Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Label_Title

Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Efficacy of Bacillus velezensis TCR11 Encapsulated in Alginate-Biochar to Promote Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Vigna unguiculata

Mani Rajkumar, Sundaramoorthy Soundarya*, Ashok Suma Archana, Viswanathan Subhadra Varshini

Department of Environmental Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract: Environmental pollution poses a growing threat to worldwide food security and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Encapsulation of bacterial cells presents a promising biotechnological approach to improve the efficacy of biofertilizers and enhance crop productivity. This study evaluated the impact of encapsulated beads containing plant beneficial bacteria (PBB) and biochar (BC) on the growth, photosynthetic pigments, protein content, and relative water content (RWC) of Vigna unguiculata. Out of 24 bacterial isolates, Bacillus velezensis strain TCR11 was selected for its superior seedling growth promotion and its ability to produce key plant beneficial metabolites including indole-3-acetic acid, siderophores, and P-solubilizing compounds. BC was produced from sawdust and bamboo under pyrolysis conditions of 400°C, 550°C, and 700°C. Among all tested BC, the bamboo-derived biochar produced at 550°C (BB2) demonstrated superior performance by significantly promoting plant growth and enhancing the viability of TCR11, making it the optimal matrix for encapsulation with sodium alginate (SA). Pot experiments demonstrated that the encapsulated beads containing TCR11, SA, and BB2 significantly improved V. unguiculata shoot and root length, biomass accumulation, pigment concentration, protein levels, and RWC compared to untreated controls. Moreover, this treatment increased TCR11 colonization in the rhizosphere of V. unguiculata, indicating that BC not only contributed its own benefits but also created a favourable microenvironment that supported the survival and activity of the encapsulated PBB. This likely facilitated the synthesis of growth-promoting metabolites, leading to enhanced plant performance. In conclusion, bamboo-derived BC (BB2) proved to be an effective additive for PBB encapsulation. Combined with PBB, it significantly improved the growth and physiological responses of V. unguiculata, highlighting its potential for sustainable agricultural applications.

Keywords: Encapsulation, Biochar, Vigna Unguiculata, Bacillus velezensis, Relative Water Content, Rhizosphere

Received October 01, 2025; Revised November 01, 2025; Accepted November 09, 2025

Citation: Mani Rajkumar, Sundaramoorthy Soundarya, Ashok Suma Archana, Viswanathan Subhadra Varshini, Efficacy of Bacillus velezensis TCR11 Encapsulated in Alginate-Biochar to Promote Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Vigna unguiculata. Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 13 (1). 21-32. January 2025. doi:10.12691/jaem-13-1-4

1. Introduction

Plant beneficial bacteria (PBB) have long been utilized to enhance plant health and productivity, thereby contributing to food and feed security for the growing worldwide population [1]. Their significance lies in their ability to improve nutrient uptake, modulate physiological responses, enhance stress tolerance, and suppress plant pathogens ultimately leading to increased crop yields [2]. It is well established that PBB promote plant growth through various mechanisms, such as the synthesis of phytohormones that regulate cell division, cell elongation, and stimulate root development [3]. They also synthesize iron-chelating siderophores, which enhance Fe availability and its uptake [4], and solubilize P, thereby increasing its bioavailability in the soil [5]. However, despite their proven potential, the efficiency of these PBB is often compromised under field conditions due to diverse abiotic and biotic stresses [6].

To improve the efficiency of PBB, several strategies have been developed to create a favourable microenvironment that supports sustained nutrient availability and offers physical protection over time. One widely adopted technique involves immobilizing PBB cells within biocompatible polymers, such as sodium alginate (SA) [7]. To enhance the structural and functional performance of these encapsulated formulations, additives like skim milk powder, clay, humic acids etc., are often incorporated into SA matrices [8]. These composite systems have shown improved stability and effectiveness in promoting plant growth [9]. According to [10], the synergistic utilization of humic substances and PBB has been shown to enhance PBB colonization in the rhizosphere while simultaneously improving plant resilience to abiotic stress and optimizing nutrient uptake. Complementary findings by [11] revealed that the incorporation of skim milk powder into SA-based encapsulation systems markedly increased the survival rates of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas corrugate, maintaining viable populations even after six months of storage under ambient conditions. In a related study, [12] demonstrated that skim milk supplementation in carrier-based PBB formulations not only stabilized PBB viability but also enhanced field performance, resulting in improved root colonization and increased crop productivity. Collectively, these studies emphasize the critical importance of incorporating additives into SA-based encapsulation formulations to develop resilient and effective PBB inoculants that enhance sustainable crop management.

Biochar (BC), a carbon-dense material synthesized via pyrolysis of biomass, is widely recognized as a sustainable and environmentally friendly soil amendment that mitigates ecological risks while enhancing plant growth [13,14]. Its high surface area and porous internal structure enable the retention of essential nutrients including N, P, K, and Ca, thereby improving soil health and supporting plant development [15]. Additionally, BC exhibits distinctive physico-chemical properties, including abundant oxygen-containing functional groups, elevated cation exchange capacity (CEC), and superior water-holding ability, all of which contribute to enhanced crop productivity [16]. For example, a recent study by [17] reported that peanut shell-derived BC increased nutrient availability in soils and thus root biomass, and water retention in Schefflera arboricola. These effects were attributed to the BC’s porous architecture and nutrient-rich composition, which collectively improved nutrient use efficiency and promoted overall plant growth. Similarly, [18] found that the combined application of P. hysterophorus BC and PBB significantly enhanced plant growth and physiological responses, including chlorophyll content, photosynthetic efficiency, and root development. Moreover, this integrated approach improved key soil physico-chemical properties such as pH, organic carbon content, and nutrient availability (N, P, K), which collectively contributed to higher crop yields. These insights prompted us to investigate the role of BC as an additive in SA-based encapsulation systems, aiming to improve the efficiency and performance of encapsulated PBB. We hypothesize that integrating BC into the SA encapsulation matrix will enhance the viability of PBB and stimulate the expression of their plant growth promoting (PGP) traits, thereby improving overall plant growth and productivity.

The objectives of this study were to: (1) screen and evaluate the suitability of PBB and BC for the preparation of encapsulated beads, and (2) assess their impact on growth parameters, pigment biosynthesis, protein accumulation, and relative water content (RWC) in Vigna unguiculata.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Characterization of PBB

Bacterial strains were isolated from tannery effluent-contaminated soils in Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India, using the serial dilution plating technique [19]. To identify potential PBB, a roll towel assay was performed using V. unguiculata. Seeds were surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 minute, followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes, and washed three times with sterile deionized water. Each isolate was cultured overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 28 ± 2°C with continuous shaking. After 18 hours, cultures were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the cells separated were resuspended in sterile distilled water to an OD₆₀₀ of 1.0 (~10⁸ CFU/mL). Sterilized seeds were soaked in the bacterial suspension for 2 hours under aseptic conditions, while control seeds were treated with sterile water. Both sets were placed on moist blotting paper and incubated in a growth chamber for 7 days. Germination rate, shoot and root length, and vigour index were recorded [20].

Isolate TCR11, which exhibited strong PGP potential, was selected for further characterization. This included assessment of IAA production [21], siderophore synthesis [22], phosphate solubilization [23], ammonia generation [24], and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) production [25]. The strain’s tolerance to heavy metal [26] and drought stress [27] was also evaluated. Molecular identification was performed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing [28].

2.2. Preparation and Screening of Biochar

Biochar was produced from bamboo and sawdust via slow pyrolysis at 400°C, 550°C, and 700°C under limited oxygen conditions following standard method [29]. The BC was ground and sieved to <2 mm particles for use. Its impact on V. unguiculata growth and survival of the PBB strain TCR11 was assessed to determine suitability for encapsulation.

For pot trials, soil collected from Bharathiar University was amended with BC at 0% or 5% (w/w). Seeds were sown in 1 kg of BC treated or untreated soil and maintained at 30°C under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle. After 20 days, plants were evaluated for shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh weight (FW), and dry weight (DW). To determine DW, the harvested biomass was oven-dried at 80°C for 48 hours.

To assess BC’s effect on TCR11 growth, 5% (w/v) BC was added to tryptone soya broth. Cultures grown to OD₆₀₀ = 1.0 were inoculated (0.1 mL) into each treatment and incubated at 28 ± 2°C with shaking (125 rpm). Growth was assessed every 12 hours for 72 hours. Samples were serially diluted in phosphate-buffered saline, plated on LB agar, and incubated at 30°C for 24 hours to determine colony-forming units (CFUs).

Bamboo BC produced at 550°C (BB2), which exhibited superior effectiveness in promoting plant growth and supporting TCR11 viability, was chosen for subsequent investigation.

2.3. Encapsulation

Prior to encapsulation, the PBB strain TCR11 was tagged with ampicillin resistance (300 mg/L) to enable monitoring of its colonization efficiency in the rhizosphere. This antibiotic-based tagging technique was adapted from the protocol established by [30]. For encapsulation, TCR11 was grown in LB broth for 18 hours at 28 ± 2°C with continuous shaking. Post incubation, the cells were separated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 7 minutes and resuspended in sterile distilled water, adjusting the final concentration to 4.8 × 10⁵ CFU/mL. The bacterial suspension was then combined with a sterile solution containing 2% SA and 5% BB2 in a 1:5 ratio. This mixture was extruded dropwise through a sterile 25 mL syringe into a 2% calcium chloride solution, facilitating bead formation via ionic crosslinking. After one hour of curing, the beads were collected by filtration, washed with sterile distilled water to remove residual calcium, and dried using sterile absorbent paper.

2.4. Pot experiment and plant analysis

A greenhouse experiment was carried out to assess the impact of free and encapsulated PBB on V. unguiculata growth and biochemical traits. Soil collected from Bharathiar University was sterilized through autoclaving at 121°C for 30 minutes over five consecutive days. Six treatments were prepared: 1. Untreated – seeds without TCR11, SA and BB2, 2. SA – uninoculated SA microcapsules, 3. SA + BB2 – uninoculated SA and BB2 microcapsules, 4. F-TCR11 – free TCR11 suspension, 5. TCR11 + SA – TCR11 encapsulated in SA, 6. TCR11 + SA + BB2 – TCR11 encapsulated in SA and BB2. V. unguiculata seeds were sown in pots containing 600 g of autoclaved soil. Each seed received either 1 mL of F-TCR11 bacterial suspension (7.2 × 10⁶ CFU/mL) or 1 g of encapsulated beads. The pots were kept in a controlled environment at 30°C with a 16-hour light and 8-hour dark cycle. After 60 days of growth, plants were uprooted and measured for SL, RL, FW, and DW.

To evaluate the colonization ability of TCR11 in the rhizosphere of V. unguiculata, 1 g of soil was suspended in sterile distilled water and spread on LB agar containing 300 mg/L ampicillin. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 4–5 days, after which CFUs were recorded as per the method outlined by [30].

Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were measured following [31]. Briefly, fresh leaf tissue (0.1 g) was homogenized in 6 mL of 80% ethanol. After centrifugation, the supernatant was analyzed spectrophotometrically at 663 nm, 645 nm (chlorophyll a and b), and 510 nm, 480 nm (carotenoids) using a UV-1800 spectrophotometer.

Protein content was determined following the procedure outlined by [32]. Briefly, fresh leaf tissue (0.1 g) was homogenized in phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), centrifuged, and the supernatant was diluted. To this, 1 mL of reagent (a 50:1 mixture of Solution 1: 2% Na₂CO₃, 1% NaK(C₄H₄O₆), 0.4% NaOH; and Solution 2: 0.5% CuSO₄•5H₂O) was added and incubated for 10 minutes. Then, 0.1 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was introduced. After 30 minutes, absorbance was recorded at 660 nm, and protein levels were estimated using a BSA calibration curve ranging from 20 to 640 µg.

Relative water content (RWC) in plant leaves was determined by calculating the difference between fresh, turgid, and dry weights. Fresh leaf samples were first immersed in distilled water for 12 hours in the dark to obtain turgid weight (TW). The same samples were then oven-dried at 72°C for 12 hours to determine dry weight (DW). RWC was derived using the formula:

RWC (%) = [(FW − DW) / (TW − DW)] × 100

Where, FW represents fresh weight, TW is turgid weight, and DW is dry weight.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Treatment effects were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test to compare group means at a significance level of p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (v25.0).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation and Characterization of PBB

During the initial isolation process, 24 morphologically distinct bacterial strains were obtained from tannery effluent-contaminated soils. To identify efficient PBB, all isolates were evaluated for their PGP potential using an in vitro roll towel assay. Among the tested strains, TCR11 exhibited the highest enhancement in vigor index, showing a 183% increase compared to the uninoculated control (Table 1). The ability of PBB to stimulate plant growth is often attributed to the production of key metabolites such as IAA, siderophores, and P-solubilizing compounds. Generally, IAA enhances cell elongation, division, and root development, thereby improving water and nutrient uptake [33]. Similarly, siderophores, which are iron-chelating compounds produced by rhizosphere microbes, facilitate iron acquisition by forming stable complexes with iron, thus enhancing its availability to plants [34]. Additionally, certain PBB strains promote P uptake by converting insoluble forms into bioavailable ones through the secretion of organic and inorganic acids, ultimately supporting robust root growth and increased crop productivity [35]. Extensive research has demonstrated a significant correlation between enhanced plant growth and the biosynthesis of plant growth-promoting (PGP) metabolites by plant-beneficial bacteria (PBB) [33,34,35,36]. For instance, [36] reported that the enhanced growth of tomato and watermelon was closely associated with the synthesis of various PGP compounds such as IAA, siderophores and P- solubilizing metabolites. To validate this association, the isolate TCR11 identified as the most effective strain based on its highest vigor index in V. unguiculata was selected for further characterization. Remarkably, TCR11 demonstrated the ability to synthesize IAA at a concentration of 14.98 ± 0.34 µg/ml, produce siderophores at 24.62 ± 1.37%, and solubilize P at 16.12 ± 0.66 µg/ml (Table 2). Additionally, the strain tested positive for ammonia and catalase production. These findings support earlier reports that the biosynthesis of PGP metabolites plays a crucial role in enhancing plant growth and development [33,34,35]. Since the survival of inoculated PBB in the rhizosphere of new environments is often challenged by various abiotic stresses, we evaluated the tolerance of the strain TCR11 to heavy metals, and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced drought conditions. The strain TCR11 demonstrated notable resistance to heavy metals, including Zn up to 200 mg/L, Cd up to 150 mg/L, Cu up to 200 mg/L, Cr up to 500 mg/L, Ni up to 200 mg/L, and Pb up to 1000 mg/L. Additionally, it exhibited drought tolerance under PEG-induced stress up to 60%. This enhanced resistance to heavy metals and drought may be attributed to the origin of the strain, as it was isolated from tannery effluent-contaminated, drought-prone soil conditions that likely exerted selective pressure, enabling the strain to adapt and survive under extreme stress [37]. Similar findings were reported by [38] who observed that bacterial strains isolated from heavy metal contaminated soils exhibited high tolerance to heavy metal stress due to their acquired resilience in such environments. Analysis of the partial 16S rRNA sequence through the online BLAST program, followed by phylogenetic tree construction (Figure 1), revealed that the PBB TCR11 belongs to the genus Bacillus. The sequenced fragment comprising 1325 base pairs, was taxonomically classified as Bacillus velezensis and has been deposited to GenBank under the accession number MH718826.1.

Table 1. Effect of selected bacteria on vigor index of V. unguiculata

Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of strain TCR11 based on partial 16S rRNA sequences. Evolutionary relationships between TCR11 and closely related sequences obtained from the NCBI database were inferred using the neighbor- joining algorithm implemented in MEGA version 11.2.1.7

Table 2. Abiotic stress tolerance and plant growth-promoting features of B. velezensis TCR11

Table 3. Effect of BC on the growth of V. unguiculata

3.2. Preparation and Screening of BC for Encapsulation

Effective bioformulations must be carefully designed to promote the survival and establishment of inoculated microorganisms in the rhizosphere. Ensuring microbial persistence is crucial for the consistent release of PGP substances such as IAA, siderophores, and P-solubilizing compounds [3]. Beyond maintaining microbial viability, these formulations should enhance plant growth and improve soil quality by stimulating beneficial microbial interactions and optimizing nutrient dynamics [8]. In this study, to identify the most suitable BC for encapsulation, BCs derived from various agro-waste biomasses at different pyrolysis temperatures were evaluated for their compatibility with V. unguiculata and selected PBB strain TCR11 by assessing their effect on plant growth and microbial viability.

3.2.1. Effect of BC on the Growth of V. unguiculata

The effect of BC amendment on V. unguiculata growth was evaluated by measuring SL, RL, FW and DW. Overall, BC application demonstrated a positive influence on plant development, with noticeable improvements across all growth parameters. As documented in numerous studies, BC used as a soil amendment has a positive influence on plant growth due to its large surface area, well-developed pore structure, abundance of oxygen-containing functional groups, and high CEC [13,18]. These properties enhance nutrient availability and retention, thereby improving crop performance by directly modifying soil physicochemical conditions [39,40,41]. However, compared to sawdust-derived BC, bamboo-derived BC consistently promoted greater shoot and root elongation, along with increased biomass accumulation. This improvement may be ascribed to the physico-chemical properties of BC such as pH, surface area, porosity, and nutrient composition which directly affect soil fertility, microbial activity, and consequently plant growth [39]. Previous studies have revealed that bamboo BC is typically rich in essential nutrients including K, Ca and Mg, which enhance nutrient availability and stimulate plant growth [42,43,44]. In contrast, BC derived from hardwoods or low-nutrient feedstocks tends to exhibit lower PGP efficiency due to limited nutrient content and reduced microbial support [45]. Notably, among the bamboo BC tested, the BC produced at 550°C (BB2) resulted in the highest plant growth enhancement, with SL increasing by 53%, RL by 76%, FW by 123%, and DW by 229% compared to the control. It is well established that BC produced at moderate to high pyrolysis temperatures (450–550°C) possess improved structural integrity, higher surface area, and enhanced porosity, which contribute to better water retention and nutrient exchange in the soil [44]. For example, wheat straw-derived BC produced at 550°C significantly increased water-stable aggregates and available water content, improving soil structure and moisture conservation by up to 166% over untreated soil [46]. Similarly, [47] reported that water hyacinth BC produced at 550°C enhanced plant height and biomass in maize, likely due to increased N and P availability and improved CEC. These findings also suggest that BC produced at 550°C contains functional groups such as carboxylic acids and amines, along with a high nutrient load [48], and exhibits increased pore volume and spatial structure [49], creating an optimal environment for plant growth. Although our findings clearly demonstrate the significant impact of bamboo BC produced at 550°C on the growth of V. unguiculata, comprehensive physico-chemical characterization and molecular-level analysis are essential to elucidate the precise mechanisms responsible for its PGP effects.

3.2.2. Effect of biochar on the growth of PBB

Before selecting an appropriate material for the encapsulation matrix, it is crucial to assess whether the candidate substances can support microbial viability or, at the very least, do not exert inhibitory effects on the target microorganisms [50]. BC, due to its diverse physico-chemical properties such as chemical composition, feedstock origin, and the presence of water-soluble organic compounds has been reported to either stimulate or suppress bacterial growth depending on its characteristics and the microbial strain involved [51]. In the present study, we investigated the influence of BC on the growth of B. velezensis TCR11 in tryptone soya broth. The results demonstrated a consistent stimulatory effect across all BC treatments, with significantly enhanced bacterial proliferation compared to the untreated control (Figure 2). This suggests that BC, irrespective of its source and pyrolysis temperature, can serve as a favourable amendment for promoting microbial growth. The observed enhancement in TCR11 proliferation is likely attributable to BC’s carbon source, high surface area, porous architecture, strong adsorption capacity and high-water retention. These properties facilitate microbial colonization by providing protective microhabitats and improving the retention of moisture and nutrients essential for microbial metabolism and replication [52]. However, among the BC tested, BB2 exhibited the most pronounced positive effect, achieving a peak cell density of 5.64 × 10⁵ CFU/mL within 24 hours of incubation. This may be linked to its pyrolysis temperature of 550°C, which is known to enhance the structural stability and chemical functionality of BC [46]. BC pyrolyzed at elevated temperatures typically exhibit lower concentrations of volatile organic compounds and higher fixed carbon content, both of which contribute to a more stable and nutrient-rich environment conducive to microbial proliferation [46,51]. Our findings align with previous reports indicating that high-temperature BC can improve microbial viability and activity by minimizing toxic residues and enhancing nutrient availability [53]. Although the positive response of B. velezensis TCR11 to BB2 confirms its compatibility with the strain, further investigations such as detailed characterization of BC properties and molecular-level studies on BC–PBB interactions are necessary to elucidate the mechanisms through which BC enhances bacterial growth.

Figure 2. Impact of BC on the growth of B. velezensis TCR11 in tryptone soya broth. BB1: Bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 400°C, BB2: Bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 550°C, BB3: Bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 700°C, SB1: Sawdust BC pyrolyzed at 400°C, SB2: Sawdust BC pyrolyzed at 550°C, SB3: Sawdust BC pyrolyzed at 700°C. Error bars (±) indicate the standard deviation from three replicates. Treatments marked with the same letter do not differ significantly, based on Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05

3.3. Encapsulation of B. velezensis TCR11 in SA and BC macrobeads

Figure 3. TCR11 encapsulated beads with BC (a) and without BC (b)

This study employed ionotropic gelation to synthesize BC–alginate composite beads. SA solutions with or without BC and TCR11, were dispensed dropwise into a CaCl₂ solution, resulting in the formation of small, spherical, insoluble macrobeads with size ranging from 1 mm to 2 mm. Beads appeared white in the absence of BC and black when BC was incorporated (Figure 3). The gelation mechanism is driven by ionic exchange, where Ca²⁺ replace Na⁺ and interact with –COO⁻ on the guluronic acid segments of alginate. This interaction forms a robust hydrogel matrix, often described by the "egg-box" model of calcium–alginate crosslinking [54]. Similarly, BC enhances the structural and functional integrity of the composite through its surface-active groups including –OH, –COOH, and –C=O which participate in hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions with the alginate polymer [55]. The viable count of B. velezensis TCR11 in TCR11+SA and TCR11+SA+BB2 beads was found to be 3.9 × 10⁵ CFU/g and 4.62 × 10⁵ CFU/g, respectively, indicating that the incorporation of BC did not affect the encapsulation efficiency of the beads.

3.4. Effect of PBB Macrobeads on V. unguiculata

3.4.1. Plant Growth

Table 4. Effect of PBB microbeads on the growth of V. unguiculata

Table 4 illustrates the impact of free and encapsulated B. velezensis TCR11 macrobeads on the growth of V. unguiculata. The findings reveal that both free and encapsulated forms of PBB significantly enhanced plant growth traits compared to the untreated control. This improvement may be ascribed to the synergistic or independent effects of TCR11 and BB2. PBB are known to improve plant growth through multiple mechanisms, including the synthesis of IAA, siderophores, and solubilization of P [56]. These traits collectively promote root development, increase the bioavailability of nutrients such as Fe and P, and facilitate their uptake by plants [57]. For instance, [58] recently reported that inoculation with a PBB B. pumilus JIZ13 led to enhanced plant growth, biomass accumulation, and nutrient acquisition, primarily through the synthesis of key metabolites associated with growth promotion. Likewise, BC has been widely recognized as an effective soil amendment that enhances key physico-chemical properties, including soil porosity, moisture retention, and nutrient-holding capacity, thereby contributing to improved plant development. [59] assessed the impact of poultry manure BC on the growth of Cicer arietinum, Zea mays, Glycine max and Vigna radiata in alkaline soils. Their findings revealed significant improvements in plant growth and related parameters, primarily attributed to the BC’s ability to increase soil water-holding capacity and optimize the root-zone environment. Interestingly, the highest growth response in our study was observed in the TCR11+SA+BB2 treatment, which led to increases of 84% in SL, 131% in RL, 121% in FW, and 177% in DW compared to the untreated control plants. These outcomes indicate that the synergistic interaction between PBB and BC significantly enhanced overall plant development. In addition to their individual benefits, BC likely created a favourable microenvironment that supported the survival and activity of the encapsulated PBB in the rhizosphere, thereby facilitating the synthesis of key PGP metabolites [60].

3.4.2. TCR11 Colonization

To validate the relationship between BC and the survival of B. velezensis TCR11 in the rhizosphere, the colonization of TCR11 in the rhizosphere of V. unguiculata was assessed (Figure 4). While colonization was evident across all treatments, the highest levels were recorded in the TCR11+SA+BB2 treatment (4.67× 10⁵ CFU/g), followed by TCR11+SA (2.89× 10⁵ CFU/g), and free TCR11 (2.08× 10⁵ CFU/g), suggesting that BB2 provides a favourable microenvironment for the survival and establishment of TCR11 in the rhizosphere. These results are consistent with those of [61], who found that BC application enhances soil physico-chemical properties including pH, moisture retention, and nutrient availability thereby increasing the abundance of Pseudomonas sp. TP27 in the rhizosphere. BC is known to supply essential nutrients like P and N, which promote microbial proliferation and facilitate root colonization [62]. Furthermore, BC improves carbon availability, stimulates microbial activity, enhances soil structure, and supports overall plant health [63]. [64] also demonstrated that wheat straw BC significantly increased rhizospheric bacterial populations in winter wheat, attributing this effect to its porous architecture and nutrient-rich composition that favour microbial habitation and proliferation. The enhanced colonization (Figure 4) and improved plant growth (Table 4) observed in the TCR11+SA+BB2 treatment, compared to free TCR11, confirm that the synergistic interaction between BB2 and TCR11 plays a pivotal role in optimizing plant growth.

Figure 4. Colonization efficiency of B. velezensis TCR11 in the rhizosphere of V. unguiculata. The results are expressed as mean values with standard deviations, based on three independent replicates. Treatments labeled with identical letters indicate no statistically significant variation, as assessed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test at a 5% significance level (p < 0.05). SA– sodium alginate; BB2 – bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 550°C; TCR11 – B. velezensis

3.4.3. Pigment Contents in V. unguiculata

Since plant health is closely linked to pigment concentration and overall photosynthetic efficiency, the impact of free and encapsulated B. velezensis TCR11 on pigment content in V. unguiculata was assessed. Plants treated with either free or encapsulated TCR11 showed elevated pigment levels compared to the untreated control (Figure 5). Notably, the TCR11+SA+BB2 treatment resulted in a marked increase, with chlorophyll a rising by 116%, chlorophyll b by 141%, total chlorophyll by 121%, and carotenoids by 98%. This enhancement can be attributed to the role of BC in improving soil structure, porosity, and water-holding capacity, along with its potential to retain and supply essential nutrients such as N, Mg, and Fe [65]. These favourable conditions support both plant and microbial activity, stimulate root development, and enhance nutrient uptake ultimately promoting chlorophyll biosynthesis [66]. Our findings align with those of [67], who reported that wheat-straw BC significantly augmented chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content in wheat, attributing the improvement to enhanced nutrient uptake. Similarly, [68] found that maize straw BC application in peanut crops elevated leaf N levels, which were positively associated with increased chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthetic efficiency. In support of this, [28] recently demonstrated that coconut husk BC-amended soils facilitated colonization of Enterobacter hormaechei which produce various PGP metabolites, resulting in elevated chlorophyll and carotenoid levels in Ricinus communis. In our study, the observed increase in pigment levels aligns with the overall enhancement in plant growth (Table 4) under the TCR11+SA+BB2 treatment, suggesting that TCR11 and BB2 work synergistically to enhance pigment biosynthesis. This effect is likely mediated through improved soil physico-chemical properties and greater nutrient uptake by plants. However, further research focusing on detailed soil characterization is warranted to confirm these interactions and underlying mechanisms.

Figure 5. Impact of free and encapsulated TCR11 on pigment levels in V. unguiculata. Mean values ± SD from three replicates are shown for (a) chlorophyll a, (b) chlorophyll b, (c) total chlorophyll, and (d) carotenoids. Identical letters indicate no significant difference (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). SA – sodium alginate; BB2 – bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 550°C; TCR11 – B. velezensis; chl – chlorophyll; fw – fresh weight

3.4.4. Protein Contents in V. unguiculata

Figure 6. Influence of free and encapsulated TCR11 on protein levels in V. unguiculata. Values are shown as means ± SD from three replicates. Treatments with matching letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). SA – sodium alginate; BB2 – bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 550°C; TCR11 – B. velezensis; fw – fresh weight

Numerous prior investigations have demonstrated that BC amendments significantly improve soil physico-chemical characteristics, enhance microbial diversity, and stimulate microbial activity [69,70,71]. These effects collectively facilitate more efficient nutrient cycling and contribute to increased protein content in plants. Accordingly, the present study assessed the influence of both free and encapsulated PBB on protein accumulation in V. unguiculata. Consistent with their positive effects on plant growth and pigment contents, both free and encapsulated PBB significantly increased leaf protein content in V. unguiculata. Notably, the TCR11+SA+BB2 treatment resulted in a marked increase in protein content by 126% compared to the untreated control (Figure 6). This enhancement is likely attributable to the effects of BC, which promotes microbial survival and activity, thereby improving root architecture, nutrient cycling, bioavailability and uptake leading to enhanced plant growth and protein synthesis. Additionally, BC influence on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties contributes to increased water and nutrient retention, reduced nutrient leaching, and improved nutrient availability [28]. As a soil conditioner, BC preserves essential nutrients such as N, P and micronutrients, with N playing a direct role in protein biosynthesis [72]. Similarly, [73] demonstrated that corn straw BC application elevated total and ammonium N levels and enhanced microbial biomass N, factors closely associated with protein synthesis in plants. Supporting this, [74] reported that BC significantly increased PBB abundance and improved N-related soil parameters, resulting in higher crop yields. Similarly, [75] observed that corn straw BC application improved root morphology and increased soil nitrate and ammonium concentrations, thereby enhancing N availability and promoting plant growth.

3.4.5. Relative Water Contents in V. unguiculata

Relative water content (RWC) is a vital physiological metric used to assess the internal water status of plant tissues. It reflects the degree of cellular hydration and is closely tied to the availability of soil moisture, influencing plant health and agricultural yield [76]. In the present study, untreated V. unguiculata exhibited the lowest RWC, indicating suboptimal water retention. In contrast, treatments involving SA+BB2 and TCR11+SA+BB2 improved plant water status, as evidenced by increased RWC values (Figure 7). Notably, the treatment of TCR11+SA+BB2 resulted in a marked 11% increase in RWC, underscoring the synergistic role of TCR11 and BB2 in enhancing plant hydration. This improvement in RWC may be attributed to enhanced root development facilitated by PBB, which expand the root surface area and improve water absorption from the soil [77]. PBB also modulate physiological processes by activating aquaporins (water channel proteins) in root cells [78], regulating stomatal conductance [79], and promoting the accumulation of osmolytes like proline and soluble sugars [80], factors that collectively contribute to improved plant water retention. Furthermore, BC has been shown to significantly enhance PBB survival and activity in the rhizosphere by creating a conducive microenvironment. This interaction stimulates root proliferation and improves root architecture, thereby increasing the plant’s capacity for water uptake [53]. Recent findings also suggest that the synergistic effect of BC and microbial communities not only expands root surface area but also enhances soil moisture retention and hydraulic conductivity [52]. Consequently, plants treated with these amendments exhibit superior water uptake efficiency and elevated RWC in their tissues. Overall, the observed increase in RWC can be correlated with the cumulative effects of PBB and BC, which help maintain water balance and contribute to improved plant growth.

Figure 7. Influence of free and encapsulated TCR11 on relative water content in V. unguiculata. Data are shown as mean ± SD from three replicates. Treatments sharing the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD, p < 0.05). SA – sodium alginate; BB2 – bamboo BC pyrolyzed at 550°C; TCR11 – B. velezensis

4. Conclusion

The results of our study demonstrate that both free and encapsulated forms of B. velezensis TCR11 significantly enhanced various traits in V. unguiculata, including shoot length, root length, fresh weight, dry weight, leaf pigment content (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids), total protein levels and relative water contents, compared to the untreated control. These improvements can be ascribed to the combined beneficial effects of BC and PBB. Notably, macrobeads containing both BC and PBB (TCR11+SA+BB2) were found to be more effective in promoting plant growth. This suggests that the encapsulated BC within the beads provides a conducive microenvironment for the survival and activity of B. velezensis TCR11, thereby enhancing the physiological responses of plants through the production of PGP metabolites. To further elucidate the underlying mechanisms, a molecular-level investigation is warranted to uncover how BC and PBB-based beads contribute to plant development. Current research efforts are focused on evaluating the efficacy of TCR11 and BB2 formulations under field conditions to validate their role in improving crop performance. This research deepens insight into the interactions among plant, PBB and BC, while contributing to the design of eco-friendly bioformulations that support improved plant development and agricultural yield.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

S.S thankfully acknowledges the financial support from DST PURSE - II, Bharathiar University (File No. BU/DST PURSE (II) /APPOINTMENT/571).

References

[1]   | Etesami, H., “The dual nature of plant growth-promoting bacteria: Benefits, risks, and pathways to sustainable deployment”, Current Research in Microbial Sciences, 100421. 2025.
[2]   | Sharma, N., Mahawar, L., Mishra, A., Albrectsen, B.R., “Microbial contributions to plant growth and stress tolerance: Mechanisms for sustainable plant production”, Plant Stress, 100966. 2025.
[3]   | He, S., Li, L., Lv, M., Wang, R., Wang, L., Yu, S., Li, X., “PGPR: key to enhancing crop productivity and achieving sustainable agriculture”, Current Microbiology, 81 (11). 377. 2024.
[4]   | Zhu, X.X., Shi, L.N., Shi, H.M., Ye, J.R., “Characterization of the Priestia megaterium ZS-3 siderophore and studies on its growth-promoting effects”, BMC microbiology, 25 (1). 133. 2025.
[5]   | Rawat, P., Das, S., Shankhdhar, D., Shankhdhar, S.C., “Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake”, Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21 (1). 49-68. 2021.
[6]   | Samonty, I., Hasan, M.Z., Hossain, M.R., Mahamud, A.G.M., “The PGPB paradox: A critical review of field performance and practical constraints in agriculture”, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 41 (9). 1-15. 2025.
[7]   | Mushtaq, N., Iqbal, A., Batool, S., Janiad, S., Ahmed, M., Al-Asmari, F., Zongo, E., “Alginate beads encapsulated auxin-producing PGPR as a biofertilizer promotes Triticum aestivum growth”, ACS omega, 10 (5). 4303-4314. 2025.

[8]  
Mousa, E.S.M., Elbagory, M., Mahdy, M.E., Abo-Koura, H.A., Omara, A.E.D., “Microencapsulation of Bacillus megaterium in humic acid-supplied alginate beads enhances tomato growth and suppresses the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica under greenhouse conditions”, Horticulturae, 10 (12). 1284. 2024.

[9]   | Khatun, M.R., Azad, M.A.K., Mondal, M.I.H., “Characterization and slow-release of urea fertilizer of hydrogel composites based on poly (vinyl alcohol)/sodium alginate/humic acid/citric acid”, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 144295. 2025.

[10]  
da Silva, M.S.R.D.A., dos Santos, B.D.M.S., da Silva, C.S.R.D.A., da Silva, C.S.R.D.A., Antunes, L.F.D.S., dos Santos, R.M., Rigobelo, E.C., “Humic substances in combination with plant growth-promoting bacteria as an alternative for sustainable agriculture”, Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 719653. 2021.

[11]   | Trivedi, P., Pandey, A., Palni, L.M.S., “Carrier-based preparations of plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculants suitable for use in cooler regions”, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21 (6). 941-945. 2005.
[12]   | Saxena, J., “Efficacy of rhizobacterial strains encapsulated in nontoxic biodegradable gel matrices to promote growth and yield of wheat plants”, Applied soil ecology, 48 (3), 301-308. 2011.
[13]   | Ni, J.J., Bordoloi, S., Shao, W., Garg, A., Xu, G., Sarmah, A.K., “Two-year evaluation of hydraulic properties of biochar-amended vegetated soil for application in landfill cover system”, Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136486. 2020.
[14]   | Ng, C.W.W., Guo, H., Ni, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, Z., “Effects of soil–plant-biochar interactions on water retention and slope stability under various rainfall patterns”, Landslides, 19 (6). 1379-1390. 2022.
[15]   | Rombel, A., Krasucka, P., Oleszczuk, P., “Sustainable biochar-based soil fertilizers and amendments as a new trend in biochar research”, Science of the total environment, 816, 151588. 2022.
[16]   | Dai, Y., Zheng, H., Jiang, Z., Xing, B., “Combined effects of biochar properties and soil conditions on plant growth: A meta-analysis”, Science of the total environment, 713, 136635. 2020.
[17]   | Guo, H., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y., Lu, H., “Effects of biochar on plant growth and hydro-chemical properties of recycled concrete aggregate”, Science of the Total Environment, 882, 163557. 2023.
[18]   | Gul, F., Khan, I.U., Rutherford, S., Dai, Z.C., Li, G., Du, D.L., “Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and biochar production from Parthenium hysterophorus enhance seed germination and productivity in barley under drought stress”, Frontiers in plant science, 14, 1175097. 2023.
[19]   | Marzan, L.W., Hossain, M., Mina, S.A., Akter, Y., Chowdhury, A.M.A., “Isolation and biochemical characterization of heavy-metal resistant bacteria from tannery effluent in Chittagong city, Bangladesh: Bioremediation viewpoint”, Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 43 (1). 65-74. 2017.
[20]   | Abdul‐Baki, A.A., Anderson, J.D., “Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria 1”, Crop science, 13 (6), 630-633. 1973.
[21]   | Bric, J.M., Bostock, R.M., Silverstone, S.E, “Rapid in situ assay for indole acetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane”, Applied and environmental microbiology, 57 (2). 535-538. Feb.1991.
[22]   | Schwyn, B., Neilands, J.B, “Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores”, Analytical biochemistry, 160 (1). 47-56. Jan.1987.
[23]   | Suleman, M., Yasmin, S., Rasul, M., Yahya, M., Atta, B.M., Mirza, M.S., “Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat”, PloS one, 13 (9). e0204408. 2018.
[24]   | Cappuccino, J.G., Sherman, N., “Microbiology, A Laboratory Manual, Second edition. The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Co. Inc, San Francisco, USA. 1996.
[25]   | Abd El-Rahman, A. F., Shaheen, H.A., Abd El-Aziz, R.M., Ibrahim, D.S., “Influence of hydrogen cyanide-producing rhizobacteria in controlling the crown gall and root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita”, Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 29 (1). 1-11. 2019.
[26]   | Sheng, X.F., Xia, J.J., Jiang, C.Y., He, L.Y., Qian, M., “Characterization of heavy metal-resistant endophytic bacteria from rape (Brassica napus) roots and their potential in promoting the growth and lead accumulation of rape”, Environmental pollution, 156 (3). 1164-1170. 2008.
[27]   | Siddikee, M.A., Chauhan, P. S., Anandham, R., Han, G.H., Sa, T., “Isolation, characterization, and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria derived from coastal soil”, Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 20 (11). 1577-1584. 2010.

[28]  
Anbuganesan, V., Vishnupradeep, R., Varshini, V.S., Archana, A.S., Soundarya, S., Bruno, L.B., Rajkumar, M., “Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and biochar on Ricinus communis growth, physiology, nutrient uptake and soil enzyme activities”, Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 10, 640-651. 2022.

[29]   | Wu, P., Qian, T.T., Fan, T.T., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Zhou, D.M., Wang, Y.J., “Time-dependent evolution of Zn (II) fractions in soils remediated by wheat straw biochar”, Science of the Total Environment, 717, 137021. 2020.
[30]   | Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M., Zhang, C., Freitas, H., “Inoculation of Brassica oxyrrhina with plant growth promoting bacteria for the improvement of heavy metal phytoremediation under drought conditions”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 320, 36-44. 2016.
[31]   | Smith, J.H.C., Benitez, A., “Chlorophylls analysis in plant materials. In: Peach, K. and Tracey, M.V (eds.)”, Modern methods of plant analysis, Springer, Verlag, Berlin, 4, 142-196. 1955.
[32]   | Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J., “Protein measurement with the fol in phenol reagent”, Journal of biological chemistry, 193 (1). 265-275. Nov.1951.
[33]   | Hareem, M., Mahmood, S., Danish, S., Iqbal, R.K., Alarfaj, A.A., Alharbi, S.A., “Influence of indole acetic acid, arginine and mango fruit waste biochar on nutrients, chlorophyll contents and antioxidants of Fenugreek in salt affected soil”, Scientific Reports, 15 (1). 167. 2025.
[34]   | Truong, H.N., Fournier, C., Hichami, S., Dole, L., Leroy, F., Wendehenne, D., Besson-Bard, A., “Apo-siderophores promote growth of iron-deficient Arabidopsis plants by mobilizing iron from roots to shoots and reducing oxidative stress in roots”, Plant Stress, 12. 100488. 2024.
[35]   | Pattnaik, S., Mohapatra, B., Gupta, A., “Plant growth-promoting microbe mediated uptake of essential nutrients (Fe, P, K) for crop stress management: Microbe–soil–plant continuum”, Frontiers in Agronomy, 3. 689972. 2021.
[36]   | Ünlü, E., Yilmaz, S., Yetişir, H., Karim, A.A., Gün, B., Idris, A.B., “Characterization of multi-trait plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from alfalfa rhizosphere and evaluation of their efficacy on tomato and watermelon growth”, Discover Agriculture, 2 (1). 117. 2024.

[37]  
Vishnupradeep, R., Bruno, L.B., Taj, Z., Karthik, C., Challabathula, D., Kumar, A., Rajkumar, M., “Plant growth promoting bacteria improve growth and phytostabilization potential of Zea mays under chromium and drought stress by altering photosynthetic and antioxidant responses”, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 25, 102154. 2022.

[38]   | Abbas, S., Zulfiqar, S., Arshad, M., Khalid, N., Hussain, A., Ahmed, I., “Molecular characterization of heavy metal-tolerant bacteria and their potential for bioremediation and plant growth promotion”, Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, 1644466. 2025.

[39]  
Rehman, M.Z.U., Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Fatima, N., Yousaf, B., Naeem, A., Ok, Y.S., “Contrasting effects of biochar, compost and farm manure on alleviation of nickel toxicity in maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to plant growth, photosynthesis and metal uptake”, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 133, 218-225. 2016.

[40]   | Ahmad, M., Usman, A.R., Al-Faraj, A.S., Ahmad, M., Sallam, A., Al-Wabel, M.I., “Phosphorus-loaded biochar changes soil heavy metals availability and uptake potential of maize (Zea mays L.) plants”, Chemosphere, 194, 327-339. 2018.
[41]   | Deng, P., Wan, W., Azeem, M., Riaz, L., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Yuan, W., “Characterization of biochar derived from bamboo and its application to modulate the toxic effects of chromium on wheat plant”, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 1-16. 2022.
[42]   | Yan, P., Shen, C., Zou, Z., Fu, J., Li, X., Zhang, L., Fan, L., “Biochar stimulates tea growth by improving nutrients in acidic soil”, Scientia Horticulturae, 283, 110078. 2021.
[43]   | Li, W., Sheng, H., “Effects of bamboo charcoal-based bio-fertilizer on wine bamboo sap yield and nutrient composition”, Journal of Forestry Research, 29 (4). 1083-1092. 2018.
[44]   | Sahoo, S.S., Vijay, V.K., Chandra, R., Kumar, H., “Production and characterization of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of pigeon pea stalk and bamboo”, Cleaner engineering and technology, 3, 100101. 2021.
[45]   | Wang, L., Olsen, M.N., Moni, C., Dieguez-Alonso, A., de la Rosa, J.M., Stenrød, M., Mao, L., “Comparison of properties of biochar produced from different types of lignocellulosic biomass by slow pyrolysis at 600 C”, Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 12, 100090. 2022.
[46]   | Ghorbani, M., Amirahmadi, E., Neugschwandtner, R.W., Konvalina, P., Kopecký, M., Moudrý, J., Murindangabo, Y.T., “The impact of pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties and its effects on soil hydrological properties”, Sustainability, 14 (22). 14722. 2022.
[47]   | Gezahegn, A., Selassie, Y.G., Agegnehu, G., Addisu, S., Mihretie, F.A., Kohira, Y., Sato, S., “The impact of water hyacinth biochar on maize growth and soil properties: The influence of pyrolysis temperature”, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 3 (3). e12117. 2024.
[48]   | Yuan, J., Liang, X., Yang, X., “Impact of biochar on the flowering and growth of strawberry varied with different pyrolysis temperatures”, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1-10. 2025.
[49]   | Yang, L., Li, S., Ahmed, W., Jiang, T., Mei, F., Hu, X., Zhao, Z., “Exploring the relationship between biochar pore structure and microbial community composition in promoting tobacco growth”, Plants, 13 (21). 2952. 2024.

[50]  
Altamirano-Ríos, A.V., Guadarrama-Lezama, A.Y., Arroyo-Maya, I.J., Hernandez-Alvarez, A.J., Orozco-Villafuerte, J., “Effect of encapsulation methods and materials on the survival and viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus: A review”, International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57 (7). 4027-4040. 2022.

[51]   | Yang, F., Zhou, Y., Liu, W., Tang, W., Meng, J., Chen, W., Li, X., “Strain-specific effects of biochar and its water-soluble compounds on bacterial growth”, Applied Sciences, 9 (16). 3209. 2019.
[52]   | Kannan, P., Paramasivan, M., Marimuthu, S., Swaminathan, C., “Applying both biochar and phosphobacteria enhances aqxr mungo L. growth and yield in acid soils by increasing soil pH, moisture content, microbial growth and P availability”, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 308, 107258. 2021.
[53]   | Azeem, M., Hassan, T.U., Tahir, M.I., Ali, A., Jeyasundar, P.G.S.A., Hussain, Q., Zhang, Z., “Tea leaves biochar as a carrier of Bacillus cereus improves the soil function and crop productivity”, Applied soil ecology, 157, 103732. 2021.
[54]   | Cao, L., Lu, W., Mata, A., Nishinari, K., Fang, Y., “Egg-box model-based gelation of alginate and pectin: A review”, Carbohydrate polymers, 242, 116389. 2020.
[55]   | Zhao, Y., Wang, C., Han, Q., Fang, Z., Gao, Y., Chen, H., Li, J., Yang, X., Chen, J., Wang, H., “Recent advances in biochar-based hydrogel composites: Preparation, aquatic environmental applications, and adsorption mechanisms”, Processes, 13 (3). 664. 2025.
[56]   | Ganesh, J., Hewitt, K., Devkota, A.R., Wilson, T., Kaundal, A., “IAA-producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from Ceanothus velutinus enhance cutting propagation efficiency and Arabidopsis biomass”, Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1374877. 2024.
[57]   | Alotaibi, F., St-Arnaud, M., Hijri, M., “In-depth characterization of plant growth promotion potentials of selected alkanes-degrading plant growth-promoting bacterial isolates”, Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 863702. 2022.

[58]  
Wang, G., Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Li, B., Li, J., Wang, X., Ji, J., “The combined use of a plant growth promoting Bacillus sp. strain and GABA promotes the growth of rice under salt stress by regulating antioxidant enzyme system, enhancing photosynthesis and improving soil enzyme activities”, Microbiological Research, 266, 127225. 2023.

[59]   | Taskin, M.B., Kadioglu, Y.K., Sahin, O., Inal, A., Gunes, A., “Effect of acid modified biochar on the growth and essential and non-essential element content of bean, chickpea, soybean, and maize grown in calcareous soil”, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 50 (13). 1604-1613. 2019.

[60]  
Širić, I., Eid, E.M., Taher, M.A., El-Morsy, M.H.E., Osman, H.E.M., Kumar, P., Adelodun, B., Abou Fayssal, S., Mioč, B., Andabaka, Ž., Goala, M., Kumari, S., Bachheti, A., Choi, K.S., Kumar, V., “Combined use of spent mushroom substrate biochar and PGPR improves growth, yield, and biochemical response of cauliflower ( Brassica oleracea var. botrytis ): A Preliminary Study on Greenhouse Cultivation”, Horticulturae, 8 (9). 830. 2022.

[61]   | Jin, X., Bai, Y., Khashi u Rahman, M., Kang, X., Pan, K., Wu, F., Wei, Z., “Biochar stimulates tomato roots to recruit a bacterial assemblage contributing to disease resistance against Fusarium wilt”, Imeta, 1 (3). e37. 2022.
[62]   | Jiang, Z., Li, Q., Peng, F., Yu, J., “Biochar loaded with a bacterial strain N33 facilitates Pecan seedling growth and shapes rhizosphere microbial community”, Plants, 13 (9). 1226. 2024.
[63]   | Rasool, M., Akhter, A., Soja, G., Haider, M.S., “Role of biochar, compost and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the management of tomato early blight disease”, Scientific reports, 11 (1). 6092. 2021.
[64]   | Li, W., Hou, Y., Long, M., Wen, X., Han, J., Liao, Y., “Long-term effects of biochar application on rhizobacteria community and winter wheat growth on the Loess Plateau in China”, Geoderma, 429, 116250. 2023.
[65]   | Bibi, S., Ullah, R., Burni, T., Ullah, Z., Kazi, M., “Impact of resorcinol and biochar application on the growth attributes, metabolite contents, and antioxidant systems of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”, ACS omega, 8 (48). 45750-45762. 2023.
[66]   | Yan, X., Wang, Z., Zhao, M., Hao, J., Liu, J., Yan, Y., Ge, G., “Hydrothermal biochar enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and yield of alfalfa by optimizing soil chemical properties and stimulating the activity of microbial communities”, Scientific Reports, 14 (1). 31420. 2024.

[67]  
Duan, S., Al-Huqail, A.A., Alsudays, I.M., Younas, M., Aslam, A., Shahzad, A.N., Hong Yong, J.W., “Effects of biochar types on seed germination, growth, chlorophyll contents, grain yield, sodium, and potassium uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress”, BMC Plant Biology, 24 (1). 487. 2024.

[68]   | Wang, S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Yang, Q., Chen, T., Chen, Y., Wang, T., “Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of peanut in response to biochar application”, Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 650432. 2021.
[69]   | Garbuz, S., Mackay, A., Camps-Arbestain, M., DeVantier, B., Minor, M., “Biochar amendment improves soil physico-chemical properties and alters root biomass and the soil food web in grazed pastures”, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 319, 107517. 2021.
[70]   | Yin, S., Suo, F., Zheng, Y., You, X., Li, H., Wang, J., Cheng, Y., “Biochar-compost amendment enhanced sorghum growth and yield by improving soil physicochemical properties and shifting soil bacterial community in a coastal soil”, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1036837. 2022.
[71]   | Cheng, J., Sun, Q., Liu, L., “Modified biochar-immobilized Bacillus spp. for the release of nutrients and its response to soil microbial community activity and structure”, Industrial Crops and Products, 225, 120466. 2025.
[72]   | Adekiya, A.O., Ogunbode, T.O., Esan, V.I., Adedokun, O., Olatubi, I.V., Ayegboyin, M.H., “Short term effects of biochar on soil chemical properties, growth, yield, quality, and shelf life of tomato”, Scientific Reports, 15 (1). 24965. 2025.
[73]   | Hu, T., Wei, J., Du, L., Chen, J., Zhang, J., “The effect of biochar on nitrogen availability and bacterial community in farmland”, Annals of Microbiology, 73 (1). 4. 2023.
[74]   | Zou, Q., Zhao, L., Guan, L., Chen, P., Zhao, J., Zhao, Y., Xie, Y., “The synergistic interaction effect between biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on beneficial microbial communities in soil”, Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1501400. 2024.
[75]   | Chai, J., Yang, H., Chen, Z., Li, W., Li, D., Yu, X., “Biochar and nitrogen fertilizer promote Alfalfa yield by regulating root development, osmoregulatory substances and improve soil physicochemical properties”, Agriculture, 15 (3). 239. 2025.
[76]   | Patanè, C., Cosentino, S.L., Romano, D., Toscano, S., “Relative water content, proline, and antioxidant enzymes in leaves of long shelf-life tomatoes under drought stress and rewatering”, Plants, 11 (22). 3045. 2022.
[77]   | Akhtyamova, Z., Martynenko, E., Arkhipova, T., Seldimirova, O., Galin, I., Belimov, A., Kudoyarova, G., “Influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the formation of apoplastic barriers and uptake of water and potassium by wheat plants”, Microorganisms, 11 (5). 1227. 2023.
[78]   | Wang, R., Wang, M., Chen, K., Wang, S., Mur, L.A.J., Guo, S., “Exploring the roles of aquaporins in plant–microbe interactions”, Cells, 7 (12). 267. 2018.
[79]   | Abd El-Mageed, T.A., Abd El-Mageed, S.A., El-Saadony, M.T., Abdelaziz, S., Abdou, N.M., “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve growth, morph-physiological responses, water productivity, and yield of rice plants under full and deficit drip irrigation”, Rice, 15 (1). 16. 2022.
[80]   | Sapre, S., Gontia-Mishra, I., Tiwari, S., “Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria ameliorates salinity stress in pea (Pisum sativum)”, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41 (2). 647-656. 2022.