Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Are Nutrition Blogs a Trustworthy Source? Author Education, Evidence-Based Writing, and Types of Diets

Erfan Khazaee*, Jeanne H. Freeland-Graves

Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Abstract: Background: The internet is a major source for nutrition information and nutrition blogs are a popular format for information dissemination. However, the quality of these websites and diets discussed is unclear. Objective: To investigate relationships of evidence-based writing practice with nutrition blog type and author education, identify diets discussed, and examine relationships of social media following, according to blog type and author education. Methods: A purposive-snowball sampling approach was utilized to locate nutrition blogs. Inclusion criteria for blogs (n = 500) were: active website, focused on nutrition/food, written in English, and free access. Outcome measures were evidence-based writing (inclusion of references to support posts), blog type, author education, diet types discussed, and number of social media followers. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and negative binomial regression were utilized. Results: Author education included: 219 Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDNs), 175 none listed, 71 bachelor’s degrees, and 35 graduate degrees. The majority of independent blogs (~57%) and those from government/food commodity organizations (~71%) practiced evidence-based writing, while ~60% of blogs from food/nutrition companies did not (P<0.05). The majority of bloggers with RDN (77%) and graduate degrees (72%) exhibited evidence-based writing; while 65% of those with bachelor’s degrees and 82% of those with no education listed did not (P<0.001). Twenty-nine types of diet were identified; plant-based was the most frequently discussed (76 blogs), followed by ketogenic (62) and detox (61). RDN authors had 2 times more followers on Instagram and Facebook and 5 times more on Twitter, as compared to authors with no education listed (P<0.001). Conclusions: Bloggers with RDNs and graduate degrees were more likely to practice evidence-based writing. Websites with RDN authors had the highest social media following. The most popular diets discussed were plant-based, ketogenic, and detox. Future studies should assess credibility of the information published.

Keywords: nutrition blogs, food blogs, social media, evidence-based, communication

Received February 07, 2023; Revised March 17, 2023; Accepted March 28, 2023

Citation: Erfan Khazaee, Jeanne H. Freeland-Graves, Are Nutrition Blogs a Trustworthy Source? Author Education, Evidence-Based Writing, and Types of Diets. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 11 (4). 277-285. January 2023. doi:10.12691/jfnr-11-4-1

1. Introduction

To The internet has become a primary resource for knowledge, so it is not surprising that it is also a major source for nutrition information and dietary trends [1]. Among U.S. adults, 80% of internet users have searched online for information related to health [2]. According to a 2020 study by Teng et al., internet inquiries about weight loss greatly increased from 2004 to 2018 [3]. Specifically, relative search volumes for ‘lose weight + weight loss’ increased from 564 to 959 in the United States, and from 275 to 978 in the United Kingdom [3]. One type of online source commonly utilized for the dissemination of nutrition information is a blog. A blog is a website that publishes posts regularly on specific topics, usually presented in reverse chronological order [4]. These websites continue to grow in popularity. In an online survey of 1,030 bloggers, ~47% reported writing more since the COVID-19 pandemic [5]. The research interest of the present study is on nutrition blogs, specifically investigation of author qualification, practice of evidence-based writing, type of diets discussed, and their audience reach.

Previous examinations of nutrition-related blogs have raised concern regarding the trustworthiness of these sites. An analysis of 45 food blogs reported promotion of attitudes and behaviors linked to dietary restraint [6]. This mental construct is associated with unhealthy outcomes, such as body dissatisfaction and eating disorders [7]. In 2014, Boepple examined a sample of 21 blogs and found that five of the bloggers had an eating disorder, and five reported that they were practicing some form of dietary restraint [8]. Thus, quality indicators of nutrition blogs, such as author credibility should be investigated.

Almost anyone, regardless of qualification, can disseminate nutrition information on the internet through blogs. Studies have compared content from nutrition blogs authored by individuals with varying educational backgrounds. For example, Dumas et al. analyzed the nutritive value of vegetarian recipes from 12 food blogs written by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) versus 12 blogs authored by non-RDNs [9]. Recipes by the RDNs contained significantly more protein and vitamin D, and were lower in sodium, vitamin C, energy, and non-heme iron [9]. Similarly, in a 2020 investigation, ten nutrition blogs written by RDNs and ten by non-RDNs were compared for the nutrition advice offered [10]. The RDNs focused primarily on promoting healthy lifestyles, while the non-RDNs concentrated on attesting to their credibility, endorsing alternative medicine, and challenging conventional medicine; but their nutrition advice was inconsistent and potentially confusing to readers [10]. Although these studies have compared content from blogs with differing author qualifications, a more extensive analysis of the type and depth of nutrition blogger education as a measure of quality is needed.

Evidence-based writing is another quality indicator of nutrition blogs that deserves more consideration. This type of writing requires the use of external sources to support the ideas, giving credibility to the work [11,12]. Few investigations have included the assessment of use of reference as part of their quality evaluation of online nutrition information. In 2013, Hirasawa et al. evaluated nutrition information regarding healthy diets from a sample of 48 websites and reported that only five included references as evidence in their posts [13]. In 2020, a pilot study created a credibility checklist for weight-management blogs that included use of references as a quality indicator [14]. Only two of the seven blogs examined scored above 50%, according to the checklist [14]. More investigations are needed to evaluate the practice of evidence-based writing in nutrition blogs using larger samples.

In addition to analyzing quality indicators of nutrition blogs, it is novel to examine the types of diets that are discussed. This is important because numerous fad diets exist with little evidence of efficacy and associated health outcomes [15]. Additionally, fad diets can be very popular, but some studies have reported adverse health effects of long-term compliance to such dietary patterns. Recently, Aslam et al. surveyed 100 college students from four different universities about fad diets [16]. Adherence to the following diets were reported: liquid diet (four students), veganism (7), Atkins (12), ketogenic (20), and other fad diets (32) [16]. Greater risks of chronic kidney disease and metabolic acidosis have been associated with low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets such as the Atkins diet [15,17,18]. Moreover, continued adherence to the ketogenic diet has been linked to hypercalcemia and hyperlipidemia [15,19]. It is therefore crucial to document the types of diets that are discussed in nutrition blogs.

Finally, this research will measure the audience reach of nutrition blogs in order to determine differences between blogs with varying levels of author education. It is common for blogs to be linked to social media sites [14], such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, for promotion of their website. The popularity of these social networking platforms enables blogs to reach much higher audiences than just on their own. For example, Facebook alone had 2.95 billion active monthly users in 2022 [20]. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the relationship of evidence-based writing practice with blog type and author education, identify the diets discussed in nutrition-related blogs, and examine the relationships of social media following according to blog type and author education.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design Overview and Sample

This study was one of the primary aims of a parent research project titled “Analysis of Nutrition and Food Blogs.” Data collection for the parent study was conducted during January 2020 – May 2021 [21]. This research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas at Austin.

Due to the nature of the internet, random sampling of blogs is not possible. Therefore, a purposive-snowball sampling approach was utilized to locate blogs, which is appropriate in such instances [22,23,24]. This method uses a referral chain, which identifies several blogs initially, then subsequently leads to more blogs that are linked [25]. The popular search engines of Google, Yahoo, and Bing were explored. Since it is common for blogs to have linked social media accounts, the search was conducted also on popular platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Relevant search terms included “food blog,” “food blogs,” “nutrition blog,” and “nutrition blogs.” Inclusion criteria were: focused on nutrition and food as the main topic, did not require a paid subscription, status as an active website (within 6 months prior to data collection), and written in English. The final sample consisted of 500 nutrition blogs.

2.2. Measurements

A content analysis approach was utilized to investigate nutrition-related blogs for author education, practice of evidence-based writing, the types of diets discussed, and social media following. This is an appropriate research methodology for the analysis of qualitative data and has been increasingly used for examination of virtual information [26,27]. Content analysis has been applied in previous investigations of online information across different areas of public health, such as examination of breastfeeding promotion on Twitter [28] and websites that distribute information about tobacco constituents [29]. In addition, prior studies that have analyzed nutrition-related blogs also have used this method [10,14,24]. From each blog in the current sample, the 100 most recent information-based posts were selected to avoid selection bias. If a blog had less than 100 posts, then all were included in the analysis. Screenshots of blog posts were taken and stored as separate PDF files for analysis. These were created so that potential updates and changes to posts by bloggers did not interfere with data collection, given the temporary nature of the internet [24]. Data were coded for education of authors, types of diets, and practice of evidence-based writing. A panel of four nutrition experts, comprising of researchers and RDNs, were consulted to discuss coding. Necessary corrections and modifications were made until the panel was in agreement.

2.2.1. Author Education and Blog Type

Blogs usually contain a page titled “about” or “about me” in which information is presented to provide a background about the website and its author. This section is different than blog posts, which contains the content of the website and is usually displayed in reverse-chronological order. “About” pages were used to identify the background of the blog authors, including education and sometimes, occupation. The “about” section also identified the types of blogs. Emerging blog types were recorded and discussed with the panel of nutrition experts. The sample of 500 nutrition blogs was categorized into three types: independent (n = 397), government/food commodity organizations (n = 55), and food/nutrition companies (n = 48).

2.2.2. Evidence-Based Writing

Each sampled information-based post was coded as either “yes” or “no” in response to “use of references as support”. Blogs were then categorized as practicing evidence-based writing, if ≥70% of their posts were coded as “yes” to inclusion of references. A reference was considered as reliable if it was linked to a publication in a peer-reviewed journal, government website, or health organization, e.g., the American Heart Association and the World Health Organization. References from popular media and other blogs were not regarded as scientifically valid and were coded as “no.” This method was adapted from investigations of nutrition-related blogs by Hirasawa et al. [13] and Sabbagh et al. [14], in which similar criteria were utilized to code posts as “yes” or “no” according to inclusion of references. The panel of four nutrition experts met to discuss and verify this approach.

2.2.3. Diets

Prior to data collection, the panel of nutrition experts were consulted to develop a list of prominent diet categories. Next, each post collected from every blog was assessed and coded for its main topic of focus in nutrition. Topics about specific diet types were coded according to the developed list and their frequencies were recorded based on the number of posts. Emerging diet categories were added to the list. To ensure proper categorization, the final list of diet types and frequencies were approved by the panel. Necessary adjustments were made until agreement was reached.

2.2.4. Social Media Following

Blogs are linked frequently to social networking sites as a means of attracting readers. Therefore, social media following was used to measure audience reach. All linked social media platforms were itemized in order to record the number of followers for each at the time of data collection. Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were the most prevalent sites among the current sample of blogs and, therefore, were included in the analysis.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Macintosh (SPSS, version 28, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2021) was used to perform statistical analysis. Author education was classified into four categories: RDN, authors with a RDN credential (including those with bachelor’s and master’s degrees); bachelor’s degree, those with a bachelor’s degree but not RDN; graduate degree, those with master’s degrees and beyond but not RDN; and no education listed. Descriptive statistics were performed for author education and diet topics. Blog frequencies for diets were calculated, according to blog type and author education. Chi-square tests of independence were used to assess the significance of the relationship between practice of evidence-based writing and blog type, as well as author education, which are categorical variables. Negative binomial regression models were used to examine the relation of blog type and author education to the number of social media followers (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter); incidence rate ratios were calculated. Social media following, which are count variables, were set as the outcome and tested for overdispersion [30]. Negative binomial regression was utilized, as it is an appropriate model for count data with overdispersion [31].

3. Results

3.1. Blog Author Education

The education of blog authors from all website types is displayed in Figure 1A. The majority of the authors were RDNs (219), of which 70% had a master’s degree. The next largest category were blogs with no author education listed (175). Subsequently, 71 authors had a bachelor’s degree (excluding RDNs), of which 32% were in nutrition-related science and 68% in other fields. The remaining 35 bloggers had a graduate degree (excluding RDNs). Specifically: 66% had a master’s degree in nutrition-related science, 11% master’s in other fields, 14% doctorate in nutrition-related science, and 9% doctorate in other fields. The majority of blogs from government/food commodity organizations (89%) and food/nutrition companies (92%) did not list any author information, including their education. Presumably, this is because the commodity or product promoted was the main focus of these websites, as compared to independent blogs, which (in this sample) were usually focused around the blogger. Figure 1B displays author education from independent blogs only (n = 397). The hierarchy of education categories remain similar, with the majority being RDNs.

Figure 1. Education of authors in a sample of nutrition blogs. A) Author education from all blog types (n = 500). B) Author education from independent blogs only (n = 397). The majority of blogs from government /food commodity organizations (89%) and food/nutrition companies (92%) do not list author information. To adjust for this, author education was displayed from independent blogs only in addition to being displayed from all blog types. RDN = Registered Dietitian Nutritionist

3.2. Evidence-Based Writing

The practice of evidence-based writing was significantly associated with blog type, as shown in Table 1. The majority of independent blogs and those from government/food commodity organizations (~57% and 71%, respectively) were categorized as evidence-based, while the majority of blogs from food/nutrition companies (~60%) were not considered evidence-based, P<0.05.

The relationships between practice of evidence-based writing and author education also were significant. The majority of blogs with authors who were RDNs or had graduate degrees (~77% and 71%, respectively) were categorized as evidence-based. In contrast, ~65% of authors with a bachelor’s degree and 62% of those with no education listed did not practice evidence-based writing, P<0.001. The same analysis was performed with only independent blogs, which yielded similar results: ~77% of authors with RDN and 72% with graduate degrees practiced evidence-based writing, while ~65% of those with bachelor’s degrees and 82% with no education listed did not, P<0.001.

Table 1. Practice of Evidence-Based Writing in Blog Articles According to Blog Type and Author Education in a Sample of Nutrition Blogs (n = 500)

3.3. Diet Types Discussed in Blogs

A total of 29 types of diets were identified in the sampled blogs and are illustrated in Figure 2. The most frequently published diet topics were plant-based (76 blogs), ketogenic (62), and detox (61). Figure 2A displays the 29 diets according to the associated blogs’ type and Figure 2B is prepared according to the author education of the blogs. Of the blogs with articles about plant-based diet, the majority were independent blogs (78%). Others were 12% government/food commodity organizations (12%), and food/nutrition companies (10%). As for author education, 71% were from blogs written by authors with RDN, 16% had no education listed, 12% had bachelor’s degree, and 1% a graduate degree. Blogs with articles about ketogenic diet were 79% independent, 16% from food/nutrition companies, and 5% from government/food commodity organizations. Author education was 57% with RDN, 24% had no education listed, 11% had bachelor’s degree, and 8% had graduate degree. Finally, websites with publications on detox were 93% independent, and only 7% from food/nutrition companies. Author education was 59% with RDNs, 21% had no education listed, 17% had bachelor’s degrees, and 3% had graduate degrees.

Figure 2. Topics on diets published in a sample of nutrition blogs (n = 500), according to blog frequency. A) Diets according to associated blogs’ type. B) Diets according to author education. Low-FODMAP diet = Fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols. DASH diet = Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension. MIND diet = Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay. AIP diet = Autoimmune Protocol. RDN = Registered Dietitian Nutritionist

3.4. Social Media Following of Blogs According to Type and Author Education

The averages for number of followers from Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter according to blog type are listed in Table 2. Figure 3 displays social media followers according to blog type and author education. Compared to independent blogs, those from government/food commodity organizations had ~35 times more followers on Facebook and ~4 times more followers on Twitter, P<0.001 (Table 3). Food/nutrition company blogs had ~118 times more Facebook followers, 5 times more Instagram followers, and ~10 times more twitter followers, as compared to independent blogs, P<0.001. As for author education among independent blogs compared to those with none listed, those with RDN authors had ~2 times more followers on Facebook and Instagram, and ~5 times more followers on Twitter, P<0.001. The number of Twitter followers for authors with bachelor’s degrees was lower by 80%, as compared to those with no education listed, P<0.001.

Table 2. Social Media Followers According to Blog Type in a Sample of Nutrition Blogs (n = 500)

Figure 3. Social media followers according to blog type and author education in a sample of nutrition blogs. A) According to blog type (n = 500). B) According to author education. Author education from independent blogs only were included (n = 397). Values displayed as means. RDN = Registered Dietitian Nutritionist

Table 3. Negative binomial regression analysis of relationships between social media following and blog type and author education in a sample of nutrition blogs (n = 500)

4. Discussion

These results suggest that nutrition bloggers with RDN licensures or graduate degrees are more likely to practice evidence-based writing in their blogs than those with bachelor’s degrees or no education listed on their websites. No previous study has been identified that documented the education levels of authors from a large sample of nutrition-related blogs. In 2020, Sabbagh et al. analyzed nine weight management blogs and reported the following occupations for the bloggers: two not listed, two self-identified personal trainers, two chefs, one nutritional therapist, one registered associate nutritionist (with Association for Nutrition [32]), and one medical doctor; of these only the latter two were considered to be qualified to provide nutrition advice [14]. Similar to the current investigation, the practice of evidence-based writing was one of the evaluated credibility criteria that only two of the nine blogs practiced. The only registered associate nutritionist from the sample had the highest overall credibility score [14]. Although the differences in sample size (9 versus 500) make it difficult to compare the two studies, over ~77% of the RDN authors in the current study utilized evidence-based writing. This finding emphasizes the importance of nutrition professionals for the dissemination of trustworthy nutrition information online.

The type of blog also was significantly related to practice of evidence-based writing. Blogs from government/food commodity organizations exhibited the highest level of evidence-based writing, followed by independent blogs. It should be noted that he majority food/nutrition company blogs did not utilize evidence-based writing. These findings are consistent with a 2008 study that assessed nutrition information published in 50 health and nutrition sites compared to Canada’s Food Guide [33]. The highest quality of nutrition advice was offered by a non-commercial government-based site; other types were commercial sites [33]. In 2013, Hirasawa et al. evaluated the quality of 48 websites concerning a “healthy diet,” which were divided into three type categories: institutional (n = 9, included government), nonpharmaceutical commercial (n = 32), and websites from nonprofit organizations/patient support groups (n = 7) [13]. Only five of the 48 websites exhibited evidence-based writing; but contrary to the current study, no significant relationships with website type were observed. The present research documented that government-based nutrition blogs had the highest amount of evidence-based writing. This finding is not surprising, as it would be expected that governments would provide accurate information and promote public health.

Assessment of the social media following of the websites suggests that nutrition blogs from food/nutrition companies and government/food commodity organizations have higher audience reach on social media platforms, as compared to independent blogs. Blogs from companies and government/food commodity organizations were centered mainly around a product or commodity; therefore, their larger social media following may be driven by the consumer-brand relationship [34,35]. In this sample, independent blogs were managed predominantly by an individual.

For independent blogs, those authored by RDNs were the only education category to have significantly more followers across all three social media platforms. This implies that nutrition credentials of bloggers, specifically RDN credentials, may be important for public interest. This finding is supported by a survey of 2,000 people from the British Dietetic Association which reported that 82% would trust a dietitian for dietary advice [36]. Yet, numerous nutrition blogs with unqualified authors still exist on the internet and reach large audiences. Moreover, the title of ‘nutritionist’ is not always protected by law (or can be attained relatively easy) in the United States and other countries [14]. Thus, almost anyone can use this title in an attempt to increase the credibility of their blog and gain more followers. The public may not always be cognizant of who can be trusted for nutrition advice. According to the same survey, nearly 60% said they would trust advice about nutrition and diet from personal trainers and fitness instructors. Furthermore, in the 18-24 year-old group, 41% indicated that they would trust advice from a ‘healthy eating blogger [36].’

One possible solution to reduce the distribution of misinformation on the internet is for reputable government organizations or nutrition associations (such as the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics) to develop a certification process for blogs. A team of experts could evaluate blogs against a set of criteria for credibility. Bloggers would be able to apply for the certification and receive an official seal if their websites meet the standards. A periodic expiration of the certification would ensure that the blogs maintain credibility. This seal could then be displayed in the homepages of the blogs to demonstrate that it is a credible source of nutrition information.

The 29 types of diets that were identified in the current research varied in their scientific credibility and health outcomes. Plant-based, ketogenic, detox, fasting/intermittent fasting, and veganism were the top five most frequently discussed diets. The most popular was the plant-based diet. Numerous studies have found that when appropriately planned, this diet (also with #5 veganism and #9 vegetarianism) have benefits for prevention or treatment of diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer disease, and certain cancers [37,38,39,40]. The second most cited diet type was the ketogenic diet, which restricts carbohydrate intake and allows for moderate amount of protein and high fat consumption. This plan advocates switching the fat metabolism to energy, in place of glucose [41]. Although the ketogenic diet has been found to be effective for the treatment of epilepsy [42], the diet is often promoted for weight loss as well, as is has been linked to favorable health outcomes, (improved lipid profiles, and treatment of cancer) [41,43,44]. However, adherence to the ketogenic diet has been associated with hypercalcemia and hyperlipidemia [15]. Detox was the third most frequently published diet; this plan claims to cleanse the body of toxins and promote weight loss, utilizing strategies such as juice fasts or use of laxatives [45]. Research is limited on its health consequences and effectiveness. Intermittent fasting was the fourth most popular diet type. Health benefits have been reported, such as weight loss, lower risk of cardiovascular disease, and DNA repair [46,47]; however, randomized controlled clinical trials are needed for better clarity.

The current results about diet types are consistent with the few previous blog studies. An analysis of nine nutrition websites included Paleolithic, sugar-free, real food, dairy-free, vegan, raw, calorie-count, and gluten-free diets [48]. Similarly, the study by Sabbagh et al. of nine nutrition blogs reported that the following were discussed: plant-based, sugar-free, grain-free, vegan, whole foods, gluten-free, dairy-free, and Paleolithic diets [14]. Frequency of publication was not provided in either study. The current investigation includes this parameter to ascertain the popularity of diets discussed.

The present findings about the publication frequency of the diets parallel those by Kaminski et al., who ranked diet types based on global popularity according to Google Trends data from 2004 to 2019 [49]. Veganism, vegetarianism, gluten-free, low-carbohydrate, and ketogenic diets had the highest interest among Google users globally. These diets were among the top ten most popular in the present study (#2 ketogenic, #5 veganism, #6 gluten-free, #9 vegetarianism), except for the low-carbohydrate diet (#17). Kaminski et al. reported a sharp decrease in interest over time for negative-calorie food, macrobiotic, and cabbage soup diets [49]. These were not mentioned in our study, confirming a diminution in public interest in these topics.

Several limitations exist in this research. Although utilization of a purposive-snowball sampling approach was justified given the dynamic nature of the internet [22,23,24], the sample may not be representative of all blogs that could be encountered online. In addition, the search terms utilized were broad for the purpose of gathering a sample, but Individuals seeking information online may instead enter specific nutrition questions or topics of interest in search engines. To remedy this limitation, data collection continued until a large sample size (n = 500) was obtained relative to previous nutrition blog studies. The practice of evidence-based writing was based on use of references as support for blog posts. However, the nutrition information and advice from the posts were not evaluated individually for scientific accuracy. Future research should examine nutrition blogs for the accuracy of the information published using larger sample sizes.

5. Conclusions

This research concludes that government-affiliated nutrition blogs and those by authors with RDNs and graduate degrees were more likely to practice evidence-based writing. Also, blogs authored by RDNs had the highest audience reach according to social media following. Although a variety of diet types were identified in this study, more investigations should utilize even larger samples of nutrition blogs to assess the credibility of the information published. Future efforts should focus on policy interventions to aid in prevention of harmful or misleading nutrition information being published online. The development of a certification process that would require blogs to meet a set of credibility criteria in order to receive an official seal is suggested.

References

[1]   | Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2021; 9(12): 1740.
[2]   | Fox S. The social life of health information, 2011. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. May 12, 2011. Accessed December 15, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Life_of_Health_Info.pdf.
[3]   | Teng Y, Huang SW, Li Z, et al. Seasonal variation and trends in the Internet searches for losing weight: an infodemiological study. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 14(3): 225-233.
[4]   | Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus Horizons. 2010; 53(1): 59-68.
[5]   | Djuraskovic O. The State of The Blogging Industry in 2020. First Site Guide. April 22, 2022. Accessed January 3, 2023. https://firstsiteguide.com/blogging-industry-survey/.
[6]   | Lynch M. Healthy habits or damaging diets: An exploratory study of a food blogging community. Ecol Food Nutr. 2010; 49(4): 316-335.
[7]   | Hawks SR, Madanat HN, Christley HS. Psychosocial associations of dietary restraint: Implications for healthy weight promotion. Ecol Food Nutr. 2008; 47(5): 450-483.
[8]   | Boepple L, Thompson JK. A content analysis of healthy living blogs: Evidence of content thematically consistent with dysfunctional eating attitudes and behaviors. Int J Eat Disorder. 2014; 47(4): 362-367.
[9]   | Dumas AA, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Dugrenier M, Desroches S. A comparative content analysis of vegetarian food blogs written by registered dietitians and non-registered dietitians. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2017; 78(2): 86-91.
[10]   | Chan T, Drake T, Vollmer RL. A qualitative research study comparing nutrition advice communicated by registered Dietitian and non-Registered Dietitian bloggers. J Commun Healthc. 2020; 13(1): 55-63.
[11]   | Academic Writing Style. USC Libraries. Accessed December 20, 2022. https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/academicwriting.
[12]   | Evidence-Based Practice. MJC Library & Learning Center. Accessed December 20, 2022. https://libguides.mjc.edu/c.php?g=255637&p=7950172.
[13]   | Hirasawa R, Yachi Y, Yoshizawa S, et al. Quality and accuracy of Internet information concerning a healthy diet. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013; 64(8): 1007-1013.
[14]   | Sabbagh C, Boyland E, Hankey C, Parrett A. Analysing credibility of UK social media influencers’ weight-management blogs: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(23): 9022.
[15]   | Tahreem A, Rakha A, Rabail R, et al. Fad diets: facts and fiction. Front Nutr. 2022; 9.
[16]   | Aslam M, Tariq A, Naveed J, et al. Emergence of FAD Diets and Obesity-Related Perceptions and Practices Among University Students: Fad Diets and Obesity-related Perceptions and Practices. PBMJ. 2022; 5(2): 33-37.
[17]   | Farhadnejad H, Asghari G, Emamat H, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Low-carbohydrate high-protein diet is associated with increased risk of incident chronic kidney diseases among Tehranian adults. J Ren Nutr. 2019; 29(4): 343-349.
[18]   | Chen TY, Smith W, Rosenstock JL, Lessnau KD. A life-threatening complication of Atkins diet. Lancet. 2006; 367(9514): 958.
[19]   | Salas Noain J, Minupuri A, Kulkarni A, Zheng S. Significant impact of the ketogenic diet on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Cureus. 2020; 12(7): e9418.
[20]   | Dixon S. Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2022 Statista. October 27, 2022. Accessed January 24, 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/.
[21]   | Khazaee E, Freeland-Graves JH. Trending topics in food blogs and social media reach. J Food Agric Environ. 2023; 21(1): 17-21.
[22]   | Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. Sage; 2013.
[23]   | Doub AE, Small M, Birch L. An exploratory analysis of child feeding beliefs and behaviors included in food blogs written by mothers of preschool-aged children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016; 48(2): 93-103.e1.
[24]   | Mete R, Curlewis J, Shield A, Murray K, Bacon R, Kellett J. Reframing healthy food choices: a content analysis of Australian healthy eating blogs. BMC public health. 2019; 19(1): 1711.
[25]   | Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Wright E, Bonus S. Weblogs as a bridging genre. Inform Technol Peopl. 2005; 18(2): 142-171.
[26]   | Hamad EO, Savundranayagam MY, Holmes JD, Kinsella EA, Johnson AM. Toward a mixed-methods research approach to content analysis in the digital age: the combined content-analysis model and its applications to health care Twitter feeds. J Med Internet RES. 2016; 18(3): e60.
[27]   | Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. 2nd ed. Sage; 2016.
[28]   | Moukarzel S, Rehm M, Daly AJ. Breastfeeding promotion on Twitter: A social network and content analysis approach. Matern Child Nutr. 2020; 16(4): e13053.
[29]   | Margolis KA, Bernat JK, Keely O’Brien E, Delahanty JC. Online information about harmful tobacco constituents: a content analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017; 19(10): 1209-1215.
[30]   | Vives J, Losilla J-M, Rodrigo M-F, Portell M. Overdispersion tests in count-data analysis. Psychol Rep. 2008; 103(1): 145-160.
[31]   | Coxe S, West SG, Aiken LS. The analysis of count data: A gentle introduction to Poisson regression and its alternatives. J Pres Assess. 2009; 91(2): 121-136.
[32]   | Association for Nutrition The UK Voluntary Register for Nutritionists (UKVRN). Association for Nutrition. Accessed January 2, 2023. https://www.associationfornutrition.org/.
[33]   | Ostry A, Young M, Hughes M. The quality of nutritional information available on popular websites: a content analysis. Health Educ Res. 2008; 23(4): 648-655.
[34]   | Sook Kwon E, Kim E, Sung Y, Yun Yoo C. Brand followers: Consumer motivation and attitude towards brand communications on Twitter. Int J Advert. 2014; 33(4): 657-680.
[35]   | Pereira HG, de Fátima Salgueiro M, Mateus I. Say yes to Facebook and get your customers involved! Relationships in a world of social networks. Bus Horiz. 2014; 57(6): 695-702.
[36]   | Survey finds that almost 60% of people trust nutrition advice from underqualified professionals. BDA The Association of UK Dietitians. Accessed January 2, 2023. https://www.bda.uk.com/resource/survey-finds-that-almost-60-of-people-trust-nutrition-advice-from-underqualified-professionals.html.
[37]   | Grant JD. Time for change: Benefits of a plant-based diet. Can Fam Physician. 2017; 63(10): 744-746.
[38]   | Fehér A, Gazdecki M, Véha M, Szakály M, Szakály Z. A Comprehensive Review of the Benefits of and the Barriers to the Switch to a Plant-Based Diet. Sustainability. 2020; 12(10): 4136.
[39]   | Satija A, Hu FB. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health. Trends Cariovas Med. 2018; 28(7): 437-441.
[40]   | McMacken M, Shah S. A plant-based diet for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017; 14(5): 342-354.
[41]   | Dowis K, Banga S. The potential health benefits of the ketogenic diet: A narrative review. Nutrients. 2021; 13(5): 1654.
[42]   | D’Andrea Meira I, Romão TT, Pires do Prado HJ, Krüger LT, Pires MEP, da Conceição PO. Ketogenic diet and epilepsy: what we know so far. Front Neurosci. 2019; 13: 5.
[43]   | Modi N, Priefer R. Effectiveness of mainstream diets. Obes Med. 2020; 18: 100239.
[44]   | Ludwig DS. The ketogenic diet: evidence for optimism but high-quality research needed. J Nutr. 2020; 150(6): 1354-1359.
[45]   | Klein A, Kiat H. Detox diets for toxin elimination and weight management: a critical review of the evidence. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015; 28(6): 675-686.
[46]   | Horne BD, Muhlestein JB, Anderson JL. Health effects of intermittent fasting: hormesis or harm? A systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015; 102(2): 464-470.
[47]   | Mattson MP, Longo VD, Harvie M. Impact of intermittent fasting on health and disease processes. Ageing Res Rev. 2017; 39: 46-58.
[48]   | Ramachandran D, Kite J, Vassallo AJ, et al. Food trends and popular nutrition advice online–Implications for public health. Online J Public Health Inform. 2018; 10(2): e213.
[49]   | Kamiński M, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Nowak JK, Stachowska E. Global and local diet popularity rankings, their secular trends, and seasonal variation in Google Trends data. Nutrition. 2020; 79-80: 110759.