Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Black Holes as the Source of All Matter and Radiation in the Universe

Jarl-Thure Eriksson

Åbo Akademi University, Finland

Abstract: An in-depth study of general relativity has led to the development of a theory, CBU for the continuously breeding universe, in which the universe emerges from a quantum fluctuation and continues to expand due to the inflow of new matter, foremostly electrons and positrons. According to a novel model for black holes, a continuous inflow of matter prevents the black holes from becoming singularities, the contraction pressure is counteracted by the expansion pressure. The study shows that the gravitational energy gap between the event horizon and the inner photon sphere of a black hole is the source of incoming real matter from a QED vacuum foam of virtual particles. The calculated CBU results are in good agreement with current observations.

Keywords: black holes, general relativity, quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation, Heisenberg uncertainty

Received June 12, 2022; Revised July 22, 2022; Accepted July 29, 2022

Citation: Jarl-Thure Eriksson, Black Holes as the Source of All Matter and Radiation in the Universe. International Journal of Physics, 10 (3). 144-153. January 2022. doi:10.12691/ijp-10-3-3

1. Introduction

In 1937 the prominent British physicist Paul Dirac published his Large Number Hypothesis (LNH), [1]. Still in the 70ies he was certain that there is a ‘continuous creation’ and that G varies with time, [2]. In 1973 E. P. Tryon wrote an article in Nature wherein he suggested that the universe was initiated by a positron-electron quantum fluctuation, [3]. In 1994 Alan Guth, the physicist behind the inflation theory, suggested that the total energy of the universe is zero. Matter and radiation provide the positive part, while the potential energy of gravity forms the negative part, [4].

This article is a continuation of an in-depth study, the aim of which is to prove that Dirac’s LNH theory has an anchorage in general relativity and depicts the universe in accordance with recent satellite data. The CBU theory was presented by the author in ref. [5]. Among other things the theory suggests that an inherent acceleration causes a Coriolis effect, which explains some strange features of galaxy rotational movements, without the introduction of dark matter.

A more recent article shows that the Einstein Field Equation can be formulated in a more concise form Gμν=Tμν, wherein Gμν is the Einstein tensor and Tμν is the energy-momentum tensor [6]. Quantum mechanics appears to have a crucial impact on the universe expansion. A solution to the Schrödinger equation of the initial event offers an explanation to the excitation of real-world positron-electron pairs from the QED vacuum foam. The energy of the universe is confined to matter and radiation, neither dark energy nor dark matter is required. However, a certain part of the quantum foam may be considered as virtual dark energy, which in an accumulated form corresponds to the dark energy of the CDM theory.

The present article introduces an alternative theory of black holes. Instead of singularities they are real objects, wherein the inflow of electrons and positrons balances the shrink effect. The same development scheme of the universe black hole is followed by galaxy black holes, with one exception, instead of expanding they increase the energy density.

2. Outline of a Theory

Black holes are of crucial importance when looking for a logical and physically comprehensive picture of the expanding universe. Here is an outline of the main features of the theory.

The universe starts with the quantum fluctuation event, an electron and a positron jump into existence and simultaneously create the space necessary for their existence. This is the inside of the universe black hole. The negative gravitational potential energy between particles equals the energy of the matter. The Newtonian gravitational constant GN is not a constant, but a parameter G inversely proportional to the curvature of space. This is also proclaimed by Albert Einstein in his original work on General Relativity [7,8], however, he did not know that the universe was expanding and that the curvature was changing. Due to a high value of G in the initial state (birth of the universe) the Planck length and Planck time were very large and allowed a fast inflow to take place. In the beginning the expansion speed is low and the acceleration high, but over time the expansion speed approaches the speed of light while the acceleration decreases asymptotically towards zero. The inflow of electrons and positrons is responsible for the large-scale expansion, the inverse value of the curvature radius is responsible for the acceleration. It was shown in ref. [6] that the curvature radius r equals the radius of the observable universe and is half the inner photon radius (the boundary that prevents photons from leaving the black hole).

In the primordial universe electrons and positrons annihilate into entangled photons. We postulate that the EM energy of entangled photon pairs has no impact on the gravitational parameter G. When a half of the total energy is confined in entangled pairs, the Schwarzschild radius limit is exceeded, and a transition occurs, wherein matter form a multitude of “small” black holes and the photons are liberated into the CMB (cosmic microwave background) radiation. The universe itself remains a low-density black hole.

After the transition, the black holes (galaxy BHs) will form the seeds for the future galaxies. It will be demonstrated that in parallel with a uniform increase electrons and positrons, baryonic matter (protons and antiprotons) is induced outside the Schwarzschild horizon of the galaxy BHs, the production of galaxy matter has begun. The theory will not go into the physics involved in the process of changing antiprotons to neutrons and electrons and further into atoms.

3. Geometry and Fundamental Equations

We regard the universe as a black hole, where light is confined to the whole of space, there is no space on the outside, at least we have no means to connect to that world. Bernard McBryan has studied black holes of different modes, [9]. He states that one could live in a low-density black hole without knowing it. According to McBryan our universe could be a “classical finite height black hole”, wherein the inner photon sphere radius is half the Schwarzschild radius rs. This is an important ruling; we use the Schwarzschild event horizon to determine the hypothetical outer radius ru of the universe

[picture] | (1)

where Mu is the mass of the universe (actually the total energy Wu divided by c²), G is the gravitational parameter and c the velocity of light. Equation (1) is familiar from several significant proposals, most important those by Sciama, [10], Brans and Dicke, [11] and Dirac, [2]. A simple formula also hints in the same direction: Think of all mass concentrated to the centre, how far distance from the centre is required to create a new mass m, which equals the gravitational potential energy? Answer: mc² = GMum/ru, i.e. eq. (1). However, the best argument in favour of eq. (1) is the inner photon sphere radius, hf = GMu(hf/c²)/ru.

We regard rB = GWB/c⁴ (photon radius) as a valid definition of the ordinary black hole radius, WB is the total energy confined in the black hole.

There is a problem to visualize the General Relativity 4D space-time into 3D. In the paper on the cosmological constant of 1917, (8), Einstein writes “the points of this hyper-surface form a three-dimensional continuum, a spherical space of curvature R”. He also defines a constant k = 8πG/c², which scales the energy-momentum tensor This constant is directly connected to a 3D sphere.

Figure 1 shows a visualization of the 3D universe, where ru is the virtual outer radius. It is useful to think of the universe as a sphere, the volume and outer area of which are

[picture] | (2)

[picture] | (3)

r = ru/2 is the radius of the observable universe. r = ar₀ is the most important variable of this study, a is the scale factor, r₀ the present value of r.

Based on eq. (1) we state as our principal postulate the following equation

[picture] | (4)

where Wu = Muc², the total real energy (matter and radiation) of the universe.

At the initial event, when the first positron-electron pair appears, we have

[picture] | (5)

where Gi is the initial gravitational parameter, ri the radius and me (We/c²) the electron rest mass. The energy equation is obtained by assuming a πri separation, in curved space, between the particles

Figure 1. Definitions related to the spherical 3D image of the universe, cf. ref. [6]

[picture] | (6)

where e is the electron charge and is the vacuum permittivity. The curvature radius of the initial universe is

[picture] | (7)

As will be shown later, ri is a fundamental quantity in the physics of the universe. The following relation can be proved correct, cf. [6],

[picture] | (8)

As a result, the present value of the radius of the observable universe is

[picture] | (9)

where G₀ = 6,67408·10-11 Nm²/kg², Newton’s gravitational constant. r₀ is close to the official estimate of 4,40·10²⁶ m.

When G₀ from eq. (9) is substituted into eq. (4) we obtain the energy of the universe

[picture] | (10)

These numbers are consistent with the official baryonic content (here 8 times those of the observable universe). Eq. (10) is valid for any arbitrary value of r, i.e. the energy is proportional to r². The author has chosen the following definition

[picture] | (11)

where b is a universal energy “pressure” constant (J/m²). From the initial event we have

[picture] | (12)

In summary, we write down some relations that are of importance in the rest of the study. The gravitational parameter is

[picture] | (13)

The energy density of matter (m) and radiation () is

[picture] | (14)

In the original General Relativity text Einstein introduces what he calls the Eulerian hydrodynamic pressure pE. The pressure is derived from basic thermodynamical principles, dWu = -pEdVu, we have

[picture] | (15)

4. Expansion of the Universe

4.1. Two Kinds of Black Holes

There is a clear distinction between the universe BH and the galaxy BH. The former has a closed 4d configuration that includes everything: space, time, matter and radiation. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity is about geometry and the interpretation that curved space is the cause of the gravitational effect, nothing more. Theories about cosmos, expansion, black holes, baryonic matter are the results of our observations of the world.

The galaxy BH can be treated as a normal cosmological object, which so far has only shown hidden characteristics. The goal of this article is to gain a better grasp of these mysteries.

A common property of both kinds of black holes is that they are not singularities. They are dynamic objects that grow by letting streams of elementary particles enter the interior space. The universe BH expands, while the galaxy BH increases its density.

4.2. Acceleration, the Hubble Parameter

If, in the theory of General Relativity, the energy-momentum tensor is isotropic and homogeneous, the Einstein's Field Equation

[picture] | (16)

has an analytic solution. (Note that the cosmological constant has been omitted.) In the Robertson-Walker metric the solution takes the form

[picture] | (17)

where a is the scale factor, ρ is the average mass density (radiation included), k is the curvature factor, -1, 0 or 1, and rcur0 is the curvature radius at present. For the closed universe k is 1. It was established in ref. (6) that rcur₀ equals the radius r₀ of the observable universe.

Next we seek the time derivative

[picture] | (18)

Using the relations and we arrive at

[picture] | (19)

where the last term represents the curvature’s influence on the acceleration. When G, and pE from eqs. (13-15) are substituted in eq. (19), it appears that the density and pressure terms exclude each other. The curvature is the only term that causes acceleration. We have

[picture] | (20)

This is the acceleration of the universe expansion in 4d. In order to obtain the projection into our 3d world we must multiply r with a factor π, cf. the denominator of eq. (6), where the distance between the initial positron and electron is taken to πr. However, the factor is exactly π only at t = 0 and t = ∞, in between we need a mathematical correction factor

[picture] | (21)

Here L = √((r/ri) + 1/4), where 1/4 is due to the increase of momentum during expansion, cf. [6], Section 3, and D₊ is the Dawson error integral function, see below. is a number close to 1. We now introduce an acceleration parameter B

[picture] | (22)

The 3d acceleration is

[picture] | (23)

This is an inherent characteristic of the expanding universe. It causes a Coriolis effect everywhere and interferes with the movements of stellar objects in the galaxies. As a result, dark matter becomes completely artificial.

Simple integration leads to the time derivative of the scale factor

[picture] | (24)

For r₀ = 4,20565·10²⁶ m, L = 96,72, and B = 0,09922 we have the Hubble parameter h = = 2,2082·10⁻¹⁸ 1/s, H = 68,14·10³ m/s/Mpc, numbers that are in good agreement with present data.

4.3. The Age of the Universe

The time function of the expansion is obtained by integration. We substitute u = ln(a/ai), where ai = ri/r = 1,2682·10⁻⁴², into eq. (24)

[picture] | (25)

The integral on the left-hand side has an error function solution

[picture] | (26)

The real part solution is obtained by using the Dawson integral function The time is a function of radius r according to

[picture] | (27)

D₊ is directly obtainable from Wolfram Alpha (Dawson(x)): D₊ = 0,0511743 for a = 1.

The age of the universe at r = r₀ is t₀ = 4,55·10¹⁷ s = 14,42 Gyr, slightly higher than the official estimate of 13,8 Gyr, discrepancy of less than 5 %.

5. The Schrödinger Equation

This section offers a bridge between quantum mechanics and gravity and is important for the understanding of the emergence of the universe.

The time-dependent Schrödinger equation is

[picture] | (28)

where is the quantum-mechanical wave function, Ei is the ground state energy, Ui = 4πbri² equals the potential energy. The spherically symmetric form of eq. (28) is

[picture] | (29)

where r is the curvature radius and b the energy constant of eq. (12).

Let

[picture] | (30)

[picture] | (31)

The Schrödinger equation takes the form

[picture] | (32)

This Sturm-Liouville type differential equation has the solution

[picture] | (33)

where Hn denotes the Hermite polynomial function and |F|(a;b;x) denotes the Kummer confluent hypergeometric function. c1 and c2 are constants of integration.

The constant a₁ is in a key position

[picture] | (34)

By substituting b we have

[picture] | (35)

And by inserting Gi from eq. (5) we obtain

[picture] | (36)

By definition is the Planck length of the virgin universe. In the CBU theory the Planck length is dependent on the radius r – and time. The numerical value is = 1,435164·10-14 m.

It can be shown that

[picture] | (37)

where is the fine structure constant 1/137,036. The result is not a coincidence, but a purely physical relation based on known physical constants. The equation emphasizes the significance of the Planck scale and the curvature radius ri of the virgin universe. It might be seen as a proof of the connection between gravity and quantum mechanics.

Equation (37) reflects the intuitive thought expressed by, among others, Richard Feynman in the 50ies: “137 holds the answers to the Universe”, [12]. Here is the key.

We obtain a general expression for the Planck length by substituting G from eq. (13) into eq. (36)

[picture] | (38)

A simple check using r₀ = 4,20565·10²⁶ m shows that the Planck length according to eq. (38) results in 1,616255·10-35 m, which exactly equals the official value.

In analogy with the hydrogen atom the ground state energy Ei is postulated to be of the form

[picture] | (39)

The general expression of the instantaneous ground state energy takes the form

[picture] | (40)

The Planck energy WP has an important bearing on the inflow of new matter. By definition

[picture] | (41)

At the initial event a positron and an electron are exited, we deduce from eq. (41) that the particles originate from

[picture] | (42)

The significance of = 13,453499 in the CBU theory is obvious, if WPi is considered the virtual dark energy of the virgin universe, then the real energy is obtained by dividing with the ratio

The general expression for WP(r) = WPr is

[picture] | (43)

The present value 1,9560815·10⁻⁹ J is in full compliance with the official value.

A comparison of eq. (43) with eq. (40) shows that

[picture] | (44)

6. The Mechanism for Lifting Particles from the Quantum Vacuum to the Real World

6.1. The Universe Black Hole

As a general principle there is a time window, during which particles can escape the virtual vacuum energy landscape. The pace of particle inflow is obtained from the ratio of Planck energy WPr and Planck time tPr = /c. We multiply with Fr, from Appendix A, in order to obtain an integrable function of the dark energy WDE, we write

[picture] | (45)

Note that c√ (BL) is equal to dr/dt, whereby we through integration obtain

[picture] | (46)

The ratio between the real energy and the virtual dark energy is

[picture] | (47)

The result is ground-breaking, it mathematically connects the real energy of the universe with its origin. A check with present data: Ωb = 0,05, tells us that There are still uncertainties in the observed relative density data, Ωb is too small, as is shown in Table 1, it must include all forms of energy, even neutrinos.

Because the electrons and positrons are picked from the instantaneous value of the Planck energy WPr(t), WDE should be regarded as virtual.

6.2. The Galaxy Black Hole

The galaxy black holes originate from a transition that is thought to have happened when the CMB radiation was released. During the primordial state of the expansion electrons and positrons form a plasma wherein there occurs annihilations. At a certain point half the energy is still in particles while the other half is confined to pairwise entangled photons. These photons are not influencing gravity, whereby the Schwarzschild condition is broken, and the universe undergoes a transition. Matter is trapped into a multitude of “small” black holes. Based on the CMB scale factor, ac = 3,523·10⁻⁵ (Appendix B), we can estimate the total energy of the black holes to be:

Several comprehensive analyses indicate that the radius, RB, of an individual black hole does not change with time. The radius is obtained from

[picture] | (48)

where MB is the mass of the black hole and G is the gravitation parameter of the universe at a given time. The equation is based on the photon radius, i.e. half the Schwarzschild radius. With RB constant and G 1/a, MB is directly proportional to a. Presently the total energy of all black holes will then be

There are different estimates of the number of galaxies in the universe, a number that has changed due to mergers. According to one estimate the number of galaxies in the observable universe is 2·10¹¹ which means a total of NG = 1,6·10¹². This leads us to an average BH mass of MB = 1,25·10³⁷ kg or 6·10⁶ solar masses. The black hole of the Milky Way Sagittarius A* is estimated to have a mass of 8,3·10³⁶ kg.

By substituting G from eq. (13) into eq. (48) we obtain the equation of the black hole mass

[picture] | (49)

The equation reminds of the energy of the universe, but instead of 2r² we have RB·r.

Inside the black hole there is a local gravitational parameter GB. By utilizing eq. (8) we may write

[picture] | (50)

The relation resembles the equation for G, eq. (13), but RB being constant means that even GB is constant for the specific BH.

6.3. Why no Singularity?

In the case of the universe BH it was shown that the density and equivalent Eulerian pressure (definition by Einstein in his original paper on GR) sum up to zero, there is no force driving matter into a singularity. The curvature of the space governs the electron-positron inflow and thereby regulates the pace of expansion. In a galaxy BH we can equally define the balance equation of expansion and contraction.

The pressure of expansion is obtained from the 1st Law of Thermodynamics

[picture] | (51)

The volume V is constant along with RB. We are left with the equation

[picture] | (52)

The expansion pressure is

[picture] | (53)

The acceleration directed outwards is

[picture] | (54a)

Alternatively, we obtain the same result by considering where

For the symmetric spherical case we have

[picture] | (54b)

QED! Here r is considered to be constant.

The acceleration inwards due to gravitation is obtained from the familiar equation

[picture] | (55)

Obviously,

[picture] | (56)

7. The Ground State and the Inflow of Baryonic Matter

A further analysis of the ground state energy at the initial event, EGSi, leads to an interesting coincidence:

[picture] | (57)

where We is the rest energy of the electron. It appears that the constant factor before 2We is very close to the proton-electron mass ratio 1836,153. We write

[picture] | (58)

where It is our conjecture, that is the initial correction factor as estimated from eq. (21). We write

[picture] | (59)

where Wp is the rest energy of the proton. represents a short delay between the entry of the first electron-positron pair at t = 0 and the entry of the proton-antiproton pair.

Embryo of a theory: The black hole has two boundary spheres, the inner one or the photon sphere, rB = 0.5·rS (rS =Schwarzschild radius), and the outer one or the black hole event horizon at rS. In between there is a forbidden energy gap. The number of pairs depends on the geometry.

1) The closed universe BH follows the rule

[picture] | (60)

We use WuS for the energy state at the Schwarzschild boundary. The square root, cf. eqs. (10), (43) and (44), indicates the number of proton-antiproton pairs injected.

The present value WuS = 2,60·1011 J is an insignificant amount compared the Wu.

2) In the galaxy BH case the number of injected pairs, Npair, is equal on the inside and on the outside, √(RB/RB) = 1.

We now postulate that all the matter and radiation, mainly stellar mass, in the galaxy originate from the central black hole. This leads to a clear-cut relation between the stellar (galaxy) mass, MG, and the BH mass, MB. We have

[picture] | (61)

This is a significant result. Some bold presumptions lead to a result that has a strong anchorage in present observations. The average example of Section 6.2, MB = 1,25·10³⁷ kg, suggests a galaxy stellar content of 2,23·10⁴⁰ kg, which is a typical value.

During the last decade several papers have been published, wherein the mass ratio is discussed and different theories about the cause has been presented, cf. [13,14,15]. Typically, it is presumed that stellar matter feeds the black holes, not vice versa as the present theory (CBU) asserts.

An indication, that the CBU result is the most reasonable one, is shown in Figure 2. The line MB = [(mp/me)]⁻¹·MG is shown in a chart created by Sandra Faber, [16]. There is a perfect fit with the “Small dense” galaxies. The line shows there is a linear correlation, which for the present theory means that MB grows linearly and the assumption of RB being constant is correct.

I leave the discussion of the difference between the “Small dense” and “Large diffuse” curves to fellow researchers. During the history of galaxies things happen, galaxies merge, one galaxy steals matter from another, etc. Available data include variations in accuracy. The CBU theory also contains uncertainties, such as the precise timing of the CMB, and the transition process itself, what is the distribution of energy among galaxy seed black holes?

Figure 2. A broadly published chart showing the results of the relation MB = f(MG) for numerous observed galaxies, [16]

The energy gap between the inner photon sphere and the Schwarzschild event horizon must be as large as the negative potential energy. The proof is simple. The potential energy at rS = 2RB is

[picture] | (62)

Because we observe the system from the outside, G is obtained from eq. (13). When G is substituted into eq. (62) and MB from eq. (49), we end up with a proof of the required condition. As MB increases, with time, G will decrease, RB remains constant.

The same evidence applies to the universe BH, just replace RB with 2r and MB with Mu. However, M a², r a and G 1/a, the condition holds even if the universe expands. Here is a difference compared to the proposals by Dirac and Brans & Dicke, they did not recognize the balance requirement between positive and negative energy.

8. The Total Energy, Comparison of Models

In the original CBU model it was assumed, that the total energy was only proportional to the curvature radius r squared. However, the new findings require the addition of a term considering the energy generated by the galaxy BHs. Notice, that this is not free energy, the negative counterpart is the gravitational potential energy provided by the increasing density of the BH. The potential acts over the gap between RH (event horizon, equal to the Schwarzschild radius) and RB.

The energy due to the electron-positron inflow is

[picture] | (63)

The total energy of the galaxies and the black holes is

[picture] | (64)

where WGu and WBu are the overall energies of the galaxies and the black holes respectively.

The earlier estimate of the total energy (matter and radiation) was Wu0 = 1,018·10⁷¹ J. The new value will be Wu0tot = 1,050·10⁷¹ J. The increase due to the galaxies is 3,147 %.

The critical density is

[picture] | (65)

where h₀ = 2,208·10⁻¹⁸ 1/s and G₀ = 6,67408·10⁻¹¹ m³/kg/s². The total critical energy is Wcr = 1,9536·10⁷² J. As a result the density parameters are = 0,05375 (matter and radiation) and = 0,723 (virtual accumulated dark energy).

Table 1 shows a comparison between some key data calculated according to the competing theories CBU and CDM (standard model).

The numbers are in good agreement, especially considering the different approaches. The main discrepancies relate to the interpretation of the energy content. In the standard model dark energy and dark matter are considered real, while in the CBU dark energy is a virtual ingredient, the vacuum energy from which the universe, in accordance with the uncertainty principle, picks up particles that accumulate into real energy. However, the virtual vacuum energy does not lead to an accumulation. Further, the CBU does not require dark matter to explain galaxy dynamics, the Coriolis effect takes care of that part.

Table 1. CBU versus CDM

9. Conclusion

It has been shown that the Planck energy divided by the Planck time, further enhanced with a gravitational uncertainty factor, provides the time derivative of the virtual dark energy. Integration with respect to time and division with a universal constant, √((2π-1)/afs), afs being the fine structure constant, gives as result the real energy content of the expanding universe.

As an important result it was shown that the ground state energy, as predicted by the Schrödinger equation, is a multiple of baryons. At the initial event the ratio of baryons to leptons almost equals the proton-electron mass ratio, which only requires a correction factor of 0,973. This points to the conclusion that the black holes of the galaxies generate protons and antiprotons outside the event horizon and simultaneously electrons and positrons inside the black hole, the number ratio being 1. We now have a conjecture for the ratio between the galaxy stellar mass and the black hole mass, 0,973·(mp/me) = 1786. There is a good statistical average supported by observed data.

The fact that the initial event provides a constant, which is very close to the mp/me ratio, suggests a strong connection between the gravitational universe and quantum mechanics. Why is the mass ratio of the most stable and most important particles in the universe determined in the very process of creation?

For the time being we emphasize that the black hole theory is indicative for further research. The accretion disk hints that black holes are of the rotating Kerr type. The violent activity in the vicinity of the event horizon of central black holes supports the idea that nuclear processes are ongoing, neutrons and hydrogen atoms are evolving, the event horizon radiates x-rays.

Appendix A: Generalized Uncertainty

The analysis is based on an open access article by the present author, [6].

A generalized form of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has an important impact on the production of new e⁺-e⁻ pairs. Because of the dynamic change of the momentum the uncertainty window is much wider than that provided by the classical Heisenberg formulation, cf. Adler [18]. We divide ∆x into a Heisenberg component ∆xH = h/(4π∆p) and a gravity component

[picture] | (A1)

The momentum uncertainty is

[picture] | (A2)

We have

[picture] | (A3)

where the term containing 1/4L is due to the fact that L is a ln(r) function.

Assuming that the location uncertainty is ∆x = /2 we have

[picture] | (A4)

where

[picture] | (A5)

Ronald J. Adler has derived an expression for the gravity component, [18],

[picture] | (A6)

After some algebraic manipulation we arrive at the final uncertainty equation

[picture] | (A7)

where Fr = fr(1 + fr) is the overall uncertainty factor. When fr is substituted into Fr, we obtain a proximity value to the real uncertainty factor: FrU = 4√(BL)·(/2ri), which applies to the universe BH. A similar analysis leads to FrB=√(BL)·( ) for the galaxy BH.

Appendix B. Determination of the Scale Factor at CMB

The analysis is based on an open access article by the present author, [19].

Influence of Gravitation on the Redshift

The gravitational parameter G is extremely large in the initial phase, Gi ≈ 5·10³¹ m³/kg/s². The parameter decreases successively with the expansion. The photons of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) are propagating faster than the expansion and must climb a gravitational upward slope. We write the energy equation for electromagnetic radiation propagating in a gravitational gradient

[picture] | (B1)

where f is the frequency, g the gravitational acceleration along r. We obtain g from

[picture] | (B2)

Here we made use of M = 4πbr²/c² and G=c⁴/2πbr, cf. eq. (4). Having that f = c/l, df = -cdl/l² and r = r₀a, where a is the scale factor, we write

[picture] | (B3)

Integration implies that l is proportional to a². We deduce that

[picture] | (B4)

Here zg is the gravitational redshift, ls and l₀ are the wavelengths at the source and at the observer respectively.

As known the cosmological redshift is

[picture] | (B5)

The combined redshift is z = zg + zcr. We have

[picture] | (B6)

Let ac stand for the scale factor at the CMB event. For vary small values of the scale factor the frequency of CMB photons decrease approximately according to

[picture] | (B7)

The Scale Factor at the CMB Event

The energy density of the black body radiation we obtain from the classical Stefani-Boltzmann equation

[picture] | (B8)

Here aB = 4sSB/c = 7,565723·10⁻¹⁶ J/K⁴m³ is the density constant, sSB is the Stefani-Boltzmann constant, and kB the Boltzmann constant.

The number density of the photons is obtained from, cf. Wikipedia: Photon Gas,

[picture] | (B9)

where z(3) = 1,202056 is the Riemann zeta-function. By dividing eq. (18) with eq. (19) we obtain an expression for the photon energy

[picture] | (B10)

If we assume that the photon energy at the CMB event equals one of the two photons caused by the annihilation, we have Wphc = We. The present time photon energy is then

[picture] | (B11)

Accordingly, for T₀ = 2,72548 K we have

[picture] | (B12)

Due to the square root the figure is much smaller than usually suggested (10⁻⁷…10⁻⁹).

The present photon energy is Wpho = 1,0164·10⁻²² J, eq. (B11), and the corresponding frequency f₀ = Wph0/h = 153,4 GHz, slightly below the Planck black body spectrum optimum frequency of fImax = 160,23 GHz.

Competing interests

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

References

[1]   | Dirac, P. A. M., The cosmological constants, Nature 139, 323, 1937.
[2]   | Dirac, P. A. M., Cosmological models and the Large Number hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 338, pp. 439-446, 1974.
[3]   | Tryon, E. P., Is the universe a vacuum fluctuation. Nature, 247, pp. 396-397. 1973.
[4]   | Guth, A., The Inflationary Universe: The quest for a new theory of cosmic origins. Perseus Books, 1997.
[5]   | Eriksson, J.-T., A modified model of the universe shows how acceleration changes galaxy dynamics. International Journal of Physics, Vol 6, No. 2, pp. 38-46, 2018.
[6]   | Eriksson, J.-T., Quantum fluctuations and variable G return Einstein’s field equation to its original formulation, 9 (3), 169-177, 2021.
[7]   | Einstein, A., Die Grundlage der allgemeine Relativitätstheorie. Annalen der Physik, 49, 769-822, 1916.
[8]   | Einstein, A., Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akad. d. Wissenschaften, 1917.
[9]   | McBryan, B., Living in a low-density black hole, arXiv: 1312.0340v1, 2 Dec 2013.
[10]   | Sciama, D. W., On the origin of inertia. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 113, 34-42, 1952.
[11]   | Brans, C., Dicke, R. H., Mach's principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation. Physical Review, 124, 3, pp. 925-935, 1961.
[12]   | BigThincOct31. 2018.
[13]   | Reines, Amy, E., Volonteri, M., Relations between central black holes and total galaxy stellar mass in the local universe, The Astrophysical Journal, 813:82 (13pp), 2015, November 10.
[14]   | Chen, Zhu, Faber, S.M., et al., Quenching as a context between galaxy halos and their central black holes, The Astrophysics journal, 897:102 (46pp). 2020 July 1.

[15]  
Taerrazas, Eric F.Bell, Annalisa Pillepich, Dylan NelsonRachel S. Somerville, Shy Genel, Rainer Weinberger, Melanie Haboutzit, Yuan Li, Lars Hernquist, Mark Vogelsberger, The relationship between black hole mass and galaxy properties: examining the black hole feedback model in IllustrisTNG, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, MNRAS 493, 1888-1906 (2020).

[16]   | SciTechDaily, How galaxies die: New insight into galaxy halos, black holes, and quenching of star formation, University of California-Santa Cruz, July 18, 2020.
[17]   | Tanabashi, M., et al., Astrophysical constants and parameters, Phys.Rev. D 98, 2019 update.
[18]   | Adler, R. J., Six easy roads to the Planck scale. Am. J. Phys., 78, pp. 925-932, 2010.
[19]   | Eriksson, J.-T., A combined cosmological and gravitational redshift supports Electron-positron annihilation as the most likely energy source of the CMB. International Journal of Physics, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp.16-20., 2019.