Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Biosynthesis of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-Ascorbic Acid from Maltose by Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002

Ahmed Eibaid, Mohanad Bashari, Ming Miao, Abubakr Musa, Tao Zhang, Bo Jiang*

State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China

Abstract: In this work 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) was synthesized by Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 with L-ascorbic acid (AA) as an acceptor and maltose as a glycosyl donor. AA-2G production was analyzed by HPLC and was confirmed by LC/MS results. The reaction parameters, such as pH (4.0-9.0), temperature (25-50C), time (0-30 h), substrate ratios and enzyme concentration were optimized. The results showed that the optimum condition was pH 8.0 at 37C for 24 h, 1:1 maltose to AA substrates mass ratio, and 200 U/mL of CGTase. Under these conditions, the production of AA-2G was 5.5 g/L, this result indicate that CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 can effectively uses maltose as a glycosyl donor to produce AA-2G in high yield.

Keywords: Cyclodextrin glucanotransferase, 2-0-α-D-glucopyransyl-L-ascorbic acid, maltose

Received April 11, 2014; Revised May 12, 2014; Accepted May 14, 2014

Citation: Ahmed Eibaid, Mohanad Bashari, Ming Miao, Abubakr Musa, Tao Zhang, Bo Jiang, Biosynthesis of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-Ascorbic Acid from Maltose by Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 2 (4). 193-197. January 2014. doi:10.12691/jfnr-2-4-10

1. Introduction

Vitamin C is the common name for L-ascorbic acid (AA), a six-carbon sugar derivative of L-threo-hex-2-enono-1,4-lactone [1]. The nutritional importance of vitamin C as an essential water-soluble vitamin is well established. It has long been known that a nutritional deficiency in vitamin C causes scurvy, a disease characterized by bleeding gums, impaired wound healing, anemia, fatigue, and depression, which, without proper care, can eventually be fatal [2]. AA can also act as a cofactor for the hydroxylation of proline and lysine residues in collagen, a major protein component of the body [3]. However, vitamin C is extremely unstable in aqueous solution, especially in the presence of heat, light, Cu2+, and ascorbate oxidase, which reduces its biological activity and limits its applications [4,5].

Different AA derivatives have been chemically synthesized as attempts to improve the stability of AA, such as AA-2-O-phosphate (AA-2P) [6], AA-2-O-sulfate (AA-2S) [7], and AA-2-methyl ether (AA-2M) [8]. Some vitamin glycosides are present in nature [9], but AA glycosides are only available as chemicals or via enzymatic synthesis [10]. The molecule 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) was enzymatically synthesized by Yamamoto et al. [11] via transglycosylation using α-glucosidase. AA-2G is stable against enhanced oxidative degradation by heat, Cu²⁺ ion, or ascorbate oxidase, and it was found to have no reducing activity [4]. AA-2G is extremely stable and is considered to be superior to other chemically synthesized AA derivatives in terms of reaction specificity and efficiency in large-scale production [4]. AA-2G is available as AA well [12]; therefore it has found wide application in cosmetics, medicines and foods [5].

Although AA-2G can be produced by different enzymes [11,13,14], but studies have shown that cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) is the most preferable either mostly in free [15], immobilized [16], recombinant [17], or in mutant state [18]. CGTase transfer glucose unit to C₂ in AA via transglycosylation from glycosyl donor, different substrates were used as glycosyl donor except glucose [15,17]. Cyclodextrins (α and β) are best substrates for CGTase for the production of AA-2G, but they found limitation for industrial applications due to the cost of α-cyclodextrin and low solubility of β-cyclodextrin. Maltose was used as substrate, it represents best choice due to it is low cost and high solubility compared to cyclodextrins, but the production of AA-2G was weak due to low specificity [15,17]. CGTase specificity for synthesis AA-2G using maltose was improved by site-saturation engineering of lysine 47 and the yield was 1.12 g/L [19]. This yield is too low compared to 13 g/L of AA-2G that produced by recombinant CGTase using β-cyclodextrin as a glycosyl donor [17]. Therefore finding of CGTase with high specificity for synthesis AA-2G from maltose will assist to narrow the wide gab with β-cyclodextrin. In this research work, maltose was used as a glycosyl donor for production of AA-2G by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

AA-2G standard was from Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories (Okayama, Japan), AA and glucoamylase were from Sigma. All other analytical grade chemicals were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Bacterial Strain and Enzyme Production

Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 originally was isolated from soil sample in our laboratory. The 16S rRNA gene sequences for this strain have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession number GU570959 [20]. After cultivation for 96 h, cells were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm and 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was used as crude enzyme solution, which was concentrated using Millipore ultra-filtration system (Millipore Company, USA) with a molecular cut-off point of 10 kDa. The concentrated enzyme solution was precipitated with 70% saturated ammonium sulfate at 4°C. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm, 4°C for 15 min and the pellets were dissolved in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) and dialysed against the same buffer overnight at 4°C. The solution obtained after dialysis was freeze-dried and the resulting CGTase powder was used in carrying out all experiments.

2.2.2. Enzymatic Production of AA-2G

The reaction mixture consisted of AA, maltose as a glycosyl donor, and CGTase in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 6.0). The reaction mixture was incubated at 40°C for 24 h in the dark in a shaking water bath. Glucoamylase (10 U/mL) was added to the mixture and incubated at 65°C and pH 5.5 for 6 h to hydrolyze the AA-2-oligosaccharides (AA-2Gn) to AA-2G and glucose.

2.2.3. HPLC analysis of AA-2G

Agilent Technologies 1200 Series (USA) connected with ODS-HYPERSIL column (4x250 mm) was used in this study. The assay conditions were a detection wavelength of 240 nm, mobile phase of 0.1 M KH₂PO₄/H₃PO₄ (pH 2.0), and a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The reaction mixture was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane before injection. The AA-2G concentration was calculated on the basis of peak area from standard curve with coefficient of correlation (r2) equal 0.9993. All experiments were conducted at least twice.

2.2.4. LC/MS/MS Analysis of AA-2G

LC/MS/MS (Waters Acquity UPLC and PDA; Waters Maldi Synapt Q-T of MS) was operated in negative ion detection mode; ultra pure synthetic air was used as a nebulisation desolvation gas (flow rate = 500 l/h) and MS fragment ions were obtained with 15 eV collision energy. The eluent consisted of gradient, A 100% methanol and B 0.1 formic acid using BEH C18 column (2.1×50 mm 1.7 μm) at 0.3 m/l flow rate, 245 nm, and at 45C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Enzymatic Production of AA-2G

The reaction mixture consists of, AA, maltose, and CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 in 0.1 M acetate buffer. HPLC profile of the reaction mixture (Figure 1 A) showed production of AA-2G (peak 2) at 7.5 min followed by AA-2-oligosaccharides; AA-2G₂ and AA-2G₃ at peaks 3 and 4 respectively. AA-2G production was 0.68 g/L, after addition of glucoamylase (10 U/mL), AA-2-oligosaccharides were hydrolyzed and AA-2G production was increased to 1.06 g/L (Figure 1 B). However, glucoamylase in addition to hydrolyze AA-2-oligosaccharides, it will also hydrolyze AA-2G; previously glucoamylase concentration was optimized [17]. Formation of AA-2-oligosaccharides by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 when maltose was used as a glycosyl donor is consistent with the result of CGTase from Paenibacillus sp [15]. On the other hand result of CGTase from Paenibacillus macerans showed that AA-2-oligosaccharides were not produced when maltose was used as a glycosyl donor [19].

Figure 1. HPLC profiles: (A) Reaction mixture product of CGTase with AA and maltose at 40oC for 24 h. (B) Reaction mixture after addition of glucoamylase to reaction mixture. 1: AA, 2: AA-2G, 3: AA-2G₂, and 4: AA-2G₃

3.2. Confirmation of AA-2G Production by LC-MS/MS

LC-MS/MS results (Figure 2) showed that mass spectrum of sample AA-2G (Standard) revealed a protonated molecule [M-H]- at 337 m/z, and this molecular ion produced ions at 277, 174, and 114 m/z. The reaction mixture showed a protonated molecule [M-H]- at 337 m/z, and this molecular ion produced ions at 277, 174, and 114 m/z, this result confirmed the production of AA-2G in the reaction of AA with maltose catalyzed by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002. The reaction mixture also showed other two peaks (data not shown) with protonated molecule [M-H]- at 499 and 661 m/z, these peaks related to AA-2G₂, and AA-2G₃ respectively. LC-MS/MS results are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 2. LC-MS/MS profile for standard (AA-2G) and reaction Mixture (AA-2G) product of AA, maltose and CGTase

Table 1. LC-MS/MS Feature of the ascorbic acid transglycosylated products

3.3. Optimization of AA-2G Production

3.3.1. Influence of Reaction pH and Temperature

The influence of pH was studied using different buffers, sodium acetate (4.0-6.0), sodium phosphate (6.0-8.0), and Tris- HCl (8.5 - 9.0). AA-2G production with acetate buffer showed gradual increase but, with phosphate buffer showed semi exponential increase and reached the maximum at pH 8.0 (Figure 3 A). With Tris-HCl buffer AA-2G production rapidly was decreased. AA-2G optimally was produced by CGTases with pH from 5.5- 6.5. On the other hand, AA-2G was produced at pH 7.5 by Sucrose phosphorylase [21], but this is first time AA-2G is produced at pH 8.0. One of two isozymes of CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 has an optimum hydrolysis activity in pH 8.0 [20]. This result is consistent with result of α-CGTase from recombinant Escherichia coli, which was showed transglycosylation maximum pH for AA-2G production same as optimum cyclization activity at pH 5.5 [17].

The influence of temperature was studied with pH 8.0 at 25-50C (Figure 3 B), the optimum temperature for AA-2G production was at 37C, other CGTase showed same maximum temperature [17] while other CGTases showed optimum transglycosylation temperature for AA-2G production around 37C [18,19,22]. On the other hand, CGTase from Bacillus stearothermophilus showed a maximum transglycosylation temperature for AA-2G production at 70C [23].

Figure 3. Effect of reaction pH (A) and temperature (B) on biosynthesis of AA-2G by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 with AA (0.016 g/mL) and maltose (0.016 g/mL) for 24 h.

3.3.2. Influence of Time and Substrate Ratio on Production of AA-2G

Figure 4 A shows the time course profile of AA-2G synthesis by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 in pH 8.0 at 37C. From the initial state (3 h), AA-2G production was exponentially increased with time till reached the maximum at 24 h and stayed constant till 30 h. Other wild and mutant CGTase showed same results [18]. The effects of substrate mass ratio (maltose/AA) on AA-2G biosynthesis were shown in Figure 4 B, maximum AA-2G production by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 was obtained at a 1:1 maltose (0.016 g/L) to AA (0.016 g/L) mass ratio. This result is in agreement with results obtained by other CGTases [17,19].

Figure 4. Influence of reaction time (A) and substrate ratios (B) on biosynthesis of AA-2G by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 with AA and maltose in pH 8.0 incubated at 37C.

3.3.3. Influence of Enzyme concentration

The effect of concentration of CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 on synthesis of AA-2G is shown in Figure 5. The results show that, maximum AA-2G production is reached when the enzyme concentration is 200 U/mL. Further increase in enzyme concentration after 200 U/mL showed decrease in AA-2G yield. Decrease of yield after reaching maximum was observed in production of AA-2G by α-CGTase from recombinant Escherichia coli, which has maximum AA-2G production at enzyme concentration of 160 U/mL [17]. These results may indicate that some CGTases may exert hydrolyzing effect on formed AA-2G, but this need to be confirmed. On the other hand, CGTase from Bacillus stearothermophilus hardly was hydrolyzed AA-2G compared to rat and rice α-glucosidases [23].

At maximum enzyme concentration the AA-2G yield by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 using maltose as a glycosyl donor was 5.5 g/L. Recombinant CGTase showed maximum AA-2G production (13 g/L) using β-cyclodextrin as a glycosyl donor [17] and CGTase from Paenibacillus sp. approximately showed a yield of 3 g/L AA-2G using dextrin as a glycosyl donor [15]. On the other hand, wild and mutant CGTases from Paenibacillus macerans showed a maximum AA-2G production of 0.85 g/L and 1.12 g/L respectively using maltose as a glycosyl donor [19]. Comparing our result with last results, the production of AA-2G by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 was 6.5 and 4.9-fold of that produced by wild and mutant CGTases from Paenibacillus macerans respectively.

Figure 5. Influence CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK13.002 concentration on biosynthesis of AA-2G from maltose (0.016 g/mL) and AA (0.016 g/mL) in pH 8.0 incubated at 37C for 24 h.

4. Conclusions

The biosynthesis of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) from maltose; the cheap and highly soluble substrate as a glycosyl donor by CGTases was previously reported. However the yield was poor due to low specificity, specificity for maltose was previously improved by site-saturation engineering and the yield increased from 0.85 to 1.12 g/L. In this study we biosynthesized 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 using ascorbic acid as acceptor and maltose as a glycosyl donor, the results were analyzed by HPLC and confirmed by LC-MS/MS. The AA-2G yield was 1.06 g/L in first step, the reaction conditions such as, pH, temperature, time, substrates ratio and enzyme concentration were optimized. At optimum conditions the maximum AA-2G production by CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 was 5.5 g/L. This result indicated that CGTase from Bacillus sp. SK 13.002 is effective in production of AA-2G compared to other CGTases.

Acknowledgement

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31000764, 20976073, 31230057), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013AA102102) and the Science & Technology Pillar Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2013647, BE2012613, BY2012049).

Statement of Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests.

References

[1]   | Cruz-Rus, E., Amaya, I. and Valpuesta, V. “The challenge of increasing vitamin C content in plant foods”, Biotechnol J, 7 (9). 1110-1121. 2012.
[2]   | Phillips, K.M., Tarrago-Trani, M.T., Gebhardt, S.E., Exler, J., Patterson, K.Y., Haytowitz, D.B. and Pehrsson, P.R. “Holden, Joanne M “Stability of vitamin C in frozen raw fruit and vegetable homogenates”, J Food Comp Anal, 23 (3). 253-259. 2010.
[3]   | Yamamoto, I., Muto, N., Murakami, K. and Akiyama, J. “Collagen synthesis in human skin fibroblasts is stimulated by a stable form of ascorbate, 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid”, J Nutr, 122. 871-877. 1992.
[4]   | Yamamoto, I., Muto, N. Murakami, K., Suga, S. and Yamaguchi, H. “L-Ascorbic acid α-glucoside formed by regioselective transglucosylation with rat intestinal and rice seed α-glucosidases: Its improved stability and structure determination”, Chem Pharm Bull, 38. 3020-3023. 1990.
[5]   | Yamamoto, I. and Tai, A. “The current state on development of novel vitamin derivatives”, Nippon Rinsho, 57. 2332-2338. 1997.
[6]   | Mima, H., Nomura, H., Imai, Y. and Takashima, H. “Chemistry and application of ascorbic acid phosphate”, Vitamin, 41. 387 1970.
[7]   | Mead, C.G. and Finamore, F.J. “Occurrence of ascorbic acid sulfate in the brine shrimp, Artemia salina”, Biochem, 8 (6). 2652-2655. 1969
[8]   | Lu, P.W., Lillard, D.W., Seib, P.A., Kramer, K.J. and Liang, Y.T. “Synthesis of the 2-methyl ether of L-ascorbic-acid - stability, vitamin activity, and C-13 nuclear magnetic-resonance spectrum compared to those of the 1-methyl and 3-methyl ethers”, J Agric Food Chem, 32. 21-28. 1984.
[9]   | Gregory III, J.F. “Nutritional Properties and Significance of Vitamin Glycosides”, Annu Rev Nutr, 18. 277-96. 1998.
[10]   | Han, R., Liu, L., Li, J., Du, G. and Chen, J. “Functions, applications and production of 2-O-D-glucopyranosyl-l-ascorbic acid”, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 95 (2). 313-320. 2012.
[11]   | Yamamoto, I., Muto, N., Nagata, E., Nakamura, T. and Suzuki, Y. “Formation of a stable L-ascorbic acid α-glucoside by mammalian α-glucosidase-catalyzed transglucosylation”, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1035. 44-50. 1990.
[12]   | Nakamura, S. and Oku, T. “Bioavailability of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid as ascorbic acid in healthy human”, Nutr,. 25. 686-691. 2009
[13]   | Markosyan, A.A., Abelyan, L.A., Adamyan, M.O., Akopyan, Z.I. and Abelyan, V.A. “Transglycosylation of L-Ascorbic Acid”, Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 43 (1). 36-40. 2007.
[14]   | Lee, S.B., Nam, K., Lee, S.J., Lee, J.H., Inouye, K. and Park, K.H. “Antioxidative effects of glycosyl-ascorbic acids synthesized by maltogenic amylase to reduce lipid oxidation and volatiles production in cooked chicken meat”, Bioscsi Biotechnol Biochem, 68. 36-43. 2004.
[15]   | Jun, HK., Bae, KM. and Kim, SK. “Production of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl L-ascorbic acid using cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from Paenibacillus sp.”, Biotechnol Lett, 23. 1793-1797. 2001.
[16]   | Prousoontorn, M.H. and Pantatan, S. “Production of 2-O-α-glucopyranosyl L-ascorbic acid from ascorbic acid and b-cyclodextrin using immobilized cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase”, J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem, 57. 39-46. 2007.
[17]   | Zhang, Z., Li, J., Liu, L., Sun, J., Hua, Z., Du, G. and Chen, J. “Enzymatic Transformation of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic Acid by α-cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase from Recombinant Escherichia coli”, Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng, 16. 107-113. 2011.

[18]  
Liu, L., Xu, Q., Han, R., Shin, H., Chen, R., Li, J., Du, G. and Chen, J. “Improving maltodextrin specificity for enzymatic synthesis of 2-O-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid by site-saturation engineering of subsite-3 in cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Paenibacillus macerans”, J Biotechnol, 166. 198-205. 2013.

[19]   | Liu, L., Han, R., Shin, H., Li, J., Du, G. and Chen, J. “Biosynthesis of 2-O-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid from maltose by an engineered cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Paenibacillus macerans”, Carbohydr Res, 382. 101-107. 2013.
[20]   | Sun, T., Jiang, B. and Pan, B.L. “Purification and Characterization of Novel Cyclodextrin Glucanotransferase from Bacillus sp SK 13.002”, Asian J Chem, 23 (11). 4977-4982. 2011.
[21]   | Kwon T., Kim, C.T. and Lee J-H. “Transglucosylation of ascorbic acid to ascorbic acid 2-glucoside by a recombinant sucrose phosphorylase from Bifidobacterium longum”, Biotechnol Lett, 29. 611-5. 2007.
[22]   | Zhang, Z., Li, J., Liu, L., Sun, J., Hua, Z., Du, G. and Chen, J. “Enzymatic transformation of 2-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid (AA-2G) by immobilized α-cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from recombinant Escherichia coli”, J Mol Catal B: Enzym, 68. 223-229. 2011.
[23]   | Tanaka, M., Muto, N. and Yamamoto, I. “Characterization of Bacillus stearothermophilus cyclodextrin glucanotransferase in ascorbic acid 2-O-α-glucoside formation”, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1078. 127-132. 1991.