Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Etiologies of Complications during Endodontic Treatment: A Survey among Dentists of the Town of Abidjan

Marie-Chantal Avoaka-Boni*, Wendpoulomdé Aimé Désiré Kaboré, Stéphane X Djolé, Kouakou Florent Kouadio, Koffi TD Kouadio

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Félix Houphouët Boigny University, Abidjan, 22 BP: 612 Abidjan 22, Ivory Coast

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to identify the etiologies of complications linked with the various stages of the operating procedure for endodontic treatment by means of a survey among dentists in the town of Abidjan so as to better understand and prevent such complications. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective and descriptive study. A data collection form was devised for this purpose. The following variables were collected: the type of practice, the number of years in practice, the frequency of root canal treatments performed, the complications encountered and identification of the etiological factors. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 135 dentists. Among them, 65.9% performed up to 10 endodontic treatments per month. The majority (92.7%) stated that they encountered between 1 and 4 cases of complications per month in the course of endodontic treatment. The absence of preoperative radiography was the most often cited reason (64.44%) followed by erroneous diagnoses (14.07%). Conclusion: Altogether, the results show non-adherence to the procedures for performing endodontic treatments, which is the source of most complications. There is an urgent need to realign practitioners with the rules of good practice during endodontic procedures.

Keywords: root canal treatment, complication, etiologies, dental surgeons of Abidjan

Received November 15, 2020; Revised December 20, 2020; Accepted January 03, 2021

Citation: Marie-Chantal Avoaka-Boni, Wendpoulomdé Aimé Désiré Kaboré, Stéphane X Djolé, Kouakou Florent Kouadio, Koffi TD Kouadio, Etiologies of Complications during Endodontic Treatment: A Survey among Dentists of the Town of Abidjan. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research, 9 (1). 1-5. January 2021. doi:10.12691/ijdsr-9-1-1

1. Introduction

Many epidemiological studies report a strong association between apical periodontitis and inadequate technical quality of root filling. Furthermore, they show unsatisfactory quality of root canal treatment carried out in general practice and in dental teaching hospitals [1,2]. On the contrary when the endodontic therapy is performed “lege et artis” the success rate for endodontic therapy is very high, between 73% and 98% [1,3,4]. In Ivory Coast, like in a lot of others African and European countries, endodontics isn’t a specialty, and the majority of endodontic procedures are carried out by general practitioners (GP). They rarely respect the basic principles to correctly perform an endodontic therapy, probably due to low standard of undergraduate training [3].

It is crucial that GP may get benefit from the teaching of endodontic specialists in order to improve the quality standards of root canal treatment. New technologies should be used in order to train and allow them to be able to perform regularly and correctly an endodontic therapy, as the ESE undergraduate curriculum guidelines recommend [3].

A lengthy series of procedural errors have been associated with endodontic treatment failures, the main ones being persistence of the bacteria, inadequate shaping, inadequate filling, missed anatomy, errors in making the access cavity preparation (ECA), iatrogenic root perforations, and instrument fractures [5]. They arise when the endodontic treatment does not rigorously adhere to the established clinical principles. Indeed, endodontic treatment is meticulous and difficult, due to the anatomical variations, the complexity of the network to be cleaned, and the lack of visibility during the operating process, the practitioner often only being able to rely on an image in two dimensions. Despite scientific and technological advances in endodontics, accidents and complications during canal treatment can occur at any stage of the endodontic therapy. The professionals performing the treatment, need to adopt all the means to not compromise the success of the treatment [6]. In Ivory Coast, a study has reported that endodontic treatment represents the most common procedure performed on a daily basis [7]. In light of this, we sought to identify the etiologies of complications linked with the various stages of the operating procedure for endodontic treatment by means of a survey among dentists in the town of Abidjan so as to better understand and prevent such complications.

2. Methodology

2.1. Ethical Considerations

The research protocol of this study was approved by the National Ethics Committee for Life Sciences and Health (US DPT OF REGISTRATION #2: IRB000111917 N°090-15/CNESVS).

2.2. Sampling and Execution of the Survey

This was a cross-sectional, prospective, descriptive study. A data collection form was devised for this purpose. The information collected comprised the following variables: information of a general nature (the type of practice, the number of years in practice), the frequency with which canal treatments are performed, the complications encountered, and identification of the implicated etiological factors. A pre-survey was carried out among 10 dentists in order to see how well the questions of the survey were understood and the level difficulty for filling out the form. Analysis of the questionnaires collected during this pre-survey allowed correction and reorganization of paragraphs that could give rise to confusion so as to eliminate all ambiguity. The survey was then carried out by self-administration of the questionnaires. The dentists stated their answers directly on the survey form which was either collected immediately or at another appointment. The survey took place over a period of six months from January to June of 2016. One hundred and fifty dentists were selected based on the official list of the National Guild of Dentists in Ivory Coast. This selection was by a random draw using the formula of Schwartz [8]. This sample included dentists practicing in the private sector as well as in the public sector of the 10 municipalities of the town of Abidjan and its suburbs. The information collected was analyzed by means of EPI-INFO version 06.01 software (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America). The results obtained are presented as tables, using Excel and Word 2013 software in Windows XP professional.

3. Results

Of the 150 dentists who were contacted, 135 completed the questionnaire, thus amounting to a response rate of 90%. The results derived from the 135 practitioners who ultimately participated in the survey are presented in the tables below.

3.1. Characteristics of the Sample

The distribution according to the type of practice allowed us to determine that a full range of experiences was represented, with a sex ratio of 2.5. The majority of the practitioners (61.19%) were in the private sector and 39.25% in the public sector. They were mostly trained in Ivory Coast (88.89%), in France (11.90%), and in Senegal (2.80%).

3.2. The Number of Endodontic Treatments Performed Per Month

Among the dentists who were surveyed, 65.9% performed up to 10 endodontic treatments per month and 30.4% between 11 and 20. Some (3.7%) performed 21 endodontic treatments or more per month.

3.3. Frequency of Complications

The majority of the practitioners, or 92.7%, stated that they encountered between 1 and 4 cases of complications per month in the course of endodontic treatment and 4.1% encountered fewer than 5 cases per month. Some practitioners (3.2%) indicated that they did not encounter any cases involving complications.

3.4. Procedural Errors

The practitioners encountered different types of procedural errors, during each step of root canal treatment. Perioperatively, this comprised weakening of the wall, as indicated by 54.68% of them; fracturing of an instrument in the canal, as indicated by 55.47%; extension of the gutta cone and or the obturation cement, as indicated by 55.47%. Postoperatively, flare-ups were encountered by 81.49% of the dentists, paresthesia by 4.83% of them, and subcutaneous emphysema by 1.61%.

3.5. Etiologies of the Preoperative Complications

According to the surveyed practitioners, the complications during endodontic treatment have different etiologies. The absence of preoperative radiography was the most often cited reason (64.44%) followed by erroneous diagnoses (14.07%). An inadequate technical capacity (2.22%) and the complexity of the root anatomy (0.75%) were other reasons provided as etiologies of preoperative complications.

3.6. Etiologies of the Perioperative Complications

Overall, for 82.96% of the practitioners, the complexity of the canal anatomy was the main etiology of perioperative complications. The lack of ergonomics and asepsis (absence of an operating field), an inadequate technical capacity, and a lack of skill represented 35.55%, 40.74%, and 1.48% of the cases, respectively. The use of unsuitable canal instruments was the main etiology (58.52%) during the access cavity preparation [Table 1], and the use of obsolete instruments (56.30%) was the etiology of complications most often indicated by the practitioners during the shaping procedure [Table 2]. Fracturing of the paste filler (54.77%) was the etiology most often reported by the practitioners during canal obturation [Table 3].

Table 1. Etiologies of the complications upon gaining the access cavity

Table 2. Etiologies of the complications during preparation of the canal

Table 3. Etiologies of the complications during canal filling

4. Discussion

This study showed that 65.9% of the practitioners performed an average of 10 endodontic treatments per month. This reflects the frequency with which endodontic treatments are performed [9]. Most often, the technique for manual preparation is by alternating use of a K-file and an H-file [9,10]. However, nowadays, the technique of mechanized canal preparation by continuous rotation or by reciprocating motion allows for greater efficacy and earnings (time savings) [11]. This new technique is indispensable for improving the procedures for canal preparation and to thereby reduce complications. In our study 64.44% of endodontic treatment was performed without pre-operative radiograph that confirms clinicians often underestimate the importance of diagnostic radiographs and pre-access analysis to plane the access cavity preparation and the shaping sequence [12].

An inadequate technical set-up and a lack of ergonomics were noted. The ergonomics for the operator are a major benefit, as they attenuate fatigue, thereby allowing complex procedures to be carried out under more favorable conditions [13].

Indeed, the etiology of perforations is based on poor evaluation by the operator of the shape, the dimensions, and the direction of the crown and of the root due to a failure to analyze the preoperative retroalveolar images and of the clinical examination.

They represent the second most common cause of endodontic treatment failure [14]. Perforation of the tooth with a burr is a common occurrence during preparation of the access cavity. These are complications derived from iatrogenic errors during canal treatment, and they often lead to extraction of the tooth. Root perforation is the iatrogenic consequence of inadequate instrumental preparation of a canal aberration. The instrument then crosses the root dentin as well as the cement, creating an artificial connection between the canal network and the desmodontium or with the oral cavity [15].

No doubt, the best way to manage perforations is to prevent them. The perfect knowledge of endodontic anatomy, a painstaking pre-access analysis of the pre-operative radiographs, the systematic identification of the cementoenemal junction, using a periodontal probe, the use of magnification coupled with the use of specific endodontic ultrasonic tips to perform the access cavity preparation, the methodical creation of a previous glide path before the shaping step and the use of patency file can help to prevent perforations.

Similarly, the complexity of the canal anatomy mentioned by the surveyed practitioners was the source of numerous complications including instrument fracture. The study showed that 35.55% of the practitioners did not use an appropriate operating field, which could lead to complications. Thus, in the absence of a dam, which constitutes a key component of the operating field in endodontics, the patient is exposed to several potential issues: (1) discomfort of the patient, (2) septic inoculation of the tooth to be treated, (3) inhalation of the irrigation products, or more seriously (4) inhalation of the burr or the endodontic instrument. These latter situations were also noted in prior studies, where the issue was remedied by extraction of the inhaled instruments by endoscopy in a hospital setting [7,16]. Whence the relevance of this tool that, in addition to allowing for better visibility of the intervention site, ensures the safety of the patient [16,17,18]. Fracturing of an instrument is, however, not a rare event. The risk of instrument fracture increases with the root complexity [19]. Indeed, Wu et al. (2011) reported a high number of fracturing in particular with mesial canals of the lower molars [19]. The experience and carefulness of the practitioners allow the frequency of instrument fracture to be reduced considerably. Nonetheless, nothing is immune to this type of incident, and the practitioner needs to know how to deal with it [20,21]. As reported by the study, the etiology of the instrument fractures can also lie with the use of outdated instruments. Numerous studies have also revealed that weakening linked with numerous cycles of sterilization, as well as the instruments used, and overuse can be the cause [19]. Fracturing can be due to torsion and/or bending [22]. Moreover, a study in Burkina Faso reported that treating patients with dilapidated equipment and insufficient provision of care services can also be the source of complications. Indeed, dilapidation equates to non-functional chairs and a nearly normal shortage of consumables forcing practitioners to overuse endodontic instruments or to devise alternatives [23]. Performing endodontic treatments requires a minimum in terms of equipment, and it is essential to have these and to strictly abide with the various stages of the process. In order to increase the success rate of treatments, health authorities should preferentially focus on ensuring that dental practices have equipment that is adequate for endodontic treatments.

Despite progress with new canal obturation techniques, some practitioners (54.77%) encountered fracture of the paste filler used in the single-cone obturation technique. But the sealer represents the weak link in the chain of root canal filling because of its setting reaction with subsequent shrinkage, the presence of intrinsic porosities, and its possible resorption over time [24,25]. As a result, the root canal volume filled by the sealer is more vulnerable because of their dimensional instability over time.

These factors constitute a relevant problem in terms of sealing ability.

Hence, the sealer thickness should be as smaller as possible. In this respect on the one hand warm gutta-percha obturation techniques have been developed to perform tridimensional root canal filling with a smaller sealer thickness and with a minimum presence of void areas [24,26]. On the other hand cold hydraulic condensation, using premixed bioceramic sealers (with intra canal tip), have been developed to perform tridimensional root canal too.

Hence increased awareness and continuous training in the use of warm gutta-percha obturation techniques or cold hydraulic condensation technique are indispensable in order to perform a correct root canal filling. Moreover, the etiology of complications in endodontics can be human, the majority being iatrogenic in nature. The stress linked with the professional burden of the practitioner can lead to operative technical errors and thus result in the occurrence of complications [27]. This again highlights the importance of preparing for the procedure in terms of the ergonomic set-up of the technical platform and of adhering to the steps involved in carrying out the procedure.

5. Conclusion

Altogether, the results show non-adherence to the procedures for performing endodontic treatments, which is the source of most complications. Considering health and economical repercussions of inadequate root canal treatment, we can conclude that there is an urgent need to realign practitioners with the rules of good practice during the performance of endodontic treatments. The main objective of endodontic therapy is not to “manage” complications, but to know how to avoid “generating” them in the first place. A strategy of continued training of practitioners appears to be required in order to prevent what are mostly avoidable complications. Therefore, it is crucial for each university to be able to give students clinical skills to perform a good standard endodontic therapy on routine root canal treatment. To face this challenge, it is imperative to recruit endodontic specialists to teach in the pre-clinical training and in undergraduate clinic.

References

[1]   | PETERS LB, LINDEBOOM JA, ELST ME, WESSELINK PR. Prevalence of apical periodontitis relative to endodontic treatment in an adult Dutch population: a repeated cross- sectional study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 523-8.
[2]   | RIBEIRO DM, RÉUS JC, FELIPPE WT, PACHECO-PEREIRA C, DUTRA KL, SANTOS JN. Technical quality of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students using hand instrumentation: a meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2018; 5: 269-83.
[3]   | DE MOOR R, HULSMANN M, KIRKEVANG LL, TANALP J, WHITWORTH J. Undergraduate curriculum guidelines for endodontology. Inter Endod J 2013; 46:1105-14.
[4]   | RICUCCI D, RUSSO J, RUTBERG M, BURLESON JA, SPÅNGBERG LS. A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1,369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontics. 2011; 112: 825-42.
[5]   | TABASSUM S and KHAN FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects. Eur D Journal 2016; 10(1):144-47.
[6]   | ESTRELA C, HOLLAND R, ESTRELA CR, ALENCAR AH, SOUSA-NETO MD, PECORA JD. Characterization of successful root canal treatment. Braz Dent J 2014; 25:3-11.
[7]   | AVOAKA-BONI MC, GNAGNE-KOFFI NY, ASSOUMOU ADOU NM. Survey of general practitioners in Abidjan on the use of the surgical field in dentistry. Rev Odontostomatol Trop 2009; 127: 15-8.
[8]   | SCHWARTZ D. The statistical method in medicine: etiological investigations. Rev Stat App 1960; 8(3): 5-27.
[9]   | AVOAKA-BONI MC, SINAN AA, ADOU J, YAO-BOHOUSSOU L, ABOUATTIER MANSILLA E. Endodontic retreatment: Survey of practitioners in the city of Abidjan. Rev Iv Odonto-Stomatol 2007; 9:31-6
[10]   | FAYE B, SARR M, LEYE F, TOURÉ B, KANE AW. Study of root canal filling techniques used in Dakar. Rev Iv Odonto-Stomatol 2009; 11:24-30
[11]   | DEL FABBRO M, AFRASHTEHFAR KI, CORBELLA S, EL-KABBANEY A, PERONDI I, TASCHIERI S. In Vivo and In Vitro Effectiveness of Rotary Nickel-Titanium vs Manual Stainless Steel Instruments for Root Canal Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2018; 18(1):59-69.
[12]   | MANCINO D, KHAROUF N. Root canal treatment of dilacerated second maxillary premolars: planning the shaping procedure. J Clin EXP Dent. 2018: 1: 624-27.
[13]   | GUILLEMIN F. The Android Surgeon Is yet to Be Born…, but Surgeons Can Be Helped by a Computer. Oncology 2016; 18: 273-74.
[14]   | TSESIS I, ROSEN E, BJORNDAL L, TASCHIERI S, GIVOL N. [Medicolegal aspects of iatrogenic root perforations]. Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993) 2014; 31(2): 15-8, 85.
[15]   | AIDASANI GL, MULAY S. Management of iatrogenic errors: Furcal perforation. JICDRO 2018; 10(1): 42-6.
[16]   | AL-ABDULWAHHAB BM, AL-THABIT H, AL-HARTHI A, SHAMINA R, AL-ASHGAI A, AL-QABBANI F, AL-GHAMDI S, AL-TAHER R. The attitudes of dental interns to the use of the rubber dam at Riyadh dental colleges. Saudi Endod J 2012; 2: 75-9.
[17]   | PETERS OA, PETERS FC, FOKKE C. Ethical principles and considerations in endodontic treatment. ENDO-Endodontic Practice Today 2007; 1: 101-08.
[18]   | COHEN S, SCHWARTZ S. Endodontic complications and the law. J Endod 1987; 13: 191-7.
[19]   | WU J, LEI G, YAN M, YU Y, YU J, ZHANG G. Instrument separation analysis of multiused ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy. J Endod 2011; 37: 758-63.
[20]   | DAHAN S. Quiz: Fractured instruments removal. Inf dent 2013; 95 (16/17): 1-3.
[21]   | McGuigan MB, Louca C, Duncan HF. The impact of fractured endodontic instruments on treatment outcome. Br Dent J 2013a; 214: 285-9.
[22]   | GLIKPO M, BUKIET F. Réintervenir en Endodontie: Eliminer les matériels et matériaux, renégocier. Réal Clin 2016; 27: 255-62.
[23]   | KABORÉ WAD, GARÉ JV, NIANG SO, GUIGUIMDÉ PWL, OUÉDRAOGO Y, RODRIGUEZ I. Dental care offer in urban areas in Burkina Faso: Example of the City of Ouagadougou. Rev Iv Odonto-Stomatol 2015; 7: 42-9.
[24]   | WHITWORTH J. Methods of filling root canals: principles and practices, Endod Topics 2005; 12: 2-24.
[25]   | PETERS DD. Two years in vitro solubility evaluation of four gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques, J Endod 1986; 12: 139-45.
[26]   | LI GH, NIU LN, SELEM LC, EID AA, et al. Quality of obturation achieved by an endodontic core-carrier system with crosslinked gutta-percha carrier in single-rooted canals. J Dent 2014; 42: 1124-34.
[27]   | GARY S, CHEUNG P. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2009; 16:1-26.