<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>Journal of Business and Management Sciences</journalTitle>
<eissn>2333-4533</eissn>
<publicationDate>2022-05-12</publicationDate>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<startPage>105</startPage>
<endPage>112</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/jbms-10-3-1</doi>
<publisherRecordId>JBMS20221031</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">A Longitudinal Study of the R&amp;D Partnership Development between Firm and Academia</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Hui-Wen Yang</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Shih-Chieh Fang</name>
<email>fangsc@mail.ncku.edu.tw</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">R&amp;D collaboration with academia is widely perceived as the important way to develop breakthrough innovation and sustain competitive advantage in the knowledge-intensive industry. The outcome of collaborative innovation depends on the firm¡¯s strategy and management to overcome the challenges from different institutional logic and different disciplinary of knowledge domains. Based on literature review and a longitudinal study, we explored how firm effectively develop and maintain R&amp;D partnership with academia. We highlighted the dynamics of collaborative sensemaking in the interdisciplinary collaboration. This study provided inspiration for practitioners to manage R&amp;D partnership and achieve the desired outcome of industry-academia collaboration.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/jbms/10/3/1/jbms-10-3-1.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>R&amp;D</keyword>
<keyword>collaboration</keyword>
<keyword>moral hazard</keyword>
<keyword>cognitive distance</keyword>
<keyword>collaborative sensemaking</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
