﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
    <journalTitle>Journal of Finance and Economics</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2328-7276</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2018-08-06</publicationDate>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <startPage>125</startPage>
    <endPage>133</endPage>
    <doi>10.12691/jfe-6-4-2</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>JFE2018642</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Explaining Why Retirees Do Not Choose Annuities in Korea: A Probability of Consumption Shortfall Approach</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Dong-Hwa Lee</name>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jun-Hee An</name>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Joo-Ho Sung</name>
        <email>jhsung@khu.ac.kr</email>
        <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Business, School of Management, Kyung Hee University</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
    <abstract language="eng">Many assume that for retirees, purchasing an annuity is a better option than self-annuitization in the decumulation period. In Korea, retirees have shown a strong preference for properties (real estate), and a decision to annuitize has been extremely rare. Using a genetic algorithm, we show that self-annuitization can be recommended as an optimal choice for retirees in Korea if they consider properties as one of the investment options. We set three scenarios that a worker can choose at retirement: self-annuitization, purchasing a whole life annuity, and mixed strategy. We then calculate an optimal asset allocation for each scenario capable of minimizing probability of consumption shortfall (PCS). An important observation is achieved: the optimal asset allocation for minimizing PCS vary by the income quintiles, and PCS rises significantly as the preference for purchasing a whole-life annuity increases. In case of a large reduction in consumption after retirement, however, annuitization may be a better option for retirees in the lowest income quintile.</abstract>
    <fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/jfe/6/4/2/jfe-6-4-2.pdf</fullTextUrl>
    <keywords language="eng">
      <keyword>annuity puzzle</keyword>
      <keyword>self-annuitization</keyword>
      <keyword>annuitization</keyword>
      <keyword>probability of consumption shortfall</keyword>
      <keyword>optimal asset allocation</keyword>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>