Dear Label_Name,

Greetings! I hope you are well.

I am writing on behalf of an international publishing house, Science and Education Publishing, USA (http://www.sciepub.com).

Science and Education Publishing (SciEP) is a multidisciplinary open access publisher of Journals covering the fields of Science, Technology and Medicine. All SciEP publications are subject to high-quality peer review, editorial and production processes and are freely available online.

Welcome to the April, 2013 edition of SciEP newsletter, providing monthly summaries of articles on science & education related topics of interest to scientist and professionals. The mission of our journals is to provide an open access forum for publishing new findings on issues pertinent to scientific and academic field. We also invite you to submit original research papers, review articles, short reports, or case studies are considered for publication in our Multidisciplinary Journals.

American Journal of Public Health Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajphr-1-1-3

The Implementation of a Tele-Homecare System with Service Oriented Architecture and HL7 Message Transmission Standard
Ching-Sung Wang

American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
DOI: 10.12691/ajmbr-1-1-2

The Influence of Ethanol on Pyruvate Kinases Activity in Vivo, in Vitro, in Silico
Lelevich Sergey Vladimirovich, Khrustalev Vladislav Victorovich, Barkovsky Eugene Victorovich, Shedogubova Tatyana Aleksandrovna

American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-1-1-1

Clinical and Histological Features in Wegener Granulomatosis
Li Cavoli Gioacchino, Passantino Rita, Bono Luisa, Tortorici Calogera, Ferrantelli Angelo, Giammarresi Carlo, Rotolo Ugo

American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
DOI: 10.12691/ajidm-1-1-2

The Curse of Lymphatic Filariasis: Would the Continual Use of Diethylcarbamazine Eliminate this Scourge in Papua New Guinea?
Anne Lanham, Lillian Mwanri

We have released issues of some journals on February 2013.
American Journal of Public Health Research
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
American Journal of Medical and Biological Research
American Journal of Pharmacological Sciences
American Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
American Journal of Nursing Research
American Journal of Cancer Prevention
American Journal of Medicine Studies
American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
American Journal of Biomedical Research
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Food and Nutrition
American Journal of Hypertension Research
American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
American Journal of Zoological Research
Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology
American Journal of Microbiological Research
Biomedical Science and Engineering

We are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for peer review for all the journals across all our subject areas in SciEP.

Please submit your manuscript via our online submission system:
http://www.sciepub.com/author/signin

To unsubscribe from our mailing list, please click on the following link: unsubscribe

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

David Rain
Email:join@sciepub.com
Science and Education Publishing (http://www.sciepub.com)

Gut-bone Cross Talks and Implications in Celiac Disease

Aaron Lerner*, Torsten Matthias

B. Rappaport School of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Abstract: Metabolic bone disease is a frequent extra-intestinal co-morbidity in newly diagnosed, mostly adult patients who have 70% low bone mineral density. Musculoskeletal signs and symptoms, osteopenia, osteoporosis and fractures are the most frequent manifestations. The etiology is multifactorial, however, micronutrient malabsorption, mainly of calcium and vitamin D, secondary hyperparathyroidism and inflammation are the main driving forces. The diagnosis is based on signs and symptoms, biochemical and endocrinologic laboratory evaluation and imaging by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Treatment of low bone mineral density in CD comprises: a gluten free diet, coverage of nutritional deficiencies (including calcium and vitamin D), changes in life style and if necessary, pharmacologic and hormonal replacement therapy. The cost effectiveness of those therapy methods were barely assessed. Understanding the pathophysiology of bone loss in celiac disease might bring new therapeutical strategies for the patient’s benefit.

Keywords: celiac disease, bone, osteopenia, osteoporosis, calcium, vitamin D, mineral density

Citation: Aaron Lerner, Torsten Matthias, Gut-bone Cross Talks and Implications in Celiac Disease. International Journal of Celiac Disease, 4 (1). 19-23. January 2016. doi:10.12691/ijcd-4-1-4

1. Introduction

1.1. Celiac Disease

Celiac disease (CD) is a life-long autoimmune condition [1] mainly of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting the small intestine of genetically susceptible individuals. Gluten, which is the storage protein of wheat and its alcohol soluble gliadins are the offending inducers of the disease and together with structurally related molecules are found in barley and rye. Nevertheless, environmental factors like infections might play a role in CD induction [2]. Many additional factors were suggested: breast feeding, time and amount of gluten consumption, intestinal permeability, the microbiome/dysbiome, mode of delivery, early vaccination or early consumption of antibiotics and geoepidemiological influences [3,4,5,6,7]. However, cause and effect relationships are far from being elucidated. Tissue transglutaminase (tTG) is the autoantigen against which the abnormal immune response is directed to [8,9] and the two main auto antibodies, anti-endomysium and anti-tTG, are the most useful serological markers to screen for the disease [10,11]. Recently, two additional autoantibodies, namely antideaminated gliadin peptide and anti-neo-epitope tTG, were found to be reliable for CD screening [12,13,14]. As yet, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 molecules are the most important known predisposing genetic factors. A lot is known on the pathogenesis of the disease. The sequential chain of events operating in the disease was recently unraveled and gives hope for future therapeutic strategies [15]. Furthermore, its epidemiology, prevalence, and clinical presentation are changing constantly, and with time, new clinical presentations are depicted and widen the plethora of clinical variability of CD [16]. It has been shown that the classical intestinal clinical picture is disappearing, and the extra-intestinal presentation is emerging. Skin, endocrine, hepatic, skeletal, rheumatic, geriatric, hematological, gynecological, infertility, dental, hypercoagulability, cardiac, and behavioral abnormalities are often described [16-22]. With the growing awareness of family practitioners, hematologists and gastroenterologists, and now gynecologists and neurologists, and other subspecialties, the diagnosis of CD is increasingly being made during the whole life-span. In fact, about 20% of newly diagnosed cases occur in patients who are older than 60 years of age. One of the growing domains is the extra-intestinal presentation of CD affecting the bone, presenting as osteopenia or osteoporosis, fractures, and falls [23-33]. The present review will concentrate, expand and update on the multiple faces of the gut-bone axis in celiac disease.

1.2. Skeletal Health Physiology

Bone homeostasis involves multiple but coordinated cellular and molecular events [34]. It is a dynamic tissue that undergoes continual adaption during vertebrate life to attain and preserve skeletal size, shape, and structural integrity and to regulate mineral homeostasis. Two processes, remodeling and modeling, underpin development and maintenance of the skeletal system. The two main types of cells responsible for bone metabolism are: osteoblasts (which secrete new bone), and osteoclasts (which break bone down). The structure of bones as well as an adequate supply of calcium requires close cooperation between these two cell types and other cell populations (osteocytes, hematopoietic precursors, macrophages, T-cells, natural killer cells and adipocytes) present at the bone remodeling sites, or in the bone marrow space. [35] Bone metabolism relies on complex signaling pathways and control mechanisms to achieve proper rates of growth and differentiation. These controls include the action of several hormones, including parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D, growth hormone, steroids, and calcitonin, as well as several bone marrow-derived membranes and soluble cytokines and growth factors like M-CSF, RANKL, decoy receptor inhibitor osteoprotegerin, VEGF, IL-6 family, cardiotrophin-1, sphingosine-1-phosphate and ephrinB2. The process is regulated by mechanically-induced stressors. In this way the body is able to maintain proper levels of calcium required for the above mentioned physiological processes.

Subsequent to appropriate signaling, osteoclasts move to resorb the surface of the bone, followed by deposition of bone by osteoblasts. Together, the cells that are responsible for bone remodeling are known as the basic multicellular unit, and the temporal duration of the BMU is referred to as the bone remodeling period [36].

Before delving into CD, defining the major bone density abnormalities is worthwhile.

Osteoporosis involves a reduction in bone mass below -2.5 standard deviations of peak bone mass. Osteopenia is defined when those values are located between -1 to -2.5 SD. Severe osteoporosis exists when the lower bone mass is associated with fracture.

2. Epidemiology of Bone Abnormalities in CD.

The intestine plays a critical role in bone homeostasis in the normal population as well as in various gastrointestinal disorders, including CD. An increased prevalence of CD in the osteoporotic population was reported, and serological screening was recommended [37]. Others casted doubt on the association and opposed routine CD screening [38]. It is estimated that by the time childhood CD is diagnosed, one-third of affected children have osteoporosis, one-third have osteopenia and only the remaining third retain a normal BMD [39]. Once the gluten free diet is instituted, most of them accelerate their rate of bone mineralization, so that most achieve normal peak bone mass by the time bone growth is completed. An opposite situation exists in adulthood once the peak bone mass has been achieved. Among these adult CD patients, the prevalence of osteoporosis is at least twice that of the unaffected population in the same age range [39,40]. More than half of asymptomatic coeliac patients with positive serological and digestive tract markers may have bone disease at the time of diagnosis [39,41]. This even includes those with minimal to moderate intestinal damage, stages 1 and 2 of the revised Marsh classification criteria. A recent literature review reported low BMD affects up to 75% celiac patients, independently of the serological status or digestive symptomatology [39]. Due to substantial differences in the experimental designs, a wide variability in the frequency of low BMD in CD exist. However, it is clear that increased prevalence exists in celiac patients, compared to the general adult population, which generally range around 40% [39]. Due to this common complication of CD, the question of screening the celiacs for BMD or the osteoporotic for CD serology, is apparent. Despite a lack of definitive consensus, most of the opinion-leaders and societies favor screening the adult osteoporotic populations. It should be noticed that the frequency of CD is 10x higher than expected in the later ones. A most recent study recommended not to routinely screen patients with idiopathic osteoporosis for CD, unless celiac or gastrointestinal related symptom exist [42]. Even in postmenopausal women, there is no justification to routinely screen for CD [43,44].

3. Etiology and Pathogenesis of Low BMD in CD

Table 1 summarizes the etiologies of low BMD in the CD patients.

Table 1. The etiologies of low BMD in the CD patients (Adapted from reference [39,45]) GFD-gluten free diet, BMI-body mass index.

The main mechanisms underlying low BMD in CD are osteomalacia due to calcium and vitamin D malabsorption and secondary hyperparathyroidism, resulting in inadequate bone deposition and net loss.

Several discrepancies should be addressed. As mentioned, at least in children, GFD can reverse the bone abnormalities associated with CD. On the other hand GFD is low in vitamins and minerals [46,47]. Surveying CD children in Brazil, Sdepanian VL et al reported that 76% to 88% of children and 85% of adolescents with CD adhering to a GFD have inadequate calcium intake. Additionally, naturally gluten-free products are often low in calcium, iron, zinc, magnesium, vitamins B and D and fiber. Very few gluten-free products are enriched in calcium as their wheat containing counterparts [45]. The second debatable question is the routine supplementation of calcium and vitamin D, in view of their contribution to the etiology. A recent review on the subject recommended that due to the fact that exclusion of gluten from the diet does not always normalize bone mineral density, in these cases, supplementation of vitamin D and calcium is recommended [48]. We investigated vitamin D status in Israeli and Spanish CD children and their parents and concluded that it is not recommended to routinely supplement the children with vitamin D, since the problem of low BMD is an age dependent phenomenon. [31]. Being a “common denominator’ of bone and the gut [45], calcium is an essential ion necessary to maintain the functionality of the circulatory, neuromuscular, endocrine, immune and the enzymatic systems. Despite its pivotal roles, calcium supplementation is not recommended routinely for CD patients unless, the intake or absorption are compromised or losses or bone pathologies are depicted.

4. Recommendations for Assessment and Follow up of Bone Health in CD Patients

There is no consensus or accepted policy between the professional CD associations, concerning assessment, diagnosis or follow-up of bone status in CD patients. Reality is more complex due to the multiple subspecialties involved in bone health. At least in the CD domain, gastroenterologists, nutritionists, dieticians, endocrinologists, gynecologists, orthopedics on one hand and internal medicine, general practitioners, pediatricians and geriatric physicians, on the other hand, are involved. Due to the complexity and the multifaceted reality, the position statement, published in the Can J Gastroenterol, in 2012 is exposed [49]. For clarity and simplicity, only level I of evidence (at least one properly conducted randomized controlled trial, systemic review or meta-analysis), is mentioned (Table 2). The bone mineralization bio-markers, serological markers and imaging technics that can be used in the diagnosis of CD are summarized in Table 3.

Table 2. Recommendations for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CD with regard to skeletal health (Adapted from ref [49]) CD-celiac disease, GFD-gluten free diet, BMD-bone mineral density, tTg-tissue transglutaminase, EMA-endomysial antibodies

Table 3. The bone mineralization, serological markers and imaging that can be used in the diagnosis of CD. (Adapted from [13,14,32,45,49,50]). PTH-parathyroid hormone, DXA-dual x-ray absorptiometry, tTg-tissue transglutaminase, DGP-delaminated gliadin peptide, EMA-endomysial antibodies.

5. Therapy for Bone Loss in CD

5.1. Gluten Free Diet

GFD is very effective for bone health when CD was diagnosed during childhood or adolescence, but the compliance for the gluten restrictive diet is age dependent, to the point that more than 50% of adults don’t adhere [15]. Pediatric longitudinal studies reported that after 1 y on GFD, BMD became normal [51,52]. On the contrary, despite being the most rational treatment in adult CD, GFD rarely normalizes BMD [45,53]. Therefore, the nutritional options should considered to improve BMD.

5.2. Nutritional Supplementations

The nutrient supplementations in question are calcium and vitamin D. There are few studies performed on the cost effectiveness of such therapy to improve BMD in the CD patients. In post- menopausal women it failed, while partially effective in pediatric CD patients [54,55].

5.3. Hormonal Therapy

Facing a situation of severe or complicated osteoporosis, hormonal replacement therapy, especially for post-menopausal women, estrogens should be considered. Most recently, transdermal estradiol has been shown to increase bone mineral density, in post-menopausal women. Safety studies of transdermal estradiol have shown a decreased risk in cardiovascular disease as compared with oral estrogen therapy [56].

5.4. Pharmaceutical Therapy

Bisphosphonates have been found to be useful in post-menopausal osteoporosis and secondary hyperparathyroidism, but it is not clear whether bisphosphonates are useful in younger CD patients with low BMD. Lately, administration of zoledronic acid (bisphosphonate) was not found to be better than GFD alone in increasing BMD in CD patients with low BMD in a pilot study [57].

5.5. Lifestyle Modifications

Several behavioral suggestions in life style can be offered to the low BMD, CD patients. A well balanced diet with adequate dairy, lactose containing products, can enhance calcium intake and absorption. Adapting a daily exercise program, smoking cessation, decreased alcohol consumption, can be beneficial. Above all, as in other extra intestinal manifestations of CD, increased knowledge and education, integrated with a team work of professionals, including dietitian, is the name of the game.

6. Conclusions

It can be concluded that low BMD is a frequent extra-intestinal manifestation of CD, mainly in adults and in post-menopausal woman. Like most of the asymptomatic or hyposymptomatic or vague presenting symptoms of childhood CD, bone abnormality remains unnoticed, unless looked for. The early detection of a low BMD is potentiated since it is completely/partially reversible early/late in life, respectively. GFD with adequate nutrition to cover the nutritional deficiencies, with dairy products and supplementation with calcium and vitamin D, when needed, increase the probability to improve BMD, thus avoiding unnecessary skeletal complications.

References

[1]   | Lerner A, Blank M, Shoenfeld Y. Celiac disease and autoimmunity. Isr J Med Sci 1996;32:33-36.
[2]   | Reif S, Lerner A. Celiac disease and infection. In: infections and Autoimmunity. Shoenfeld, Y. and Rose, N. (Eds), Elsevier B.V. 2004, pp.689-692.
[3]   | Chmielewska A, Pieścik-Lech M, Szajewska H, Shamir R. Primary Prevention of Celiac Disease: Environmental Factors with a Focus on Early Nutrition. Ann Nutr Metab 2015; 67(suppl 2): 43-50.
[4]   | Lerner A, Matthias T. Changes in intestinal tight junction permeability associated with industrial food additives explain the rising incidence of autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14:479-89.
[5]   | Lerner A. Factors affecting the clinical presentation and time diagnosis of celiac disease: The Jerusalem and the West Bank-Gaza experience (editorial). Isr J Med Sci 1994;30:294-295.
[6]   | Lerner A. Non nutritional environmental factors associated with celiac disease: infections and vaccinations. In: vaccines and autoimmunity. Ed. Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N, Tomljenovic L. Wiley Blackwell Pub. P.301-306, 2015.
[7]   | Lerner A, Reif S. Nonnutritional environmental factors associated with Celiac disease: The Infectome. In: Infections and Autoimmunity. Eds: Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levine N, Rose NR. 2nd Ed. Elsevier B.V. Chapter 50. 2015, pages 829-837.
[8]   | Reif S, Lerner A. Tissue transglutaminase—the key player in celiac disease: a review. Autoimm Rev 2004;3:40-45.
[9]   | Lerner A, Neidhöfer S, Matthias T. Transglutaminase 2 and anti transglutaminase 2 autoantibodies in celiac disease and beyond: Part A: TG2 double-edged sword: gut and extraintestinal involvement. Immunome Research, In Press, 2015.
[10]   | Shamir R, Eliakim R, Lahat N, Sobel E, Lerner A. ELISA assay of anti endomysial antibodies in the diagnosis of celiac disease: comparison with immunofluorescence assay of anti endomysial antibodies and tissue transglutaminase antibodies. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4:594-596.
[11]   | Lerner A, Neidhöfer S, Matthias T. Transglutaminase 2 and anti transglutaminase 2 autoantibodies in celiac disease and beyond. Part B: Anti- Transglutaminase 2 autoantibodies: friends or enemies. Immunome Research, In Press, 2015.
[12]   | Rozenberg O, Lerner A, Pacht A, Grinberg M, Reginashvili D, Henig C, Barak M.A novel algorithm for childhood celiac disease serological diagnosis based upon intestinal biopsies. Crit Rev Allerg Immunol. 2012;42:331-341.
[13]   | Lerner A, Neidhöfer S, Matthias T. Serological markers and/or intestinal biopsies in the case-finding of celiac disease. International Journal of Celiac Disease 2015;3:53-55.
[14]   | Lerner A. Serological Diagnosis of Celiac Disease –Moving Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg. International Journal of Celiac Disease. 2014;2:64-66.
[15]   | Lerner A. New therapeutic strategies for celiac disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9:144-147.
[16]   | Lerner A. Blank M. Hypercoagulability in celiac disease-an update. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:1138-1141.
[17]   | Branski D, Ashkenazy A, Frier S, Lerner A, et al. Extra intestinal manifestation and associated disorders of celiac disease. In: Branski D, Rozen P, Kaganoff MF (eds) Gluten-sensitive enteropathy, from gastrointest res. Karger, Basel, 1992, pp 164-175.
[18]   | Zelnik N, Pacht A, Obeid R, Lerner A. Range of neurological disorders in patients with celiac disease. Pediatrics 2004;113:1672-1676.
[19]   | Lerner A, Makhoul B, Eliakim R. Neurological manifestations of celiac disease in children and adults. Eur Neurolog J. 2012; 4: 15-20.
[20]   | Lerner A, Matthias T. Rheumatoid arthritis-celiac disease relationship: joints get that gut feeling. Autoimm Rev. 2015: 14: 1038-47.
[21]   | Lerner A, Matthias T. Increased knowledge and awareness of celiac disease will benefit the elderly. International Journal of Celiac Disease 2015;3:112-114.
[22]   | Lerner A, Matthias T. Editorial: Celiac disease: intestinal, heart and skin inter-connections. International Journal of Celiac Disease 2015;3:28-30.
[23]   | Capriles VD, Martini LA, Arêas JA. Metabolic osteopathy in celiac disease: importance of a gluten-free diet. Nutr Rev 2009;67:599-606.
[24]   | Zanchi C, Di Leo G, Ronfani L, Martelossi S, Not T, Ventura A. Bone metabolism in celiac disease. J Pediatr 2008;153:262–265.
[25]   | Bianchi ML, Bardella MT. Bone in celiac disease. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:1705-1716.
[26]   | Scott EM, Gaywood I, Scott BB. Guidelines for osteoporosis in coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 2000;46(Suppl 1):1-8.
[27]   | Turner J, Pellerin G, Mager D. Prevalence of metabolic bone disease in children with celiac disease is independent of symptoms at diagnosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009;49:589-593.
[28]   | Lewis NR, Scott BB. Should patients with coeliac disease have their bone mineral density measured? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;17:1065-1070.
[29]   | Mora S. Celiac disease in children: impact on bone health. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2008;9:123-130.
[30]   | Olmos M, Antelo M, Vazquez H, Smecuol E, Mauriño E, Bai JC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies on the prevalence of fractures in coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis 2008; 40:46-53.
[31]   | Lerner A, Shapira Y, Agmon-Levin N, , Pacht A, Ben-Ami Shor D, López Hoyos M, Sanchez-Castanon, M, Shoenfeld Y. The clinical significance of 25OH-vitamin D status in celiac disease. Crit Rev Allerg Immunol. 2012;42:322-330.
[32]   | Hartman C, Hino B, Lerner A, et al. Bone quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density in children with celiac disease. J. Pediatr Gastrointerol. Nutr. 2004;39:504-510.
[33]   | Ish Shalom S, Rozen GS, Lerner A. Osteoporosis: An Emerging Problem in Pediatrics. In: “Pediatric Nutrition”. Eds. Reifen RM, Lerner A, Branski D, Heymans ASA. Karger, Basel. pp.110-121, 1998.
[34]   | Raggatt, L. J. Partridge NC. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Remodeling. J of Biolog Chemist 2010;285: 25103-25108.
[35]   | Sims, NA, Martin TJ. Coupling the activities of bone formation and resorption: a multitude of signals within the basic multicellular unit”. Bonekey Rep. 2014;3:481-490.
[36]   | Sims NA, Vrahnas C.Regulation of cortical and trabecular bone mass by communication between osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;561:22-8.
[37]   | Stenson WF, Newberry R, Lorenz R, Baldus C, Civitelli R. Increased prevalence of celiac disease and need for routine screening among patients with osteoporosis. Arch Intern Med 2005;28:393-399.
[38]   | Legroux-gerot I, Leloire O, Blanckaert F, Tonnel F et al. Screening for celiac disease in patients with osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 2009;76:162-165
[39]   | Lucendo AJ, García-Manzanares A. Bone mineral density in adult coeliac disease: an updated review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013;105:154-162.
[40]   | Younes M, Ben YH, Safer L, Fadoua H, Zrour S, Bejia I, et al. Prevalence of bone loss in adult celiac disease and associated factors: a control case study. Tunis Med 2012;90:129-135.
[41]   | Corazza GR, Di SM, Maurino E, Bai JC. Bones in coeliac disease: diagnosis and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005;19:453-465.
[42]   | Shahbazkhani B, Aletaha N, Khonche A, et al. Is it necessary to screen for celiac disease in adult idiopathic osteoporosis? Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015;8:140-145.
[43]   | 43. Kavuncu V, Dundar U, Ciftci IH, et al. Is there any requirement for celiac disease screening routinely in postmenapausal women with osteoporosis? Rheumatol Int. 2009;29:841-845.
[44]   | González D, Sugai E, Gomez JC, et al. Is it necessary to screen for celiac disease in postmenopausal osteoporotic women? Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71:141-144.
[45]   | Krupa-Kozak U. Pathologic bone alterations in celiac disease: etiology, epidemiology, and treatment. Nutrition. 2014;30:16-24.
[46]   | Saturni L, Ferretti G, Bacchetti T. The gluten-free diet: safety and nutritional quality. Nutrients 2010;2:16-34.
[47]   | Sdepanian VL, de Miranda Carvalho CN, de Morais MB, Colugnati FAB, Fagundes-Neto U. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in children and adolescent with celiac disease on a gluten free diet in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003;37:571-6.
[48]   | Caruso R, Pallone F, Stasi E, Romeo S, Monteleone G. Appropriate nutrient supplementation in celiac disease. Ann Med. 2013;45:522-531.
[49]   | Fouda MA, Khan AA, Sultan MS, et al. Evaluation and management of skeletal health in celiac disease: position statement. Can J Gastroenterol. 2012;26:819-829.
[50]   | Real A, Gilbert N, Hauser B, et al. Characterisation of osteoprotegerin autoantibodies in coeliac disease. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:125-133.
[51]   | Barera G, Mora S, Brambilla P, et al.Body composition in children with celiac disease and the effects of a gluten-free diet: a prospective case-control study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:71-75.
[52]   | Szathmári M, Tulassay T, Arató A, et al. Bone mineral content and density in asymptomatic children with coeliac disease on a gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13:419-424.
[53]   | Larussa T, Suraci E, Nazionale I, et al. No evidence of circulating autoantibodies against osteoprotegerin in patients with celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1622-1627.
[54]   | Meyer D, Stavropolous S, Diamond B, et al.Osteoporosis in a north american adult population with celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:112-119.
[55]   | Muzzo S, Burrows R, Burgueño M et al. Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density of celiac children. Nutr Res. 2000;20:1241-1247.
[56]   | Bertonazzi A, Nelson B, Salvador J, Umland E. The smallest available estradiol transdermal patch: a new treatment option for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2015 Nov 30. [Epub ahead of print].
[57]   | Kumar M, Rastogi A, Bhadada SK, et al. Effect of zoledronic acid on bone mineral density in patients of celiac disease: a prospective, randomized, pilot study. Indian J Med Res. 2013;138:882-887.