<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
<record>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Science and Education Publishing</publisher>
<journalTitle>American Journal of Educational Research</journalTitle>
<eissn>2327-6150</eissn>
<publicationDate>2016-04-16</publicationDate>
<volume>4</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<startPage>420</startPage>
<endPage>426</endPage>
<doi>10.12691/education-4-5-10</doi>
<publisherRecordId>EDUCATION20164510</publisherRecordId>
<documentType>article</documentType>
<title language="eng">Teachers' Accountability for Adaptive Project-Based Learning</title>
<authors>
<author>
<name>Abu-Hussain Jamal</name>
<email>jamal_ah@qsm.ac.il</email>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>
<author>
<name>Oleg Tilchin</name>
<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
</author>

</authors>
<affiliationsList>
<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Al-Qasemi Academic College of Education, Baqa El-Gharbieh, Israel</affiliationName>

</affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng">In this paper, we propose an approach to determining accountability of teachers for organizing an adaptive project-based learning (PBL) environment. The environment enables customization on performance of students. The certain phases of teacher accountability are determined. Teachers would be accountable for preparing instructional material, teaching a subject through a relevant sample-project, guiding collaborative performance of group projects, and defining course study results. The first phase associated with holding teachers accountable for preparing instructional materials for teaching of subject while performance of a sample-project by every student and performing group projects and comprises: specification of a subject, specification of the sample-project and group projects, setting initial assessments of studying of a subject. The second phase aimed at holding teachers accountable for promoting development of subject-relevant knowledge during the sample-project performance and fostering adoption of specificity of adaptive PBL by students and comprises: submitting subject material while performance of the sample-project; facilitating learning by doing, assessing of students' knowledge after completion of the sample-project. The third phase aimed at holding teachers accountable for inducing development of higher-order knowledge and collaborative skills of students and comprises: fostering self-formation of knowledge heterogeneous collaborative groups; assigning projects of different complexity levels for collaborative groups; support of forming a structure of project tasks; setting adaptive assessments of knowledge and the fixed assessment of the collaborative skill. The fourth phase pertains to teachers' accountability for defining results of the adaptive PBL, and includes: assessing student knowledge after completing the sample-project and group projects; assessing collaborative skills; defining complex summative assessment of students.</abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="pdf">http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/4/5/10/education-4-5-10.pdf</fullTextUrl>
<keywords language="eng"><keyword>adaptive project-based learning</keyword>
<keyword>teachers' accountability</keyword>
<keyword>adaptive assessment</keyword>
</keywords>
</record>
</records>
