louveaux, J, (1976). “Les produits de la ruche,” information technique des services vétérinaire, n°60 à 63. 67-78. 1976.
[48]   | Malika, N., Faid, M., El adlouni, C, “Microbiological and physico-chemical properties of moroccan honey,” Int J Agri Biol, (7). 773-6. 2005.
[49]   | Finola, M.S., Mirta, F., Lasango, C., Marioli, J.M, “Microbiological and chemical characterization of honeys from central Argentina,” Food Chemistry, 100.1649-953. 2007.
[50]   | Codex alimentarius Commission, “Programme mixte FAO/OMS. Projet de norme codex révisée pour le miel”. CX/S 00/3 Novembre 1999.
[51]   | C.R.C, ch. 287, “Règlement sur le miel”. 27 octobre (2015). Publié par le ministre canadien de la Justice. Available: http://lois-laws.justice.gc.ca [Accessed Aug. 15, 2017].
[52]   | Fléché, C., Clément, M.C., Zeggane, S., & Faucon, J.P, “Contamination des produits de la ruche et risques pour la santé humaine: situation en France,” Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 16 (2). 609-619. 1997.
[53]   | Hocine, L, “Caractérisation microbiologiques et physicochimiques des miels produits au niveau de la région de Tiaret,” PhD thesis in Sciences. Ibn khaldoun-Tiaret University-Algeria, 2017.
[54]   | Hocine, L., and Rezzoug, W, “Microbiological and Physicochemical Characterization of Honeys from the Tiaret Region of Algeria,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care, Vol 9(3). 85-91. 2017.
[55]   | Iurlina, M. O., Fritz, R, “Characterization of microorganisms in Argentinean honeys from different sources,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, 105. 297-304. 2005.
[56]   | Kunová, S., Kačániová, M., Haščík, P., Čuboň, J, “Microbiological and chemical quality of slovak and european honey,” J Microbiol Biotech Food Sci., 4 (special issue 1). 41-44. 2015.
[57]   | Różańska, H, “Microbiological quality of polish honey,” Bull Vet Inst Pulawy, 55. 443-445. 2011.
[58]   | Rall, V.L.M., Bombo, A.J., Lopes, T.F., Carvalho, L.R., Silva, M.G, “Honey consumption in the state of Sao Paulo:a risk to human health,” Anaerobe, (9). 299-303. 2003.
[59]   | Sodré, G.S., Marchini, L.C., Moreti, A.C.C.C., Rosa, V.P., Carvalho, C.A.L, “Conteúdo microbiológico de méis de Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) dos Estados do Ceará e Piauí,” Boletim de Indústria Animal, 64. 39-42. 2007.
[60]   | Ratia, G, “Cahier des charges concernant le mode de production biologique du miel,” Bureau des signes de qualité et de l’apiculture biologique, France. 2001. 13.
[61]   | Kitambala, K, “Etude bactériologique et biochimique du miel vendu au marché central de Bukavu (Congo),” Tropicultura, 16-17 (4). 189-192.1999.
[62]   | Snowdon, J.A., Cliver, D.O, “Microorganisms in honey,”. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 31. 1-6. 1996.
[63]   | Jouve, L. J, (1996). La qualité microbiologique des aliments maîtrise et critères, 2eme édition; Ed. Polytechnica, Paris, 1996. 186-354.
[64]   | Dromigny, E, Les critères microbiologiques des denrées alimentaires, Ed tec & doc lavoisier, 2012. 509.
[65]   | ANSES, “Bacillus cereus,” Fiche de description de danger biologique transmissible par les aliments, Septembre 2011.
[66]   | Collins, C.H., Lyne, P.M., Grange, J.M, Collins and Lyne’s microbiological methods. 7th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999, 213-221.
[67]   | Gliński, Z., Chmielewski, M, “Pathology and therapy of diseases of usable insects,” Agricultural Academy Press, Lublin, Poland. 1994.
[68]   | Kačaniová, M., Chlebo, R., Kopernický, M., Trakovická, A, “Microflora of the honeybee gastrointestinal tract,” Folia Microbiol, 2004 (49). 169-171.
[69]   | Nasser Laila, A, (2004). “Isolation and characterization of fungi contaminating packaged honey commonly consumed in saudi Arabia,” Ass. Univ. Bull. Environ. Res. Vol. 7 No. 1, 2004, March 1-7.
[70]   | Root, A.I. (Ed.), “The ABC and XYZ of Bee Culture,” The A. I. Root Co., Medina, OH. 1983.
[71]   | Graham, J.M. (Ed.), (1992). The Hive and the Honey Bee, Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois. 1992.3330.
[72]   | Coll Cárdenas, F., Villat, C., Laporte, G., Noia, M., Mestorino, N, “Microbial characteristic of honey,” A Review. Veterinaria Cuyana Año 3, 2008, nº 1 y 2.
[73]   | Moreau, C, “Les moisissures,” in microbiologie alimentaire. Tome I, Edition Technique & documentation, Paris. 1996. 237-247.