<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>International Journal of Physics</journalTitle>
<eissn>2333-4576</eissn>
<publicationDate>2021-11-15</publicationDate>
<volume>9</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<startPage>275</startPage>
<endPage>279</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/ijp-9-6-3</doi>
<publisherRecordId>IJP2021963</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Reexamine Copenhagen Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Zhonglin BO</name>
<email>bill.b.bo@dupont.com</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Dupont China Technical Center, 600 Cailun Road, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">We reexamined the Copenhagen interpretations of quantum mechanics from the perspectives of mathematical deduction, logic reasoning process and intrinsic physical nature of wave function. We conclude that all the HeisenbergĄ¯s uncertainty principle, Born rule, and BohrĄ¯s complimentary principle were not correct. Even for a quantum particle, at specific time, it must be classically localized but not non-local. Based on our analysis and deduction, the right interpretations to quantum mechanics were also developed.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/ijp/9/6/3/ijp-9-6-3.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>HeisenbergĄ¯s uncertainty principle</keyword>
<keyword>Born rule</keyword>
<keyword>BohrĄ¯s complimentary principle</keyword>
<keyword>wave function collapse</keyword>
<keyword>wave function superposition</keyword>
<keyword>Copenhagen interpretations</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
