Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Market Risk and Market Risk Premium

Frederick Adjei

Economics, Finance & Accounting Department, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA

Abstract: We study the effect of the level of economic policy uncertainty on market risk and market risk premium by employing an OLS regression model. The results show that economic policy uncertainty impacts market risk more during the recession periods than during the expansion periods. However, we do not find support for a relationship between economic policy uncertainty and market risk premium. Evidently, the level of economic policy uncertainty impacts market risk and policymakers must take that into consideration when deliberating new economic policy.

Keywords: Economic Policy Uncertainty, Market Risk, Market Risk Premium

Received February 04, 2020; March 06, 2020; Accepted March 14, 2020

Citation: Frederick Adjei, Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Market Risk and Market Risk Premium. Journal of Finance and Economics, 8 (2). 57-60. January 2020. doi:10.12691/jfe-8-2-2

1. Introduction

Economic policy makers hesitance to implement new monetary or fiscal policy may result in an uncertainty termed Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) [1]. Economic Policy Uncertainty affects the trading behavior of economic agents [2] and will have real contemporaneous and future impacts in the market. Pastor and Veronesi [3] show that policy uncertainty affects market risk and also elevates the equity risk premium.

In this study, we examine the relationship between degree of economic policy uncertainty, stock market risk, and market risk premium. The uniqueness of our study is that with the EPU measure, developed by Baker, Bloom, and Davis [1], we can differentiate economic policy uncertainty impacts from business cycle impacts and examine the effect of economic policy uncertainty on market volatility.

2. Economic Policy Uncertainty and Market Risk

The economic policy uncertainty (EPU) measure by Baker, Bloom, and Davis [1], presents a chance to directly examine the impact of EPU on market risk. With the EPU measure, we extend extant studies such as Bernanke [2] and Bernanke and Kuttner [4] who find that monetary policy adjustments affect market volatility.

Several studies in the existing literature present a link between the degree of economic policy uncertainty and market risk. Panousi and Papanikolaou [5] find that economic policy uncertainty could increase managerial risk aversion and affect the equity risk premium. Pastor and Veronesi [3] develop a theoretical model to investigate the link between economic policy uncertainty and market risk and find that the degree of economic policy uncertainty impacts market volatility.

In this study, we investigate the impact of the degree of economic policy uncertainty on market risk and market risk premium. Following Pastor and Veronesi [3], who show that political uncertainty affects market volatility, our primary hypothesis is that higher economic policy uncertainty may lead to higher market risk.

Hypothesis I: Higher economic policy uncertainty is correlated with an increase in contemporaneous market risk.

Additionally, Pastor and Veronesi [3] show that policy uncertainty elevates the equity risk premium and find that political uncertainty commands a risk premium and the impacts are stronger when the economy is recessionary. We hypothesize that higher economic policy uncertainty is correlated with higher market risk premium.

Hypothesis II: Higher economic policy uncertainty is correlated with an increase in market risk premium.

3. Economic Policy Uncertainty Measure

In this section, we discuss the EPU measure: the economic policy uncertainty index developed by Baker, Bloom, and Davis [1]; and our primary model.

3.1. The Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) Index

The EPU index is made up of parts of measurement that track three dimensions of economic policy uncertainty: (a) the frequency of references to economic uncertainty and policy in 10 leading newspapers; (b) the number of federal tax code provisions set to expire in future years; (c) the extent of disagreement among economic forecasters over future federal, state, and local government purchases and the level of the CPI. We discuss our model next.

3.2. EPU, Market Risk, Market Risk Premium

In this study, our main hypothesis is that the degree of economic policy uncertainty affects market risk. To test our hypothesis, we employ an OLS regression framework with market risk measured by the standard deviation of daily market returns. The model is the following:

[picture] | (1)

Where σt is the standard deviation of daily market returns, ψ is the intercept term, EPUt is the monthly EPU index level, TSt is the monthly term spread, DSt is the monthly default spread, RRt is the monthly relative interest rate, DVtis a dummy variable set to 1 for a recession year and zero otherwise, and εt is the error term. DVt * EPUt is an interaction term between the recession dummy variable and the EPU Index.

To test our second hypothesis: higher economic policy uncertainty is correlated with higher market risk premium; we employ a second OLS regression in the following form:

[picture] | (2)

where RPmt is the monthly market risk premium, ψ is the intercept term, EPUt is the monthly EPU index level, TSt is the monthly term spread, DSt is the monthly default spread, RRt is the monthly relative interest rate, DVt is a dummy variable set to 1 for a recession year and zero otherwise, and εt is the error term. DVt * EPUt is an interaction term between the recession dummy variable and the EPU Index.

4. Data and Descriptive Statistics

The dataset spans the period from January 1985 to December 2019, consistent with the available EPU data. We obtain stock market return data from CRSP. We use the three-month Treasury bill rate as a proxy for the risk-free rate (RF), and obtain the data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data.

For business cycle conditioning variables, we follow Santa-Clara and Valkanov [6]. We employ the default spread which is the difference between yields of BAA-rated bonds and AAA-rated bonds, term spread which is the difference between the yield to maturity of a 10-year Treasury note and the three-month Treasury bill, the relative interest rate which is computed as the deviation of the three-month Treasury bill rate from its one-year moving average. Treasury securities data are obtained from the Federal Reserve Economic Data.

Table 1 shows the summary statistics of the variables we use in the study. std is the standard deviation of daily market returns, and RPm is the market risk premium. Market return is of monthly periodicity

Table 1 shows the summary statistics of the variables we use in the study. The average of the EPU Index is 113.8 and the standard deviation is 42.8. The EPU index is elevated during the recession periods; with a median of 113.5, and during the expansion periods the median is 101.2.The median of monthly standard deviation of market returns for the full sample period is 0.774 and the standard deviation is 0.577.

5. Empirical Results

In this section, we present the results of the regression estimations.

Table 1. Summary Statistics

Table 2. EPU and Market Risk Regression

Table 3. EPU and Market Risk Premium Regression

In Table 2, we present results of the regression with the standard deviation of returns as the dependent variable. Even after counting business cycle effects, the coefficient for EPU is positive and statistically significant, indicating that economic policy uncertainty has an effect on market risk. This result is consistent with Bernanke [2], which chronicles that increased monetary policy uncertainty has negative effects on corporate investment.

For robustness, we divide the sample into expansion and recession periods and rerun model 1. Surprisingly, we uncover that the coefficient for EPU is positive; statistically significant at the 1% level, during both recession and expansion periods. However, on including an interaction term between a recession dummy variable and the EPU Index in the regression, the positive and statistically significant coefficient of the interaction term indicates that economic policy uncertainty impacts market risk more during the recession periods than during the expansion periods.

In Table 3, we show results of the regression with the market risk premium as the dependent variable. After controlling business cycle effects, the coefficient for EPU is not statistically significant for the full sample. However, on bifurcating the sample into recession and expansion periods, the coefficient for EPU is negative and significant in the recession period. However, this finding is not consistent with the extant literature.

6. Conclusion

We study the effect of the level of economic policy uncertainty on market risk and market risk premium by employing an OLS regression model.

First, the results of the OLS regression estimation show that economic policy uncertainty impacts market risk more during the recession periods than during the expansion periods. Second, we do not find support for a relationship between economic policy uncertainty and market risk premium.

Clearly, the level of economic policy uncertainty impacts market risk and policymakers must take that into consideration when deliberating new economic policy.

References

[1]   | Baker, Scott R., Nicholas Bloom, and Steven J. Davis. “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty.” Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 13-02 (2013).
[2]   | Bernanke, Ben. “Irreversibility, uncertainty and cyclical investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics98 (1983): 85-106.
[3]   | Pastor, Lubos, and Pietro Veronesi. “Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices.” Journal of Finance67.4 (2012): 1219-1264.
[4]   | Bernanke, Ben and Kenneth N. Kuttner. “What Explains the Stock Market’s Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy?” Journal of Finance 60 (2005): 1221-1257.
[5]   | Panousi, Vasia, and Dimitris Papanikolaou, “Investment, idiosyncratic risk, and ownership.”Journal of Finance 67 (2012): 1113-1148.
[6]   | Santa-Clara, Pedro, and Rossen Valkanov. “The presidential puzzle: Political cycles and the stock market.” The Journal of Finance 58.5 (2003): 1841-1872.
[7]   | Pastor, Lubos, and Pietro Veronesi. “Political uncertainty and risk premia.” Journal of Financial Economics 110.3 (2013): 520-545.