<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>Journal of Food and Nutrition Research</journalTitle>
<eissn>2333-1240</eissn>
<publicationDate>2016-09-29</publicationDate>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>10</issue>
<startPage>664</startPage>
<endPage>670</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/jfnr-4-10-6</doi>
<publisherRecordId>JFNR20164106</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Nutritional Evaluation and Consumer Preference of Legume Fortified Maize-meal Porridge</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Alamu Emmanuel Oladeji</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Maziya-Dixon Bussie</name>
<email>b.dixon@cgiar.org</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Popoola Ibironke</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gondwe Therese</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Chikoye David</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Oyo Road, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria</affiliationName>




</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">Maize-meal porridge is commonly consumed meal for the adults as breakfast food and for the children as complementary food. Food-to-food fortification was employed in order to improve the protein content of maize-meal porridge using soy flour and local groundnut paste. The study was aimed at evaluating the nutritional properties and consumer preference of the attributes of the unfortified porridge, legume-fortified porridge, and powdered milk-fortified porridge. The influence of consumers' knowledge of the type of fortificant added to the porridge was also investigated. Soy-fortified porridges provide comparable ash, crude fibre and fat contents to powdered milk- fortified porridge but with higher protein than powdered milk-fortified porridge. Soy flour raised the protein and ash content of the porridge by 90% and 63% respectively, the groundnut paste raised the protein and ash content by 88% and 41% and the powdered milk by 87% and 65% respectively. The unfortified porridge was the least preferred while the milk-fortified porridge was the most preferred. There was no significant difference between preference for some of the attributes of the groundnut paste fortified-porridge and the soy flour-fortified. There was no significant difference between consumption intent for the soy flour and groundnut paste -fortified porridge. Soy-fortified porridges provide comparable ash, crude fibre and fat contents to powdered milk- fortified porridge but with higher protein than powdered milk-fortified porridge. Soy-flour has shown to be a good substitute for powdered milk as a protein-fortificant for porridge and soy-fortified porridge could be a possible means of alleviating Protein-energy malnutrition among low income populations.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/jfnr/4/10/6/jfnr-4-10-6.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>maize-meal porridge</keyword>
<keyword>porridge fortificant</keyword>
<keyword>legume fortified porridge</keyword>
<keyword>Eastern Zambia</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
