Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Assessment of Aerobic Plate Counts, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Meat Sold by Street Vendors in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

B.E. Mazizi*, V. Muchenje, M. Makepe, G. Mutero

Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa

Abstract: The study was carried out to determine the aerobic plate counts (APC), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella contamination levels in cooked (n=24) and raw (n=24) beef, pork and mutton samples, surface contact plates (n=48) and water samples (n= 40) from street vendors. A total of 8 street vendors who were willing to participate in the study were randomly selected. After biochemical tests, no significant differences were found in the microbial counts of meat sold by street vendors in Alice and King Williams town. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in the mean scores of raw beef, mutton and pork where APC (4.8, 3.7 and 2.8 Log CFU/g), Staphylococcus aureus (3.3, 3.7 and 2.8 Log CFU/g) and E. coli (1.0, 0.6 and 0.3 Log CFU/g) respectively. Salmonella tested negative in all the samples tested in the study. The results in the study were associated with cross-contamination during processing and storage. However, the levels of contamination in cooked meat were lower when compared to the standards set by Commission Regulation for determining the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods. Overall, poor hygiene of the street vendor, utensils, and holding area were major sources of contamination. It was therefore concluded that there were no differences in the microbial counts of meat sold in the informal markets of Nkonkobe and Buffalo City Municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Improved sanitation facilities, hygiene tools, and training will promote the production of safer food by the street vendors.

Keywords: meat, street vendors, hygiene, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella

Citation: B.E. Mazizi, V. Muchenje, M. Makepe, G. Mutero, Assessment of Aerobic Plate Counts, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Meat Sold by Street Vendors in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 5 (6). 436-442. January 2017. doi:10.12691/jfnr-5-6-11

1. Introduction

Foodborne illnesses represent a worldwide concern to public health [1]. About 33% of the population in developing countries is affected by foodborne sicknesses every year [2]. This high rate of illnesses recorded may be due to a large number of consumers who are utilizing the informal sector as a source of their food for consumption [3] Foods sourced from the informal markets are easy to access, cheaper and convenient to consumers on an everyday basis [4]. This is informal markets are located in congested areas, where there are large numbers of prospective customers [3,4,5]. [6] mentioned that street food vending plays a pivotal role in the livelihood of consumers. Street food vending in developing countries is presumably the single biggest source of employment and potentially one of the most significant contributors to the economies of these countries[7]. This sector may be the biggest enterprise in African countries including, South Africa [7]. However, much still needs to be done to educate vendors to improve the safety of the food they sell. These street vendors operate in areas that do not meet all food safety regulations [8]. There is also a lack of basic sanitary facilities in areas where street food vendors operate [5]. As a result, food-borne sicknesses outbreak can occur as a consequence of consumers ingesting meat products contaminated with pathogens [9]. High bacterial or microbial counts of Salmonella spp., B. cereus and Staphylococcus are normally detected in street-vended foods [10,11] Contaminated vended foods can subsequently expose consumers to the risks of foodborne illnesses such as diarrhea, salmonellosis, listeriosis, and cholera [12,13]. The outbreaks of bacterial foodborne diseases can be controlled through frequent inspection by relevant personnel. The incorporation of food safety as one supporting component influencing food security and consumer nutrition may result in a healthy livelihood for the consumers [14]. Implementing food safety principles may not be feasible without educating the public about food safety risks [15]. Even though most consumers utilize food from this sector in South Africa, not much research has been done to determine the microbial status of meat sold in the informal market. Knowledge of the microbial quality of meat sold by street vendors will help in determining its safety. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine the microbial quality of meat sold in the informal markets in Nkonkobe and Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Consideration

The University of Fort Hare Ethics Committee (MUC161SMAZ01) approved all the protocols that were used in the experiments carried out in this study.

2.2. Description of Study Site

The study was conducted in two local municipalities, Nkonkobe and Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipalities in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Within these two municipalities, two towns Alice (Nkonkobe) and King William’s Town (Buffalo City) were selected for data collection. Alice is a small rural Town with a total population of approximately 15,143, of which 93% are Back African, 5.6% Coloured, 0.3% Indian/Asian , 0.6% white and others 0.5%. It lies at latitude 26° 49' 60E and 32° 45' 0S at an altitude of 572 m above sea levels with a minimum rainfall of 386mm per year and average temperatures of 29°C.

King Williams Town (KWT) is an urban Town that has a total population of approximately 34,019 in which Back African (65.3%), Coloured (25.6%), Indian/Asian (2.5%), white (5.6%) and others (1%). It lies along the latitude 32°53′S and 27°24′E at an altitude of 389 m above the sea levels and has dense and indigenous bushes which normally receive about 502mm of rain per year, with most rainfall occurring mainly during summer at average temperatures of 26.7°C.

2.3. Description of Street Vendors Operations in Alice and King Williams Town

Street vendors in Alice town are located around the taxi rank, and they are close to the road. Vendors operate in old caravans and shacks with walls, and the roofs are made of metal sheets. They purchase the meat they sell from the different butcheries in the central business district (CBD) and the rest of the food from the supermarkets. These street vendors sell basic food such as rice, samp, beans, dumplings, fat cakes, beef, mutton, pork, offal (Ulusu) and chicken. The food is served with vegetables which may consist of onions, cabbages, butternuts and beans.

Street vendors in KWT town are scattered around taxi ranks and bus stations. Most of these vendors are not sheltered while a few have permanent shelters including caravans and shacks made up of metal sheets or small tents. Workers, scholars and public transport drivers purchase food from these vendors. The street vendors who participated in the study had shelter in the form of either a caravan or a shack. Most of them had wooden tables which they covered with tablecloths. On top of the tables, they placed buckets of water which were used as reservoirs, stainless steel pots for cooking and the rest of the cutlery for easy access when required.

2.4. Assessment of Hazard Identification and Exposure

The preparation, handling and serving of meat after cooking was assessed to identify incidences of cross contamination. The temperature of the raw and cooked meat (at holding) was measured using a portable probe thermometer to determine the potential growth of bacteria. Samples were collected from raw and cooked meat to determine potential contamination of the meat in these two different states. Reservoir water was collected and surface contacts were plated for microbial identification and counting.

2.5. Sample Collection

A total of 48 beef, pork, and mutton meat samples were collected from 8 street vendors in Alice (n=4) and King Williams Town (n=4). The meat samples (cooked, n=24 and raw, n=24) were aseptically collected into sterile polyethylene bags, sealed and immediately transported in an ice box to prevent microbial growth during sample transportation. A total of 48 Contact plate samples were also taken from the table, cutlery, and hands of vendors. A total of 3 meat samples and 3 contact plates were taken from each vendor in each town. Also, a total of 40 samples were aseptically collected from the street vendor (5 water samples from each vendor) water reservoirs using 500ml sterile glass bottles for microbial determination. After collection, all the samples were immediately transported Grahamstown veterinary diagnosis center for microbial analysis.

2.6. Microbial Determination

2.6.1. Salmonella spp.

Samples were weighed, and ±25 g of each sample was used for the biochemical tests according to international standards (ISO) methods [16] (ISO 6579:2002). The weight was multiplied by 9 to calculate the volume of the buffer to be added to the sample to give a 10⁻¹ dilution. The samples were emptied into a stomacher bag (Bag mixer®DOA 20550) and buffered peptone water was added. The sample was placed in a stomacher and mashed for three minutes. The stomacher bag was emptied into a 250ml flat-bottom flask, which was marked for identification. The flask was placed in 37°C incubator for 18 h. 0.1 ml of the pre enriched broth was added to 10ml of Modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis (MSRV) agar and the plates were inoculated with the culture at 41.5°C for 24h. The negative plates were further inoculated for 24h. The sample from MSRV was streaked into Xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) and β-galactosidase (BGS) agar plates then inoculated at 37°C for 24h. After the complete incubation period, plates were colony counted according to the ISO methods [17] (ISO 6579:2002). The presumptive positive bacterial isolates obtained from the culture were confirmed using media from Oxid.

2.6.2. Aerobic Plate Counts

According to the international standards [17] (ISO 21528-2, 2004), ±25 g of samples was used for the biochemical tests. The weight was multiplied by 9 to calculate the volume of the buffer to be added to the sample to give a 10⁻¹ dilution. The samples were emptied into a stomacher bag (Bag mixer®DOA 20550) and buffered peptone water was added into the stomacher bag with the sample. The stomacher bag with the sample was placed in a stomacher and mashed for three minutes. 1 ml of the test sample was transferred into two Petri dishes using a sterile pipette. 15 ml of plate count agar at 44°C to 4°C was added into each petri dish. The inoculum was carefully mixed with the medium by rotating the Petri dishes and the mixture was left in a cool horizontal surface to allow it to solidify. An overlaying layer medium of 4 ml at 44°C to 47°C was added into the surface of the inoculated medium. The layer was allowed to solidify by putting it in a cool horizontal surface. The prepared dishes were inverted and placed in an incubator at 30°C ±1°C for 72 h ± 3 h. After the complete incubation period, plates were colony counted.

2.6.3. Staphylococcus aureus

According to the international standards [18] (ISO 4833:2003), samples were weighed and ±25 g was used for the biochemical tests. The weight was multiplied by 9 to calculate the volume of the buffer to be added to the sample in order to give a 10⁻¹ dilution according to ISO methods. The samples were emptied in a stomacher bag (Bag mixer®DOA 20550) and buffered peptone water was added into the stomacher bag with the sample. The stomacher bag with the sample was placed in a stomacher and mashed for three minutes. 1 ml of the test sample was transferred into two Petri dishes by means of a sterile pipette. 15 ml of staphylococcus aureus baired parker agar at 44°C to 47°C was added into each petri dish. The inoculum was carefully mixed with the medium by rotating the Petri dishes and the mixture was left in a cool horizontal surface to allow it to solidify. An overlaying layer medium of 4 ml at 44°C to 47°C was added into the surface of the inoculated medium. The layer was allowed to solidify by putting it in a cool horizontal surface. The prepared dishes were inverted and placed in an incubator at 37°C ±1°C for 24 h ± 3 h. After the complete incubation period, plates were colony counted according to the ISO methods [19] (ISO 4833:2003).

2.6.4. Escherichia coli

The most probable number technique [19] (ISO 16649-2, 2003) was used for identification of E. coli according to the international standards guidelines. The weight was multiplied by 9 to calculate the volume of the buffer to be added to the sample in order to give a 10⁻¹ dilution. The samples were emptied in a stomacher bag (Bag mixer®DOA 20550) and buffered peptone water was added into the stomacher bag with the sample. The stomacher bag with the sample was placed in a stomacher and mashed for three minutes. 1 ml of the test sample was transferred into two Petri dishes by means of a sterile pipette then after the mixture incubated at 44°C for 48 hours. The Agriculture Research Council [20] reference table was used to determine the most probable number of E. coli per milliliter. The positive results were streaked onto McConkey agar medium in order to isolate and confirm E. coli. For 24 hours at 37°C, the plates were incubated and examined for any pink colonies.

2.6.5. Water Analysis

Total viable counts (CFU/ml, 35°C 48h), total coliform counts (MAC/100ml, 35°C 24h), Escherichia coli (MAC/100ml, 35°C 24h and 44°C 24h) and Enterococci counts (MAC/100ml, 37°C 48h) were determined from the water samples collected.

A water sample of 100mls was emptied onto a filter paper (pore size 0.44μm) to trap bacteria and isolate total viable organisms. After filtration, the filter paper was placed in a Petri dish containing the Plate Count Agar and incubated at 35°C for 48 hours. Coliform bacteria and E. coli enumeration were done simultaneously; water sample of 100ml was filtered and then the filter paper was placed in Petri dishes with EMB agar. The Petri dishes were incubated for a period of 24 hours at 35°C. Dark-blue to violet colonies in EMB were counted as presumptive E. coli and salmon to red as coliforms. Confirmation of E. coli was done using the Indole test with Kovac’s reagent. Enumeration of Enterococci was done by placing filter paper in Bile Esculin agar and then incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. Black colonies after incubation were counted as presumptive Enterococci [19,20]. (ISO 4833, 2003, ISO 21528-2, 2004).

2.6.6, Contact Surface Analysis

2.6.6.1. Agar Contact Plate Method

Street vendor hands and equipment such as cutlery and tables used in vendor stalls may provide an indication of the hygiene and microbiological quality of the meat produced. Agar contact plates which had an internal diameter of 5.0cm were used and the dishes had a contact surface of 20cm². The dishes were filled with violet red bile glucose agar and the other dishes with plate count agar. They were hard-pressed onto each sampling site for a minimum of 10 seconds and correctly sealed. The plates were immediately transported to the laboratory in a cooler bag and aerobically incubated at 37°C for 24 hours for evidence of microbial growth (ISO, 6579, 2002) [17].

3. Statistical Analysis

All microbial counts were converted to a log₁₀ colony forming a unit (CFU) per gram values to confirm to normality. The mean and variances between the bacterial counts of meat, contact plates and water from sheltered vendors were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SAS [21] (2003). The means were compared using Tukey's test and were considered to be significant at P<0.05. Correlations between APC, Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, Contact plates for Enterobacteriaceae (cENT) ,contact plates for total viable counts (cTVC), Total viable counts from water (wTVC) and Temperature (Temp) were performed using Pearson’s analyses procedure of SAS [22] (2003). The results were considered to be significant at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001 respectively.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Aerobic Plate, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli counts of Meat from Street Vendors in Alice and King Williams Town

Figure 1, represents APC, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli counts on the meat sold by street vendors from Alice and King Williams Town. There were no significant differences in the overall APC found in meat sold by street vendors between the two towns (P> 0.05). A similar trend was also observed for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli counts from the meat sold by street vendors (Figure 1). This may be due to the similarity in the mode of operation of the vendors between the two study sites. Furthermore, microbial loads were relatively low in all the samples collected as compared to the standards set by the Commission Regulation [22] for determining the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat food. This could also be because these vendors did no re-sell leftovers the next day, so their ready-eat-foods were fresh and were not contaminated by different bacteria. A lot still needs to be done to improve the quality of meat sold by street vendors as it is a source of food for thousands of consumers.

Figure 1. Mean log10 of Aerobic plate, Staphylococcus eureus(staph) and Escherichia coli counts from street vendors from Alice and King Williams Town, at α= 0.05

4.2. Microbial Counts and Temperature in Raw and Cooked Meat Sold by Street Vendors

This study did no record the presence of Salmonella spp. in all the meat samples, this is similar to what [11] found in their study in Johannesburg, South Africa where they discovered that there were no species of salmonella on meat sold by street vendors. On the other hand [23] found salmonella spp. in cooked food and identified improper hygiene, sanitation and storage facilities as the main cause of food contamination. Table 1 represents the least square means (log) ±standard errors of microbial counts and temperature in raw and cooked meat sold by street vendors. The results revealed that there were no significant differences between the Aerobic Place Counts of raw beef (4.8 Log CFU/g), mutton (3.7 Log CFU/g) and pork (2.8 Log CFU/g). Also, no significant differences between cooked beef (1.5 Log CFU/g), mutton (1.3 Log CFU/g) and pork (1.9 Log CFU/g) sample tested for microbial quality. This is because most of the pathogens that tested positive in meat samples were aerobic bacteria such Staphylococcus aureus. Also, most of the vendor chopped their meat with the same instrument without in between disinfection. [24] earlier reported that similarities in raw meat microbial counts may be because the vendors use the same knife during chopping of meat without in between disinfection. The Meat Safety Act No. 40 of 2000 [25], however, states that equipment must be sterilized and not contaminate meat with greases to control such pathogens. This can be linked to lack of knowledge about meat safety amongst street vendors. There were significant differences in the values of Aerobic Plate Counts of cooked and raw beef, mutton and pork meat used in the study (P<0.05). Cooking might have played a role in the reduction in the Aerobic counts differences between cooked and raw meat because high temperature kills most of the pathogens.

Furthermore, the result of Staphylococcus aureus count did not reveal any significant differences in raw and cooked meat samples. However, the raw mutton had the highest staphylococcus count (3.7 Log CFU/g), followed by beef (3.3 Log CFU/g), and least in pork (2.8 Log CFU/g) (Table 1). Whereas in cooked meat, pork had the highest the staphylococcus count (1.9 Log CFU/g), followed by beef (1.5 Log CFU/g) and least in mutton (1.3 Log CFU/g), (Table 1). This is similar to the findings of [25] who observed that cross contamination influenced the microbial quality of meat from street vendors. Also, the higher counts of pathogens in raw meat may be due to unsterilized vendor’s hand. As it is common for vendors to seek for help from colleagues when cutting large difficult chunk of meat. This could potentially bridge hygiene and lead to meat contamination. Furthermore, Staphyloccocal organisms are common the respiratory tract of human, hence the possibility of its introduction if meat is handled by too many workers. [26] reported that hands are the major source for most cross contaminations in most foods. Cross-contamination may increase in cases where the vendors handle money from customers with the same hands that handle food [27]. Cross contamination through hands observed in the present study is almost similar in some other countries as well. [28] reported that about 60% of the people who are involved in food services in Spain neglected proper hand hygiene. In this study, Staphylococcus aureus counts were lower than the standard >105 CFU/g, and thus potrays the food as acceptable. There were no significant differences in Escherichia coli counts across all the meat samples used in the study (Table 1). There were generally lower counts of Escherichia coli in both cooked and raw meat. This result is in contrast with the findings of [11] who reported higher levels of Escherichia coli in meat collected from street vendors. Similarly, [24] in their study also reported coliforms of Escherichia coli in 50% of the beef sampled in Bloemfontein, South Africa while Ahmed and [29] detected about 2.6% E. coli O157: H7 in beef samples in a study done in Egypt. More importantly, the levels of Escherichia coli were much less than the standard counts ≥100CFU/g set for determining the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat food [23].

Table 1 below shows that there were significant differences between the temperature of raw beef, mutton, and pork. The differences in the temperatures of the meat samples may be due to the different temperatures at which different meat samples were prepared. This may have resulted in the decrease in the bacterial counts in different meat types. Also, the temperature at which food is kept during holding and display may influence microbial growth. Foods that are prepared should be kept at least 60°C if kept for more than ±5 hours a day [30]. Total coliform counts (MAC/100ml, 35°C 24h), Escherichia coli (MAC/100ml, 35°C 24h and 44°C 24h) and Enterococci counts (MAC/100ml, 37°C 48h) in water samples all tested negative. This might be because water was taken in the morning when the environmental temperatures were low however the water was used throughout and kept in closed containers. Water and soap were the only solutions that were commonly used to wipe the surfaces. Furthermore, water was used to clean the utensils that were used for cooking, cutting, and storage, due to cross contamination the water contact surfaces may exhibit the same counts as the water stored. [24] reported that few vendors practice the basics of using water and soap to wipe their equipment. Contaminated water spreads pathogens around thus increasing their proliferation [31]. The quality of water is vital as water plays a pivotal role during preparation of these ready-to-eat foods. Access to good quality water may be elusive for other street vendors, due to water problems facing Africa as a whole.

Table 1. least square means (log) ±standard errors of microbial counts and temperature in raw and cooked meat sold by street vendors

4.3. Correlations among Microbial Counts and Temperature of the Meat Sold by Street Vendors

Aerobic plate counts (APC) are counts of aerobic bacteria that may be found in raw and cooked food. APC may be a good indicator of low-quality food including meat which is contaminated by numerous microorganisms. Table 2 represents Pearson correlation analysis between microbial counts and temperature on the meat from street vendors. The results revealed a positive correlation between Aerobic plate counts (APC) and Staphylococcus aureus (Staph) (P<0.001), as well as Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, count n (P<0.001). Staphylococcus aureus is a common commensal found in the human and animal skin and respiratory tract and can in cases of poor hygiene management is found in human foods such as raw meat [32]. Improper handling of food before and after processing contributes to the presence of pathogens in foods after processing [33]. There was a positive correlation between cTVC and wTVC in the samples (Table 2). The corelation is possibly due to cross contamination from water used for cleaning surfaces. More so, the results also revealed a negative correlation between APC and meat temperature and between Staphylococcus aureus and meat temperature (P<0.001). The negative relationship between APC and meat temperature may be because high temperature destroy most of the aerobic bacteria. [11] reported that cooking temperatures over 80°C kill all the vegetative forms of pathogens. However, cooking at high temperature is also known to denature some of the essential nutrients in foods. On the other hand, Staphylococcus aureus is abundant is its ability to grow over a wide range of temperatures [34] from 7° to 48.5°C. However, [35] mentioned that food that is not going to be consumed imminently must be kept at least 7°C to avoid contamination. There was a negative correlation between contact plates of Enterobacteriaceae (cENT) and contact plates for total viable counts (cTVC) and a negative correlation between wTVC and Escherichia coli in the samples that were used (P<0.01).

Table 2. correlations among microbial counts and Temperature of meat sold by street vendors

5. Conclusion

There were no differences in the microbial quality of meat sold by street vendors in Alice and King Williams’s Town. The results obtained from the samples revealed fewer chances of consumers contracting illnesses from the meat sold by street vendors. However, much still needs to be done to make sure that their produce is fit for consumption even for the next generation. The pathogenic microorganisms, which were found in the cooked meat sold by street vendors, were lower when compared to the standards set for determining the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat food. However, improved sanitation facilities, hygiene tools, and training will promote the safe food produced by the street vendors.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre and the Grahamstown Veterinary Laboratory for their support and contribution. Special thanks to DST-NRF Center of Excellence in Food Security (project number P801) and Meat Industry Trust for providing the financial resource for this research.

References

[1]   | Ko WH. “Food suppliers' perceptions and practical implementation of food safety regulations in Taiwan”. Journal of food and drug analysis. 2015 Dec 31; 23(4): 778-87.
[2]   | Isara AR, Isah EC, Lofor PV, and Ojide CK. “Food contamination in fast food restaurants in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria: Implications for food hygiene and safety”. Public health. 2010 Aug 31; 124(8): 467-71.
[3]   | Muyanja C, Nayiga L, Brenda N, and Nasinyama G. “Practices, knowledge and risk factors of street food vendors in Uganda”. Food Control. 2011 Oct 31; 22(10): 1551-8.
[4]   | Patricia V. Azanza, Corazon F. Gatchalian, Melba P. and Ortega M. “Food safety knowledge and practices of streetfood vendors in a Philippines university campus”. International journal of food sciences and nutrition. 2000 Jan 1; 51(4): 235-46.
[5]   | Kubheka LC, Mosupye FM, and Von Holy A. “Microbiological survey of street-vended salad and gravy in Johannesburg city, South Africa”. Food control. 2001 Mar 31; 12(2): 127-31.
[6]   | Hill, J.. The development of a street-food vending model that offers healthy foods for sale. Ph.D. thesis, School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape. 2016. Available at: http://etd.uwc.ac.za/xmlui/handle/11394/4995.
[7]   | Von Holy A, and Makhoane FM. “Improving street food vending in South Africa: Achievements and lessons learned”. International journal of food microbiology. 2006 Sep 1; 111(2): 89-92.
[8]   | Aluko OO, Ojeremi TT, Olaleke DA, and Ajidagba EB. “Evaluation of food safety and sanitary practices among food vendors at car parks in Ile Ife, southwestern Nigeria”. Food Control. 2014 Jun 30; 40: 165-71.
[9]   | Webb M, Morancie A. “Food safety knowledge of foodservice workers at a university campus by education level, experience, and food safety training”. Food Control. 2015 Apr 30; 50: 259-64.
[10]   | Mosupye FM, and von HOLY AL. “Microbiological quality and safety of ready-to-eat street-vended foods in Johannesburg, South Africa”. Journal of Food Protection. 1999 Nov; 62(11): 1278-84.
[11]   | Umoh VJ, and Odoba MB. “Safety and quality evaluation of street foods sold in Zaria, Nigeria”. Food Control. 1999 Feb 1; 10(1): 9-14.
[12]   | Liu Z, Zhang G, and Zhang X. “Urban street foods in Shijiazhuang city, China: Current status, safety practices and risk mitigating strategies”. Food Control. 2014 Jul 31; 41: 212-8.
[13]   | Manguiat LS, and Fang TJ. “Microbiological quality of chicken-and pork-based street-vended foods from Taichung, Taiwan, and Laguna, Philippines”. Food microbiology. 2013 Oct 31; 36(1): 57-62.
[14]   | Unnevehr L. “Food safety in developing countries: Moving beyond exports”. Global food security. 2015 Mar 31; 4: 24-9.
[15]   | Hennessy DA, Roosen J,and Miranowski JA.”Leadership and the provision of safe food”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2001 Nov 1; 83(4): 862-74.
[16]   | International Standard Organisation (ISO) 6579.Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs – Horizontal Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp., ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. 2002.
[17]   | International Standards Organisation (ISO) 21528-2. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs- Horizontal Methods for the Detection and Enumeration of Enterobacteriaceae. II. Colony-Count Method, Geneva, Switzerland. 2004.
[18]   | International Standard Organisation (ISO) 4833. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs – Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Microorganisms-Colony- Count Technique at 30C, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. 2003.
[19]   | International Standards Organisation (ISO) 17604. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs – Carcass Sampling for Microbiological Analysis, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. 2003.
[20]   | Agricultural Research Council (ARC). Standards operating procedure for DPP 9704. Enumeration of Escherichia coli. Feed and food analysis Laboratory, ARC, Onderstepoort Institute, South Africa, 2010.
[21]   | Statistical Analytical Systems (SAS). SAS/STAT users guide, Release 8.1 Edition SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina, USA. 2003.
[22]   | Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005. Microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union. 22.12.2005, 2005; 26p.
[23]   | Lues JF, Rasephei MR, Venter P, and Theron MM. “Assessing food safety and associated food handling practices in street food vending”. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2006 Oct 1; 16(5): 319-28.
[24]   | Bryan FL. “Risks of practices, procedures and processes that lead to outbreaks of foodborne diseases”. Journal of Food Protection. 1988 Aug 1; 51(8): 663-73.
[25]   | Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF). Meat Safety Act No. 40 of 2000. Available at: http://www.nda.agric.za/doaDev/sideMenu/APIS/doc/MEATSAFETY. (Accessed 15 August 2015).
[26]   | Ferron, S., Morgan, J. and O’Reilly, M. Hygiene Promotion: A Practical Manual for Relief and Development; Intermediate Technology: Warwickshire, England, 2000.
[27]   | Monney I, Agyei D, and Owusu W. “Hygienic practices among food vendors in educational institutions in Ghana: the case of Konongo”. Foods. 2013 Jul 9; 2(3): 282-94.
[28]   | Martı́nez-Tomé M, Vera AM, and Murcia MA. “Improving the control of food production in catering establishments with particular reference to the safety of salads”. Food Control. 2000 Dec 31; 11(6): 437-45.
[29]   | Ahmed AM, and Shimamoto T. “Isolation and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Shigella spp. from meat and dairy products in Egypt”. International journal of food microbiology. 2014 Jan 3; 168: 57-62.
[30]   | World Health Organisation. Essential safety requirement for street-vended foods. Government Printer, Pretoria. 1996. Available at: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/fs_management/en/streetvend.pdf. (Accessed 10 October 2016).
[31]   | Nyamakwere, F., Muchenje, V., Mushonga, B., Makepe, M. and Mutero, G. “Assessment of Salmonella, Escherichia Coli, Enterobacteriaceae and Aerobic Colony Counts Contamination Levels during the Beef Slaughter Process”. Journal of Food Safety 2016; 36: 548-556.
[32]   | Zhao, R.M., Shi C, Liu, Z., Huang, Y., Zhao, Z., Guo, Na. and Yu, Lu. “Analysis of the gene expression profile of Staphylococcus aureus treated with nisin Xingchen”, Food Control. 2015; 1-59.
[33]   | Lampel, K.A., Sandlin, R.C., and Formal, S., Shigella. In: Robinson, R.K., Batt, C.A. Patel, P.D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology. Academic Press, London, 2000. pp. 2015-2020.
[34]   | Fuchs S, Pané-Farré J, Kohler C, Hecker M, and Engelmann S. “Anaerobic gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus”. Journal of bacteriology. 2007 Jun 1;189(11):4275-89.
[35]   | Normanno G, Firinu A, Virgilio S, Mula G, Dambrosio A, Poggiu A, Decastelli L, Mioni R, Scuota S, Bolzoni G, Di and Giannatale E. “Coagulase-positive Staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus in food products marketed in Italy”. International journal of food microbiology. 2005 Jan 15; 98(1): 73-9.