<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>Journal of Finance and Economics</journalTitle>
<eissn>2328-7276</eissn>
<publicationDate>2016-12-21</publicationDate>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<startPage>184</startPage>
<endPage>190</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/jfe-4-6-3</doi>
<publisherRecordId>JFE2016463</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Gompers versus Bebchuck Governance Measure and Firm Value</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Frederick Adjei</name>
<email>fadjei@semo.edu</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Mavis Adjei</name>
<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Economics and Finance Department, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, USA</affiliationName>
<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Marketing Department, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, USA</affiliationName>
</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">This study compares the two primary measures of corporate governance quality, [1], GIM index and [2] E index using tests for comparing two nonnested models. We find that the GIM index has statistically significantly more power than the E index in explaining the variability in firm value, as measured by Tobin's Q. This finding suggests that the IRRC provisions excluded from the E index may have a statistically significant incremental power in explaining the variability in firm value.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/jfe/4/6/3/jfe-4-6-3.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>corporate governance</keyword>
<keyword>firm value</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
