﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Journal of Finance and Economics</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2328-7276</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2020-08-19</publicationDate>
    <volume>8</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <startPage>190</startPage>
    <endPage>200</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/jfe-8-4-5</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>JFE2020845</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Control of the Agreement on Valuation to Restrict Competition in Vietnam - Viewed from Efficiency Standards of Economics</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Tran Thi Nguyet</name>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tran Anh Vu</name>
        <affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Law Department, National Economics University, Ha Noi, Vietnam</affiliationName>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="2">International School, Thai Nguyen University, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">The article presents in detail the basic theoretical contents of price-fixing agreement, provides analysis by drawings, graphs and specific examples, and discusses price-fixing agreement acts, including: direct price-fixing agreement, indirect price-fixing agreement, price-using agreement to consolidate positions in the relevant market. From these theoretical contents and analysis, the author offers a number of assessments and proposes solutions to adjust Vietnam's competition laws in order to control price-fixing agreements to restrict competition, viewed from the efficiency standards of economics. Some of the issues discussed are: (1) Perfectly competitive market and monopoly market; (2) Direct price-fixing agreements to restrict competition from the viewpoint of economic efficiency; (3) Indirect price-fixing agreements to restrict competition; (4) Price-using agreements to consolidate its position in the relevant market. After offering analysis, discussion and research on issues of price fixing agreements, the article has made a number of author's recommendations on effect assessment content or the ability to cause significant anti-competitive effect of price fixing agreement to restraint competition in Vietnam.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/jfe/8/4/5/jfe-8-4-5.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>Competition Law 2018</keyword>
      <keyword>Vietnam competition law</keyword>
      <keyword>price-fixing agreement</keyword>
      <keyword>price-using agreement</keyword>
      <keyword>competition restriction</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>