<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>Journal of City and Development</journalTitle>
<publicationDate>2020-12-29</publicationDate>
<volume>2</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<startPage>18</startPage>
<endPage>21</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/jcd-2-1-3</doi>
<publisherRecordId>JCD2020213</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">An Evaluation of Users¡¯ Place Attachment and Identity in a Recreational Urban Setting</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Sarah E. Mount</name>
<email>smount2@ewu.edu</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Kinesiology & Health Education, University of Texas, Austin, Tx 78705</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">The validity of Williams and Roggenbuck¡¯s [1] place attachment scale has been examined in numerous studies and the results indicate that it is a valid instrument for measuring place dependence and place identity in a variety of settings. The purpose of this study is to expand previous construct validity research on items related to the latent variable identified as place identity on a recreational resource in an urban setting. Participants included 126 trail users (58% female, 42% male, age 20-66) who completed an online survey designed to measure individual perceptions of trail characteristics and patterns of use. A single-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed with goodness-of-fit tested using chi-square. When performed using the Maximum Likelihood method, the test was not significant, ¦Ö2(2) = 4.74, p = .09. When performed using the Generalized Least Squares method, the test also was not significant, ¦Ö2(2) = 4.54, p = .10, thus failing to reject the null hypothesis that the data do not fit the model. The results suggest that the 4-item place identity scale may be a valid measurement tool for use on recreational spaces in urban settings.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/jcd/2/1/3/jcd-2-1-3.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>place attachment</keyword>
<keyword>place identity</keyword>
<keyword>biophilic cities</keyword>
<keyword>urban planning</keyword>
<keyword>recreation</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
