Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Cloning and Functional Analysis of Callose Gene SbGlu1 in Protein Content

Shen Hui Yong, Hafeez Noor, Dang Dexuan, Gao Haiyan, Liu Peng, Zhang Yuan qing, Cheng Qingjun*

Shanxi Key Laboratory of Sorghum Genetic and Germplasm Innovation

Abstract: The Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Moench is a variant of grain sorghum, which origins in Africa. Due to its high sugar and tolerance, it has been considered as a potentially useful energy crop and received more attention. However, less study on sweet sorghum has been performed in physiology and molecular by Al stress. These results illustrated that the decrease of β-1,3-glucanase activity by Al could lead to callose accumulation. In POTCHETSTRM, five β-1,3-glucanase genes expression were up-regulated, and a gene expression was down-regulated. In ROMA, only one β-1,3-glucanase gene, SbGlu1 (Sb03g045630.1) expressed response to Al, and the expression was higher in ROMA than in POTCHETSTRM. The expression levels of six callose synthase-like genes were very low exposure of 10 µM Al upon to 24 h in ROMA, but POTCHETSTRM exhibited the highest expression level only at 24 h. Therefore, callose synthase-like genes maybe regulate callose deposition in the later stage of Al stress in sweet sorghum. The SbGlu1 expression positively correlated with callose content in both cultivars. The SbGlu1 expression maybe involve in callose degradation in sweet sorghum by Al stress. The full-length cDNAs of SbGlu1 were cloned from the root tips of both ROMA and POTCHETSTRM, respectively. The SbGlu1 were transient expressed in onion epidermal cells for subcellular localization, showed that SbGLU1 is soluble with no specificity localization.

Keywords: sweet sorghum, Callose, β-1,3-glucanase gene, different expressed gene, protein content

Received November 21, 2022; Revised January 02, 2023; Accepted January 10, 2023

Citation: Shen Hui Yong, Hafeez Noor, Dang Dexuan, Gao Haiyan, Liu Peng, Zhang Yuan qing, Cheng Qingjun, Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Cloning and Functional Analysis of Callose Gene SbGlu1 in Protein Content. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 11 (1). 46-56. January 2023. doi:10.12691/jfnr-11-1-5

1. Introduction

Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) gene cloning is the first prerequisite for studying gene function. In the early 1970s, for identification and isolation Specific target gene, obtain the full length of the gene coding region sequence, clarify the gene location and elucidate the gene function [1] The technique of DNA recombination in vitro and has been put into practice through bioengineering technology, for gene work Can provide convenient conditions for research [2,3,4,5]. Plants are under stress such as bacterial invasion and animal feeding, the expression of genes and activities of enzymes in the body will be changed to complete the induction, transmission of these signals and the realization of biological effects [6]. With DNA sequencing technology, enzyme engineering technology And bioinformatics as well as Arabidopsis, canola, tobacco, tomato, potato, rice, sorghum, corn, The publication of the whole genome sequence of strawberry, grape, poplar and other plants has enabled the cloning and functional analysis of plant genes [7]. Previous research progress Plants generally resist the damage caused by insect feeding through three pathways, namely, chemotaxis, antigenicity or pest tolerance. Some plant resistance sources have multiple insect resistance pathways, and different insect resistance pathways are regulated by different resistance mechanisms. Therefore, the aphid resistance mechanism of sorghum has important guiding significance for sorghum aphid resistance breeding [8]. The resistance inheritance of sorghum to aphids was complex, with different resistance source materials controlling different number of gene loci, and the resistance genetic mechanism was controlled by single dominant and recessive genes or by a few major genes [9]. Identified anti-Al transcription factors in rice OsART1, a transcription factor belonging to the C₂H2 zinc finger protein family, regulates the expression of 29 genes, these include the ALMT1 gene. The transcription factor OsART1 in rice regulates the location of the plasma membrane of the cell Anomalous Al transporter NRAT1 gene, which belongs to Nramp (natural resistance-associated) macrophage proteins, a member of the family, are a special trivalent metal ion transporter that modulate plants the absorption of Al, and Al induces upregulation of NRAT1 gene expression [10]. Many other plant studies have identified the member genes of MATE family located in cell membrane, which regulate Al Induce citric acid secretion in roots and improve plant Al tolerance. In addition, Al resistance has been found in Arabidopsis thaliana Sex-related C₂H₂ zinc finger protein family of transcription factors AtSTOP1 [11]. Among the 31 genes regulated by AtSTOP1, MATE and FRD of MATE family members [12]. These two genes can improve plant Al tolerance under Al stress. Under Al stress, sorghum can increase its Al tolerance and citric acid content by secreting citric acid from its roots Secretion is regulated by the SbMATE gene on the cell membrane, whereas Al induced SbMATE gene expression is not rapidly, the expression of SbMATE gene was significantly increased after Al treatment for 2-3 days [13,14]. Sweet sorghum is a variety of grain sorghum. Al induces callose to form rapidly at root tips. The nanase gene SB03G0456301 (SbGlu1) can rapidly respond to Al stress and is resistant to Al in sweet sorghum SbGlu1 gene expression in ROMA was significantly higher than that in POTCHETSTRM, an Al sensitive cultivar Gene expression levels. It was speculated that SbGlu1 gene induced root tip formation of sweet sorghum in Al Callose and Al tolerance may play important roles. In this study, we cloned and subcloned SbGlu1 gene function of SbGlu1 gene in sweet sorghum was further analyzed by cell localization and allogeneic expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Real-time Fluorescent Quantitative PCR Primer Design

Through the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) BLAST engine retrieved 6 callose synthase related genes in sorghum (SB01G0486301, SB03G0234901, Sb03g030800.1, Sb03g034880.1, SB04G03851.1 and Sb10g030970.1) and 6 sorghum β-1, The 3-glucanase gene [SB03G0454601, SB03G0454901, Sb03g045510.1, SB03G0456301 (SbGlu1), SB08G0196701 and Sb09g018730.1] was compiled from the known online. The coding sequence was based on Primer design requirements of real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, primer design software Primer 5.0 was applied Specific primers for target gene and accession No.X79378 (GenBank accession No.X79378) were designed Table 1.

Table 1. Primer pairs of callose synthase-like genes and the β-1, 3-glucanase genes for qRT-PCR

2.1.1. Main Reagent

Enzymes: PrimerSTAR HS DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), rTaq (Takara), infusion Ligase, BP Clonase II and LR Clonase II (Invitrogen) Antibiotics: Bleomycin Zeo, kanamycin Kan, ampicillin Amp, Rifampicin Rif, B Acyl syringone AS, carboxyl benzyl penicillin purchased from Dingguo Company. Kit: DNA recovery and purification kit, plasmid extraction kit purchased from Trans, plant based because the DNA extraction kit was purchased from Tianroot Biological Company. Other reagents: MS medium purchased from Haibo; Basta (Glufosinate_Ammonium) LUC The substrate. Strain: Eschreichia coli DH5α (Eschreichia coli) from Trans, Agrobacterium tumefaciense AGL0 and EHA105 (Agrobacterium tumenfacience) were preserved in this laboratory. Vectors: Plant expression vectors pEGAD and pGWB5 were kept in our laboratory, and pDONR was purchased from us (Invitrogen).

2.1.2. Preparation of Medicine

Ampicillin (Amp) reserve solution (50 mg/mL): Weigh 0.5g Amp, dissolve in 10 ml and steam distilled water was separated after filtration and sterilization and stored at -20°C.

Kanamycin (Kan) reserve solution (50 mg/mL): Weigh 0.5g Kan and dissolve in 10mL distilled water after filtration and sterilization, they were divided and stored at -20°C.

Rifampicin (Rif) reserve solution (50 mg/mL): Weigh 0.5g Rif and dissolve in 10 mL dimethylkia sulfoxide (DMSO) was extracted and sterilized, then divided and stored at -20°C.

Car reserve solution (50 mg/mL): 0.5g Car was weighed and dissolved in 10 mL for distillation water was separated after filtration and sterilization and stored at -20°C.

Preparation of 50×TAE: Weigh 242 g tris, 37.2 g Na2EDTA·2H2O and add 800 in turn 1-L beaker of mL deionized water, stir it thoroughly with a magnetic stirrer and then add 57.1 mL acetic acid. Stir well and mix well. Add deionized water to 1000 mL. Store at room temperature and dilute when using one hundred times.

2.1.3. Preparation of medium

LB liquid medium; Weigh 5g yeast extract, 10 g tryptone, 10 g NaCl (LB solid medium added 15g AGAR powder) in turn into 1 L triangle bottle, add 800 mL distilled water, use a magnetic stirrer to stir evenly After that, adjust 1M KOH to pH 7.0, constant volume to 1000 mL, and seal at 120°C for high temperature and humid heat sterilization 20 min.

MS solid medium; MS Plant medium (sucrose and AGAR free) was purchased from Haibo Biological Company and weighed according to the method used 4.74 g MS plant medium dissolved in 800 mL distilled water, adding 10 g sucrose and 10 g AGAR powder, respectively. Use magnetic stirrers to stir evenly, adjust to pH 5.8, constant volume 1000 mL, 120°C high temperature humid heat sterilization Sterilized for 20 min, poured into petri dishes under aseptic condition in super clean table, sealed, stored at 4°C for later use.

2.1.4. Bioinformatics Analysis of Sorghum β-1, 3 glucanase Gene

The steps of bioinformatics analysis of sorghum β-1, 3 glucanase gene are as follows:

The found through sorghum genome sequence database (http://www.helmhltz-muenchen.de/)

Liang β-1, 3 glucanase gene SbGlu1 (SB03G0456301) Coding sequence (Coding sequence, CDS) and amino acid sequence. The use of proteomics database (http://www.expasy.org/tools/scanprosite/)

The main domains of SbGLU1 protein were analyzed.

Through the NCBI database (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) BLAST tool SbGlu1 gene of oats, Arabidopsis, soybean, barley, tobacco, rice and wool were found to be similar to sorghum.

Compare and analyze amino acid sequence through Clustal X and GeneDoc software, and then use the software treeview1.6.6 builds the phylogenetic tree to analyze the evolutionary relationship between sorghum and other species.

2.1.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were shown as mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance and independent-samples T test were used in significance testing with the software of SPSS17.0. Mean values were assessed with significance set at P < 0.05.

Table 2. Cloning of callose gene SbGlu1 in sweet sorghum and SbGlu1 gene was amplified by RT-PCR were derived 10 μM from Al tolerant sweet sorghum and Al sensitive sorghum, respectively the root tips cDNA treated with Al3+ for 24 h was the template, and the PCR reaction system was as follows

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Influence of Aluminum Treatment with Different Concentration and Time on Callose Accumulation at Root Tips of Sweet Sorghum

The tolerant sweet sorghum at all treatment concentrations and at different time points accumulation of callose in the root tips of the variety ROMA was always lower than that of the Al sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM.5 microns In Al³⁺ treatment, callose accumulation between two sweet sorghum varieties was 7 times higher than that in 24 h after treatment High (Figure 1A). The 10 μM Al³⁺ treatment, sweet callose accumulation at root tip of sorghum al sensitive cultivar POTCHETSTRM was approximately the same as tolerant cultivar ROMA Brosal Callose accumulation was twice as large as that of Al, and root elongation is inhibited to a certain extent at 24 h after AL treatment (Figure 1B). There was significant difference in relative root elongation between the two cultivars. Therefore, 10 μM Al³⁺ was selected as the treatment in the subsequent test to further study the mechanism of callose accumulation induced by Al in sweet sorghum root tips. 15μM Al³⁺ treatment had the smallest difference of 1.2 times (Figure 1C). Al sensitive sweet sorghum POTCHETSTRM had callose in root tips of three concentrations amount of substance accumulation increased with the increase of treatment time. Al tolerance of sweet sorghum ROMA was 10 μM, 15 μm the accumulation of callose in root tips increased with the increase of treatment time with μM Al³⁺, while that with 5 μM Al³⁺ Callose content in root tips was relatively small and tends to be stable between 6 and 24 h after Al treatment. Under the same treatment time, the root tip of the sweet sorghum variety ROMA increased with the treatment concentration Callose accumulation also increased. And POTCHETSTRM, sweet sorghum susceptible to Al, was treated with 5 μM Al³⁺ Callose accumulation at 24 h was similar to that at 10 μM Al³⁺ treatment, and callose accumulation at 24 h is similar to that at POTCHETSTRM. The root relative elongation was all lower than 40% (Figure 1D). Indicating that when Al stress reached a certain degree, the sweetness was high Callose accumulation at the root tips of a beam reaches a stable level.

Figure 1. Effect of different Al concentration on callose content and root growth in sweet sorghum root with time-course treatment (A. 5 μM Al³⁺ Deal with; B. Treatment with 10 μM Al³⁺ ;C. 15 μM Al³⁺ treatment; D. 5, 10, 15 μM Al³⁺ treatment for 24 h Relative root elongation of sweet sorghum (Note: POT stands for POTCHETSTRM. The same as below))

3.2. Effects of Aluminum Stress on Callose Synthase Activity in Root Tips of Sweet Sorghum

The effects of Al treatment on callose synthase activity in sweet sorghum root tips are shown in (Figure 2). Regardless of Al resistant products ROMA was also an Al-sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM. Callose synthase activity decreased from 0 h to 0 h after Al treatment 12 h showed an increasing trend.Callose synthesis of ROMA and POTCHETSTRM at 12 h after Al treatment. The enzyme activity was 6 and 8 times that of 0 h. The enzyme activity decreased from 12 h to 24 h. During the whole Al treatment period, callose synthase activity of Al sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM was always high In addition, callose synthase activity was observed between the two cultivars at 6 h and 12 h after sex treatment difference was significant P < 0.05.

Figure 2. Effects of Al stress on callose synthase activity in the root apices of sweet sorghum

3.3. Bioinformatics Analysis Results of Sorghum SbGlu1

The sorghum SbGlu1 gene has a total length of 954 bp, no intron, and encodes a protein containing 318 amino acids. Amino acid sequence of Sorghum SbGLU1. The analysis results of GLU amino acid sequences in Sorghum (Figure 3). The picture, the ten kinds of plants amino acid sequence of GLU was highly conserved, and the C-terminus contains the structure of the 17th family of glycohydrolases Domain (VQVVVSESGWPSAG), which was the structural characteristic of hydrolytic protease. GLU amino acid sequence Phylogenetic tree analysis showed (Figure 4). There were three GLU phylogenetic trees for the above ten plants Clade, 1 clade of soybean, Arabidopsis and tobacco; 1 branch of Oat, bamboo; while SbGLU1 of sorghum, OsGLU of rice and HvGLU of barley belong to the same evolutionary clad. Sorghum the similarity rate of SbGLU1 to rice OsGLU and barley HvGLU sequences was high (71% and 68%, respectively). These results indicated that the AtGLU of Arabidopsis thaliana was closely related and had the lowest similarity rate with Arabidopsis thaliana (similarity rate: 49%). The most distant relatives.

Figure 3. A multiple sequence amino acid alignment of sorghum (As : Avena sativa (GenBank ID: AAP33176); At: Arabidopsis thaliana (GenBank ID: AAM63339); Gm: Glycine max (GenBank ID: AAB03501); Hv: Hordeum vulgare (GenBank ID: 1607157A); Nt: Nicotiana tabacum (GenBank ID: ACF93731); Os: Oryza sativa (GenBank ID: AAL40191); Pe: Phyllostachys edulis (GenBank ID: ADG56569); Sb: Sorghum bicolor (GenBank ID:XP_002456922); Ta: Triticum aestivum (GenBank ID: AAY96422). Zm: Zea mays (GenBank ID: ACJ62639))

Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship of SbGLU1of sorghum

3.4. Effects of Cloning of SbGlu1 Gene in Sweet Sorghum

The SbGlu1 gene of sweet sorghum was cloned to Al tolerant variety ROMA, and Al sensitive variety respectively. The cDNA of POTCHETSTRM was amplified by PCR as the template, and the electrophoretic map showed the presence of a target gene band at a position close to 1000bpMaker (Figure 5A). After purification, electrophoretic detection of pure heterozonal order recovered fragment was recombined with a linear vector (Figure 5B). Therefore, we believe that in Al tolerant cultivar ROMA and Al sensitive cultivar POTCHETSTRM, SbGlu1 gene sequence is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs (Figure 5C). However, the amino acid sequence of SbGLU1 protein of two sweet sorghum varieties (Figure 5D). The SbGlu1 gene from two different varieties was analyzed separately in future experiments. Select the correct sequencing Escherichia coli solution and extract two fractions respectively plasmid was transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciae by freeze-thaw method. The liquid was amplified by PCR and displayed by electrophoresis plasmids containing SbGlu1 gene have been successfully transferred into Agrobacterium Tumefaciae (Figure 5E) and can be used to infect Bacteriopaena transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants were obtained and functional analysis of SbGlu1 gene was performed.

Figure 5. Electrophorogram of SbGlu1 clone in sweet sorghum

3.5. Aligment of SbGlu1 Sequencing, and Aligment of SbGLU1 Amino Acid Sequence

The correct one will be verified bacterial solution was sent to Beijing Huada Company for sequencing, and the comparison and analysis of sequencing results were shown in (Figure 6) from SbGlu1 gene sequence of sensitive cultivar POTCHETSTRM and sequence queried from sorghum database SbGlu1 gene sequence from resistant ROMA was 27 '(C-T), 97' (T-G). And 817 '(C-A) were different, and the results were consistent in the three single colonies.

We suggest that the SbGlu1 gene is present in the tolerant variety ROMA and the sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM Sequences of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) are polymorphism while mononucleosides difference of acid polymorphism resulted in one amino acid in the amino acid sequence of SbGLU1 protein of two sweet sorghum varieties different (-33, S-A). Two different varieties in future experiments SbGlu1 gene was analyzed separately.

Figure 6. Aligment of SbGlu1 sequencing, and Aligment of SbGLU1 amino acid sequence in sweet sorghum

3.6. Effects of SbGLU1 Proteins in Sweet Sorghum

The N-terminus of SbGlu1 gene was fused with GFP gene, and the two genes were activated by super strong 35S promoter. GFP SbGLU1 could be expressed by instantaneous fusion in onion epidermal cells. As shown in (Figure 7). Both control groups GFP alone or fused GFP: P: SbGLU1 and GFP: R: SbGLU1 were distributed in cytoplasm and cytoplasm in the nucleus, SbGLU1 protein was intracellular soluble, non-specific protein.

Figure 7. Subcellular localization of SbGLU1 proteins in sweet sorghum

4. Discussion

The SbGlu1 gene sequences of sweet sorghum Al tolerant cultivar ROMA and Al sensitive cultivar POTCHETSTRM showed changes in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPS), and there was no difference in Al resistance of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, indicating that SNPS did not affect the function of SbGlu1 gene. This is similar to the malic acid transporter gene performed by Sasaki et al. using the Al resistant genotype ET8 and Al sensitive genotype ES8 in wheat ALMT1 showed similar results. A 6-nucleotide difference between the TaALMT1-1 gene of ET8 and the TaALMT1-2 gene of ES8 resulted in a 2-amino acid difference at the protein level, but this difference was not associated with Al resistance [15]. That more than 90% of sweet sorghum lines had copy number differences in their genomes. Such genomic structural differences enhanced the response of genes to environmental stress and stimulation, and played a role in phenotypic diversity and adaptability of sweet sorghum. In sweet sorghum recombinant inbred lines, the MATE1 gene with three gene copy numbers showed strong Al tolerance [15,16]. A similar relationship has been reported in soybean, where variation in this gene structure enriches the genome of occulted genes associated with plant biodefense [17]. After insect feeding, genes involved in plant hormone metabolism and signaling pathways, trauma response, control of protein and lipid binding, glutathione metabolism and cell catabolic processes are often involved in plant defense response [18,19]. Insect-resistant genotypes respond to aphid feeding by changing enzyme function, signaling and gene expression [20,21]. The plant hormone jasmonate plays a key role in resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses as a signaling molecule. Jasmonic acid and its derivative methyl jasmonate are important plant hormones for plant defense against insect feeding [22]. However, when studying the Al resistance of Hl ALMT1 gene, Chen et al. found that the same Hl ALMT1 gene copy number in the genome of plussum grass did not affect its gene expression [23]. Al tolerant variety ROMA and Al sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM showed no difference in the copy number of SbGlu1 gene were differences in gene expression. This indicated that there were differences in SbGlu1 gene expression induced by Al between the two sweet sorghum varieties in this experiment, which might not be caused by the same SbGlu1 gene copy number, but other factors regulating gene expression. Studies have shown that the expression of ALMT1 gene, which regulates the secretion of malic acid in wheat roots, is upstream of the gene Regulation of ABCD repeats, the more ABCD repeats, the higher gene expression and Al resistance [24]. While in susceptible soybean plants, aphids can inhibit the expression of jasmonate signaling pathway genes [25]. The transient increase of jasmonic acid in the early feeding stage of aphids can prevent aphids from colonizing on sorghum and improve the resistance to aphids feeding [26]. This study involved in styrene acrylic acid metabolic pathways of gene expression appeared to rise, phenylalanine metabolic pathway is a plant secondary metabolic pathways in a general way, and can generate trans cinnamic acid, coumaric acid intermediate and final lignin can be formed, yellow ketone, flavonoids and other secondary metabolites, involved in the salicylic acid signal pathway and lignin synthesis way [27]. The upstream promoter region of Hl ALMT1 gene is subject to transcription factors number of cis-acting elements regulated by HlART1 affected the expression level of this gene. Increasing the number of cil-acting elements regulated by HlART1 in the upstream promoter region of Hl ALMT1 gene can improve the expression level of Hl ALMT1 gene and the secretion of malic acid [28]. Similarly, regulate the secretion of citric acid in sorghum upstream repeats of SbMATE gene were positively correlated with Al tolerance in sorghum [28,29]. When insects feed, flavonoids, as secondary metabolites of plants, will also change some enzyme activities in insects, which will affect the growth and development of insects and make plants have a defense effect against plant-eating insects [30]. Flavonoids are also the precursors for the synthesis of tannins, which can also protect plants from damage and improve their ability to adapt to stress [31]. In all Al tolerant barley varieties, the upstream of HvAACT1 gene coding region contains a 1023 bp insertion sequence, which can improve the expression of HvAACT1 gene and promote the secretion of citric acid in barley roots [32]. In this study, the upstream 2 kb sequence analysis of SbGlu1 gene in sweet sorghum showed that there were certain differences in the SbGlu1 gene promoter sequence between the Al tolerant variety ROMA and the Al sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM (Figure 5). In the 2 kb sequence upstream of SbGlu1, the Al tolerant variety ROMA had an insertion sequence of 83 bp, and the number of promoter core element TATA-box and distal regulatory enhancer element CAAT-box were significantly different between the two sweet sorghum varieties. Therefore, we believe that the upstream sequence of SbGlu1 gene may play an important role in regulating the expression and Al resistance of this gene. In addition, in this experiment, the upstream 2 kb sequence of SbGlu1 gene of two sweet sorghum varieties both contained elements responsive to ABA, MeJA, SA, GA and other plant hormones [33]. In their study on rice, they found that the OsGlu12 gene with high sequence consistency and close genetic relationship to SbGlu1 could respond. Our laboratory's previous studies on soybeans also showed that endogenous ABA may be involved in the signal transduction process under Al stress, which is a signal molecule that soybean senses Al toxicity and transmits between the aboveground part and the root system [34]. And SA may be an early signal molecule responding to Al stress. In addition, endogenous SA can regulate the secretion of citric acid in soybean roots under Al stress [35]. Sweet sorghum Al-tolerant variety ROMA and Al-sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM, the copy number of SbGlu1 gene was 3 times that of internal reference genes Sb-β-actin and Sb-β-tubulin. These results indicated that the two sweet sorghum varieties had the same copy number of β-1, 3 glucanase gene SbGlu1. Sequence comparison of the upstream 2kb promoter region of the SbGlu1 gene of the Al-tolerant variety ROMA and the Al-sensitive variety POTCHETSTRM showed that the ROMA SbGlu1 promoter amplified by the same primer was 67 bp more than that of POTCHETSTRM. The ROMA SbGlu1 promoter sequence had an 83 bp insertion fragment. Predictive analysis of functional elements of the promoter sequence of SbGlu1 gene showed that in the 2 kb promoter region upstream of SbGlu1 gene, there was a difference of 13 promoter core elements of TATA-box between the two varieties and a difference of 3 regulatory enhancer elements of CAAT-box between the two varieties. The difference in the number of these elements may be the reason for the difference in the expression of SbGlu1 gene at the transcription level between the two varieties. In addition, the promoter sequence also contained ABA, MeJA, SA, GA response elements and MYB binding drought resistance elements, suggesting that the expression of SbGlu1 gene may also be regulated by hormones and related to drought resistance.

5. Conclusions

The Al-sensitive POTCHETSTRM, Al tolerant sweet sorghum ROMA has lower synthase activity, higher β-1, 3-glucanase activity and higher expression of SbGlu1 gene under Al stress, which are the main reasons for less accumulation of callose at root tips. Allogeneic expression of β-1, 3-glucanase SbGlu1 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana can reduce callose accumulation and improve Al tolerance. Due to limited time, the physiological mechanism of sensitivity to Al in sweet sorghum cultivars ROMA and POTCHETSTRM to Al has not been thoroughly studied. This part will be gradually improved in the follow-up studies in our laboratory. We will continue to reveal the mechanism of Al induced callose accumulation in sweet sorghum root tips by analyzing the polymorphism of upstream SbGlu1 gene and identifying the structural domains regulating gene expression, the modification of small molecular RNA and epigenetics, and the protein interacting with SbGLU1.

Acknowledgements

This project was approved by the Fourteenth Five-Year Plan" biological breeding project (YZGC058). Jinzhong Key Science and Technology R & D Plan (Y212018). “National Laboratory of Germplasm Resources Innovation and Molecular Breeding for Cereals (202204010910001-27) for financial support of this study.

References

[1]   | Horst W., Püschel A. K. and Schmohl N. Induction of callose formation is a sensitive marker for genotypic aluminium sensitivity in maize. Plant and Soil, 192:23-30, 1997.
[2]   | Jones D.L. and Kochian L.V. Aluminum Inhibition of the Inositol 1, 4, 5-Trisphosphate signal transduction pathway in wheat roots: a role in aluminum toxicity. Plant Cell7:1913-1922, 1995.
[3]   | Li Y. Y., Yang J. L., Zhang Y. J. and Zheng S. J. Disorganized distribution of homogalacturonan epitopes in cell walls as one possible mechanism for aluminium-induced root growth inhibition in maize. Annals of Botany.104: 235-241, 2009.
[4]   | Zhou Shaoqun, Lou Yann-Ru, Tzin Vered, Jander Georg. Alteration of plant primary metabolism in response to insect herbivory. Plant Physiology, 169:1488-1498, 2015.
[5]   | Rossi Magdalena, Goggin Fiona L, Milligan Stephen B, Kaloshian Isgouhi, Ullman Diane E, Williamson Valerie M. The nematode resistance gene Mi of tomato confers resistance against the potato aphid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95:9750-9754, 1998.
[6]   | Tetreault Hannah M, Grover Sajjan, Scully Erin D, Gries Tammy, Palmer Nathan A, Sarath Gautam, Louis Joe, Sattler Scoot E. Global responses of resistant and susceptible sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari). Frontiers in Plant Science, 10:145, 2019.
[7]   | Zhang Hengyou, Huang Jian, Huang Yinghua. Identification and characterization of plant resistance genes (R genes) in sorghum and their involvement in plant defense against aphids. Plant growth regulation, 96:443-461, 2022.
[8]   | Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memort requirements. Nature methods, 12 (4): 357-360, 2015.
[9]   | Pertea M, Pertea G M, Antonescu C M, et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nature biotechnology, 33(3):290-295, 2015.
[10]   | Kerchev PI, Fenton B, Foyer CH, Hancock RD. Plant responses to insect herbivory: interactions between photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species and hormonal signalling pathways. Plant Cell and Environment, 35: 441-453, 2012.

[11]  
Donze-Reiner Teresa, Palmer Nathan A, Scully Erin D, Prochaska Travis J, Koch Kyle G, Heng-Moss Tiffany, Bradshaw Jeffrey D, Twigg Paul, Amundsen Keenan, Sattler Scott E, Sarath Gautam. Transcriptional analysis of defense mechanisms in upland tetraploid switchgrass to greenbugs. BMC Plant Biology, 17: 46, 2017.

[12]   | Gutsche A, Heng-Moss T, Sarath G, Twigg P, Xia Y, Lu G, Mornihinweg D. Gene expression profiling of tolerant barley in response to Diuraphis noxia (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 99: 163-173, 2009.
[13]   | Prochaska TJ, Donze-Reiner T, Marchi-Werle L, Palmer NA, Hunt TE, Sarath G, Heng-Moss T Transcriptional responses of tolerant and susceptible soybeans to soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) herbivory. Arthropod Plant Interactions, 9: 347-359, 2015.
[14]   | Kiani Mahnaz, Szczepaniec Adrianna. Effects of sugarcane aphid herbivory on transcriptional responses of resistant and susceptible sorghum. BMC Genomics, 19:774, 2018.
[15]   | Rahbe Yvan, Sauvion Nicolas, Febvay Gerard, Peumans Willy J, Gatehouse Angharad MR. Toxicity of lectins and processing of ingested proteins in the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 76: 143-155, 1995.
[16]   | Rogers Lindsay D, Overall Christopher M. Proteolytic post-translational modification of proteins: Proteomic tools and methodology. Molecular & cellular proteomics:MCP, 12: 3532-3542, 2013.
[17]   | Smith C. Michael, Boyko Elena V. The molecular bases of plant resistance and defense responses to aphid feeding: current status. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 122: 1-16, 2007.
[18]   | Studham ME, and Macintosh GC. Multiple phytohormone signals control the transcriptional response to soybean aphid infestation in susceptible and resistant soybean plants. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 26: 116-129, 2013.
[19]   | Kumar Shrestha, Huang Yinghua. Genome-wide characterization of the sorghum JAZ gene family and their responses to phytohormone treatments and aphid infestation. Scientific reports, 12: 3238, 2022.
[20]   | Pan WB. Advances in the investigation of vegetable tannin and its effect on forage quality I. the character and function of vegetable tannins. Journal of Zhangzhou Technical institute, 10 (3): 58-61, 2008.

[21]  
Dogramaci Mahmut, Mayo ZB, Wright Robert J, Reese John. Categories of resistance, antibiosis and tolerance to biotype I greenbug (Schizaphis graminum (Rondani) Homoptera Aphidiae) in four sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Moench Poales: Gramineae) hybrids. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 80: 183-191, 2007.

[22]   | Ryan P.R., Raman H., Gupta S., Sasaki T., Yamamoto Y. and Delhaize E. The multiple origins of aluminium resistance in hexaploid wheat include Aegilops tauschii and more recent cis mutations to TaALMT1. Plant Journal, 64: 446-455, 2010.
[23]   | Sasaki T., Ryan P.R., Delhaize E., Hebb D.M., Ogihara Y., Kawaura K., Noda K., Kojima T., Toyoda A. and Matsumoto H. Sequence upstream of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ALMT1 gene and its relationship to aluminum resistance. Plant and Cell Physiology, 47: 1343-1354, 2006.
[24]   | Liu J., Pineros M.A. and Kochian L.V. The role of aluminum sensing and signaling in plant aluminum resistance. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 56:221-230, 2014.
[25]   | Tian Q.Y., Sun D.H., Zhao M.G. and Zhang W.H. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) underlies aluminum-induced inhibition of root elongation in Hibiscus moscheutos. New Phytologist, 174:322-331, 2007.
[26]   | Toller A., Brownfield L., Neu C., Twell D. and Schulze-Lefert P. Dual function of Arabidopsis glucan synthase-like genes GSL8 and GSL10 in male gametophyte development and plant growth. Plant Journal, 54:911-923, 2008.
[27]   | Wang H.H., Huang J.J. and Bi Y.R. Nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide production is involved in aluminum tolerance in red kidney bean roots. Plant Science, 179, 281-288, 2010.
[28]   | Liu Q., Zhu L., Yin L., Hu C. and Chen L. Cell wall pectin and its binding capacity contribute to aluminium resistance in buckwheat [C]. The 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 4508-4511. 2008.
[29]   | Furukawa J., Yamaji N., Wang H., Mitani N., Murata Y., Sato K., Katsuhara M., Takeda K. and Ma J.F. An aluminum-activated citrate transporter in barley. Plant and Cell Physiology, 48:1081-1091, 2007.
[30]   | Guenoune G.D., Elbaum M., Sagi G., Levy A. and Epel B.L. Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) replicase and movement protein function synergistically in facilitating TMV spread by lateral diffusion in the plasmodesmal desmotubule of Nicotiana Benthamiana. Molecular Plant, 21:335-345, 2008.
[31]   | Ahad A. and Nick P. Actin is bundled in activation-tagged tobacco mutants that tolerate aluminum. Planta, 225:451-468, 2007.
[32]   | Ahn S.J., Sivaguru M., Chung G.C., Rengel Z. and Matsumoto H. Aluminium-induced growth inhibition is associated with impaired efflux and influx of H+ across the plasma membrane in root apices of squash (Cucurbita pepo). Journal of Experimental Botany, 53: 1959-1966, 2002.
[33]   | Ahn S.J., Sivaguru M., Osawa H., Chung G.C. and Matsumoto H. Aluminum inhibits the H+-ATPase activity by permanently altering the plasma membrane surface potentials in squash roots. Plant Physiology, 126:1381-1390, 2001.
[34]   | Ahn S.J., Rengel Z. and Mastsumoto H. Aluminum-induced plasma membrane surface potential and H+-ATPase activity in near-isogenic wheat lines differing in tolerance to aluminum. New Phytologist, 162:71-79, 2004.
[35]   | Albrecht G. and Mustroph A. Sucrose utilization via invertase and sucrose synthase with respect to accumulation of cellulose and callose synthesis in wheat roots under oxygen deficiency. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 50:813-820, 2003.